http://lionking02.files.wordpress.co...an-kadavul.jpg
[/html:1d7dece46d]
Lets continue here
BALA'S NAAN KADAVUL - 3
Thread started by rajasaranam on 26th February 2009 05:33 PM
[html:1d7dece46d]
http://lionking02.files.wordpress.co...an-kadavul.jpg
[/html:1d7dece46d]
Lets continue here
http://lionking02.files.wordpress.co...an-kadavul.jpg
[/html:1d7dece46d]
Lets continue here
Responses:
-
From: MrJudge on 26th February 2009 05:58 PM [Full View]
AV has given 42 points to SMS... only two point difference between that and NK
-
From: rajasaranam on 26th February 2009 06:14 PM [Full View]
AV's reviews have taken a deep dive nowadays, not to bother about it much
-
From: njv on 28th February 2009 12:35 PM [Full View]
AV seems to have "outsourced" the cine review. Quality review now a days is hard to fine. Blogs have much more meaningful and detailed review now a days.
-
From: viraajan on 28th February 2009 12:46 PM [Full View]
If you are a regular AV reader, you can feel the difference. The way they've quoted the negatives of SMS is far different than their usual way of pointing out the Minuses.
Originally Posted by MrJudge
AV has given 42 points to SMS... only two point difference between that and NK
Sondha Thayarippu aadhalal, SMS vimarsanathil kutram sollvadhil oru thadumaatram theriyathan seigiradhu.
-
From: MrJudge on 28th February 2009 06:34 PM [Full View]
I feel SMS review was OK.... sounded balanced. Seriously I wasn't thinking this much negative points from them for it. 42 is OK for SMS, but for NK, I was expecting more points, don't know what made them to give only 44. Originally Posted by viraajan
If you are a regular AV reader, you can feel the difference. The way they've quoted the negatives of SMS is far different than their usual way of pointing out the Minuses. Originally Posted by MrJudge
AV has given 42 points to SMS... only two point difference between that and NK
Sondha Thayarippu aadhalal, SMS vimarsanathil kutram sollvadhil oru thadumaatram theriyathan seigiradhu.
-
From: Sanguine Sridhar on 28th February 2009 07:34 PM [Full View]
44 is too much for NK. Should be 40-42.
-
From: nellaiselvam on 28th February 2009 09:55 PM [Full View]
Thanks for creating this thread Rajasaranam....
As for me, 'Naan Kadavul' is the best movie in the year 2009. (I've watched this movie soon after it's release) Isaignani's background score is the backbone of this movie. No doubt, this movie will get at least two national awards - one for Isaignani and another for Bala.
Vaalee's lyrics are so good, which add colors to our Maestro's tunes (though two tracks in the CD are his old tunes). Especially, "Ohm shivo hum..." is the top-most and it's a very rare and entirely different one from Maestro.
Hope everyone will enjoy this movie.
-
From: P_R on 28th February 2009 09:56 PM [Full View]
Pithamaganukku evvaLavu koduththaanga ? Originally Posted by Sanguine Sridhar
-
From: Sanguine Sridhar on 28th February 2009 10:00 PM [Full View]
49-nu nenaikiren.
-
From: steveaustin on 1st March 2009 07:02 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Sanguine Sridhar
-
From: njv on 1st March 2009 01:00 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Sanguine Sridhar
Vaazhga Tamil!
-
From: Hulkster on 1st March 2009 01:02 PM [Full View]
Njv
To each his own. As the film had parts cut out he might have felt confused watching the film. Thus for the version which is in the theaters it seems enough.
-
From: Anban on 1st March 2009 02:54 PM [Full View]
finally saw Naan Kadavul..
a crisp movie abt eccentric and extraordinary characters.. its very simple and to-the-point ..
-
From: rajasaranam on 1st March 2009 03:43 PM [Full View]
I dont see it fair that this thread should be devoid this joke!
[quote:8cd659c191="raja_fan"][tscii]
Translation of the review of the "genius" Charu Nivedita in a Malayalam journal . A must read to understand his "genius" !
---------------------
தமிழகம் வாழ்த்தும் இயக்குனர் பாலாவின் இது வரை வெளிவந்த படங்களை ( சேது,
நந்தா , பிதாமகன்) கடுமையாக விமர்சித்துள்ளேன் நான். அதனாலேயே பாலவின்
புதிய படமான “நான் கடவுளை” பார்ப்பதில்லையென்று தீர்மானித்திருந்தேன்.
அது மட்டுமல்லாமல் எனக்குப் பிடிக்காத இசையமைப்பாளர் இளையராஜாவும்,
எழுத்தாளர் ஜெயமோகனும், மூன்று வருடங்களெடுத்து நிறைவு செய்த இந்தப்
படத்தின் பின்னணியிலுள்ளனர். அதனால் இம்முவர் சங்கத்தின் திசைக்கே
போகக்கூடாதென்று கருதியிருந்தேன்.
இதற்கிடையில், ஒரு வாரப்பத்திரிக்கையில், இப்படத்தை "கொடுமைகள் நிறைந்த
படம் " என்று சிறப்பித்திருந்ததனால் ஒரு சிறிய நம்பிக்கை எட்டிப்
பார்த்தது..ஏனென்றால் அவ்விமர்சனத்தை எழுதியவர் ஒரு படத்தை தரம்
தாழ்ந்தது என்று குறிப்பிட்டு இருந்தால் அது நல்ல சினிமாவாக இருக்கும்
என்பது என் அனுபவம். ஆனால் அதன் பிறகு சிறிய தயக்கம். பின் என்
நண்பர்களின் எண்ணத்தைக் குறித்து ஒரு வோட்டெடுப்பு நடத்தினேன். குறைந்த
பட்சம் 20 பேரிடமாவது கேட்டிருப்பேன். ’படம் பிடித்திருந்ததா இல்லையா ? “
என்ற என் கேள்விக்கு யாருமே நேராக பதிலளிக்கவில்லை. இறுதியில் தைரியத்தை
வரவழைத்துக் கொண்டு படத்தைக் காணச் சென்றேன்!!
......
......
அகிரா குரோசோவாவின் " The Lower Depths” (1957) ற்கு இணையான ஒரு படம்
கண்ட உணர்வு.. Maxim Gorky இன் நாடகத்தின் கதையை ஆதாரமகக் கொண்டது தான் “
The Lower Depths”. “ நான் கடவுளைப் " போல் அந்தப் படத்திலும் விளிம்பு
நிலை மனிதர்கள் தான் முக்கியக் கதாபாத்திரங்கள். “ The Lower Depths “ல்
விலை மாதர்களும், பிச்சைக்காரர்களும் திருடர்களும், எல்லாவரும், நரகம்
போன்றொரு குப்பைக் கிடங்கின் பாதாள அறையில் தான் வசித்து வருவார்கள். “
நான் கடவுளின் " பாதாள அறை எனக்கு குரோசாவின் படத்தை நினைவூட்டியது.
ஒரு வகையில் “ slumdog millionaire” ஐக் காட்டிலும் சிறந்த கலைப்படைப்பு
என்று " நான் கடவுளைக் " கூறலாம். உலக சினிமாவில் புன்வைல் (Luis
Bunuel) மட்டும் தான் விளிம்பு நிலை மனிதர்களின் வாழ்க்கையை இத்தனை
தீவிரத்துடன் சித்தரித்திருக்கிறார். “ நான் கடவுளில் "
அப்பிச்சைக்காரர்களை அந்த பாதாள அறையில் அறிமுகப்படுத்தும் அக்காட்சி
புன்வைல், குரோசாவா போன்ற இயக்குனர்களின் காட்சிப்படைப்புக்களுக்கு
இணையாக உள்ளது...இந்தியாவைப் போல உள்ள மூன்றாமுலக நாட்டில் யாரும்
பார்க்காத, அல்லது பார்த்தும் பார்க்காமல் போகும் குரூரமான வாழ்க்கைகளின்
பச்சையான நிதர்சனம் தானிது.
.....
இத்தனை விசித்திரமான மனிதர்களை வெர்னர் ஹெர்சாக் படத்திலும் ( பெயர்
ஞாபகமில்லை ) ஒட்ராவ்ஸ்கியின் படத்திலும் மட்டுமே காண முடியும்.
இந்த உருப்படிகளெல்லாம் ஹாலிவுட் படத்தில் நாம் காணும் கிராபிக்ஸ்
உருவங்களல்ல. எல்லா வழிபாட்டுத்தலங்களின் வெளியிலும் சாதாரணமாகாக்
காணக்கிடைப்பவர் தானிவர்கள். சில்லறைகளை எறிந்து விட்டு நாம் இவர்களைக்
கடந்து செல்லும்போது பால என்ற இயக்குனர் இவர்களின் உலகத்திற்கு இறங்கிச்
சென்று இருக்கிறார். அவர்கள் வாழ்வது நாம் வாழும் கற்பனை உலகமல்ல.
டெலிவிஷனும் மசாலா சினிமாக்களும் காட்சி வைக்கும் வர்ணமயமான கனவுகள்
நிறைந்த உலகமல்ல அது. அது உண்மையிலேயே ஒரு நரகம் தான். இவ்வுலகத்தைத்
திரைப்படத்தில் எடுத்துக்காட்டுவது அராஜகமென்று சொல்பவரே...இப்படிப்பட்ட
ஒரு நரகத்தை உருவாக்கி அதில் இம்மனிதர்களை கைதிகளாக்கி வைத்திருக்கும்
நமது சமூகத்தையும்,இச்சமூகத்தில் அங்கமான நம்மையும் நமது சுயநலத்தையும்
என்னவென்பது..
' slumdog millionaire' படத்தை ஹிந்துத்துவவாதிகள் எதிர்ப்பதிலும், '
நான் கடவுளை ' ஞானி எதிர்ப்பதிலும் ஒரு வித்தியாசத்தையும் நான்
காணவில்லை..
கலை, பண்பாடு, பாரம்பரியம் போன்ற விஷயங்களைக் குறித்துப் பேசும்போது
ஹிந்துத்துவவாதிகளும் இடது பட்சத்தைச் சேர்ந்தவர்களு ஒரே மாதிரியான
நிலைப்பாட்டை எடுப்பது புதிதல்லவே..
.....
.....
அதர்மமும் பயங்கரமும் நிறைந்த இச்சமூகத்தின் மீது ஒரு கலைஞனின் எதிர்வினை
தான் ' நான் கடவுள் ' . இவ்வெதிர்வினை இத்தனை தீவிரமாகவும்
கலைநயத்தோடும் இது வரை எந்த தமிழ்ப் படத்திலும் சித்தரிப்படவில்லை.
திரைப்படத்தின் ஒவ்வொரு காட்சியும் இதற்கு உறுதுணையாக உள்ளது.
உதாரணத்திற்கு,10 லட்சம் ரூபாய்க்கு அம்சவல்லியை வாங்க முயற்சிப்பவனுடைய
முகம் ' mummy ' யின் முகத்தைப்போலத் தோன்றுகிறது. ஹாலிவுட் மேக்கப்
கலைஞர்களை கோடம்பாக்கத்திற்கு வரவைத்து உருவாக்கப்பட்டதல்ல இம்முகம்.
இயற்கயின் விசித்திரமான ஸ்ரிஷ்டிதான் இது.
பாலா என்ற இயக்குனருக்கு சமூகத்தோடு ஏன் இத்தனை கோபமென்று தான் நான்
சிந்தித்தேன். எதற்காகக் கடுமையான மொழியை உபயோகிக்கிறீர்களென்று
பெரியாரிடம் கேட்டபோது அவர் ‘ ' பல நூற்றாண்டுகளாக தமிழ் சமூகம்
உறக்கத்திலாழ்ந்திருக்கிறது. அதைச் சாட்டை கொண்டு அடித்துத்தான்
விழித்தெழச் செய்ய வேண்டும்’ ' என்றாராம். பாலாவின் இப்படத்தைக் கண்ட
போது அவ்வாசகம் தான் எனக்கு ஞாபகத்துக்கு வந்தது. ஆனால் பெரியார்
சொன்னாலும் எந்தப் பயனும் ஏற்படவில்லை. சாட்டையடியை எறும்புக்கடியாக
எண்ணி விலக்கித் தள்ளிவிட்டு தமிழ் சமூகம் மீண்டும் மயங்கிக்
கிடக்கிறது. இத்திரைப்படம் இச்சமூகத்தை நிலை குலையச் செய்துள்ளது.
அதானால் தான் தமிழர்களால் இப்படத்தைக் குறித்து தீர்மானமான ஒரு
அபிப்பிராயம் சொல்ல முடிவதில்லை.
' slumdog millionaire ' ஐக்காட்டிலும் பலமடங்கு சிறந்தது ' நான் கடவுள்
'. ஆனால் உலகமெங்கும் விவாதிக்கப்படும் ' slumdog millionaire ' ஐப்போல்
' நான் கடவுள் ' விவாதிக்கப்படவில்லை. பாஷையல்ல காரணம். ஈரானியப் படங்கள்
பாஷையை மீறி உலகமெங்கும் வரவேற்கப்படுகின்றனவே. வேறென்ன காரணம்?
முதலாவது இளையாராஜாவின் இசை. பாலா இப்படத்தை புன்வைல், குரோசாவா
படங்களுக்கு இணையாக எடுத்துச் செல்ல முயலும்போது இளையராஜா இப்படத்தை '
கரகாட்டக்காரனின் ' தரத்துக்கு எடுத்துச் செல்ல யத்தனிக்கிறார்.
தனிப்பட்ட விருப்பு வெறுப்புக்களால் அல்ல நான் இதைச் சொல்வது. படத்தின்
துவக்கம் காசியிலும் கங்கையிலும் நடக்கின்றது. இவ்வுலகத்தில்
மரணத்திற்கு ஒரு நகரமுண்டென்றால் அது காசி. மனித வாழ்க்கையில்
மரணத்தைப்போல் ஒரு மர்மமில்லை என்று காசி நமக்கு உணர்த்துகிறது.
மனிதன் மரணத்தைக் கண்டு பயப்படவும் அதனிடமிருந்த் விலகுவதற்கு ஆன
மட்டிலும் முயற்சியும் செய்கிறான். ஏழை, பணக்காரன், ஆண், பெண், நல்லவன் ,
கெட்டவன் என்று வித்தியாசமுமில்லமல் மரணம் வருவதும் போவதும்
செய்துகொண்டிருக்கின்றது. இத்தனை சிக்கலான விஷயத்தை விளக்கும்
காட்சிகளில் இளையாராஜா ‘ரொமாண்டிக்கான ' பின்னணி இசையை நல்கியிருக்கிறார்
இளையராஜா. மனிதர்கள் நடுக்கத்தோடு பார்க்கும் மரணத்தை ' ரொமாண்டிக்காக
' சித்தரிக்க இளையராஜாவால் மட்டுமே முடியும்.
அது போகட்டும். ஆனால் குருடியான பிச்சைக்காரி ட்ரெயினில் பாட்டு பாடி
பிச்சையெடுக்கும்போது பின்னணியில் நூறு வயலின், தபலா, கீபோர்டு என்று
ஆர்க்கெஸ்ட்ராவின் சங்கீதம் கேட்பது எப்படியென்று எவ்வளவு ஆலோசனை
செய்தும் புரியவில்லை.
ட்ரெயினில் பாட்டு பாடி பிச்சையெடுக்கும் அம்சவல்லியின் இனிமையான குரலே
அவளுக்கு ஆபத்தாக முடிகிறது. இதைப்போல் ஒரு காட்சி 'slumdog millionaire
'லும் உள்ளது. சேரியிலிருந்து அனாதைகளையும் குழந்தைகலையும்
கடத்திக்கொண்டு வந்து அவர்களுடைய கை கால்களை உடைத்தும், கண்களைக்
குருடாக்கியும் பிச்சைக்காரர்களாக மாற்றுபவர்ன், குழந்தைகளை வரிசையாக
நிறுத்தி வைத்து ' தர்ஷன் தே கன்ஷ்யாம் நாத், ' மோரி அக்கியான் ப்யாஸீ
ஹே' என்ற பாடலை பாடச் சொல்கிறான். நன்றாகப் பாடும் சிறுவனைத்
தேர்ந்தெடுத்து குருடனாக்குகிறான். பிறிதொருநாள் சப்வேயில் அதே பாட்டைப்
பாடிப் பிச்சையெடுக்கும் ஒரு சிறுவனை பாடலை சரியாகப் பாட முடியாமல்
கூட்டத்தில் இருந்து தப்பியோடிய வேறொரு சிறுவன் சந்திக்கிறான். ' slumdog
millionaire ’ ல் மிக முக்கியமான கட்டங்களில் ஒன்று இது. அந்தப்
பிச்சையெடுக்கும் சிறுவன் அப்பாடலைப் பாடும் கட்டங்களில் பின்னணியில்
இசைப்பது ஏ.ஆர்.ரஹ்மானின் ஆர்க்கெஸ்ட்ரா இசையல்ல. ஒரு
குருட்டுப்பிச்சைக்காரன் பாடிப் பிச்சையெடுக்கும் போது கேட்கும் அதே
படியான இசையே இங்கு இசைக்கப்பட்கிறது. ஆனால் அம்சவல்லி பாடும்போதெல்லாம்
மூன்றாம் தர டப்பாங்குத்து சினிமாக்களுக்கான இசையை இளையராஜா
உபயோகித்திருக்கிறார். இத்தனை உயர்ந்த ஒரு கலைப்படைப்பாக இருந்தாலும் இது
போலுள்ள இசை இப்படைப்பின் நம்பிக்கைத்தன்மைக்கு ஊறு விளைவிக்கிறது.
ஒரு உதாரணமும் கூட..’பிச்சைப்பாத்திரம் ஏந்தி வந்தேன், அய்யனே, என்
அய்யனே ' என்ற பாடல் காட்சி. நம் சமுகம் இந்த மனிதர்களுக்கு
உருவாக்கிக் கொடுத்திருக்கும் நரகத்த்தின் குரூரமான யதார்த்தம்
இக்காட்சிகளில் சித்தரிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது. எதிர்பார்ப்புகளை இழ்ந்த இது
நரகம். 'slumdog millionare ' ல் சேரிகளை அறிமுகப்படுத்தும் தொடக்க
பாடல் காட்சிகளுக்கும் இதற்கும் நிறைய வித்தியாசம். ஏ.ஆர் ரஹ்மானின்
குரலிலும், ஸ்ரீலங்கன் தமிழ் வம்சாவளியில் வந்த மாதங்கி மாயாவின் ராப்
பாடலும் சேர்ந்து ஒத்திசைத்த ' ஓ சய்யா' என்ற பாடல் பின்னணியில்
முழங்குகிறது. என் ஊகம் சரியென்றால் நீங்கள் இதைப் படிக்கும் சமயத்தில்
அப்பாடலுக்கு ஆஸ்கர் பரிசு கிடைத்திருக்கும். ஆனால் பாலா
சித்தரித்திருக்கும் இந்த க்ளாசிக் காட்சிகளுக்கு இளையராஜ இசைத்திருக்கு
இசையோ? இளையராஜாவின் குரலிலேயே இப்பாடலைக் கேட்கும்போது தோன்றுவது என்ன
தெரியுமா? அம்பானி, அமிதாப் பச்சன் தொடங்கிய கோடீஸ்வரர்கள் மும்பை
வினாயகர் கோவிலுக்கு வேண்டுதலுக்காக தங்கத் திருவோடு கையிலேந்திச்
செல்வது..அது போல குருத்வாராத்தில் சென்று பக்தர்களி செருப்புக்களைச்
சுத்தம் செய்யும் கோடீஸ்வரர்களும் உண்டு. இப்படிப்பட்ட பக்திகரமான
காட்சிகளுக்கு இளையராஜாவின் இசை ஒத்துப்போகலாம் . ஆனால் பாலா
ஸ்ருஷ்டித்துள்ள நிணமும் கண்ணீரும் நிறைந்தொழுகும் பிச்சைக்காரர்களின்
உலகத்திற்கு சிறிது சேரவில்லை இந்த இசையும் பாடலும். ' பிச்சைப்பாத்திரம்
ஏந்தி வந்தேன் ‘' என்ற அப்பாடல் ரஜினிகாந்திற்காக யேசுதாஸ் பாடிய '
அம்மாவென்றழைக்காத உயிரில்லையே ' என்ற செண்டிமெண்ட் பாடலை
நினைவுபடுத்தியது என்பது உண்மை.
உலகத்தில் முக்கியமான காவியத் (epic )திரைப்படங்களில் ஒன்றாக
விவாதிக்கப்படவேண்டிய இத்திரைப்படத்திற்கு சாதாரண மசாலா சினிமாவின்
தரத்திற்கு த் தாழ்த்த Mastero இளையராஜாவின் முயற்சிகளைக் குறித்து
இன்னமும் சொல்ல வேண்டும். அம்சவல்லியை விற்பனைக்காகக் கடத்திக்கொண்டு
போகும் காட்சியிலும் இதைப்போலே ரொமாண்டிக்கான இசைதான் பின்னணியில். பால
உள்ளிட்ட இளையராஜ ரசிகர்கள் என் மேல் கோபப்படாமல் அகிரா குரோசோவாவின் '
The Lower Depths ' படத்தை ஒரு முறை பார்க்குமாறு சிபாரிசு செய்கிறேன்.
இத்தகைய படங்களில் இசை எப்படி இருக்கவேண்டுமென்பதின் எடுத்துக்காட்டு
தான் 'Masaru Sato' வின் இசை.
நான் கடவுளில் பாலாவுக்க்கு இணையாக பங்களித்திருப்பது இரண்டு பேர். ஆர்ட்
டைரக்டரான கிருஷ்னமூர்த்தியும், வசனகர்த்தாவான ஜெயமோகனும். இவர் இரண்டு
பேருமே இலக்கிய உலகத்தோடு தொடர்புள்ளவர்கள் என்பது
குறிப்பிடத்தக்கதாகும். பாலாவின் சிந்தனையில் உதித்த விஷயங்களை
வார்த்தையில் பிரகாசிக்காச் செய்திருக்கிறார் ஜெயமோகன். ரசிகர்களை
படத்தோடு ஒன்றச் செய்ததில் ஜெயமோகனின் வசனங்கள் பெரும்பங்கு
வகிக்கின்றன. நரகத்தைக் குறித்துள்ள பயங்கக் காட்சிகளாக இருந்தாலும்,
படம் முழுவது ‘ ப்ளாக் ஹ்யூமர் ' ரசிகனை திரைப்படத்தின் உள்ளே அழைத்துச்
செல்கிறது..
...
...
'slumdog millionaire' ஐப்போல விவாதிக்கப்படாமலிருப்பதற்கு இன்னொரு
காரணமும் உள்ளது. ருத்ரனுக்கும் தாண்டவனுக்கும் நடக்கும் கைகலப்பு,
இறுதிக்காட்சிகள். ருத்ரன் ஒரு அகோரி, அகோரி என்றால் மனித ரூபத்திலுள்ள
கடவுள். ஒரு மனிதனுக்கு இனி மறு பிறவி இல்லாமல் செய்யக்கூடிய
சக்தியுள்ளவன். சுடுகாட்டில் வசிப்பவன். பிணங்களைப் புசிப்பவன்.
அப்படிப்பட்டவன் எதற்காகத் தாண்டவனை ரஜினிகாந்த்,விஜய்காந்த், விஜய்,
விஷால், தனுஷ் போலுள்ள சினிமா ஹீரோக்களைப்போல் ஸ்டண்ட் மாஸ்டர் சொன்னபடி
15 நிமிடத்திற்கு சண்டையிட்டு சம்ஹாரம் செய்ய வேண்டும்? தமிழ் மசாலா
சினிமாக்களின் ஃபார்முலாப்படி நாயகன் இறுதியில் நீண்ட சண்டையில் வில்லனை
ஒரு வழி பண்ணுவான். அதே ஃபார்முலாவை பாலாவும் உபயோகிக்கும்போது அது
படத்தை பாதிக்கவே செய்கிறது.
இப்படத்தில் ஜெயமோகன் எழுதிய வசனங்களைக் குறித்து ஒரு கேள்வி:
ஹிந்துத்துவவாதிகளின் பார்வையில் இருந்து 'slumdog millionaire' படத்தை
விமர்சித்தவர் தான் ஜெயமோகன். ஆனால் அதை விட பல மடங்கு தீவிரத்துடன்
இந்தியாவின் யதார்த்த வாழ்வை வெளிச்சம் போட்டுக் காட்டும் ' நான்
கடவுளுக்கு ' இத்தனை அழுத்தமான வரிகளை எப்படி எழுத முடிந்தது? இதே படத்தை
ஆங்கிலத்தில் எடுத்து, அதிலும் ஜெயமோகனே வசனம் எழுதுகிறாரென்றால் அப்போது
அப்படத்தின் மீது அவரின் அணுகுமுறை எப்படி இருக்கும்?
....
....
' நான் கடவுள் ‘ படத்தில் உடல் ஊனமுற்றவர்களை
‘உபயோகப்படுத்திக்கொண்டிருக்கிறார்கள்’ என்றும், இப்படம்
அவர்களுக்கெதிரானதென்றும் ஒரு குற்றச்சாட்டு எழுந்திருக்கிறது. விளிம்பு
நிலை மனிதர்களுக்கெதிரான தென்று கூட சொல்லப்படலாம்.
அப்படிக்கூறுபவர்களுக்கு கலை என்றால் என்னவென்று தெரியாது என்று &
-
From: rajasaranam on 1st March 2009 03:47 PM [Full View]
And the Rebuttal by Setupathi
Originally Posted by raja_fan
-
From: steveaustin on 1st March 2009 04:52 PM [Full View]
Charu Niveditha may be given Nobel Prize for her article.
Meanwhile, I saw the movie today for the 4th time. Still I liked the movie very much.
-
From: MrJudge on 2nd March 2009 08:29 AM [Full View]
Charu is a guy. Originally Posted by steveaustin
-
From: steveaustin on 2nd March 2009 09:17 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by MrJudge
Even though I have read about him in many websites, I have failed to mention as 'him'. 
-
From: rajasaranam on 2nd March 2009 02:28 PM [Full View]
Steve,
I hope the 'Him' to 'Her' was not intentional
-
From: jaiganes on 4th March 2009 06:04 PM [Full View]
Does anyone have link to bala interview in Kalaignar TV? pazhaya posts thaedi aluthu poitten. also Hassini pesum padam youtube link?
-
From: MrJudge on 4th March 2009 07:20 PM [Full View]
"With the rave reviews that Naan Kadavul has been receiving, the film’s director Bala is in the seventh heaven reaping the success after three years of hard work. The director attributes his current success to his mentor Balu Mahendra. Deciding to show his appreciation and regard for Balu Mahendra, Bala gifted him a car." - Behindwoods
-
From: joe on 4th March 2009 07:55 PM [Full View]
Judge
for the links.
-
From: jaiganes on 5th March 2009 01:34 AM [Full View]
Needhibadhi avargaLe mikka nandri!!!
-
From: jaiganes on 7th March 2009 11:26 AM [Full View]
http://passionforcinema.com/naan-kad...ll-the-brutes/
Another well written article on Naan Kadavul..
-
From: NOV on 10th March 2009 01:28 PM [Full View]
Finally watched Naan Kadavul.
I am confused about the film - the film is not confusing, rather I am confused on how I feel about the film.
Anyway, NK is a must see for EVERY avid Tamil film fan.
Some observations:
1. Pooja's intro song in the train was good and looked genuine. Her subsequent songs were jarring with BGM and got worse when original songs were played with her mouthing them (ammavum neeyE, thaayirsirandha kOyilum illai)
2. Bala's obsession with Brahmin community continues: Sethu - the heroine; Nandha - Karunas character; Pithamagan - the bus travellers; NK - the judge.
3. The Simran song sequence in Pithamagan is repeated here by the MGR-Sivaji impersonators and the old songs. 2nd time En En En song used by Bala.
4. In every film, someone gets murdered in the end. Pattern?
5. The killing of the Kerala guy was extremely satisfying. Felt so good, that the subsequent killing of Thandavan failed to be that gratifying.
6. Underlying humour made the movie watchable. Unlike Nandha and Pithamagan, Naan Kadavul is not so depressing.
7. Opened a new world to the ordinary men about the lower stratum of life. Will be never able to look at beggars in the same way again.
8. Songs were apt, and BGM was haunting. We are there!
What happened to Ammaa un kOyilil?
9. Except for Arya and Pooja, the rest of the cast were unknown. Thumbsup to Bala for bringing alive the characters.
10. Hindi and Sanskrit? Without subtitles?
I very definitely want to watch Naan Kadavul again, more so because I missed the first 10 mins!
NK, tho early to say, is definitely the Best Film of the Year, so far.
-
From: NOV on 10th March 2009 01:31 PM [Full View]
There were many speculations that Arya would eat Priya in the end; that would have been
Here in Malaysia, many parts of the film were bleeped!
I would love to watch an unedited version of the film. Anyone?
-
From: sarna_blr on 10th March 2009 01:49 PM [Full View]
here in AP, movie running time is 1 hour 30 mins Originally Posted by NOV
There were many speculations that Arya would eat Priya in the end; that would have been
Here in Malaysia, many parts of the film were bleeped!
I would love to watch an unedited version of the film. Anyone?
wt abt there ?
-
From: NOV on 10th March 2009 01:49 PM [Full View]
don't joke!
its 2 hours 15 mins..... one of the shortest tamil film ever made.
-
From: complicateur on 10th March 2009 01:50 PM [Full View]
NOV, Originally Posted by NOV
I would love to watch an unedited version of the film. Anyone?
I doubt you would have much success unless Bala decides to release a director's cut.
-
From: groucho070 on 10th March 2009 01:52 PM [Full View]
Nov, I think the bleep is original, present in the release version everywhere. Scissors wielders here does not use bleep, they just cut the word out, audio and the visual. Originally Posted by NOV
There were many speculations that Arya would eat Priya in the end; that would have been
Here in Malaysia, many parts of the film were bleeped!
I would love to watch an unedited version of the film. Anyone?
Glad you enjoyed the film.
-
From: NOV on 10th March 2009 01:52 PM [Full View]
Deepak, not that I think we have missed much... for we can piece up the puzzle and join the dots as we please.
But it will be interesting to know what had gone thru that man's mind.
What's your feelings about the film?
-
From: sarna_blr on 10th March 2009 01:54 PM [Full View]
I am serious Originally Posted by NOV
don't joke!
its 2 hours 15 mins..... one of the shortest tamil film ever made.
the movie has lot of cuts....
1. pitchai paaththiram yEndhivandhEn song is not there....
2. MGR-Sivaji portion cut.... but Nayan song is there.....
a lot more scenes were not there in telugu.....
PS... I saw 1 and 2 in TV/youtube ...
-
From: NOV on 10th March 2009 01:55 PM [Full View]
I watched in Federal. Heard that the prints were heavily censored in the main cinemas. Originally Posted by groucho070
-
From: NOV on 10th March 2009 01:57 PM [Full View]
this song was the soul of the film. Originally Posted by sarna_blr
without it, might as well not watch it.
-
From: complicateur on 10th March 2009 02:05 PM [Full View]
Jeyamohan has some clarifications and insights to Bala's take on his website. This is a spelling-mistake ridden assortment of thoughts I jotted down after watching the movie. Originally Posted by NOV
-
From: sarna_blr on 10th March 2009 02:08 PM [Full View]
i was cornered Originally Posted by NOV
this song was the soul of the film. Originally Posted by sarna_blr
without it, might as well not watch it.
-
From: groucho070 on 10th March 2009 02:09 PM [Full View]
Watched it in BIG cinema, Selayang. Mine is around 2hrs 15mins too. I think that is the general runtime, as judged from earlier posts here. But as Compli said, if only TFI embraced DVD directors cut culture, than we have a bargain. But enna seyirathu Originally Posted by NOV
I watched in Federal. Heard that the prints were heavily censored in the main cinemas. Originally Posted by groucho070
-
From: Hulkster on 12th March 2009 05:41 PM [Full View]
-deleted-
Seri, anyone mind telling me if the official DVDs are coming out soon. I would like to read into the scenes one more time.
-
From: Nerd on 13th March 2009 11:45 AM [Full View]
Watched it again last night in sona, trichy. Liked it better than the first time. But only 10 people were there and the movie has been removed today Padam hit-A flop-A?? Dinamalar says bala gave up his dream of starting a production house because of NK's failure.
-
From: kannannn on 15th March 2009 10:39 PM [Full View]
Just watched it today. Flawed piece, but still Bala's most impressive film to date.
-
From: ajaybaskar on 15th March 2009 10:42 PM [Full View]
I heard that the film has recovered its production cost and nothing more.. Originally Posted by Nerd
Watched it again last night in sona, trichy. Liked it better than the first time. But only 10 people were there and the movie has been removed today Padam hit-A flop-A?? Dinamalar says bala gave up his dream of starting a production house because of NK's failure.
-
From: MrJudge on 16th March 2009 11:01 AM [Full View]
The movie did well at BO and it is a hit....I guess PM was released only in a handful of theaters, but NK was released widely, that is the reason for less no. of audience now.
-
From: podaskie on 16th March 2009 11:28 AM [Full View]
watched the movie 2nd time in coimbatore only 20 to 25 peoples r there in the cinema hall...but jeeva's sms movie is going strong...
-
From: P_R on 18th March 2009 12:14 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by [url=http://jeyamohan.in/?p=2102
-
From: joe on 18th March 2009 06:59 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Prabhu Ram
Originally Posted by [url=http://jeyamohan.in/?p=2102
-
From: complicateur on 31st March 2009 09:57 AM [Full View]
Jeyamohan answers, among other questions, my only question after watching the film. He indicates that the question itself rises out of an incomplete understanding. The article is quite a slap in the face.
-
From: Plum on 31st March 2009 10:40 AM [Full View]
compli, is he saying that GURU is not a bandhan so much as a searching light in the path towards salvation?
-
From: rajasaranam on 31st March 2009 11:16 AM [Full View]
ithathaana raja_fan remba naal munnaidyae sonnaar
"உறவுகள் அனைத்தையும் நிராகரிக்கும் அவனுக்கு குருவின் மீது ஏன் பிடிப்பு? "
Since this doubt arises out of a spiritual context, we have to see this only in that way.
The word Guru means "destroyer of darkness".
Guru acts as a bridge between world and God. It is not like other relationships which binds one with the world, but a relationship which helps one cross the worldy life.
Ultimately that relationship will also be broken.
-
From: complicateur on 2nd April 2009 09:57 AM [Full View]
Thanks RS. I remember his post now.
-
From: jaaze on 5th April 2009 10:28 PM [Full View]
Naan ‘Boring’ Kadavul
Naan Kadavul didn’t strike a chord in me. It was a typical Bala movie aimed at making wet hankies over a hyped and pointless story. The whole concept of Aham Brahmasmi was wrongly used and preached. The only saving grace was the clandestine black humor in Jeyamohan’s dialogues and the amazing ‘acting’ of the ‘real’ mendicants.
Aarya was terribly artificial. Ajith would have been a worst choice. It’s time Bala starts making real movies instead of hashing out the same sethu-type characters and Pithamahan type storylines.
Just like Sethu, Subramaniyapuram and ParuthiVeeran where the directors bagged on capitalizing the viewer by making him cry, Naan Kadavul uses the beggar underworld. The beggar world is certainly a revelation and this subplot could have impacted millions had it been made into a full fledged movie or even a documentary.
And if you think I’m wrong for the first time, I’m not. I’ve committed this mistake of starting a bala flame war earlier, although unintentionally. Head here for more.
http://www.lazygeek.net/
Guru's Blog Review of NK
-
From: jaiganes on 6th April 2009 01:15 AM [Full View]
avaroda gastric problems towards Bala therinjadhu dhaan - I expected to see exactly this from him.
-
From: irir123 on 19th April 2009 08:24 PM [Full View]
Bala's 'Nan Kadavul' is heavily inspired from Alejandro Jodorowsky's "El Topo" that came out in the 1970s as part of the underground-midnight film movement - EL TOPO is filled with symobolisms and surrealistic images relating to the concept of God in various cultures - in one scene the protogonist is asked by the bad guy "who are you?" - guess what the answer is ? "I am God" !!
later on, in the second half, the protogonost wakes up to find himself in a cave surrounded by severely handicapped people, who think he is God and expect him to 'liberate' them from the 'dark' world they are trapped in! the scene in the cave actually shows him with his hair tossled and his whole self smeared with something and sitting is some kind of a medidative pose!
yennada nammoorla Balavavadhu original appadinnu ninaichen - Kamal, Mani Ratnam, Balu Mahendra and now Bala - sondhamaa think pannavey maattaangala ? idhula Bala interviewla "I dont watch world cinema" !! indha jilpa, puruda pammathhu ellaam edhukku sir ??
-
From: irir123 on 19th April 2009 08:26 PM [Full View]
Now I have doubts about the originality of his other films as well! maybe more underground films of the 1970s will bring more skeletons out of the closet!
btw, underground films are NOT mainstream films and were midnight films released in select halls!
aaga mothhathil, the only original creators in Tamil cinema are Mahendran and annan Goundamani!
-
From: venkkiram on 19th April 2009 10:01 PM [Full View]
மகேந்திரின் எந்தெந்த படைப்புக்களை அசல் என சொல்ல வருகிறீர்கள் ? விளக்கிச் சொன்னால் தெரிந்து கொள்ள உதவும்.
-
From: irir123 on 19th April 2009 11:08 PM [Full View]
Udhiri pookkal, Johny, Nenjathai Killadhey to name a few
-
From: venkkiram on 20th April 2009 12:35 AM [Full View]
உதிரிப்பூக்களின் கதை மகேந்திரனின் சொந்தமான ஒன்றல்ல. புதுமைப்பித்தனின் ஒரு சிறுகதையை வைத்தே செதுக்கப்பட்டது.
ஜானி போன்ற மசாலா படங்கள் எல்லாம் பாலாவின் நான் கடவுளின் திரியில் பதிவு செய்யப்பட வேண்டிய படைப்புக்களே அல்ல.
பாலாவின் "நான் இதுவரை எந்த வெளிநாட்டு படங்களையும் பார்த்ததில்லை" போன்ற பேச்சுக்களுக்கு முக்கியத்துவம் கொடுக்கத் தேவையில்லை. ராஜாவும் இதுபோல நிறைய சொல்லியிருக்கிறார். மற்ற இசையமைப்பாளர்களின் பாடல்களை நான் கேட்பதேயில்லை என. ஸ்லம்டாக் மில்லியனிரின் பாடல்களை ராஜா ஒருமுறையாவது கேட்காமல் இருந்திருக்க மாட்டார். அதுபோலத் தான் இதுவும்.
அரசியல்ல இதெல்லாம் சகஜம் என எடுத்துக்கொண்டு நகர வேண்டியதுதான்.
-
From: Nerd on 20th April 2009 12:48 AM [Full View]
அதனால் என்ன கெட்டுவிட்டது? மகேந்திரன் தன் கதையை தான் படம் எடுக்க போகிறார் என்று புதுமைப்பித்தனுக்கு நன்றாக தெரியும். அதற்கு உரிய சன்மானத்தையும் புதுமைப்பித்தன் பெற்றிருப்பார். இதையும், பாலா (மற்றும் பலர்) ஆங்கிலப் படங்களை பார்த்து கப்பியடிப்பதையும் ஒப்பிடுவது முட்டாள்தனம். Originally Posted by venkkiram
மேலும், மகேந்திரன் தங்கப்பதக்கம் உள்பட பல படங்களுக்கு கதை எழுதியிருக்கிறார். அப்படங்களின் இயக்குனர்கள் மகேந்திரனை பார்த்து காப்பியடித்தார்கள் என்று சொல்வீர்கள் போலும்.
And well, it might just be a *coincidence (NK - El Topo)
-
From: bimmer on 20th April 2009 12:58 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by irir123
-
From: bimmer on 20th April 2009 12:59 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by jaaze
Supeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr......
-
From: venkkiram on 20th April 2009 02:13 AM [Full View]
அதனால் என்ன கெட்டுவிட்டது? மகேந்திரன் தன் கதையை தான் படம் எடுக்க போகிறார் என்று புதுமைப்பித்தனுக்கு நன்றாக தெரியும். அதற்கு உரிய சன்மானத்தையும் புதுமைப்பித்தன் பெற்றிருப்பார். இதையும், பாலா (மற்றும் பலர்) ஆங்கிலப் படங்களை பார்த்து கப்பியடிப்பதையும் ஒப்பிடுவது முட்டாள்தனம்.
மேலும், மகேந்திரன் தங்கப்பதக்கம் உள்பட பல படங்களுக்கு கதை எழுதியிருக்கிறார். அப்படங்களின் இயக்குனர்கள் மகேந்திரனை பார்த்து காப்பியடித்தார்கள் என்று சொல்வீர்கள் போலும்.
----
அப்ப உங்க பார்வையில் ஒருவர் அடுத்தவர் கதையை, அவர் சம்மதத்தோடு எடுத்து படைப்பாக்கினால் irir123 சொல்வது போல original creator ஆகி விடுவாரா? என்னவிதமான தர்க்கம் இது? இதுதான் சரியென்ன நீங்கள் நினைத்தால் நான் நீங்கள் சொல்லும்படி முட்டாளாகவே இருந்து விட்டுப் போகிறேன்.
கலைத்துறையில் original creator என்பதற்கான வழிமுறைகளை முதலில் வரையறுங்கள். அப்புறம் பேசலாம்.
பாலா காப்பி அடித்தாரோ, டீ அடித்தாரோ எனக்கு கவலையே யில்லை. "நான் கடவுளின்" வழி அவர் சொல்ல முற்பட்ட கருத்துக்கள் பாராட்டத்தக்கது. நல்லதை யார் யார் எத்தனை முறை சொன்னாலும் பாராட்ட வேண்டும்.
-
From: irir123 on 20th April 2009 03:04 AM [Full View]
Venkikram and Nerd - I have no problems in ppl getting inspired - everyone gets inspired no doubt about that - but instead of accepting this openly, if and when people try to give an impression as if it is their own work, that sucks bigtime! artists might have egos, but they should be honest when they lift/get inspired too - Balu Mahendra's shameless use of scenes from Paul Newman's COOL HAND LUKE in Adhu Oru kanaa kaalam (Dhanush doing a Paul Newman - kodumaiyilum kodumai!) and not mentioning the same anywhere in either is interviews or even in the film credits, does not impress me at all
El Topo - NK coincidence is too much for me to accept - am pretty certain that Bala HAS seen El Topo - solradhu dhaaney 'I saw EL TOPO and was inspired to adapt a part of the theme in the Indian context and thus NAN KADAVUL was born' ?
-
From: irir123 on 20th April 2009 03:08 AM [Full View]
i might also add K Vishwanath to the list of original thinking filmmakers
-
From: venkkiram on 20th April 2009 03:32 AM [Full View]
Mr irir123,
"முதல் மரியாதை" பாரதிராஜா, "பருத்தி வீரன்" அமீர் இவர்களையும் சேர்த்து கொள்ளலாமா?
-
From: Nerd on 20th April 2009 03:55 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by venkkiram
முதல் மரியாதைக்கு கதை வசனம் எழுதியவர் செல்வராஜ். அதனால் பாரதிராஜாவின் உழைப்பும் இயக்கமும் "அசல்" இல்லை, எல்லாப் புகழுமே செல்வராஜுக்கு தான் போய் சேர வேண்டும் என்று கூறுவீர்களா? ஒருவரின் கதையை படமாக்குவதற்கும், ஏற்கனவே ஒருவர் எடுத்த படத்திலிருந்து சில காட்சிகள் திருடவதற்கும் பல வித்தியாசங்கள் உள்ளன. மகேந்திரன் தலைசிறந்த original creator என்பதில் எந்த சந்தேகமும் இல்லை. மேலும், ஒருவர் எழுதிய கதையை படமாக்குதல் எளிதான காரியமும் அல்ல. Originally Posted by venkkiram
நான் பாலாவுக்கு எதிராக பேசவே இல்லை. நான் கடவுளை ரசித்தவர்களில் நானும் ஒருவன்.
-
From: bimmer on 20th April 2009 05:32 AM [Full View]
Kavalai vendam Venki...Adutha Bala Padam varaikkum wait pannungo... Originally Posted by venkkiram
-
From: irir123 on 20th April 2009 05:52 AM [Full View]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kRaWdpTJ0o
a sample from EL TOPO - they are saying/chanting "protect us, oh Lord" - the scene is very starkly and darkly satirical and critical of the dangerous role of religion in blinding people's ability to think rationally
an entire crowd blindly believes one mad priest exhorting that with Faith, God will not forsake them and tests the same by loading the pistol with a bullet and challenges someone to use the same on himself/herself - luckily a few surivive, but when a small boy tries it out, the bullet is in the correct chamber and gets killed!
its meant to be funny, but very powerful
PS: this is NOT the part of the film thats reminiscent of NK
-
From: sarna_blr on 20th April 2009 07:32 AM [Full View]
am downloading El Topo via torrent Originally Posted by irir123
paakkalaam endha alavukku matching'nu :P
-
From: irir123 on 20th April 2009 07:47 AM [Full View]
sarna_blr - let me warn you beforehand, its not a film that you can watch with family! it has some graphic disturbing images and lots of nudity as well!
also, NK is NOT an exact copy - but definitely a thematic inspiration
-
From: sarna_blr on 20th April 2009 07:56 AM [Full View]
thanks Originally Posted by irir123
will take care :P
konjam velaavaariya solla mudiyumaa ??? I mean - need a clear explanation regarding " Thematic Inspiration " Originally Posted by irir123
because Bala's PM has a similar scene from KV's Swathimuthyam :P ( rendu padangallayum orEy maadhiriyaana oru scene irukku :P )
unga previous post'la kooda 1 or 2 similar scenes dhaan'nu solreenga
-
From: irir123 on 20th April 2009 08:30 AM [Full View]
sarna_blr - you watch the film, especially the second half n you will understand what I meant when i said "bala has definitely seen this film"
-
From: sarna_blr on 20th April 2009 08:33 AM [Full View]
ok Originally Posted by irir123
-
From: venkkiram on 20th April 2009 09:50 AM [Full View]
Nerd,
கே.விஸ்வநாத்திற்கு ஓரிடம் இருக்கும்போது, "முதல் மரியாதை" படைப்பு சார்பாக பாரதிராஜாவிற்கு ஒரு இடம் இருக்கும் என்ற அர்த்தத்திலேயே நான் எனது கருத்தை பதிவு செய்திருக்கிறேன்.
நினைவில் நிற்கும் பல காட்சி அமைப்புக்களை செறிவாக அமைத்து இயக்கிய விதத்தில் நான் கடவுள் மற்றும் பருத்திவீரன் இந்த இரு படைப்புக்களின் இயக்குனர்கள் பாலா, அமீர் போன்றோரையும் விஸ்வநாத், பாரதிராஜா பட்டியலில் சேர்த்துக்கொள்ளலாம்.
-
From: app_engine on 20th April 2009 10:40 PM [Full View]
சந்தடிச்சாக்குல ராசாவை ஏய்யா இழுக்குறீங்க? அவர் எப்ப மத்தவங்க பாட்டு கேக்கலன்னு சொன்னார்? எல்லா இசைக்கும் நான் ரசிகன்னு எத்தனை முறை சொல்லி இருக்கார்? இசை மூலமாக மட்டுமே அவரும் ரஹ்மானும் கேள்வி பதில் சொல்லுவதாகவே ஆஸ்கர் பாராட்டு விழாவில் பேசினதாகக்கேள்வி. Originally Posted by venkkiram
ரஹ்மான் தான் முன்னொரு முறை அப்படி சொன்னார் - அதுவும் inspiration-ஐத்தவிர்ப்பதற்காக என்பதாக.
ராசா தற்போதைய இசையை 'பாப் கார்ன்' என்று சொன்னதாக அவரைக்குறை சொல்லிக்கொண்டிருக்கும் போது நீர் என்ன புதுக்கதை சொல்கிறீர்?
-
From: jaiganes on 21st April 2009 01:09 AM [Full View]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Topo
One of the most interesting stories for movie that I have read in a long long time!!
The note is that the movie was available in DVD only 2007(officially). For bala to have seen the unofficial bootlegs is rather fantastic theory. I will go ahead and give him a benefit of doubt. One common thing that seems to link NK and El Topo is the religious symbolism and show of degradation of people - however (reading the story), the exploitation in El Topo is by abnormal people in an abnormal and most imaginary of circumstances, while NK's settings are not all that fantastic and the Beggar exploitation is very very real.
-
From: irir123 on 21st April 2009 06:03 AM [Full View]
jaiganes - you watch the film yourselves and decide - as i said before its not a 'copy', but when I saw the protoganist say "I am God" and renders justice and coolly walks off and later when he is surrounded by physically handicapped people and one of the handicapped women falls in love with him, the scenes where the handicapped people try to make a living begging, and performing comic scenes on the streets, all of it immediately gave me a sense of NK deja vu!! Bala has seen it - it cant be otherwise - or else, this is one heck of a coincidence that will go down in the history of cinema as the most amazing!
Bala of course has given it a different treatment altogether - all credit to him for that, but I wont buy his claim that he doesnt watch global cinema, after I saw El Topo
-
From: venkkiram on 21st April 2009 07:17 AM [Full View]
--------சந்தடிச்சாக்குல ராசாவை ஏய்யா இழுக்குறீங்க? அவர் எப்ப மத்தவங்க பாட்டு கேக்கலன்னு சொன்னார்? எல்லா இசைக்கும் நான் ரசிகன்னு எத்தனை முறை சொல்லி இருக்கார்? இசை மூலமாக மட்டுமே அவரும் ரஹ்மானும் கேள்வி பதில் சொல்லுவதாகவே ஆஸ்கர் பாராட்டு விழாவில் பேசினதாகக்கேள்வி.
ரஹ்மான் தான் முன்னொரு முறை அப்படி சொன்னார் - அதுவும் inspiration-ஐத்தவிர்ப்பதற்காக என்பதாக.
ராசா தற்போதைய இசையை 'பாப் கார்ன்' என்று சொன்னதாக அவரைக்குறை சொல்லிக்கொண்டிருக்கும் போது நீர் என்ன புதுக்கதை சொல்கிறீர்?
உலக சினிமா பார்த்தது கிடையாது என்ற பாலாவின் வார்த்தைகளுக்கு இணையாக இங்கு நிறைய சினிமா கலைஞர்கள் பேசுவதுண்டு. அதில் எனக்கு உடனே ஞாபகம் வந்தது ராஜா. அவரது பேட்டிகளில் "தற்போதைய இசையைப் பற்றி உங்கள் கருத்தென்ன?" என்ற கேள்விகளுக்கெல்லாம் அவரது பதில்கள் "தற்போதைய இசை ஒரே சத்தம். சத்தங்களை கேட்க மனம் இடம் கொடுப்பதில்லை" என்பது போன்றவைதான். எனக்குத் தெரிந்து அவர் சம கால இசையைப் பற்றி நேர்மறை எண்ணங்களை வெளிப்படுத்தியது "மயிலு" பட சம்பந்தமான கேள்வி பதில் உரையாடலின் போதும், நீங்கள் குறிப்பிட்ட ரஹ்மானின் பாராட்டுவிழா பேச்சின் போதுதான்.
ரஹ்மான் அவர்கள் சொன்னதாக நீங்கள் குறிப்பிடும் கருத்து சம்பந்தமாக நான் எதையும் படித்ததில்லை. ஆனால் அவர் "சிறைச்சாலை" பாடல் வெளிவந்த வேளையில் "ராஜா அற்புதமாக இசையமைத்திருக்கிறார்" என ஒரு கேள்விக்கு பதில் சொன்னதாக ஞாபகம்.
கமலும் அவ்வை சண்முகி படைப்பை மிஸஸ் டவுட்ஃயரை ஒப்பிட்டு வந்த கேள்விக்கு "ஆமாம்" என ஒரு வார்த்தையில் முடிக்காமல் "இல்லை... இங்கே சண்முக அண்ணாச்சி நிறைய பெண் வேடங்களில் நாடகம் எடுத்திருக்கிறார்.. " என பதிலளித்தார்.[/quote][/b]
-
From: irir123 on 21st April 2009 08:51 AM [Full View]
Kamal's claim of his 'Avvai Shanmugi' idea having preceded Mrs.Doubtfire, at the time of AS release was downright hilarious!!
-
From: rajasaranam on 21st April 2009 10:41 AM [Full View]
There is nothing to laugh about, for the 'IDEA' to have originated inside Kamal long before 'Mrs.Doubtfire'. There are many such ideas floating around in heads of people who are inclined towards making movies. Some people take lead in time and gets the chance to express it before the others. Originally Posted by irir123
-
From: bingleguy on 21st April 2009 10:57 AM [Full View]
True .... i feel we are no less thinkers ... but definitely when it comes to execution such amazing thoughts are given the least importance Originally Posted by rajasaranam
There is nothing to laugh about, for the 'IDEA' to have originated inside Kamal long before 'Mrs.Doubtfire'. There are many such ideas floating around in heads of people who are inclined towards making movies. Some people take lead in time and gets the chance to express it before the others. Originally Posted by irir123
when masala takes a higher stand .... vAzhga namadhu masala-jananAyagam
-
From: groucho070 on 21st April 2009 11:11 AM [Full View]
True, the whole dude in drag thing has been done before and Mrs. Doubtfire draws from that, from Tootsie, way back to Some Like it Hot. In fact, it's Tootsie meets Kramer vs Kramer. Originally Posted by rajasaranam
There is nothing to laugh about, for the 'IDEA' to have originated inside Kamal long before 'Mrs.Doubtfire'. There are many such ideas floating around in heads of people who are inclined towards making movies. Some people take lead in time and gets the chance to express it before the others. Originally Posted by irir123
Just that Kamal could have do away with the divorce thing. But what the heck, I like Avvai better than Mrs. Doubtfire.
-
From: rajasaranam on 21st April 2009 01:34 PM [Full View]
Myself & gang of friends have been discussing many film plots over the years that we have actually seen some of them made in to films later. 'Semma Gaanda Irukkum' Originally Posted by bingleguy
True .... i feel we are no less thinkers ... but definitely when it comes to execution such amazing thoughts are given the least importance when masala takes a higher stand .... vAzhga namadhu masala-jananAyagam 
Enna panrathu adutha plot pathi yosikka aarambichuduvom :P
Ippa sonna sirippa irukkum 'Aghorie' ya protaogonist'a vechu oru thriller padam pannanumnnu 5-6 varusham munnadi pesittu irunthom. Almost pesi pesi oru form'kku vantha apparam 'Bala' 'Naan kadavul' announce pannitaar semma gaanchalla 4 varusham kathuttu irunthom. padam paarthathum oru nimmathi enga plot'la irunthu 3 scene 2 dialogue mattum thaan 'NK'la irukkunnu aaanalum oru velai naanga antha padam inimae eduththa 'Bala' padam inspirationnnu solliduvaanga 
-
From: bingleguy on 21st April 2009 02:05 PM [Full View]
this so i hear happening for many others Originally Posted by rajasaranam
Myself & gang of friends have been discussing many film plots over the years that we have actually seen some of them made in to films later. 'Semma Gaanda Irukkum' Originally Posted by bingleguy
True .... i feel we are no less thinkers ... but definitely when it comes to execution such amazing thoughts are given the least importance when masala takes a higher stand .... vAzhga namadhu masala-jananAyagam Enna panrathu adutha plot pathi yosikka aarambichuduvom :P
Ippa sonna sirippa irukkum 'Aghorie' ya protaogonist'a vechu oru thriller padam pannanumnnu 5-6 varusham munnadi pesittu irunthom. Almost pesi pesi oru form'kku vantha apparam 'Bala' 'Naan kadavul' announce pannitaar semma gaanchalla 4 varusham kathuttu irunthom. padam paarthathum oru nimmathi enga plot'la irunthu 3 scene 2 dialogue mattum thaan 'NK'la irukkunnu aaanalum oru velai naanga antha padam inimae eduththa 'Bala' padam inspirationnnu solliduvaanga sad situation indeed ... sometimes orey concept ai ye famous aanavanga edutha adu jAsthi pesa paduthu indha maadiri enga nadakkum
oru example sollanum nna .... Indra sir & Naga sir oda vidAdhu karuppu was the original but ppl knew only Chandramukhi, Anniyan etc for multiple personality / split personality ... atleast am happy that Marmadesam came well before the movies 
adhula rombave sandhosham
-
From: bingleguy on 21st April 2009 02:08 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by rajasaranam
padam paarthathum oru nimmathi enga plot'la irunthu 3 scene 2 dialogue mattum thaan 'NK'la irukkunnu aaanalum oru velai naanga antha padam inimae eduththa 'Bala' padam inspirationnnu solliduvaanga concept muzhukka padathula poda mudiyAdhE that u knw better .... concept is just to differentiate ... rest all lies with the director handling the rest of the scenes dont u agree
as rightly said by you .... neenga ninaichirundha baaki 50 scenes unga padathula pottAlum inspiration nnu dhAn soluvanga
-
From: app_engine on 21st April 2009 07:44 PM [Full View]
venkkiram,
'அவைகளின் பாதிப்பில்லாமல் வித்தியாசமாக செய்ய வேண்டும் என்பதற்காக நான் கேட்பதில்லை என்று சொன்னதை என்னமோ ராசா பாட்டு எனக்குக்கேட்கப்பிடிக்காது என்பது போல திரித்து எழுதி விட்டார்கள்...நான் எனக்கு 'இஞ்சி இடுப்பழகி' பிடிக்கும் என்று சொன்னதை எல்லாம் கவனிக்காமல் இப்படி செய்து விட்டார்கள்' என்று ரஹ்மான் ஒரு முறை அங்கலாய்த்திருக்கிறார்.
ராசாவைப்பொறுத்த மட்டில் 'கேட்டேன், பிடிக்கவில்லை' என்று தானே சொல்கிறார், 'கேட்பதில்லை' என்று பொய் சொல்லவில்லையே? நீங்கள் என்னமோ அவர் கேட்டு விட்டு 'ஆங்...நானெல்லாம் கேக்குறதில்லை'ன்னு பொய் சொல்லுற மாதிரி எழுதி இருக்கீங்க...
பிரச்னை பாலா ஆங்கிலப்படம் பார்த்துட்டு 'பாக்கலை'ன்னு பொய் சொல்றாரா இல்லையா என்பது தானே? இதில் எப்படி ராசாவை ஒப்பிட முடியும்?
அடிக்கடி 'பாக் என் நாத தேவன்' தொடங்கி நௌஷத், எம் எஸ் வி, ரஹ்மானையெல்லாம் புகழ்ந்து தள்ளி இருக்காரே? யாரையாவது அவர் நான் 'கேட்டதில்லை'ன்னு சொல்லி இருக்காரா? (ஈவன் யுவனைக்கூட விடவில்லை, 'மாங்குயிலே'யை யுவன் ஸ்டைலில் பாடி வேடிக்கை செய்தது யூ ட்யூபில் இருக்கு)
தயவு செய்து தவறான ஒப்பீடுகளைத்தவிருங்கள்.
-
From: sarna_blr on 3rd May 2009 01:08 AM [Full View]
-rejected- Originally Posted by irir123
irir123, unga nomination thaakkal sellaadhu
naan eltopo paaththuputtEn
-
From: irir123 on 3rd May 2009 10:25 PM [Full View]
sarna_blr: I never said the movie itself is a blatant copy - but after watching it, didnt you get the distinct feel that Bala has most likely seen it ??
-
From: rajasaranam on 4th May 2009 11:21 AM [Full View]
After Watching ElTopo I got a distinct feel that 'you've watched both movies' Originally Posted by irir123
-
From: sarna_blr on 4th May 2009 11:45 AM [Full View]
RS.... neenga eltopo'va paaththa piragu, irir123 rendu padaththayum(NK and Eltopo) paaththaarOnu sandhEgam varudhaa Originally Posted by rajasaranam
After Watching ElTopo I got a distinct feel that 'you've watched both movies' Originally Posted by irir123
if yes I second ur doubt
-
From: rajasaranam on 4th May 2009 03:39 PM [Full View]
Athey Athey Originally Posted by sarna_blr
RS.... neenga eltopo'va paaththa piragu, irir123 rendu padaththayum(NK and Eltopo) paaththaarOnu sandhEgam varudhaa Originally Posted by rajasaranam
After Watching ElTopo I got a distinct feel that 'you've watched both movies' Originally Posted by irir123
if yes I second ur doubt 
aana Bala Eltopo Paatthurupaarnu oru microgram alavukku kooda feelings vara maatenguthu 
BTW I have also seen 'Lower depths' by AK (The movie Charu was reminded off while watching NK) Thats a great movie too but no relation to NK. Finished Reading 'Ezham Ulagam' and found it more appealing as a fiction - Novel. It needs a person like Bala to transform parts of that novel to cinema adding on his own style and make it into NK 'A truly masterpiece of Art'.
-
From: jaiganes on 27th July 2009 08:38 AM [Full View]
I finally caught up with Naan Kadavul - and Sarna forgive me- it is a internet download - There is no way to even get the DVD of the movie legally in the place I live and had a hope of an India trip in August, that was cancelled by my company and with that the hope of seeing Naan Kadavul legally in India (by buying DVD) was dashed. A desperate me downloaded DVD rip from a site and watched it just now and was BLOWN AWAY by the cinematic vision of the maverick director we call Bala. It is by far the most outrageous story ever conceivable and yet executed in the most stark and delightful execution. Bala easily deserves to be in the best directors of thamizh .. south indian... nope - Indian cinema.
@sarna - legal DVD purchase links (less than $10) ungalukku therinja link anuppunga.
-
From: Thirumaran on 27th July 2009 06:00 PM [Full View]
Naan Kadavul to be telecasted in Kalaignar TV
-
From: Sarna on 27th July 2009 07:36 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by jaiganes
enna solla vareenga
-
From: venkkiram on 28th July 2009 06:19 PM [Full View]
கருத்து.காம் தளத்தில் இந்த படத்தைப் பற்றிய விமர்சனத்தில் சக நண்பர் எழுதியது..
-----------------------------------------------
பிச்சைக்காரர்கள் ஒற்றுமையாக, பாசமாக, சந்தோஷமாக இருக்கிறார்கள். இவர்கள் எடுக்கும் பிச்சை முழுவதும் இவர்களிடமிருந்து வாங்கப்பட்டு விடுகிறது. எல்லோருக்கும் ஒரே மாதிரி பொட்டலங்களும், பாட்டில்களும் இவர்களைப் பராமரிப்பவர்களாலேயே விநியோகம் செய்யப்பட்டு விடுகிறது. இவர்களுக்கென்று தனியுடமை இல்லை.
ஓரு வேளை இவர்கள் கலெக்க்ஷனிலிருந்து % basis-ல் commission மட்டும் வசூலிக்கப்பட்டு மீதி வருமானம் இவர்களிடம் ஒப்படைக்கப்பட்டு, இவர்கள் தங்களைத் தாங்களே பராமரித்துக் கொள்ள வேண்டும் என்றால் அப்போது இது மாதிரி ஒரு ஒற்றுமை இருந்திருக்குமானு ஒரு யோசனை வந்தது.
குடும்ப பாதுகாப்பில்லாத மனிதன் (ஆண் / பெண்) சமூகத்தில் எதிர்கொள்ளும் உடனடி பிரச்சனையான பாலியல் அத்துமீறல் படத்தில் இல்லை. பிச்சைக்காரர்கள் அழுக்குடன் நாற்றமெடுத்து திரியாமல் குளித்து சுத்தபத்தமாக இருப்பதாக காட்டியிருக்கிறார்கள். (இதையெல்லாம் குறையாக சொல்லவில்லை. Just ஒரு observation).
பிச்சைக்காரகளை காட்டும் போது இவ்வளவு கவனம் எடுத்து மெனக்கெட்ட பாலா, நடிகைகளின் மீதும் இதே கரிசனத்தோடு இருந்திருக்கலாம். தன் சக நண்பனை தொழிலதிபராக்கி நடிகையை திருமணம் செய்து வைக்கப் போவதாக சொல்வது சமுதாயத்திற்கு நடிகைகளின் மீது இருக்கும் தாழ்வான எண்ணத்தை பிரதிபலிப்பதாகவே உள்ளது.
கடைசியாக முக்கியமான விஷயத்திற்கு வருகிறேன். கடவுளை காப்பாத்தனுமே! சும்மா விட்டுட முடியாதில்லையா!
கடவுள் நம்பிக்கை உள்ள சராசரி மனிதர்களையும் கடவுளின் இருப்பை பற்றி கேள்வி கேட்ட வைக்கக் கூடியதாக சில இடங்களில் வரும் வசனங்கள், காட்சி அமைப்புகள் இருக்கிறது.
வரம், சாபம்னு இரண்டு விஷயம் சொல்கிறார்கள். சாபத்தை பார்ப்போம். உலகில் வாழக் கூடாதவர்கள் என்ற முடிவை எதன் அடிப்படையில் எடுப்பது? எந்த ஒரு மனிதனுக்கும் தான் நல்லவன், எதிராளி கெட்டவன் என்ற நினைப்பே இருக்கும். வாழக் கூடாதவன் என்று முடிவு செய்து சாபமாக மரணத்தை தரும் பொறுப்பு சாதாரணமான மனிதனிடம் இந்தப் படத்தில் தரப்படவில்லை. அந்த வேலையை செய்ய அசாதாரணமான அகோரி என்பவன் தேவைப்படுகிறான். சரி, தவறு முடிவு செய்து தீர்ப்பு எழுத மனிதனுக்கு மேல் ஒருவன் தேவைப் படுகிறான்.
தாண்டவன் – வாழக்கூடாதவன், சரி. முருகன் எந்த நூலிழையில் வாழக்கூடாதவன் என்ற முத்திரையில் இருந்து தப்பிக்கிறான்? வலுக்கட்டாயமாக மனிதர்களை பிடித்து வந்து பிச்சைக்காரர்கள் ஆக்குகிற பாவத்தை அவர்கள் மேல் பொழியும் பாசத்தால் கழுவி விடுகிறானா? அதென்ன சாப விமோசனமா?
பாவம், புண்ணியம், வரம், சாபம், சாப விமோசனம் – இதையெல்லாம் ஆசாபாசங்களுக்குட்பட்ட மனிதன் எப்படி முடிவு செய்வது?
சுவற்றில் முகத்தை வைத்து அந்த தேய் தேய்த்தால் ரத்த காயம் வராது? வெறுமே முடி மட்டும் இல்லாமல் வழுக்கையான மாதிரி மட்டுமே தெரிகிறது. அந்த இடத்தில் கொஞ்சமும் ரத்தம் இல்லை.
----
மற்ற இடங்களில் இருந்து மனிதர்களை தாண்டவனிடம் கொண்டு சேர்க்கும் முருகன் நல்லவன். தாண்டவனிடம் இருக்கும் மனிதர்களை பிற இடங்களுக்கு கொண்டு செல்ல வருபவனும், தாண்டவனும் கெட்டவர்கள்.
கேரளாவிலிருந்து வரும் ஒருவன் இங்கே இருக்கும் பிச்சைக்காரர்களை வலுக்கட்டாயமாக இழுத்துசெல்லும் போது முருகன் கண்ணீர் விடுகிறான்.
பூஜாவை அதே போல் முருகன் அழைத்து வரும் போது கலங்கும் அந்த "ஓனர்", MGR, சிவாஜி இவர்களும் கலங்குகிறார்கள்.
முருகன் தண்ணி அடித்து விட்டு புலம்புவது இந்த முரண்பாட்டை நியாயப் படுத்தும் அளவு வலுவாக இல்லை.
-
From: app_engine on 5th August 2009 06:34 PM [Full View]
-
From: steveaustin on 3rd January 2010 10:18 AM [Full View]
BEHINDWOODS TOP 10 BEST TAMIL MOVIES OF 2009
2. Naan Kadavul
A film where the hero is an Aghori, the heroine a blind beggar and the plot is centered on the life of a group of suffering mutilated beggars ‘owned’ by a tormentor. Who would have thought that such a movie is possible in Tamil?. There is only one man who can pull such stuff off. No marks for guessing. Its only Bala!. Calling Arya and Pooja the hero and heroine of the movie respectively would be a disservice to Naan Kadavul which broke all existing conventions about the lead pair. The gumption of the director to give more importance and footage to the support cast than the male protagonist should serve as a tonic to all those who believe in script centered film making.
-
From: Anban on 3rd January 2010 02:43 PM [Full View]
naan kadavul no.2
UPO no.1
... thats not fair at all...
-
From: venkkiram on 19th January 2010 08:01 AM [Full View]
Here is a different take on this film, by a journalist Pa.Raaghavan:
தவறாகப் புரிந்துகொள்ளப்படும் ஆன்மிகம், சரியாகப் புரிந்துகொள்ளப்படும் தீவிரவாதத்தைக் காட்டிலும் அபாயகரமானது. பாலாவின் நான் கடவுள் திரைப்படத்தை நேற்றிரவு பார்த்தேன். வியப்பும் ஏமாற்றமும் ஒருங்கே தோன்றியது.
வியப்பு, அவரது செய்நேர்த்தி பற்றியது. படத்தின் ஒரு ஃப்ரேமைக் கூட அலங்கரிக்காமல் விடவில்லை. ஒரு கதாபாத்திரம் கூட வெறுமனே வந்துபோகவில்லை. ஒரு காட்சிகூட வீணாக்கப்படவில்லை. ஒரு துண்டு வசனம் கூட, அது உண்டாக்கவேண்டிய நியாயமான அதிர்வினை உண்டாக்காமல் இல்லை. தமிழ் சினிமாவின் அத்தியாவசியங்கள் என்று காலம் காலமாகச் சொல்லப்பட்டுவரும் அபத்த காமெடி, காதல் கசுமாலங்கள், கனவுக்காட்சிகள், போலி செண்டிமெண்ட்கள், உப்பில்லாக் கண்ணீர் என்று அனைத்தையும் பெருக்கித் தள்ளிவிட்டு ஒரு கதையை எழுதியிருக்கும் இயக்குநரை உண்மையில் பாராட்டவேண்டும்.
ஆனால் இந்த கம்பீரங்கள் அனைத்தும் அர்த்தம் பெறுவது, படம் ஒரு சரியான குறிக்கோளை நோக்கிப் பயணம் செய்வதன்மூலம் மட்டுமே. பாலாவின் நான் கடவுள், அடிதடிக்கு ஆன்மிக ஜிப்பா போட்டுப்பார்ப்பதுடன் திருப்தியடைந்துவிடுகிறது. இதனைச் சற்று விளக்குகிறேன்.
அஹம் ப்ரம்மாஸ்மி - நான் கடவுள் என்பது மிக நேரடியாகத் தருகிற பொருள், அதன் உண்மையான பொருளல்ல. நான் என்பதை முற்றிலும் எரித்த பிறகு எஞ்சக்கூடியதைத்தான் பிரம்மம் என்பது வழக்கம். அப்போது என்ன எஞ்சும் என்பது நமக்குத் தெரிய வாய்ப்பில்லை. கண்டவர் விண்டிலர். அத்வைதம் சொல்வது அதனைத்தான். ஆனால் படத்தின் கதாநாயகன் வெளிப்படுத்தும் ‘நான்’ முற்றிலும் தன் அகங்காரம் மற்றும் ஆளுமை சார்ந்து உருவாவது. பிணத்தை எரித்த சாம்பலை மேனி முழுதும் பூசிக்கொள்வதனால் மட்டுமே தன்னகங்காரம் இல்லாது போய்விடுமா. ஆர்யாவின் பாத்திரப்படைப்பு அப்படிச் செய்யும்போதெல்லாம் ஒரு குழந்தை, தானே குளிக்கிறேன் என்று அடம் பிடித்து சோப்பு பூசிக்கொள்வது போன்ற உணர்வே உண்டாகிறது.
காசியில் அகோரி சன்னியாசிகள் மத்தியில் வளரும் கதாநாயகனைத் தேடி, சிறு வயதில் அவனை விட்டுவிட்டுப் போய்விட்ட அப்பா வருகிறார். மகனைத் திரும்ப வீட்டுக்கு அழைத்துச் செல்வது நோக்கம்.
மிகச் சிறு வயதில், ‘வேண்டாம்’ என்று விட்டுவிட்டுப் போகிறவருக்குப் பல வருடங்களுக்குப் பிறகு அவனைப் பார்த்த மாத்திரத்தில் [நமக்கே ஆர்யாவை அடையாளம் காண்பது சிரமமாயிருக்க!] நான் பெத்தவன எனக்குத் தெரியாதா என்று கண்டுபிடிக்க முடிந்துவிடுகிறது. ஆனால் காலமும் சூழலும் அவனை என்னவாக உருமாற்றியிருக்கிறது என்பதை ஓர் அனுமானமாகக் கூட எண்ணிப்பார்க்க முடியவில்லை.
உனக்கு உறவில்லை, தொடர்பில்லை. போய் அறுத்துவிட்டு வா என்று ருத்ரனின் [ஆர்யா] குரு சொல்லி அனுப்புகிறார். ஏன் வரவேண்டும்? உறவு என்பது பெற்றோர் மட்டுமா? குரு அந்த வகையில் சேர்த்தியில்லையா? ஒன்றுமில்லை என்றால் ஒன்றுமில்லைதான். முற்றும் துறப்பதென்பது இருக்கும் நிலையைத் தக்கவைத்துக்கொண்டு பிறவற்றை ஒதுக்கித் தள்ளுவதா? புரியவில்லை.
ஆக, தந்தையுடன் ஊருக்குத் திரும்புகிறான் ருத்ரன். வீடு சரிப்படவில்லை. அம்மா, தங்கை, பாசம், கண்ணீர் எதுவும் உவப்பாக இல்லை. எனவே மலைக்கோயிலடி பிச்சைக்காரர்கள் மத்தியில் போய் உட்கார்கிறான். எப்பப்பார் கஞ்சா அடித்துவிட்டு வவ்வால் மாதிரி தலைகீழாக யோகாசனம் செய்கிறான். ஒன்றும் பேசப்படாது. ஒரு சில லோ ஆங்கிள் ரவுண்ட் டிராலி ஷாட்டுகளில் இது ஓர் உக்கிரமான தவமாகக் காட்டப்பட்டாலும் மிகச் சில காட்சி நகர்வுகளில் நமக்கு அதன்மீதான அதிசய உணர்வு போய்விடுகிறது. காரணம், அதைவிட நேர்த்தியாகப் படத்தில் காட்டப்படும் கழைக்கூத்தாடி கயிற்றின்மீது அந்தரத்தில் மிக அநாயாசமாக நடந்து செல்வதுதான்.
இந்த இடத்தில் கதையின் உயிர்நாடி தெரிய ஆரம்பிக்கிறது. பிச்சைக்காரர்களின் உலகம். அவர்கள் படும் பாடுகள். அவர்களை வைத்து வியாபாரம் செய்யும் கயவர்கள். அண்டா அண்டாவாகச் சேரும் சில்லறைக் காசுகளைத் தராசில் நிறுத்து அளந்து கொட்டுகிற காட்சி குலைநடுங்கச் செய்துவிடுகிறது. பிச்சைக்காரர்கள் மீது நிகழ்த்தப்படும் வன்முறைகளைக் காட்டிலும் இந்தக் காசு நிறுக்கும் ஒற்றைக்காட்சி மிகுந்த வன்முறையாக மனத்தில் இறங்குகிறது. தம் மீது திணிக்கப்படும் வலி மிகுந்த வாழ்வின் இடையே அவர்கள் ரசித்துச் சிரிக்கவும் பேசி மகிழவும் கண்டுபிடிக்கும் சில கணங்கள் நெகிழ்ச்சியூட்டுகின்றன. ஒவ்வொரு பாத்திரமும் நெஞ்சை நிறைக்கின்றன. கவிஞர் விக்கிரமாதித்தன் ஒரு பிச்சைக்காரக் கிழவனாக வருகிறார். வலுக்கட்டாயமாகத் தன்னிடமிருந்து குழந்தையை பிச்சைக்கார ஏஜெண்ட் பிடுங்கிக்கொண்டு போகிற காட்சியில் காலைப் பிடித்துக்கொண்டு கதறுகிற கதறலில் பிரமாதப்படுத்திவிடுகிறார்.
இந்த கோஷ்டியால் கடத்திவரப்பட்டு பிச்சையெடுக்க வைக்கப்படும் இன்னொரு கோஷ்டி குருட்டுப் பிச்சைக்காரியாக பூஜா. நம்பமுடியாத அளவுக்கு நிறைவான நடிப்பு. அவரை முன்னிட்டு ருத்ரன் மேற்கொள்ளும் இரண்டு கொலைகளும் இறுதியில் வாழமுடியாதவர்களுக்குத் தருகிற மரணம், வரம் என்று சொல்லிவிட்டுக் குருட்டுப் பிச்சைக்காரிக்கு மோட்சமளிப்பதும்தான் நமக்குப் பிரச்னையான விஷயங்கள்.
வாழ்வுக்கு உதவாத எந்த மதமும் தத்துவமும் சொல்லப்பட்ட பிற சொற்குப்பைகளும் உபயோகமற்றவை. மண்ணில் இல்லாத சொர்க்கம் என்று விண்ணில் ஒன்றுமில்லை. சொர்க்கம் என்று மதங்கள் முன்வைக்கும் கருத்தாக்கங்கள் கூட உள்ளர்த்தம் கொண்டவை. பூடகமானவை. உடைத்துப் பார்க்கப்படவேண்டியவை. என் கஷ்டம் தீராதா என்று கதறும் பெண்ணின் கழுத்தை அறுத்துக் கொன்றுவிட்டு, மோட்சமளித்ததாகப் புறப்பட்டுப் போகும் கதாநாயகன் நிச்சயமாகத் தன்னை உணர்ந்த ஒருவனாக இருக்கமுடியாது. அது ஆன்மிகமல்ல. ஒரு சைக்கோவால் மட்டுமே அப்படிச் செய்ய முடியும். இதனைத்தான் அவனது குரு அத்தனை ஆண்டு காலம் போதித்திருந்தார் என்றால் அவரும் டாக்டர் ருத்ரனையோ ஷாலினியையோ சந்திக்கவேண்டியவர்தான். அதற்குமுன்னால் குற்றவியல் நடுவர் நீதிமன்றம்.
முற்றிலும் தவறான, மோசமாகப் புரிந்துகொள்ளப்படும்போது ஆன்மிகம்கூட அபத்தமாகிவிடுகின்றது. நான் கடவுள் என்று கருதுவது சரி. கடவுள் வழங்கும் மானுட விடுதலை என்பது மரணத்தால் நேர்வது மட்டும்தானா? தன் மகள் வயதுக்கு வந்திருக்கிறாள். தலைக்குத் தண்ணீர் ஊற்றவேண்டும். பிச்சைக்காரக் கூட்டத்தின் நடுவே கஞ்சா அடித்துக்கொண்டு மயங்கிக்கிடக்கும் மகனை வீட்டுக்கு வா என்று கூப்பிடுகிறார் அம்மா. அவன் அவளைத் திட்டி அனுப்பிவிடுகிறான். நேரே வீட்டுக்கு வந்து கடகடவென்று அடுத்த காரியத்தைப் பார்க்கிற அம்மாவிடம் மகள் கேட்கிறாள்: அண்ணன் வரலியாம்மா? அவன் வரமாட்டான் என்று தீர்மானமாகச் சொல்லிவிட்டு வேலையைப் பார்க்கிற அந்தப் பெண் கதாபாத்திரம் எய்தியிருக்கிற ஞானத்தைக் கூட அகோரி சன்னியாசி ருத்ரன் அடையவில்லை என்பது ஏமாற்றமளிக்கிறது.
மிகவும் பிற்போக்கான, சமூக விரோதமான, அபத்தமான ஒரு கருத்தை ஆன்மிக பெயிண்ட் அடித்து அளித்திருக்கிறார் பாலா. இந்த வகையில் வழக்கமான தமிழ் மசாலா திரைப்படங்கள் இதனைக்காட்டிலும் மிக மேலானவை, கையெடுத்துக் கும்பிடத்தக்கவை. ஏனெனில் அவை எந்தக் கெடுதலான தாக்கத்தையும் உண்டுபண்ணாதவை. பார்த்த கணத்தில் நினைவை விட்டுப் போய்விடக்கூடியவை.
இந்தப் படத்தின் ஆகப்பெரிய சிறப்பு, இளையராஜா. அந்த வல்லமையை சொற்களால் விவரிக்க நினைத்தால் அது நேர விரயம். பாடல், பின்னணி இசை என்று தனித்தனியே சொல்ல ஒன்றுமில்லை. பிரம்மமாகப் படம் முழுதும் வியாபித்திருக்கிறார். வணங்க மட்டுமே தோன்றுகிறது.
மற்றபடி, இது ஒரு தவறான படம் என்பதில் எனக்கு எந்தச் சந்தேகமும் இல்லை. ராஜாவுக்கும் பூஜாவுக்கும் தேசிய விருதே கிடைத்தாலும்கூட.
-
From: AravindMano on 23rd January 2010 04:21 PM [Full View]
Bala picks up the National Film Award for Best Director in 2009.
-
From: joe on 23rd January 2010 04:24 PM [Full View]
-
From: Anban on 23rd January 2010 04:25 PM [Full View]
-
From: joe on 23rd January 2010 04:26 PM [Full View]
Naan Kadavul bagged two awards for Best director and makeup
-
From: MADDY on 23rd January 2010 04:33 PM [Full View]
wow congrats
are NA really worth and to be taken seriously?? there have been so many artistes and directors in tamil before who have been neglected by NA..........NA is just india's high, decided by a few north indies, doesent mean its the best movie made that year.......anyways, im not suggesting Bala didnt deserve it, but these are some things we need to ponder upon at this very moment
-
From: Anban on 23rd January 2010 04:36 PM [Full View]
appo oscar kooda waste thaan... when deserving ppl get awards, even awards get some value..
-
From: AravindMano on 23rd January 2010 04:36 PM [Full View]
You are probably right. But two things - NK didnt garner the applause it deserved (IMHO). Two - Except for Nandha, all the other three films have bagged one prime honour or the other at the NA! That's really worth talking about.
-
From: Appu s on 23rd January 2010 04:41 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Anban
Athavathu namakku pudichvangalukku kidacha deserve
Congrats Bala makeup artist moorthy
-
From: Vivasaayi on 23rd January 2010 04:43 PM [Full View]
Congrats Bala
-
From: Sourav on 23rd January 2010 04:49 PM [Full View]
-
From: Vivasaayi on 23rd January 2010 04:51 PM [Full View]
As Anban pointed out,u can replace NA with Oscar in each instance there Maddy - it will fit. Originally Posted by MADDY
wow congrats
are NA really worth and to be taken seriously?? there have been so many artistes and directors in tamil before who have been neglected by NA..........NA is just india's high, decided by a few north indies, doesent mean its the best movie made that year.......anyways, im not suggesting Bala didnt deserve it, but these are some things we need to ponder upon at this very moment
And India with US
-
From: MADDY on 23rd January 2010 04:59 PM [Full View]
no u r confusing, im not saying Bala didnt deserve it - or Bala is the best director just bcos he won 2 NA.........all im saying is, there have been greater directors like mahendran, K.Balachander before Bala........winning NA is a good achievement but we also have to accept its based on lobbying, hype and is a commercial recognition..... Originally Posted by Vivasaayi
-
From: Vivasaayi on 23rd January 2010 04:59 PM [Full View]
adhE adhE! Originally Posted by Anban
-
From: Vivasaayi on 23rd January 2010 04:59 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by MADDY
no u r confusing, im not saying Bala didnt deserve it - or Bala is the best director just bcos he won 2 NA.........all im saying is, there have been greater directors like mahendran, K.Balachander before Bala........winning NA is a good achievement but we also have to accept its based on marketing, hype and is a commercial recognition..... Originally Posted by Vivasaayi
-
From: Appu s on 23rd January 2010 05:09 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by MADDY
no u r confusing, im not saying Bala didnt deserve it - or Bala is the best director just bcos he won 2 NA.........all im saying is, there have been greater directors like mahendran, K.Balachander before Bala........winning NA is a good achievement but we also have to accept its based on lobbying, hype and is a commercial recognition..... Originally Posted by Vivasaayi
-
From: ajaybaskar on 23rd January 2010 05:10 PM [Full View]
Congratulations to Bala, Murthy, NK and VA teams....
-
From: Kalyasi on 23rd January 2010 05:14 PM [Full View]
Vaazhthukkal Bala
Vaazhthukkal Murthy
-
From: MADDY on 23rd January 2010 05:21 PM [Full View]
http://www.tamilwire.com/20563-naan-...-national.html
posted on january 17th,2009....
so, it was always Bala's plan to win national awardDirector Bala and the Naan Kadavul unit are absolutely convinced that this film will sweep several National Awards. That is the reason they have worked on everything so carefully, not allowing anything to stand between them and their prospective National Awards.
Bala made sure Pooja dubbed for herself in Naan Kadavul, for the National Award committee does not consider actors for an award if they do not dub in their own voices.
Also, realizing that films made in digital format cannot compete for the Best Film of the nation, Bala gave up the idea of converting Naan Kadavul into digital format.
The entire unit is very confident about Bala and Arya walking away with Best Director and Best Actor awards, respectively at the 56th National Film Awards.
-
From: littlemaster1982 on 23rd January 2010 05:38 PM [Full View]
Congrats Bala and Murthy
-
From: Plum on 23rd January 2010 05:39 PM [Full View]
Maddy, we discussed awards before. Awards depend on the committee composition in the case of national awards. Unlike Oscar, committee changes radically every year. I doubt if even one member is common between two successive years in the na committee. So, sometimes you see mallu jolna pais sweeping while sometimes it is others.
One thing to be noted, mainstream bollywood has got very few NAs - the only accusation there is the ones that got were likes of agneepath and hum tum. So, if one says that hum tum award was the result of lobbying, will you say that every award every year is due to commercial reasons or lobbying or north indies?
If a dev d loses out to love aaj kal, what would you attribute that to? Merit?
So, just becaus some award in the past was accused of being due to lobbying, you cannot expect that person who made that accusation to say every award given is due to lobbying.
-
From: raghavendran on 23rd January 2010 05:40 PM [Full View]
naan kadavul is a film made for national awards...bala is shocked that arya,pooja didnt win...hehehe
-
From: ajaybaskar on 23rd January 2010 05:43 PM [Full View]
Though the physical strain that Arya had undergone was phenomenal, i dont think he deserves a national award for his performance in NK... Originally Posted by raghavendran
-
From: raghavendran on 23rd January 2010 05:47 PM [Full View]
ya really arya didnt much in the film to get a national award...mayb filmfare is in the grabs
-
From: Plum on 23rd January 2010 05:49 PM [Full View]
Continuing, when it comes to awards, there are exactly 4 possibilities
1. Deserves and gets the award - can anybody dispute asmita patil or azmi or moondaam pirai or shah's awards. A few people may dispute but broadly, one can say these are deserved
2. Deserves and doesn't get. 2 words. Sivaji Ganesan
3. Doesn't deserve but gets. Wife ali khan
4. Obvious - thousands of films that don't deseve and don't get the awards
It depends on the committee composition which film falls in 1 and which in 2. For all we know, the commitee in 2004 might have genuinely believed that wife ali belonged to category 1 in humtum. Well, one would have to examine the brains of such people but the possibility is there. But I'd prefer to believe that that case belongs to category 2.
AvLO dhAn matter.
Oscar is a completely different thing - committee is fairly stable, hollywood films alone qualify therefore you cannot compare Rahman and his predecessors who never scored for a hollywood films. In this case, all directors in tamil have directed tamil films which qualify for the award consideration. But only agathian and now bala have got it. Even then, you cannot say that they are better than mani or balachander just because of the award adhu vera vishayam but atleast, bala didn't get a special opportunity.
I would like to know who was the committee chairman this time.
Also whether IR, chitra or shreya got awards for naan kadavul/pazhassi.
-
From: raghavendran on 23rd January 2010 05:52 PM [Full View]
i feel that national awards r always bollywood dominated..in 2006 pritam got best music director award for lage raho...how silly Originally Posted by Plum
-
From: ajaybaskar on 23rd January 2010 05:53 PM [Full View]
Pritam was not the MD of Lage raho. It was Shantanu Moitra
-
From: MADDY on 23rd January 2010 05:55 PM [Full View]
enakku appadi dhaan sonnaangappa HUB-la...... Originally Posted by Plum
heart in heart, im happy that bala has won it and subramaniapuram like craps didnt win it......im disappointed that raaja and rahman are being neglected for reasons other than excellence......thats all i can say....
-
From: raghavendran on 23rd January 2010 05:56 PM [Full View]
absolutely..... Originally Posted by MADDY
Originally Posted by Plum
heart in heart, im happy that bala has won it and subramaniapuram like craps didnt win it......im disappointed that raaja and rahman are being neglected for reasons other than excellence......thats all i can say....
-
From: Plum on 23rd January 2010 06:00 PM [Full View]
No raghavendran. That is not true. Mainstream bollywood has grabbed very few awards - the one category that they hae dominated is best wholesome entertainment - that too only in the last 10 years - although I doubt if that category was there before that.
Now, it is not even true that north indies are undeservedly grabbing na's year after year. Just that the 1 or 2 cases they did were blatant and
Btw, lrm was scored by shantanu moitra and I don't think it got national award for music. If it did, that would be undeserved as it was mediocre.
The bigger point is that while mallu films have dominated years when jolna pais from kerala headed the committee, those haven't been as blatant cases as wife ali khan, a nil kappoor etc.
When balu mahendra was chairman, roja got a few awards. Some north indies folks might still be crying over that - nevertheless they'll have much less justification than we have for wife ali, right?
-
From: ajaybaskar on 23rd January 2010 06:02 PM [Full View]
If Subramaniapuram had won a NA, then i would say that AO deserves an Oscar.. Originally Posted by MADDY
enakku appadi dhaan sonnaangappa HUB-la...... Originally Posted by Plum
heart in heart, im happy that bala has won it and subramaniapuram like craps didnt win it......im disappointed that raaja and rahman are being neglected for reasons other than excellence......thats all i can say....
-
From: MADDY on 23rd January 2010 06:05 PM [Full View]
this is what im saying Plum, when Mani and rahman win, some people suggest its lobbying but when bala, kamal, IR win its real talend.....how do we differentiate when it is lobbying or not? Originally Posted by Plum
-
From: ajaybaskar on 23rd January 2010 06:08 PM [Full View]
U can visit the hub and find the difference.. there are some ppl who would have a clue on this... Originally Posted by MADDY
this is what im saying Plum, when Mani and rahman win, some people suggest its lobbying but when bala, kamal, IR win its real talend.....how do we differentiate when it is lobbying or not? Originally Posted by Plum
-
From: Anban on 23rd January 2010 06:09 PM [Full View]
maddy,
subramaniapuram crap-aa??
-
From: muralee10 on 23rd January 2010 06:10 PM [Full View]
Bollywood rules 56th National Film Awards
By indiaabroad
Saturday Jan 23 5:20 PM
New Delhi, Jan 23 (IANS) Bollywood ruled the 56th National Film Awards Saturday, bagging as many as 13 awards, with films like 'Fashion', 'Rock On!!', 'Firaaq' and 'Jodha Akbar' winning two awards each in various categories. But Bengali film 'Antaheen' won the best feature film award and three more.
While Madhur Bhandarkar's 'Fashion', a dark tale about the Indian fashion industry, won its heroine Priyanka Chopra the best actress award and got Kangana Ranaut the best supporting actress honour, Farhan Akhtar's cult music-based film 'Rock On!!' got the best Hindi film award. Actor Arjun Rampal won the best supporting actor for the film too.
Ashutosh Gowariker's epic 'Jodha Akbar' won Chinni Prakash and his wife Rekha Prakash the best choreography award for the song 'Azeem-o-shaan shehenshah', a number that depicts dance forms of different Indian states. Fashion designer Neeta Lulla, who styled actress Aishwarya Rai in the film, has won the best costume designer award.
Nandita Das' directorial debut 'Firaaq', which was based on the 2002 Gujarat riots, has won the awards for best editing (A. Sreekar Prasad) and best art direction (Gautam Sen).
Even films like 'A Wednesday', 'Roadside Romeo', 'Oye Lucky! Lucky Oye!', 'Mumbai Meri Jaan' and 'Thanks Maa' took one award each.
While Neeraj Pandey's 'A Wednesday' has bagged the Indira Gandhi award for Best First Film of a director, Yash Raj Films' 'Roadside Romeo' bagged the best animation film.
Dibakar Banerjee's satirical 'Oye Lucky! Lucky Oye!' has been adjudged the best popular film providing wholesome entertainment, 'Mumbai Meri Jaan' directed by Nishikant Kamat has got the award for best special effects (Govardhan), and 'Thanks Maa' has got Shams Patel the best child artist award.
The award for best direction has gone to Bala for Tamil film 'Naan Kadauul', while the best actor is Upendra Limaye for Marathi film 'Jogva'.
Bengali film 'Antaheen', directed by Annirudh Roy-Chowdhary, has won four awards including for best feature film.
http://in.movies.yahoo.com/news-deta...lm-Awards.html
-
From: raghavendran on 23rd January 2010 06:10 PM [Full View]
ya...wen autograph won...director vasanth was a main member in the committe...and he has said that he supported autograph...and actress vyjenthimala was also a member in 2003-4 she has also recommemded for pithamagan...vikram got it...how abt that Originally Posted by MADDY
this is what im saying Plum, when Mani and rahman win, some people suggest its lobbying but when bala, kamal, IR win its real talend.....how do we differentiate when it is lobbying or not? Originally Posted by Plum
-
From: MADDY on 23rd January 2010 06:11 PM [Full View]
kuppai - a college student can write better movies based on political exploitation etc.... Originally Posted by Anban
maddy,
subramaniapuram crap-aa??
-
From: raghavendran on 23rd January 2010 06:14 PM [Full View]
kandippa crap dhan....copied from city of god....that too aragora...no justication for violence Originally Posted by Anban
maddy,
subramaniapuram crap-aa??
-
From: Plum on 23rd January 2010 06:20 PM [Full View]
Maddy, people will say whatever but the simple point is this:
Even deserving people will need the luck of the right committee composition to get awarrds.
There is nothing we can say on the quality of an artist based on awards received. This doesn't mean that rama narayanan is great because he didn't eceive awards. That is taking the extreme view of the logic that you are questioning!
-
From: joe on 23rd January 2010 06:20 PM [Full View]
There is no doubt ,NA was given mostly on National award commitee members liking.
VaraNam aayiram - best tamil film ..Nagma commitee member-am .. enge itha vachu 10 pakkam oottunga paarmpom
-
From: mexicomeat on 23rd January 2010 06:21 PM [Full View]
Priyanka Chopra won the national award for her performance in the movie "Fashion"
-
From: Vivasaayi on 23rd January 2010 06:22 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by joe
There is no doubt ,NA was given mostly on National award commitee members liking.
VaraNam aayiram - best tamil film ..Nagma commitee member-am .. enge itha vachu 10 pakkam oottunga paarmpom
-
From: joe on 23rd January 2010 06:23 PM [Full View]
Btw ,One of the commitee members openly said there were pressures from few actors to include their names in award list ,also they called many members and did lobbying - source : Today Sun TV news
-
From: Plum on 23rd January 2010 06:25 PM [Full View]
Another thing: in some cases lobbying, bias, selfish interests could also be in play. this doesn't mean that every award given is based on these factors only.
So, Point is if xyz says award a is due to lobbying while award b is due to merit, there is no logical inconsistency. He may or may not be correct about the lobbying but there is no logical inconsistency there.
-
From: joe on 23rd January 2010 06:28 PM [Full View]
Ithu therinja vishayam thaan ..Motha list-m mokkaiya iruntha nalla irukkathunnu Konjam deserve case-yum serthukkuRathu thaan. Originally Posted by Plum
-
From: MADDY on 23rd January 2010 06:31 PM [Full View]
Plum, when u took example u took balumahendra-helped-mani/rahman but u conveniently ignored vyjanthimala's recommendation for pithamagan - idha thaan naa solren,.......i know what is awards and whom to respect or not respect - but why this blatant double standards-nnu kekkuren.... Originally Posted by Plum
when someone from our place wins awards, we should feel happy for that - instead of questioning what is that award, who lobbies or doesent, whether there is commercialisation or alsheshan, why my favorites havent won it before, this award means nothing etc etc.......we should have discussions abt it but later - our primary motive must be a congratulatory one
-
From: Appu s on 23rd January 2010 06:32 PM [Full View]
Vera yaarukku koduthirukkalam? Originally Posted by mexicomeat
Priyanka Chopra won the national award for her performance in the movie "Fashion"
haven't seen all other nomination movies,but Priyanka given a finest performance....
-
From: raghavendran on 23rd January 2010 06:33 PM [Full View]
many say the best actor from bengal in 2006 was due to the fact that he was 60yrs old and it was a respect given to him....nobody talked abt his performance in that film
-
From: Roshan on 23rd January 2010 06:33 PM [Full View]
Congrats to Bala, Murthy and ESPECIALLY VA team !!
VA'a crap'nu sonnavanga Bala award vAnguRathaiyum crap'nu solluvAngalA
-
From: P_R on 23rd January 2010 06:33 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by MADDY
-
From: littlemaster1982 on 23rd January 2010 06:34 PM [Full View]
But P_R, you didn't like NK as well
-
From: Roshan on 23rd January 2010 06:35 PM [Full View]
Prabhu.. unga padam award vAngi irukku.. santhOshamthAnE ?
-
From: ajaybaskar on 23rd January 2010 06:36 PM [Full View]
Its out of context, but i have to mention it here.. When ARR won the Oscar, there were some hubbers saying that ivara vida thiramaiyanavangalukku kidaikkala.., Idhu americavoda uchcha virudhu mattume..blah blah... Originally Posted by MADDY
Plum, when u took example u took balumahendra-helped-mani/rahman but u conveniently ignored vyjanthimala's recommendation for pithamagan - idha thaan naa solren,.......i know what is awards and whom to respect or not respect - but why this blatant double standards-nnu kekkuren.... Originally Posted by Plum
when someone from our place wins awards, we should feel happy for that - instead of questioning what is that award, who lobbies or doesent, whether there is commercialisation or alsheshan, why my favorites havent won it before, this award means nothing etc etc.......we should have discussions abt it but later - our primary motive must be a congratulatory one
-
From: joe on 23rd January 2010 06:36 PM [Full View]
Aama , Saroja thaan best padam Originally Posted by littlemaster1982
But P_R, you didn't like NK as well
-
From: P_R on 23rd January 2010 06:41 PM [Full View]
Enakku Pithamagan pidichappO Bala-ku award kuduthaangaLA ? adhukku-nu ninaichukka vENdiyadhu dhaan. Originally Posted by littlemaster1982
But P_R, you didn't like NK as well
Anyway the comparison is with contenders in 2008. I am glad pandhalkaaran did not get the director award also and gladder that Subramaniapuram was treated with the scorn it deserves.
-
From: steveaustin on 23rd January 2010 06:42 PM [Full View]
தாதா கங்குலிக்கு கேப்டன் பதவி கொடுக்கப்போற SRK-க்கு ஒரு அவார்ட் வாங்கி கொடுக்க சொல்லுங்க..... :P Originally Posted by joe
Nagma commitee member-am .. enge itha vachu 10 pakkam oottunga paarmpom
-
From: P_R on 23rd January 2010 06:43 PM [Full View]
Isit ?? Originally Posted by Roshan
Naan kadaisiyA mooNu thadavai paartha orE thamizh padam.
Naanum Nagmavum orE frequency-la irukkOm.
btw manasAtchiNu oNNu irukkuradhaala solli aagaNum: VA-ku NA ellAm remba over.
-
From: MADDY on 23rd January 2010 06:44 PM [Full View]
kavudham for Vaaranam ayiram
-
From: littlemaster1982 on 23rd January 2010 06:44 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by P_R
Enakku Pithamagan pidichappO Bala-ku award kuduthaangaLA ? adhukku-nu ninaichukka vENdiyadhu dhaan. Originally Posted by littlemaster1982
But P_R, you didn't like NK as well
Anyway the comparison is with contenders in 2008. I am glad pandhalkaaran did not get the director award also and gladder that Subramaniapuram was treated with the scorn it deserves.
-
From: littlemaster1982 on 23rd January 2010 06:45 PM [Full View]
I read this like Surya in Mundhinam Paarthene Originally Posted by P_R
-
From: VENKIRAJA on 23rd January 2010 06:46 PM [Full View]
onniyum solradhukkilla
GM (Annan) :dei... unakku manasaatchi irukaada... andha nee 2 kodiya thaanguviyaada - GM (Gautham Menon)
-
From: raghavendran on 23rd January 2010 06:46 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by MADDY
kavudham for Vaaranam ayiram 
-
From: 19thmay on 23rd January 2010 06:47 PM [Full View]
Red Giant movies? -
-
From: steveaustin on 23rd January 2010 06:47 PM [Full View]
அனல் மேலே பனித்துளி... :P Originally Posted by P_R
-
From: Plum on 23rd January 2010 06:50 PM [Full View]
Maddy, if you read carefully, I said a north indies might say that roja award was due to balu being chairman just like we attribute hum tum to mishra Originally Posted by MADDY
Plum, when u took example u took balumahendra-helped-mani/rahman but u conveniently ignored vyjanthimala's recommendation for pithamagan - idha thaan naa solren,.......i know what is awards and whom to respect or not respect - but why this blatant double standards-nnu kekkuren.... Originally Posted by Plum
when someone from our place wins awards, we should feel happy for that - instead of questioning what is that award, who lobbies or doesent, whether there is commercialisation or alsheshan, why my favorites havent won it before, this award means nothing etc etc.......we should have discussions abt it but later - our primary motive must be a congratulatory one
I didn't say anything on the roja award here whether it was deserved or not.
The reason quoted by balu mahendra for choosing roja was " roja and thevar magan were both deserving but chose roja because rahman is new - to encourage him". Adhu pathi we argued before but that is a different thing
I qam not saying that but still if you look at it logically,in any case, what I am saying is that it is not illogical to say that one award is due to lobbying and another is not. Adhu sariya thappa double standards-Angaadhu vera vishayam. Adhai illogical-nu solla mudiyaadhunu dhaan solrEn
-
From: P_R on 23rd January 2010 06:50 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by littlemaster1982
I read this like Surya in Mundhinam Paarthene Originally Posted by P_R
-
From: equanimus on 23rd January 2010 06:51 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by littlemaster1982
I read this like Surya in Mundhinam Paarthene Originally Posted by P_R
-
From: VENKIRAJA on 23rd January 2010 06:51 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by P_R
Originally Posted by littlemaster1982
I read this like Surya in Mundhinam Paarthene Originally Posted by P_R
-
From: MADDY on 23rd January 2010 06:52 PM [Full View]
i dont know if they would have talked like that if IR or kamal or shivaji ganesan had won oscars Originally Posted by ajaybaskar
-
From: Sanjeevi on 23rd January 2010 06:53 PM [Full View]
wov finally he won for very opt film Originally Posted by AravindMano
Bala picks up the National Film Award for Best Director in 2009.
Congrats Bala
-
From: Roshan on 23rd January 2010 06:55 PM [Full View]
onnumE puriya mAttEnguthu neenga pEsuRathu Originally Posted by P_R
Isit ?? Originally Posted by Roshan
Naan kadaisiyA mooNu thadavai paartha orE thamizh padam.
Naanum Nagmavum orE frequency-la irukkOm.
btw manasAtchiNu oNNu irukkuradhaala solli aagaNum: VA-ku NA ellAm remba over. Anyways, I am happy for GVM
-
From: joe on 23rd January 2010 06:56 PM [Full View]
Paavam antha manushana vittudunga Originally Posted by MADDY
i dont know if they would have talked like that if IR or kamal or shivaji ganesan had won oscars Originally Posted by ajaybaskar
-
From: Plum on 23rd January 2010 06:57 PM [Full View]
Maddy, if you read carefully, I said a north indies might say that roja award was due to balu being chairman just like we attribute hum tum to mishra Originally Posted by MADDY
Plum, when u took example u took balumahendra-helped-mani/rahman but u conveniently ignored vyjanthimala's recommendation for pithamagan - idha thaan naa solren,.......i know what is awards and whom to respect or not respect - but why this blatant double standards-nnu kekkuren.... Originally Posted by Plum
when someone from our place wins awards, we should feel happy for that - instead of questioning what is that award, who lobbies or doesent, whether there is commercialisation or alsheshan, why my favorites havent won it before, this award means nothing etc etc.......we should have discussions abt it but later - our primary motive must be a congratulatory one
I didn't say anything on the roja award here whether it was deserved or not.
The reason quoted by balu mahendra for choosing roja was " roja and thevar magan were both deserving but chose roja because rahman is new - to encourage him". Adhu pathi we argued before but that is a different thing
I qam not saying that but still if you look at it logically,in any case, what I am saying is that it is not illogical to say that one award is due to lobbying and another is not. Adhu sariya thappa double standards-Angaadhu vera vishayam. Adhai illogical-nu solla mudiyaadhunu dhaan solrEn
-
From: MADDY on 23rd January 2010 06:58 PM [Full View]
for taking examples why did u take a rahman example why not a IR example or a bala example - is my point......all it takes to degrade someone's achievement is a PC/notebook with keyboard, internet connection..... Originally Posted by Plum
Maddy, if you read carefully, I said a north indies might say that roja award was due to balu being chairman just like we attribute hum tum to mishra
I didn't say anything on the roja award here whether it was deserved or not.
The reason quoted by balu mahendra for choosing roja was " roja and thevar magan were both deserving but chose roja because rahman is new - to encourage him". Adhu pathi we argued before but that is a different thing
I qam not saying that but still if you look at it logically,in any case, what I am saying is that it is not illogical to say that one award is due to lobbying and another is not. Adhu sariya thappa double standards-Angaadhu vera vishayam. Adhai illogical-nu solla mudiyaadhunu dhaan solrEn
again, u want to rake up the balumahendra issue on rahman - i know u Plum .....
-
From: jaiganes on 23rd January 2010 07:00 PM [Full View]
Yippie yippie yaayy yaaayyyy
congrats to Bala....
-
From: P_R on 23rd January 2010 07:00 PM [Full View]
I don't watch many films more than once. VA was the only film I watched more than once that year. Nagma is part of the jury. So apart from alleging familial bias - I was pointing out that we seemd to opine similarly on the abovesaid film. Originally Posted by Roshan
onnumE puriya mAttEnguthu neenga pEsuRathu Originally Posted by P_R
Isit ?? Originally Posted by Roshan
Naan kadaisiyA mooNu thadavai paartha orE thamizh padam.
Naanum Nagmavum orE frequency-la irukkOm.
btw manasAtchiNu oNNu irukkuradhaala solli aagaNum: VA-ku NA ellAm remba over. Anyways, I am happy for GVM
-
From: raghavendran on 23rd January 2010 07:05 PM [Full View]
[quote="Plum"]Maddy, if you read carefully, I said a north indies might say that roja award was due to balu being chairman just like we attribute hum tum to mishra Originally Posted by MADDY
Plum, when u took example u took balumahendra-helped-mani/rahman but u conveniently ignored vyjanthimala's recommendation for pithamagan - idha thaan naa solren,.......i know what is awards and whom to respect or not respect - but why this blatant double standards-nnu kekkuren.... Originally Posted by Plum
when someone from our place wins awards, we should feel happy for that - instead of questioning what is that award, who lobbies or doesent, whether there is commercialisation or alsheshan, why my favorites havent won it before, this award means nothing etc etc.......we should have discussions abt it but later - our primary motive must be a congratulatory one
I didn't say anything on the roja award here whether it was deserved or not.
The reason quoted by balu mahendra for choosing roja was " roja and thevar magan were both deserving but chose roja because rahman is new - to encourage him". Adhu pathi we argued before but that is a different thing
mr.balu roja was far better than ir's devar magan...itt redefined indian film music...accept the fact
-
From: littlemaster1982 on 23rd January 2010 07:06 PM [Full View]
Ahaa, marupadiyum mudhalla irundha
-
From: Vivasaayi on 23rd January 2010 07:09 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by raghavendran
-
From: MADDY on 23rd January 2010 07:09 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by littlemaster1982
Ahaa, marupadiyum mudhalla irundha
-
From: P_R on 23rd January 2010 07:09 PM [Full View]
raththa boomi begins
-
From: Appu s on 23rd January 2010 07:10 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by littlemaster1982
Ahaa, marupadiyum mudhalla irundha
-
From: joe on 23rd January 2010 07:10 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by P_R
-
From: Plum on 23rd January 2010 07:12 PM [Full View]
You are wrong maffy. Avlo dhan solla mudiyum
-
From: MADDY on 23rd January 2010 07:17 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Plum
was that intentional or typo?
who won the music award yaa?? any news??
-
From: Appu s on 23rd January 2010 07:22 PM [Full View]
Maddy its not anounced yet Shreya G won the best female playback award
-
From: MADDY on 23rd January 2010 07:27 PM [Full View]
oh wow - she is going to overtake everyone i believe Originally Posted by Appu s
Maddy its not anounced yet Shreya G won the best female playback award .....for which song??
-
From: P_R on 23rd January 2010 07:28 PM [Full View]
Btw just watching JTYJN on Star One.
Priyanga maadhiri azhudhgunE emotional trauma kaamichA dhaan reward kuduppAingaLaamA.
kuzhandhai ennamA nadichirukku
-
From: Appu s on 23rd January 2010 07:29 PM [Full View]
the same Bengali movie "Antaheen".... Originally Posted by MADDY
oh wow - she is going to overtake everyone i believe Originally Posted by Appu s
Maddy its not anounced yet Shreya G won the best female playback award .....for which song??
-
From: AravindMano on 23rd January 2010 07:30 PM [Full View]
Music is for Atul nu yaaro oruththar. For the film Jogua. Official list here http://pib.nic.in/archieve/others/20...2010012302.pdf
-
From: littlemaster1982 on 23rd January 2010 07:32 PM [Full View]
Idhai motthama naalu per support pannuvangalenne sandhegam (Incl you and me) Originally Posted by P_R
-
From: Jyothsna on 23rd January 2010 07:35 PM [Full View]
Congrats Bala & Moorthy Aana poojavukku kodukkama antha mokkai priyanka chopra ku koduthathu romba over.. 
-
From: MADDY on 23rd January 2010 07:35 PM [Full View]
Jogva (marathi) and Antaheen(Bengali) have swept the awards Originally Posted by AravindMano
-
From: raghavendran on 23rd January 2010 07:36 PM [Full View]
i m with you Originally Posted by littlemaster1982
Idhai motthama naalu per support pannuvangalenne sandhegam (Incl you and me) Originally Posted by P_R
-
From: MADDY on 23rd January 2010 07:36 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by P_R
-
From: P_R on 23rd January 2010 07:41 PM [Full View]
Ok that makes it 4. List over
Just watched the Paresh Rawal confrontation scene. Champa...ChamEli....Charulataaa !
-
From: raghavendran on 23rd January 2010 07:42 PM [Full View]
ya pooja is more deserving compared to priyanka Originally Posted by Jyothsna
Aana poojavukku kodukkama antha mokkai priyanka chopra ku koduthathu romba over..
-
From: Plum on 23rd January 2010 08:06 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by MADDY
Originally Posted by Plum
was that intentional or typo?
who won the music award yaa?? any news?? - was a typo but idhu kooda nallA dhAn irukku - maffy matthews-nu sonnA rhyming-A varudhu....indha pErai establish paNNiralAmA?
-
From: Plum on 23rd January 2010 08:06 PM [Full View]
indha logic solli dhAN(Emotional traumaku mattum dhAn kodukkaNumA?) Wife Ali khan-ku koduthAnga! Originally Posted by P_R
-
From: Plum on 23rd January 2010 08:08 PM [Full View]
Priyanka, KangnA idhellAm remba over.
But idhellAm kooda mannikkalAm. Arjun Rampal-A?
2 days time kodunga - Anban matrum kid_glove kitta training eduthikittu varaen
-
From: P_R on 23rd January 2010 08:19 PM [Full View]
Echchoos Ramabaalan nalla payyan 'nga.
-
From: Bala (Karthik) on 23rd January 2010 08:20 PM [Full View]
Inga naan onnu sutti kaatta kadamaippattirukken, virumbaren..... Originally Posted by Plum
Originally Posted by MADDY
Originally Posted by Plum
was that intentional or typo?
who won the music award yaa?? any news?? - was a typo but idhu kooda nallA dhAn irukku - maffy matthews-nu sonnA rhyming-A varudhu....indha pErai establish paNNiralAmA?
"F' and 'P' can be interchanged
'B' and 'P' can be interchanged.
etc....
For example, ippo namma oorla paatheenganna, "free-paid" mbaanga. Ennada oxymoron-a irukku nu paakkaadheenga. Pre-paid a thaan appadi solluvaanga.
Adhe madhiri college vaathi oruthar "Stand uff! Oru govt adhigaariya vela seyya vidaama thadukkareenga, idhu oru kiriminal oppense" nu echarippaaru.
Idam porul eval paathu dhaan use pannanum. Indha vidhi murai padi paatha, i am very sorry to say that Bala cannot become Fala or Maddy cannot become Maffy.
-
From: Plum on 23rd January 2010 08:21 PM [Full View]
Sireyaa gosaalai poNNukku kuduthadhu dhAn orE aarudhal
-
From: Vivasaayi on 23rd January 2010 08:23 PM [Full View]
"sa" and "ja/cha" vayum interchange pannuvainga Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
chandigar- sandigar
sauce - chause
-
From: Plum on 23rd January 2010 08:25 PM [Full View]
:lol - idhukku rules vEra irukkA? Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
Inga naan onnu sutti kaatta kadamaippattirukken, virumbaren..... Originally Posted by Plum
Originally Posted by MADDY
Originally Posted by Plum
was that intentional or typo?
who won the music award yaa?? any news?? - was a typo but idhu kooda nallA dhAn irukku - maffy matthews-nu sonnA rhyming-A varudhu....indha pErai establish paNNiralAmA?
"F' and 'P' can be interchanged
'B' and 'P' can be interchanged.
etc....
For example, ippo namma oorla paatheenganna, "free-paid" mbaanga. Ennada oxymoron-a irukku nu paakkaadheenga. Pre-paid a thaan appadi solluvaanga.
Adhe madhiri college vaathi oruthar "Stand uff! Oru govt adhigaariya vela seyya vidaama thadukkareenga, idhu oru kiriminal oppense" nu echarippaaru.
Idam porul eval paathu dhaan use pannanum. Indha vidhi murai padi paatha, i am very sorry to say that Bala cannot become Fala or Maddy cannot become Maffy.
But Maddy Rahman fan-garadhAla, rules-aiyellAm thookki pOttuduvOmla. unga pErai vENA rejeet paNNunga, Maddy pEru establish paNna padum.
Sari pAlA garthig ok-vA? idhuvum saripadalainA, Raja of Erotic dhAN AmAm!
-
From: P_R on 23rd January 2010 08:27 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
neengellAm avarai enna faadu paduthiyirundhA manusan ippidi polambiyiruppAru.
Oh appaavE sollittaaraa.... Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
-
From: P_R on 23rd January 2010 08:29 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Vivasaayi
idhu dhaan correct-nu oruthan en kitta saNdaiyE pOttAn.
-
From: Bala (Karthik) on 23rd January 2010 08:35 PM [Full View]
Vagupparayila pechu satham adhigamaa irundhuchu. Sathama oru adhattu adhattunaaru "Do what i say!". Meaning no offense but just as a reflex i shouted back "Say what i do!" . Oru nimisham he got confused i think (as in "naan seriya thaane pesunen") and then he gave that warning.... Originally Posted by P_R
Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
neengellAm avarai enna faadu paduthiyirundhA manusan ippidi polambiyiruppAru.
-
From: Plum on 23rd January 2010 08:36 PM [Full View]
Harvesting Crop... Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
Vagupparayila pechu satham adhigamaa irundhuchu. Sathama oru adhattu adhattunaaru "Do what i say!". Meaning no offense but just as a reflex i shouted back "Say what i do!" . Oru nimisham he got confused i think (as in "naan seriya thaane pesunen") and then he gave that warning.... Originally Posted by P_R
Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
neengellAm avarai enna faadu paduthiyirundhA manusan ippidi polambiyiruppAru.
-
From: Bala (Karthik) on 23rd January 2010 08:36 PM [Full View]
Balapperiyavaa nu muthaana peru irukkarappo... Originally Posted by Plum
-
From: P_R on 23rd January 2010 08:38 PM [Full View]
Chandru to Suppiah: unnai kaNdikka aaL illaama ippidi aayitte Originally Posted by Plum
-
From: Bala (Karthik) on 23rd January 2010 08:39 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Vivasaayi
-
From: Plum on 23rd January 2010 08:39 PM [Full View]
mhmm...insulting-A oru pEru vENum. Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
Balapperiyavaa nu muthaana peru irukkarappo... Originally Posted by Plum
-
From: Vivasaayi on 23rd January 2010 08:41 PM [Full View]
paalaaperiyava..uhum..palaanaperiyava nu vechukureengala? Originally Posted by Plum
mhmm...insulting-A oru pEru vENum. Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
Balapperiyavaa nu muthaana peru irukkarappo... Originally Posted by Plum
but then it may refer to someone else and u may have to answer rama gopalan...thevaya?
-
From: Thirumaran on 23rd January 2010 08:48 PM [Full View]
Bala 
Though as a director i like Bala, i dont like naan kadavul movie
Does not matter, Sethu or Pithamagan kku vara vaendiyathu late a vanthatha eduthukaraen
-
From: Sanjeevi on 23rd January 2010 09:01 PM [Full View]
Though I got disturbed mentally while/after watching AO like Bala movies, what missing in AO is exists in NK. I meant 'Neat execution'.
That is Bala.
Oru kalaignanukku thAn enna padam edukkurOmnu oru thelivu irukkanumla
-
From: VENKIRAJA on 23rd January 2010 09:13 PM [Full View]
indha kodumaigaLAle unmaiyilayE... பொன்சேகா-nnE blaagla pOttu pOttu avarOda pErai english paper-la Fonseka-nnu pArthappo sema Originally Posted by Plum
:lol - idhukku rules vEra irukkA? Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
Inga naan onnu sutti kaatta kadamaippattirukken, virumbaren..... Originally Posted by Plum
Originally Posted by MADDY
Originally Posted by Plum
was that intentional or typo?
who won the music award yaa?? any news?? - was a typo but idhu kooda nallA dhAn irukku - maffy matthews-nu sonnA rhyming-A varudhu....indha pErai establish paNNiralAmA?
"F' and 'P' can be interchanged
'B' and 'P' can be interchanged.
etc....
For example, ippo namma oorla paatheenganna, "free-paid" mbaanga. Ennada oxymoron-a irukku nu paakkaadheenga. Pre-paid a thaan appadi solluvaanga.
Adhe madhiri college vaathi oruthar "Stand uff! Oru govt adhigaariya vela seyya vidaama thadukkareenga, idhu oru kiriminal oppense" nu echarippaaru.
Idam porul eval paathu dhaan use pannanum. Indha vidhi murai padi paatha, i am very sorry to say that Bala cannot become Fala or Maddy cannot become Maffy.
But Maddy Rahman fan-garadhAla, rules-aiyellAm thookki pOttuduvOmla. unga pErai vENA rejeet paNNunga, Maddy pEru establish paNna padum.
Sari pAlA garthig ok-vA? idhuvum saripadalainA, Raja of Erotic dhAN AmAm! aprom thAn theriyum avaru ponsEkA illainnu
-
From: Sid_316 on 23rd January 2010 09:36 PM [Full View]
Bala -Well deserved!
-
From: Bala (Karthik) on 24th January 2010 12:06 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Fliflo
BTW, vevaram theriyaama Raaja ku ellam ippo award kudupaanga nu mana paal kudichirukaaru
-
From: venkkiram on 24th January 2010 12:27 AM [Full View]
வாழ்த்துக்கள் இயக்குனர் பாலா!
இனியாவது, இன்பமான முடிவாக இருக்குமாறு ஒரு படைப்பை உருவாக்குங்கள்.
-
From: jaiganes on 24th January 2010 12:40 AM [Full View]
Naan Kadavul padathula inbamaana mudivu dhaane? Originally Posted by venkkiram
neenga endha inbam solreenga? sitrinbaava? illai paerinbaava?
naan kadavul cinema rasigargalukku perinbaa. andha maadhiri innum perinbaavaa padam edungo punniyavaane..
-
From: venkkiram on 24th January 2010 12:55 AM [Full View]
ஜெய்,
நான் குறிப்பிட்டது ..
----------
சேது - மையக் கதாபாத்திரங்கள் - அபிதாவின் துர்மரணம் - விக்ரம் சுயநினைவில் இருந்தும் பைத்தியமாக இருக்க முனையும் இறுதிக் காட்சி
நந்தா - மையக் கதாபாத்திரம் - சூர்யாவை அவர் தாயாரே விஷம் வைத்து கொல்வது
பிதாமகன் - மையக் கதாபாத்திரங்கள் - சூர்யா கொலை செய்யப் படுதல், விக்ரம் மானுட வாழ்க்கையை வெறுத்து செல்லுதல்..
நான் கடவுள் - மையக் கதாபாத்திரங்கள் - பூஜாவை உயிரை ஆர்யாவே பறிப்பது, ஆர்யா மீண்டும் அகோரியாகவே செல்லுதல்
----------
இதுவரை யாருமே எடுக்க முனையாத களங்கள், மனிதர்கள் என்றாலும், நோயுற்றத் தன்மையே இயக்குனரின் பார்வையாக இருக்கிறது.
இவரது பாத்திரங்கள் ஒவ்வொரு படைப்பின் இறுதியில் மனதளவில் மானுட வாழ்க்கை ஒட்டிய நம்பிக்கை அற்றுப் போனவர்கள்.
நம்பிக்கை ஒளிக் கீற்று சிறிய அளவிலும் இயக்குனரின் பார்வையில் தெரிவதில்லை.
-
From: mexicomeat on 24th January 2010 04:25 AM [Full View]
if we go by the same logic, jothilakshmi and jayamalini deserve several national awards for their performances. Originally Posted by Appu s
Vera yaarukku koduthirukkalam? Originally Posted by mexicomeat
Priyanka Chopra won the national award for her performance in the movie "Fashion"
haven't seen all other nomination movies,but Priyanka given a finest performance....
I saw fashion - ordinary film with lots of skin show. Just doesn't deserve to be awarded. Anyway, I will stop here. Peace.
-
From: jaiganes on 24th January 2010 07:50 AM [Full View]
நான் இயக்குனரின் பார்வையில் நம்பிக்கையை எதிர்பார்ப்பதில்லை, நேர்மையை மட்டுமே. அந்த நேர்மை வாழ்வின் சோகம் நிறைந்த முடிவை சுட்டுவதாக அமைந்தால், அதை ஒரு பார்வையாளனாக ஏற்றுக்கொள்வதே என் நேர்மையான கடமை. மேற்சொன்ன அணைத்துப்படங்களிலும் முடிவு சோகமானதாகத்தான் அமைய முடியும் - அந்த கதாபாத்திரங்களின் இயற்கையும், அமைப்பும் சூழலும் எந்த ஒரு மாற்று முடிவிற்கான வழிகளை இயல்பாகவே தரவில்லை என்பது தான் உண்மை. Originally Posted by venkkiram
-
From: udaykumar on 24th January 2010 08:15 AM [Full View]
Congrats to Bala.
I didnt liked Naan Kaduval but his nanda and pithamagan were too good
-
From: complicateur on 24th January 2010 09:11 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by P_R
Ok that makes it 4. List over
Just watched the Paresh Rawal confrontation scene. Champa...ChamEli....Charulataaa ! My fav scenes in the film. BTW list-la nAnum sErtthi.
B(K),
Unga rules padi ungaLa "Milk?" (pAlA) enRu thAn azhaikka mudiyeen.
-
From: Plum on 24th January 2010 09:55 AM [Full View]
Ah compli, that one clicks. Milk karthik sounds sufficiently insulting and ironic. Feeyaar, hub records-la add paNNidunga.
-
From: Guru-V on 24th January 2010 11:32 AM [Full View]
congratz to bala !
-
From: ajaybaskar on 24th January 2010 12:08 PM [Full View]
Bala's interview in Polimer TV:
Interviewer: Valarndhu varra directorsku neenga enna solla virumbureenga?
Bala: Naane ippothaan valarandhu varren. Neengalum ennoda serndhu valarunga...
Interviewer:
-
From: P_R on 24th January 2010 12:28 PM [Full View]
-
From: Sanjeevi on 24th January 2010 01:15 PM [Full View]
what an answer
His write-ups in Ananda Vikatan was very good. He has literature blood.
-
From: Bala (Karthik) on 24th January 2010 01:26 PM [Full View]
-
From: Plum on 24th January 2010 01:48 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by ajaybaskar
Bala's interview in Polimer TV:
Interviewer: Valarndhu varra directorsku neenga enna solla virumbureenga?
Bala: Naane ippothaan valarandhu varren. Neengalum ennoda serndhu valarunga...
Interviewer:
-
From: MADDY on 24th January 2010 02:15 PM [Full View]
Vaanga valaralaam..... Originally Posted by ajaybaskar
Bala's interview in Polimer TV:
Interviewer: Valarndhu varra directorsku neenga enna solla virumbureenga?
Bala: Naane ippothaan valarandhu varren. Neengalum ennoda serndhu valarunga...
Interviewer:
-
From: interz on 24th January 2010 03:18 PM [Full View]
Gongratulations to Director Bala.
Atleast one award for tamil industry.
-
From: venkkiram on 24th January 2010 05:20 PM [Full View]
நான் கடவுள் படத்தை ரீமேக் செய்வீர்களா?
இந்த படத்தை ரீமேக் செய்ய முடியாது. இதுக்கு முதல் காரணம். ஆர்யா நடிப்பு. ஆர்யாவைவிட யார் அந்த கேரக்டரில் நடித்துவிட முடியும். இப்படி நான் கேட்பது பிற நடிகர்களை புண்படுத்தக் கூடும். ஆனால் வேறு என்ன சொல்வது...
பிறமொழிப் படங்களைப் பார்த்து இன்ஸ்பையர் ஆகியிருக்கிறீர்களா?
பொதுவா நான் ஆங்கிலப் படங்கள் பார்க்கிறதில்லை... அப்படியே பார்த்தாலும் நான் இன்ஸ்பையர் ஆக அதில் ஒண்ணுமிருக்காது. அதைவிட இந்திய மொழிப் படங்களைத்தான் அதிகமா பார்க்கிறேன். இங்க இல்லாததா...
சக் தே இந்தியா... இந்தப் படத்தை ரீமேக் செய்ய முடியுமா.. தமிழ்ல சுப்ரமணியபுரம், நாடோடிகள் எல்லாம் சாதாரணமா ஒதுக்கிவிடக் கூடிய படங்களா என்ன?
Source : Thatstamil.com
-
From: HonestRaj on 24th January 2010 06:12 PM [Full View]
dark themes edukka koodadhunnu IR & BM ivarkitta saththiyam vangirukkuradha thandhi'la potrundhadhu Originally Posted by venkkiram
-
From: MADDY on 24th January 2010 06:23 PM [Full View]
andha kadaila adhellam kedaikkaadhe Originally Posted by HonestRaj
-
From: Appu s on 24th January 2010 06:24 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by MADDY
andha kadaila adhellam kedaikkaadhe Originally Posted by HonestRaj
சக் தே இந்தியா... இந்தப் படத்தை ரீமேக் செய்ய முடியுமா.. தமிழ்ல சுப்ரமணியபுரம், நாடோடிகள் எல்லாம் சாதாரணமா ஒதுக்கிவிடக் கூடிய படங்களா என்ன?
-
From: MADDY on 24th January 2010 06:25 PM [Full View]
adhaane Originally Posted by venkkiram
...
*damn, subramaniapuram is one lucky movie - its liked by kashyaps and Balas
-
From: app_engine on 24th January 2010 06:46 PM [Full View]
There were a few clippings from NK that are shown on the "nakkeeran" website (link somewhere in the IR forum). Extremely good! Though I've seen this movie once - and had a "just ok" opinion /even thought BGM was a bit noisy at places - never got a chance to do repeats / appreciate the details (impossible for such movies at home, with family around).
Bala can easily be said to be in the company of BR / MR / BM / Mahendran in the film making skills. Well-deserved recognition!
-
From: NOV on 24th January 2010 07:12 PM [Full View]
Congrats Bala - a well-deserved victory in a very mediocre year!
-
From: sathya_1979 on 24th January 2010 07:15 PM [Full View]
"very mediocre year". Yaarukku?
-
From: NOV on 24th January 2010 07:23 PM [Full View]
in general for tamil cinema. Originally Posted by sathya_1979
"very mediocre year". Yaarukku?
-
From: HonestRaj on 24th January 2010 07:25 PM [Full View]
for thamizh films.. wonly... Originally Posted by sathya_1979
"very mediocre year". Yaarukku?
remakes after remakes.. . reuse titles .. etc. etc.
-
From: app_engine on 24th January 2010 08:11 PM [Full View]
http://dailythanthi.com/article.asp?...date=1/24/2010
This says confusion in the name of the awardee for make-up (supposedly for the NK make-up artist but a wrong name in the list)
-
From: Plum on 24th January 2010 08:16 PM [Full View]
Mahendran innikku udhiripookkaL eduthA 3 Idiots maadhiri nallA irukkA? enna idhu climax-nu kEppAnga pOla jai! Originally Posted by jaiganes
நான் இயக்குனரின் பார்வையில் நம்பிக்கையை எதிர்பார்ப்பதில்லை, நேர்மையை மட்டுமே. அந்த நேர்மை வாழ்வின் சோகம் நிறைந்த முடிவை சுட்டுவதாக அமைந்தால், அதை ஒரு பார்வையாளனாக ஏற்றுக்கொள்வதே என் நேர்மையான கடமை. மேற்சொன்ன அணைத்துப்படங்களிலும் முடிவு சோகமானதாகத்தான் அமைய முடியும் - அந்த கதாபாத்திரங்களின் இயற்கையும், அமைப்பும் சூழலும் எந்த ஒரு மாற்று முடிவிற்கான வழிகளை இயல்பாகவே தரவில்லை என்பது தான் உண்மை. Originally Posted by venkkiram
-
From: Plum on 24th January 2010 08:17 PM [Full View]
En mudiyAdhu - will suit Ajith very well. Originally Posted by venkkiram
நான் கடவுள் படத்தை ரீமேக் செய்வீர்களா?
இந்த படத்தை ரீமேக் செய்ய முடியாது. இதுக்கு முதல் காரணம். ஆர்யா நடிப்பு. ஆர்யாவைவிட யார் அந்த கேரக்டரில் நடித்துவிட முடியும். இப்படி நான் கேட்பது பிற நடிகர்களை புண்படுத்தக் கூடும். ஆனால் வேறு என்ன சொல்வது...
பிறமொழிப் படங்களைப் பார்த்து இன்ஸ்பையர் ஆகியிருக்கிறீர்களா?
பொதுவா நான் ஆங்கிலப் படங்கள் பார்க்கிறதில்லை... அப்படியே பார்த்தாலும் நான் இன்ஸ்பையர் ஆக அதில் ஒண்ணுமிருக்காது. அதைவிட இந்திய மொழிப் படங்களைத்தான் அதிகமா பார்க்கிறேன். இங்க இல்லாததா...
சக் தே இந்தியா... இந்தப் படத்தை ரீமேக் செய்ய முடியுமா.. தமிழ்ல சுப்ரமணியபுரம், நாடோடிகள் எல்லாம் சாதாரணமா ஒதுக்கிவிடக் கூடிய படங்களா என்ன?
Source : Thatstamil.com
-
From: sathya_1979 on 24th January 2010 08:20 PM [Full View]
Oh ok. Naan kooda officela pasanga kooda pona oru padamum urupadiyaa velangala (At least I hate them). Originally Posted by HonestRaj
for thamizh films.. wonly... Originally Posted by sathya_1979
"very mediocre year". Yaarukku?
remakes after remakes.. . reuse titles .. etc. etc.
-
From: venkkiram on 24th January 2010 08:37 PM [Full View]
உங்களின் உதிரிப்பூக்கள் - 3 idiots ஒப்பீடும், எனது "பாலா படைப்புக்களில் வரும் மையப்பாத்திரங்களின் இறுதி நிலையைப் பற்றிய" பார்வையும் சம தளங்களில் இல்லாமல் மலிவான முறையில் இருக்கிறது. இதற்கு மேல் சொல்வதற்கில்லை. Originally Posted by Plum
-
From: Plum on 24th January 2010 08:44 PM [Full View]
Yes, முள்ளை முள்ளால் தான் எடுக்கணும்! Originally Posted by venkkiram
உங்களின் உதிரிப்பூக்கள் - 3 idiots ஒப்பீடும், எனது "பாலா படைப்புக்களில் வரும் மையப்பாத்திரங்களின் இறுதி நிலையைப் பற்றிய" பார்வையும் சம தளங்களில் இல்லாமல் மலிவான முறையில் இருக்கிறது. இதற்கு மேல் சொல்வதற்கில்லை. Originally Posted by Plum
-
From: P_R on 24th January 2010 09:02 PM [Full View]
umma Bollywood veRuppukku oru limit illaiyA Originally Posted by Plum
-
From: Plum on 24th January 2010 09:34 PM [Full View]
En Ajith-Ala saarug level-ku perform paNNa mudiyAdhA? Originally Posted by P_R
umma Bollywood veRuppukku oru limit illaiyA Originally Posted by Plum
-
From: MADDY on 24th January 2010 09:43 PM [Full View]
oh shahrukh could have played in Naan kaduvul, is it? Originally Posted by Plum
En Ajith-Ala saarug level-ku perform paNNa mudiyAdhA? Originally Posted by P_R
umma Bollywood veRuppukku oru limit illaiyA Originally Posted by Plum
i heard Arya was pretty bland and lame in NK
-
From: Plum on 24th January 2010 09:47 PM [Full View]
Straight Answer - Ajith can play that CDI role as well as Saarug or not? Originally Posted by MADDY
oh shahrukh could have played in Naan kaduvul, is it? Originally Posted by Plum
En Ajith-Ala saarug level-ku perform paNNa mudiyAdhA? Originally Posted by P_R
umma Bollywood veRuppukku oru limit illaiyA Originally Posted by Plum
i heard Arya was pretty bland and lame in NK
-
From: P_R on 24th January 2010 09:50 PM [Full View]
Most definitely cannot.
Madhavan perhaps can.
-
From: Plum on 24th January 2010 09:56 PM [Full View]
Actually, I was going to suggest Vijay...
Anyway, Ajith-Ala En mudiyAdhu? apdi enna difficulty andha role-la?
-
From: MADDY on 24th January 2010 09:56 PM [Full View]
SRK, Ajith, Madhavan - hmm, ivanga outer ring road-laye irukkangale, be careful (to self) :P
-
From: P_R on 24th January 2010 10:03 PM [Full View]
Then I take it you haven't seen Chak De. Originally Posted by Plum
Originally Posted by Plum
idhukku enna badhil solradhu. It is one of SRK's best performance. I like it way better than the pulpit talker SudEsamOhanabaargavan.
-
From: Plum on 24th January 2010 10:05 PM [Full View]
No, no, no. Sharukh-Ala En mudiyum-ngaradhu illai question. Ajith-Ala En mudiyAdhu?
-
From: MADDY on 24th January 2010 10:08 PM [Full View]
Karunas: kelen, machi kelen, nee kelen....
-
From: Plum on 24th January 2010 10:10 PM [Full View]
ada iruppA, avaru badhil sollattum Originally Posted by MADDY
-
From: P_R on 24th January 2010 10:12 PM [Full View]
From We are not Tata Birla Originally Posted by Plum
GM about Parthiban: AhA...enna oru uyarndha uLLam
En stand ulagam (adhAvadhu Hub) aRindhadhu. idhu varaikkum dhaan enakku mariyAdhai. iththOda niruthikkuvOm
-
From: Appu s on 24th January 2010 10:28 PM [Full View]
------
-
From: jaiganes on 24th January 2010 11:56 PM [Full View]
Chak dela appdi enna kizhichuttaar saarug? pannadellaam andha ponnunga daan. Originally Posted by P_R
Rudran intro scenela vara modhal sirasaasanam maththa yaaru panni irundhaalum (except kamal) dupe thaan.
அந்த கோர்ட் ஸீன்லயும் அந்த தெனாவட்டும் சூப்பர்.
3 முறை படம் பார்த்த பின் ஆர்யாவின் நடிப்பு மிகவும் பொருத்தமாக இருந்தது.
-
From: MADDY on 25th January 2010 12:00 AM [Full View]
oho, NA jury oru dhadava dhaan paathirupaanga Originally Posted by jaiganes
-
From: jaiganes on 25th January 2010 01:52 AM [Full View]
neenga paadhi padam kooda bayathula paakalaingaradhai saamarthiyamaa marachuttengale maddy. Neenga yaen saarug maadiri try panna koodadhu? Originally Posted by MADDY
oho, NA jury oru dhadava dhaan paathirupaanga Originally Posted by jaiganes
-
From: MADDY on 25th January 2010 01:56 AM [Full View]
is everything ok with u? Originally Posted by jaiganes
-
From: venkkiram on 25th January 2010 02:16 AM [Full View]
வாழ்த்துக்கள்! Originally Posted by Plum
ஒரு படைப்பை எப்போது இலக்கியமாகிறது, உன்னதமாகிறது என்றால், தர்க்கத்தை அடிப்படையாக வைத்துக் கொண்டு, கற்பனையை பெரிதும் பயன்படுத்தி, உள்ளுணர்வைத் தொடும்போது.
இந்த வகையில், நான் கடவுளின் இறுதிப் படலம் உள்ளுணர்வைத் தொட்டதா என்பது கேள்விக்குறியே!
நான் கடவுள் வெளியான நேரத்தில், ஜெயமோகன் தனது இணையத்தில் கேள்வி - பதில் முறையில் வந்த ஒரு கட்டுரையில்
---------------
9. ஊனமுற்றவர்களைக் கொல்லும்படி ‘சேதி‘ சொல்கிறதா நான் கடவுள்?
ஏற்கனவே சொன்னதுபோல ‘கருத்து‘ சொல்லும் படங்களைப் பார்த்த மனநிலையின் நீட்சி இது. படத்தின் மையமே முற்றிலும் வேறு. ஒரே விஷயம், ருத்ரன் எல்லா ஊனமுற்றவர்களையும் கொன்றானா என்ன? அவர்கள் சாகவேண்டியவர்கள் என்றா படம் சொல்கிறது? அவர்களின் வாழ்க்கையின் துள்ளலை அல்லவா படம் காட்டுகிறது. அதுவும் வாழ்க்கை என்றுதானே சொல்கிறது? ‘உருப்படிகளுக்கு‘ வாழ்க்கைமேல் பிடிப்பு இருக்கிறது. ஆகவே வாழ்க்கையின் துன்பமும் இன்பமும் இருக்கிறது. அதைக் காட்டத்தான் பிச்சைக்காரர் வாழ்க்கை அவ்வளவு விரிவாக சொல்லப்பட்டிருக்கிறது. நம்மை விட அவர்களே வாழத்தகுதிகொண்டவர்கள் என்றுதான் காட்சி காட்சியாக சொல்லிச் செல்கிறது படம்.
ஆனால் கடைசியில் வரும் அம்சவல்லி வாழ்க்கையில் இருந்து முற்றாக விலகி விட்டவள். அவளுக்கு மேற்கொண்டு வாழ்க்கையில் நம்பிக்கையும் இல்லை ஆசையும் இல்லை. அவள் நாடுவது விடுதலையை. அந்த விடுதலையை ருத்ரன் அளிக்கிறான். அது சரியான விடுதலையா என்பது அவரவர் கருத்து. ருத்ரன் அப்படித்தான் செய்ய முடியும் என்பது மட்டுமே அதன் தர்க்கம். ஏனென்றால் அவனது கதாபாத்திரம் அப்படிப்பட்டது. மனசாட்சியை நோக்கி ஓர் அடி அடித்து நிம்மதியிழக்கவைக்கும் இத்தகைய படம் அத்தகைய முடிவையே எடுக்கும். பிரமித்து கையறுநிலையில் நிற்கும் கடவுள்கள் நடுவே ஒரு அபலை பொசுங்கி அழியும் காட்சி அளவுக்கு குரூரமாக தன் கேள்வியை பார்வையாளர் முன்வைக்கும் முடிவு பிறிது இல்லை என பாலா எண்ணினார்.
------------------
அபலைப் பெண்ணிற்கு மரணத்தின் மூலம் விடுதலை அளிக்கும் ருத்னனின் பாத்திரப் படைப்பை நான் பொருட்படுத்த வில்லை. ஜெயமோகன் சொன்னது போல, பாலாவின் பார்வையில் ஒரு அகோரியின் பொதுப்புத்தி அந்த அளவுக்குத் தான் யோசிக்கும். ஆனால் இந்தப் படத்தை பார்த்த எத்தனை மனிதர்கள் அகோரி செய்ததும் தவறுதான் என்ற நிலையை உணர்கிறார்கள்? கடைசி வரை, ஏதோ கடவுள் நிலைக்கு அல்லவா அகோரியின் பாத்திரப் படைப்பு ஒரு பிம்பத்தை ஏற்படுத்துகிறது?
நான் கடவுள் முழுக்க முழுக்க குறியீடுகளால் நிரம்பி வழியும் படைப்பு. ஆனால் பார்க்கும் எத்தனை மனிதருக்கு இது புலப்படும்? படைப்பாளி ஒரு துருவத்தில் இருக்க, பார்ப்போரில் பெரும்பாலானோர் இன்னொரு துருவத்தில் இருந்தால் அதுவும் ஒரு வகையில் படைப்பாளனின் குறையே.
நான் கடவுளில் பாலா, ஆன்மீகத்தின் வழியான பார்வையில் கொண்டு செல்லவில்லை. முற்றிலும் தவறான, மோசமாகப் புரிந்துகொள்ளப்படும்போது ஆன்மிகம்கூட அபத்தமாகி விடுகின்றது.
-
From: jaiganes on 25th January 2010 02:22 AM [Full View]
vindunga - timing miss aiduchu Originally Posted by MADDY
is everything ok with u? Originally Posted by jaiganes
<ala gounder in thanga manasukkaaran>
a god bless.
</ala gounder in thanga manasukkaaran>
-
From: MADDY on 25th January 2010 02:35 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by jaiganes
vindunga - timing miss aiduchu Originally Posted by MADDY
is everything ok with u? Originally Posted by jaiganes
<ala gounder in thanga manasukkaaran>
a god bless.
</ala gounder in thanga manasukkaaran> director Bala said "only Arya could have done NK" to poke at the obvious - i dont think he really meant that .....
isnt it true that good movies get second, third viewings by jury? or is it something relevant with film festivals only .......
-
From: RC on 25th January 2010 03:40 AM [Full View]
தேசிய விருதும் ; டைரக்டர் பாலா வருத்தமும்! ( http://cinema.dinamalar.com/tamil-ne...onal-award.htm )
டைரக்டர் பாலாவுக்கு நான் கடவுள் படம் தேசிய விருதை பெற்றுத் தந்துள்ளது. இதனால் மகிழ்ச்சியில் இருக்கும் பாலா நிருபர்களுக்கு பேட்டியளித்தார். அப்போது அவர் கூறுகையில், இந்த தேசிய விருதை எனது குரு பாலுமகேந்திராவுக்கு சமர்ப்பிக்கிறேன், என்றார். மேலும் அவர் கூறியதாவது:-
என்னை விட மிகப்*பெரிய இயக்குனர்கள் மணிரத்னம், பாலுமகேந்திரா, கே.பாலசந்தர், பாரதிராஜா போன்றவர்கள் தமிழ் திரையுலகில் இருக்கிறார்கள். தேசிய விருது கிடைத்திருப்பதை நினைக்கும்போது எனக்கு பெருமையாகவும் இருக்கிறது; கொஞ்சம் கூச்சமாக இருக்கிறது. இறக்கை கட்டி பறப்பது போல் இருக்கிறது. அதே நேரம் இந்த விருது எனக்கு கிடைத்ததற்காக என்னை விட அதிகம் சந்தோஷப்படும் இரண்டு ஜீவன்கள் இருக்கிறார்கள். ஒருவன் என் குரு பாலுமகேந்திரா, இன்னொருவர் பாலுமகேந்திராவின் மனைவி அகிலாம்மா. இந்த தேசிய விருதை அவர்களுக்கு சமர்ப்பிக்கிறேன்.
நான் எப்போதுமே எனக்கு விருது கிடைக்க வேண்டும் என்று எதிர்பார்த்து படம் எடுக்க மாட்டேன். நான் கடவுள் படத்தையும் விருது எதிர்பார்ப்புடன் எடுக்கவில்லை. என்னை நம்பி வந்த நடிகர் - நடிகைகளுக்கு, தொழில்நுட்ப கலைஞர்களுக்கு விருது கிடைக்க வேண்டும் என நினைப்பேன். என்னைவிட அவர்கள்தான் வெயிலிலும், மழையிலும் கஷ்டப்பட்டார்கள். பூஜா முகம் முழுக்க கறுப்பு மை பூசி, கண்களில் லென்ஸ் வைத்து கஷ்டப்பட்டு நடித்தார். அவர்களுக்கெல்லாம் விருது கிடைக்கவில்லையே என்கிற வருத்தம் இருக்கிறது.
என்னுடைய அடுத்த படம் பற்றி எல்லோரும் கேட்கிறார்கள். இனிமேல் நீ இருட்டு ஏரியாவுக்குள் போகக்கூடாதுன்ன இமையராஜாவும், பாலு மகேந்திராவும் என்னிடம் சத்தியம் வாங்கியிருக்கிறார்கள். அதுபோன்ற படங்களை இனி இயக்க மாட்டேன். இனி நான் இயக்கும் படங்கள் சராசரி மனிதர்களைப் பற்றியதாக இருக்கும்.
இவ்வாறு டைரக்டர் பாலா கூறினார்.
-
From: venkkiram on 25th January 2010 04:50 AM [Full View]
முக்கியமா ராஜா, பூஜா, ஆர்தர் வில்சனுக்கு விருது கிடைத்திருக்க வேண்டியது. Better luck next time! Originally Posted by RC
-
From: jaiganes on 25th January 2010 07:23 AM [Full View]
கலை இயக்குனர் கிருஷ்ணமூர்த்திக்கும் கிடைத்திருக்கவேண்டும். Originally Posted by venkkiram
முக்கியமா ராஜா, பூஜா, ஆர்தர் வில்சனுக்கு விருது கிடைத்திருக்க வேண்டியது. Better luck next time! Originally Posted by RC
ஆர்தர் வில்சனின் சில கோணங்களும், காட்சியமைப்புகளும் மிகவும் நன்றாக இருந்தன. சொந்த ஊரின் சுடுகாட்டில் ருத்ரன் முதல் முறையாக தியானம் செய்யும் காட்சி இன்னும் நிழலாடுகிறது.
-
From: venkkiram on 25th January 2010 08:10 AM [Full View]
நான் "V. மூர்த்தி" என்றவுடன் கிருஷ்ண மூர்த்திக்குத்தான் கிடைத்துவிட்டது என நினைத்து விட்டேன். நீங்கள் சொல்வது சரி. கிருஷ்ண மூர்த்தியின் உழைப்பிற்கு விருது கண்டிப்பாக கிடைத்திருக்க வேண்டும். Originally Posted by jaiganes
ஒரு தமிழ் படத்திற்கு, சிறந்த படம், சிறந்த இயக்குனர், சிறந்த இசை, சிறந்த நடிகை, சிறந்த கலை, சிறந்த உடை அலங்காரம், சிறந்த ஒளிப்பதிவு என பலதரப்பட்ட கலைஞர்களுக்கு தேசிய விருது கிடைத்திருக்க வேண்டும் என்ற எதிர்பார்ப்பை கொடுத்த படம், பாலாவின் நான் கடவுள்.
என் வாழ்க்கையில் ஒரே படத்திற்கு இப்படிப்பட்ட எதிர்பார்ப்புக்கள், இதுதான் முதல் முறையாக. அந்த விஷயத்தில் நான் கடவுள் ப்ரத்யேகமான படைப்பு என்பதில் இருவேறு கருத்துக்கள் இல்லை.
-
From: P_R on 25th January 2010 11:12 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Appu s
vevaram therinjavanga yArAchum dangerous phlow-nu warn paNNIttaangaLA ?
-
From: ajaybaskar on 25th January 2010 11:23 AM [Full View]
Actually it was not Murthy. There was a mistake when they ad submitted the nominations. It was Sasi who was the make-up man... Source: Dinakaran Originally Posted by venkkiram
நான் "V. மூர்த்தி" என்றவுடன் கிருஷ்ண மூர்த்திக்குத்தான் கிடைத்துவிட்டது என நினைத்து விட்டேன். நீங்கள் சொல்வது சரி. கிருஷ்ண மூர்த்தியின் உழைப்பிற்கு விருது கண்டிப்பாக கிடைத்திருக்க வேண்டும். Originally Posted by jaiganes
ஒரு தமிழ் படத்திற்கு, சிறந்த படம், சிறந்த இயக்குனர், சிறந்த இசை, சிறந்த நடிகை, சிறந்த கலை, சிறந்த உடை அலங்காரம், சிறந்த ஒளிப்பதிவு என பலதரப்பட்ட கலைஞர்களுக்கு தேசிய விருது கிடைத்திருக்க வேண்டும் என்ற எதிர்பார்ப்பை கொடுத்த படம், பாலாவின் நான் கடவுள்.
என் வாழ்க்கையில் ஒரே படத்திற்கு இப்படிப்பட்ட எதிர்பார்ப்புக்கள், இதுதான் முதல் முறையாக. அந்த விஷயத்தில் நான் கடவுள் ப்ரத்யேகமான படைப்பு என்பதில் இருவேறு கருத்துக்கள் இல்லை.
-
From: Scale on 25th January 2010 11:29 AM [Full View]
Congrats Bala and the make-up man
-
From: Appu s on 25th January 2010 11:42 AM [Full View]
Illeng...naane pannitten :P neenga reply panna mathree theriyala ... Originally Posted by P_R
Originally Posted by Appu s
vevaram therinjavanga yArAchum dangerous phlow-nu warn paNNIttaangaLA ?
-
From: Sanjeevi on 26th January 2010 12:08 PM [Full View]
Bala virudhu kidaikkathavangalukku (Arya & Pooja) oru aaruthalukkaga solli irukkaru. Atha poyi perusa eduthukittu
-
From: PARAMASHIVAN on 26th January 2010 02:47 PM [Full View]
bala sir
congrats for winning the National award
I thing Pooja & prakash deserves some sort of award
AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST IR THE GENIUS TO GET NATIONAL AWARD FOR 'OM SIVOHAM'
-
From: ajaybaskar on 27th January 2010 10:59 AM [Full View]
Asked if he thanked God for the national award, Bala said,
Did God come and act in Naan Kadavul movie? Did he do the make up? Did he do the costume designing? Did he operate the camera? It was the actors, actresses and workers who worked hard. Why should I thank someone who doesnt exist?
-
From: Cinefan on 27th January 2010 12:23 PM [Full View]
[quote="ajaybaskar"]Asked if he thanked God for the national award, Bala said,
Did God come and act in Naan Kadavul movie? Did he do the make up? Did he do the costume designing? Did he operate the camera? It was the actors, actresses and workers who worked hard. Why should I thank someone who doesnt exist?[quote]
Unnecessary comment.What efforts has Bala taken to find out whether GOD exists or not?
It would have been better if he had told that he does not know if GOD exists and so he will rather attribute the award to his and the teams hard work.
-
From: MADDY on 27th January 2010 03:14 PM [Full View]
Ajay quoting Ajay? Originally Posted by Cinefan
Unnecessary comment.What efforts has Bala taken to find out whether GOD exists or not? Originally Posted by ajaybaskar
It would have been better if he had told that he does not know if GOD exists and so he will rather attribute the award to his and the teams hard work.
easy ticket to intellect group in TN is to become a atheist....there would be 2-3 kosu kadis appreciating this "not so great" statement of Bala's
-
From: Anban on 27th January 2010 03:18 PM [Full View]
seriously asking, did u watch the movie.. pooja's final lines are bala's POV in this matter.. why a sudden reaction now?? whats wrong in his statement?? Originally Posted by Cinefan
Unnecessary comment.What efforts has Bala taken to find out whether GOD exists or not? Originally Posted by ajaybaskar
It would have been better if he had told that he does not know if GOD exists and so he will rather attribute the award to his and the teams hard work.
if somebody attributes his success to god, do we ask him if he did any research..
everybody has an opinion.. let them live with it..
-
From: equanimus on 27th January 2010 04:03 PM [Full View]
Agree with Anban here. (By the way, idhaiyE dhAn Kamal oru idam vidAma sollittu vaRAru, adhai yArum kaNdikkaRadhillaiyE!)
Maddy,
Nobody is "appreciating" his statement, nor is there anything smart-alecky about Bala's answer. That question (whoever asked it) made little sense in the first place. If anything, Bala is actually guilty of answering it too earnestly!
-
From: P_R on 27th January 2010 04:18 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by equanimus
Bala asstend machAnai press meet paakka kooti vandhuruppAr-nu ninaikkaREn
-
From: Bala (Karthik) on 27th January 2010 04:23 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Anban
Originally Posted by equanimus
Maddy,
Idha "appreciate" panravano, thappu illai nu nenaikkaravano, atheist-a dhaan irukkanumnu avasiyam illa (
)
The answer was specifically for the question. So, if anything, the problem is with the question. The interviewer asked about something which is not in Bala's belief system. Vera enna sollirukkanum-nu edhirpaarkareenga?
Appo, "God is great" nu solradhayum, adhai appreciate panravangala paathu atheists offend avaanga, paralliya?
-
From: Scale on 27th January 2010 04:24 PM [Full View]
The title is Naan kadavul and how stupid this man can be?
I mean the interviewer.
-
From: Bala (Karthik) on 27th January 2010 04:25 PM [Full View]
Neenga solradhu "Pudhumaippithan" politician Vadivel press meet madhiri irukke Originally Posted by P_R
Originally Posted by equanimus
Bala asstend machAnai press meet paakka kooti vandhuruppAr-nu ninaikkaREn
-
From: P_R on 27th January 2010 04:31 PM [Full View]
adhai thaan 'nga sonnEn
Imagine Bala saying : yAryA adhu...kEkkura kELviyap pArthA pathirikkai kaaran maadhiri illaiyE
Anyway, as equa said, I wonder why Bala was so earnest in his response.
Once when kids asked him "if God appeared before you what boon would you ask him etc" he replied "paritchaiyE illaama ellArum pass aagaNum-nu kEppEn"
Enna oru deflationary tactic !
-
From: Bala (Karthik) on 27th January 2010 04:33 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by P_R
adhai thaan 'nga sonnEn
Imagine Bala saying : yAryA adhu...kEkkura kELviyap pArthA pathirikkai kaaran maadhiri illaiyE
-
From: equanimus on 27th January 2010 04:36 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by P_R
adhai thaan 'nga sonnEn
Imagine Bala saying : yAryA adhu...kEkkura kELviyap pArthA pathirikkai kaaran maadhiri illaiyE
-
From: raghavendran on 27th January 2010 05:17 PM [Full View]
bala seems to b having his so called "GOD" moments in his films...remember sethu saamiyar and in nanda rajkiran sayin u r god pointing towards surya....and naan kadavul ofcourse Originally Posted by ajaybaskar
-
From: jaiganes on 27th January 2010 05:28 PM [Full View]
All i would say is like loosu upendra in 'A'
I AM GOD
GOD IS GREAT...
BTW I am so very disappointed by everything associated with his next movie - Avan ivan.
only ray of hope is S.Ramakrishnan...
-
From: P_R on 27th January 2010 05:32 PM [Full View]
S.Ramakrishnan's last film was Dhaam Dhoom.
Before that he wrote Sandakkozhi, Bheema etc.
-
From: AravindMano on 27th January 2010 05:32 PM [Full View]
Enakku avar melayum nambikka illa Originally Posted by jaiganes
so far his inputs to cinema are highly forgettable. (kutti revathi dialogue thavirththu :P ) or is there any film that i missed?
Of course with Bala it might be a different story. Irundhum oru intution.
-
From: Benny Lava on 27th January 2010 05:34 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Anban
-
From: raghavendran on 27th January 2010 05:40 PM [Full View]
ya true...esp vishal in a bala film irks me like anythin Originally Posted by jaiganes
-
From: equanimus on 27th January 2010 05:40 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by P_R
adhAnE!
I'm of course very keen about this film. Anything by Bala, I say. For once, we'll see a film that doesn't insult/underestimate the audience under the pretext of being an entertaining film.
Incidentally the title is hilariously frivolous!
-
From: raghavendran on 27th January 2010 05:41 PM [Full View]
if a comedy film he could have gone for crazy mohan or rajkannan or even viji Originally Posted by P_R
-
From: equanimus on 27th January 2010 05:44 PM [Full View]
raghavendran, Originally Posted by raghavendran
if a comedy film he could have gone for crazy mohan or rajkannan or even viji Originally Posted by P_R
Crazy Mohan ellAm total disconnect 'nga. (Bala and Crazy Mohan writing a film together in itself would make a hilarious film, I think!) He comes from a different universe and not a versatile writer really. (But Viji IMO wouldn't have been a bad choice at all though.) I think S. Ramakrishnan is one hell of a writer. Lingusamikkum Balavukkum viththiyAsam illaiyA!
-
From: raghavendran on 27th January 2010 05:46 PM [Full View]
craz-kamla combova adikka yaarume illa boss....he has also written for shankar's indian...but in a way u r right bala oda andha rawness varadhu kashtam... Originally Posted by equanimus
raghavendran, Originally Posted by raghavendran
if a comedy film he could have gone for crazy mohan or rajkannan or even viji Originally Posted by P_R
Crazy Mohan ellAm total disconnect 'nga. He comes from a different universe and not a versatile writer in any sense. (But Viji IMO wouldn't have been a bad choice at all though.) I think S. Ramakrishnan is one hell of a writer. Lingusamikkum Balavukkum viththiyAsam illaiyA!
-
From: P_R on 27th January 2010 05:46 PM [Full View]
Bala is pretty awesome in comedy. With no offense to JM, the funnylines in NK are Bala's (and Singampuli's)
Singampuli: ambAni-nA yaaru ?
Midget1:CellpOne vikkuravainga..unakku theriyAdhu
In Singampuli's in maayAvi too, it is acknowledged that Bala was actively involved.
bAlaiyyA..kaaval thurai than kadamaiyai seyyum. nee soosaikkudi
-
From: P_R on 27th January 2010 05:48 PM [Full View]
Viji ...ah well, avarOda aduththa padam paaththuttu karuththu solrEn
-
From: raghavendran on 27th January 2010 05:48 PM [Full View]
his comedy is not dialouge oriented...more of body language....but this film would have needed a young writer...and thnk god he went for yuvan and nobody from outside Originally Posted by P_R
Bala is pretty awesome in comedy. With no offense to JM, the funnylines in NK are Bala's (and Singampuli's)
Singampuli: ambAni-nA yaaru ?
Midget1:CellpOne vikkuravainga..unakku theriyAdhu
In Singampuli's in maayAvi too, it is acknowledged that Bala was actively involved.
bAlaiyyA..kaaval thurai than kadamaiyai seyyum. nee soosaikkudi
-
From: raghavendran on 27th January 2010 05:49 PM [Full View]
actually thr was a talk that bala is goin to go for viji for this film....but vishal yaaroda dialouge pesinaalum thappadhan pesuvan Originally Posted by P_R
Viji ...ah well, avarOda aduththa padam paaththuttu karuththu solrEn
-
From: ajaybaskar on 27th January 2010 05:50 PM [Full View]
Indian dialogue writer balakumaran illaiya?
-
From: Bala (Karthik) on 27th January 2010 05:50 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by P_R
Bala is pretty awesome in comedy. With no offense to JM, the funnylines in NK are Bala's (and Singampuli's)
Singampuli: ambAni-nA yaaru ?
Midget1:CellpOne vikkuravainga..unakku theriyAdhu
In Singampuli's in maayAvi too, it is acknowledged that Bala was actively involved.
bAlaiyyA..kaaval thurai than kadamaiyai seyyum. nee soosaikkudi
-
From: raghavendran on 27th January 2010 05:50 PM [Full View]
sujatha-crazy mohan Originally Posted by ajaybaskar
-
From: P_R on 27th January 2010 05:51 PM [Full View]
Sujatha Originally Posted by ajaybaskar
-
From: equanimus on 27th January 2010 06:00 PM [Full View]
Yeah, absolutely. He hardly needs a writer to write the dialogue, especially for a comedy! Originally Posted by P_R
Oh, certainly. But you conveniently forget Viji. Originally Posted by P_R
In Singampuli's in maayAvi too, it is acknowledged that Bala was actively involved.
bAlaiyyA..kaaval thurai than kadamaiyai seyyum. nee soosaikkudi
-
From: P_R on 27th January 2010 06:04 PM [Full View]
feecher work vachu old credit distribution-ai re-evaluate paNNittEn
-
From: equanimus on 27th January 2010 06:08 PM [Full View]
By the way, I did get to see a few pieces of 'abhiyum nAnum.' It was quite funny and all, but honestly the tone of humour was not in the league of 'azhagiya thIyE' at all IMO.
I contend that Viji is not even a feel-good writer. AnA, idhai prove paNRadhukku aNNanukku inimE project irukkAnnu dhAn therla!
-
From: Aalavanthan on 27th January 2010 06:11 PM [Full View]
Bala's comedy is just bits and pieces in his movies IMO.. Padam mudinja udane, ppl. dont really appreciate the comedy in his movies..
The best of all is pithamaghan.. thanks to Surya He has to push in such characters to make his movies more watchable..
-
From: Aalavanthan on 27th January 2010 06:11 PM [Full View]
ennanga ippadi solliteenga.. I thought Mozhi might stand as the best feel good film in this decade -nGO Originally Posted by equanimus
-
From: P_R on 27th January 2010 06:12 PM [Full View]
I found parts of Abhiyum Naanum funnier than veLLithirai. Of course, not in the league of azhagiya theeyE (unnai maadhiri oru piRavi kalaignan)
-
From: equanimus on 27th January 2010 06:15 PM [Full View]
Aalavanthan, Originally Posted by Aalavanthan
Very contestable claim thAn. (ippadi EdhAvadhu kiLaRinA thAnE oru theLivu kidaikkum!) I'm saying this based on the tone of the humour in other films he wrote (the ones not directed by Radha Mohan) -- mAyAvi, majA, veLLiththirai.
-
From: rajasaranam on 27th January 2010 06:19 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Anban
-
From: P_R on 27th January 2010 06:20 PM [Full View]
oththaikku oththaiyA ninnappO RM seemed to fare better
adhunaala dhaan, let's wait-and-see-nu solrEn.
Anyway, what's the best feel good seems like a good poll. What are the other contenders ? idhai enga ninnu pEsikkittu irukkOm paarunga
-
From: equanimus on 27th January 2010 06:32 PM [Full View]
Let me steer the thread back from the digression with an old post on Bala's sense of humour (unfortunately made in a totally unrelated thread):
Originally Posted by equanimus
Oh, absolutely. The man has a wicked sense of humour. pithAmagan comedy track is so obscenely funny! The lines could be loud, obscene or what have you, but they send you rolling down the floor laughing. (Sample a rollicking Surya shouting out, "ALak kollappAkkurA, Adi asanju variyE, kunthANi!") Originally Posted by crajkumar_be
In addition to this, you've also talked about something i very much agree with - not sure if it was here or in your blog - Bala's dark but very real sense of humor. Really, wicked maan!
By the way, I strongly recommend the autobiographical series he wrote in Anandha Vikatan. An interesting peek into the man, lucidly written, extremely candid, at times funny, and at times poignant.
While Surya's performance was simply fabulous in the film, a total riot to my mind and of the scene-stealing variety, I thought Laila was, ahem, quite riotous too. And, I know I'm probably the only one to say so. I despise her idea of "acting," she grated on my nerves even in her much-appreciated performances like the one in uLLam kEtkumE, and her performance in nandhA was also close to nothing. But, in this film, I loved her way-over-the-top act. It's probably all thanks to the lines, but still it's quite a feat to have Laila mouth a piece of dialogue and still retain the humour, or funniness if you will. [In fact, coming to think of it, I'd even go a step further and claim that the scenes are so funny because Laila's role and her over-the-top performance is such an effective foil to Surya's. C'mon, do you think the girl's outrage at Sakthi would have been as effective had she not been such a loudmouthed oaf? And, of course, "lUsAppA nI?" is part of the pop-culture already!] Originally Posted by crajkumar_be
-
From: MADDY on 27th January 2010 06:45 PM [Full View]
there is no question of getting offended here - its so cliche to pass "smart-aleck" comments abt GOD and then getting appreciated and proclaimed as unmayana thamizhan, paguthharivu-vadhi, indellligent etc etc ........no doubt the interviewer was stupid in asking this and Bala had to respond but "idhellam naanga 1940's laye paathuttom, thanniya kudi" madhiri aaiduchhu...... Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
Originally Posted by Anban
Originally Posted by equanimus
Maddy,
Idha "appreciate" panravano, thappu illai nu nenaikkaravano, atheist-a dhaan irukkanumnu avasiyam illa ( )
The answer was specifically for the question. So, if anything, the problem is with the question. The interviewer asked about something which is not in Bala's belief system. Vera enna sollirukkanum-nu edhirpaarkareenga?
Appo, "God is great" nu solradhayum, adhai appreciate panravangala paathu atheists offend avaanga, paralliya?
yes, as Anban said - ella pugazhum iraivanukke-nnu solli solli oruthar humble-humble-nnu paarattu vaanguraar - adhuvum cliche dhaan........aana adhukaaga naa idha sollama irukkanuma??
-
From: Aalavanthan on 27th January 2010 06:45 PM [Full View]
Just a dig here .. Bala's speech during Avan Ivan press meet -- romba unmaiya pesaraaru and equally sarcastic with the reporters
http://www.indiaglitz.com/channels/t...nts/20832.html
-
From: Aalavanthan on 27th January 2010 06:51 PM [Full View]
Totally agree with you on the pithamaghan comedy - equa
Laila's comedy (her body language, the dialogue delivery, uruti uruti paakkura kangal) ellaamae just out of the world and proves that the heroines can still act nu.. Loosa pa nee came as a surprise shock to everybody and I remember people blasting out with laughter.
Surya ellam sollavae thevai illai.. He is proving himself to be the best in whatever he does at the moment .. I remember watching the movie second time and just skipped the other portions other than Surya's and Laila's scenes .. And even a bit of dance sequence during the Simran song was
Bala-voda orae kurikol ippa.. tamil naatu heroines-a nadika veikkardhu thein
-
From: MADDY on 27th January 2010 06:55 PM [Full View]
i never knew i would be alive to see such lines written and read Originally Posted by Aalavanthan
-
From: Aalavanthan on 27th January 2010 06:56 PM [Full View]
Well, You should be happy now Originally Posted by MADDY
i never knew i would be alive to see such lines written and read Originally Posted by Aalavanthan
-
From: MADDY on 27th January 2010 06:58 PM [Full View]
Koundar in tata-birla: vera enna panna mudiyum Originally Posted by Aalavanthan
Well, You should be happy now Originally Posted by MADDY
i never knew i would be alive to see such lines written and read Originally Posted by Aalavanthan
-
From: ajaybaskar on 27th January 2010 07:01 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by MADDY
i never knew i would be alive to see such lines written and read Originally Posted by Aalavanthan
-
From: VENKIRAJA on 27th January 2010 07:01 PM [Full View]
kaNda nAL mudhal Originally Posted by P_R
Anyway, what's the best feel good seems like a good poll. What are the other contenders ? idhai enga ninnu pEsikkittu irukkOm paarunga
-
From: Appu s on 27th January 2010 07:05 PM [Full View]
Bala: naan pothuva ippalaam theatre la poi padam paakirathu illa, yenna mutha reel odittu irukkum pothey,oruthan Cell phone pesittto, illa sms-oo anuppittu iruppan,poi adichiduvomonnu bayathila than porathilla Originally Posted by Aalavanthan
reporter: Cell phone pesra level-kku than ippa tamizh padam irukku
-
From: rangan_08 on 27th January 2010 07:12 PM [Full View]
" ennadhu, boatiya ? (having a feast in a kayyendhi bhavan) naan yarukkum poatii illa, enakkum yarum poati illa. Originally Posted by P_R
bAlaiyyA..kaaval thurai than kadamaiyai seyyum. nee soosaikkudi
BTW, Congrats to Bala & Murthy.
Hope Bala doesn't succumb to IR & BM's request and let down his uniqueness in Avan Ivan. Let's wait - he has promised to finish it in 6 months !!
Visahal !!
-
From: ajaybaskar on 27th January 2010 07:17 PM [Full View]
Read somewhere that Abes Balaiya is none other than Bala himself.. It is the pet name of Bala as he used to steal money from his dad's wallet once in a while...
-
From: Anban on 27th January 2010 08:01 PM [Full View]
maddy,
ellaa pugalum iraivanukkenu Raaja kooda thaan solluraaru.. karuthu thaan mukkiyam.
-
From: HonestRaj on 27th January 2010 08:09 PM [Full View]
Ravusu Rasappan: Originally Posted by Anban
neeyellam karuthu pesadhe.. kaal amukkuradhoda niruthika
-
From: Anban on 27th January 2010 08:44 PM [Full View]
he says Originally Posted by Aalavanthan
" ennoda kathaanaayaganukkum, aryaakkum, poojaakkum viruthu kedaikkalayenu varutham"
ellorukkum purinjurukkum..
-
From: Bala (Karthik) on 27th January 2010 08:50 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Anban
he says Originally Posted by Aalavanthan
" ennoda kathaanaayaganukkum, aryaakkum, poojaakkum viruthu kedaikkalayenu varutham"
ellorukkum purinjurukkum.. 
-
From: jaiganes on 27th January 2010 09:11 PM [Full View]
Bala - comedykku 'loosaappaa nee' ondre podhumanadhu.
but still edho ellarum avara compel panni comedy panna vaikaraangalonnu thonudhu. Adhu dhaan bayamaa irukku.
versatile versatile ngara oru vaarthaya vechu ethanai paera edai poduvaangannu theriyalai.
edhu nallaa varudho adhai nalla seyya vidradhu dhaan uththamam
udhaaranathukku gounder - avaru poi naan seriousaa act kudukkarennu poi yaarayum hospitalla seriousaakalaye adhukkaaga andha maamedhayai not versatilenu solli avamaanamaa paduthittom?
-
From: Cinefan on 28th January 2010 10:09 AM [Full View]
Anban,
If Raaja and others attribute their success to GOD,then it's their belief.
If Bala does not believe in a GOD,then he could have responded with a "Award is for our hard work and has got nothing to do with a GOD i don't know".
What is the need to question the existence as if he has taken efforts to find GOD and has not realized it.
There is a difference in not believing because you don't feel,see and saying there is no GOD.
Hope I am very clear.As Maddy said that was an unnecessary comment by him to prove that he is rational.
-
From: Scale on 28th January 2010 10:12 AM [Full View]
You be a thiest or an athiest thats your personal choice why hurt believer's feelings. Bala attributed his success to his artists hero, arya, make-up man and
all those disabled souls as a director/workmanship I appreciate. Why put your medhavithanam here? One person becomes disabled doesnt mean everyothers to blame GOD!
Even in his films the evils in the Humans have exploited them for begging. It is the belief that took them to the temple for begging so they can fill their hunger. Why not show something positive as Balachander the handicapped gentleman in "Vaaname ellai" neither he praises GOD nor he blames him. Its his self confidence
hard work, right spirits have overpowered his disability. A "pithamagan" self-proclaiming himself as "naan kadavul" is digging his own grave the reason being even if you pose the
same Q to any of his artist they might attribute this success to GOD. A research may have done well in advance. Just taking one film doesnt meant that he has lended a whole life helping hand to them. Athiest means intelligent and A Theist means Ignorant such attitude, comments are opprobrious and highly disgusting.
-
From: avven on 28th January 2010 10:47 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by HonestRaj
-
From: Cinefan on 28th January 2010 11:03 AM [Full View]
[quote="Anban"]he says Originally Posted by Aalavanthan
" ennoda kathaanaayaganukkum, aryaakkum, poojaakkum viruthu kedaikkalayenu varutham"
ellorukkum purinjurukkum..[/quote
I did not understand,explain pls.
-
From: Scale on 28th January 2010 11:16 AM [Full View]
Thats Ilayaraaja, Cinefan.
-
From: Cinefan on 28th January 2010 11:28 AM [Full View]
Thanks,Scale Originally Posted by Scale
-
From: equanimus on 28th January 2010 01:02 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Scale
Scale, Originally Posted by Scale
இப்படி எல்லாம் அவர் எப்போ சொன்னார்? அவர் சொல்லாததை எல்லாம் சொல்லிட்டு, "highly disgusting" 'னா என்ன அர்த்தம்?
-
From: Bala (Karthik) on 28th January 2010 01:09 PM [Full View]
Idhu ennanga anyayama irukku? Originally Posted by Cinefan
The counter question still holds good - Have people who say there is a god undertaken extensive research to establish this? And avaru eppadi pesanum enna pesanum (in the context of this conversation) ellam naama eppadinga solla mudiyum?
It is his right in saying what his belief is. He believes God does not exist and that being the case, he finds it absurd to give credit to a non-existent entity which did not play any part in the film making.
What exactly is the problem here? Whether he did research or not is not anybody else's problem.
And the height of absurdity is to call this an "unwanted comment to prove he is rational". I mean where do we get started? Firstly, he is replying to a very specific question. Secondly, this can be said about just about anyone, saying just about anything "This is an unwanted comment to prove he is xyz" etc..
-
From: Roshan on 28th January 2010 01:15 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Appu s
Bala: naan pothuva ippalaam theatre la poi padam paakirathu illa, yenna mutha reel odittu irukkum pothey,oruthan Cell phone pesittto, illa sms-oo anuppittu iruppan,poi adichiduvomonnu bayathila than porathilla Originally Posted by Aalavanthan
reporter: Cell phone pesra level-kku than ippa tamizh padam irukku simple logic - idhukooda puriyala bala'ku. straight forwardaam
anyways, bala pEsuRatha pAthu yEnda award koduthOmnu NA committee varuthapada pOguthu. oru award'ke ivvaLavu aarpaattam. Probably it's going to be his last too.
-
From: Bala (Karthik) on 28th January 2010 01:16 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by equanimus
Originally Posted by Scale
Scale, Originally Posted by Scale
இப்படி எல்லாம் அவர் எப்போ சொன்னார்? அவர் சொல்லாததை எல்லாம் சொல்லிட்டு, "highly disgusting" 'னா என்ன அர்த்தம்?
This is like "thirumba thirumba pesara nee"
Intelligent, medhavi nu oruthar kooda sollala, neengale dhaan pesitrukkeenga
And Maddy, Thalaivar-a solreenga nu theriyidhu. Thalaivar "I don't believe in God" nu sonnadhukkaaga thaan avar indelligend, medhavi nu solrom nu eppadi oru mudivukku vandheenga?
-
From: Kalyasi on 28th January 2010 01:19 PM [Full View]
enti boss problemu??
-
From: Sanjeevi on 28th January 2010 01:26 PM [Full View]
unga logic padi Mokkai padam koduthAlum, nalla vidhama nadichu pesina, jalra thatti pesina udanE NA koduthidungappA Originally Posted by Roshan
Originally Posted by Appu s
Bala: naan pothuva ippalaam theatre la poi padam paakirathu illa, yenna mutha reel odittu irukkum pothey,oruthan Cell phone pesittto, illa sms-oo anuppittu iruppan,poi adichiduvomonnu bayathila than porathilla Originally Posted by Aalavanthan
reporter: Cell phone pesra level-kku than ippa tamizh padam irukku simple logic - idhukooda puriyala bala'ku. straight forwardaam
anyways, bala pEsuRatha pAthu yEnda award koduthOmnu NA committee varuthapada pOguthu. oru award'ke ivvaLavu aarpaattam. Probably it's going to be his last too.
You can hate Bala and his movies. Yo are saying like this since you can not digest this award?
-
From: equanimus on 28th January 2010 01:32 PM [Full View]
Yeah, and all this about what sounds like a completely innocuous remark. Again, wonder why nobody has anything to say about people like Kamal who is so vocal about his atheism. Or any paguththaRivuvAdhi for that matter. Discounting the point that Bala is a soft target and hence more prone to such brickbats, one can clearly sense that the kind of response that Bala's films evoke from the general (largely theistic) audience is markedly different from what Kamal's (any other paguththaRivuvAdhi's) films do. The point I'm trying to highlight here is that MADDY (the hubber) couldn't have been more wrong when he likens Bala to a paguththaRivuvAdhi. Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
-
From: Bala (Karthik) on 28th January 2010 01:37 PM [Full View]
1. Nobody should say "There is no God". The maximum permissible level is "I don't know God/i don't know if there is no god" but everybody is encouraged to say "God is great", "God's grace" etc. Originally Posted by Kalyasi
2. "He is intelligent/medhavi because he is an atheist" nu oru koottam suthitrukku, apparently and more importantly, that koottam would jaalra thattufy for such statements made by Bala, Kamal etc
3. It goes like:
"Ella pugazhum iraivanukke" -is a cliche
"There is no God" - this is also a cliche
Anban apparently must have questioned the motivation of the first utterance.
Hence it is fair to make points 1 and 2...
Something like this, not sure if i understood
-
From: AravindMano on 28th January 2010 01:42 PM [Full View]
Interesting, very well said! Originally Posted by equanimus
-
From: Kalyasi on 28th January 2010 01:48 PM [Full View]
Oh Balaperiyavaa ku against a irukarava... maraimugama ulaganayagarayum thaakara... en na Anbar ulaganayagaroda fan... correct a? Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
1. Nobody should say "There is no God". The maximum permissible level is "I don't know God/i don't know if there is no god" but everybody is encouraged to say "God is great", "God's grace" etc. Originally Posted by Kalyasi
2. "He is intelligent/medhavi because he is an atheist" nu oru koottam suthitrukku, apparently and more importantly, that koottam would jaalra thattufy for such statements made by Bala, Kamal etc
3. It goes like:
"Ella pugazhum iraivanukke" -is a cliche
"There is no God" - this is also a cliche
Anban apparently must have questioned the motivation of the first utterance.
Hence it is fair to make points 1 and 2...
Something like this, not sure if i understood
-
From: MADDY on 28th January 2010 01:52 PM [Full View]
i think enough criticisms have been made on kamal and others too for making statements irrelevant to situation that look forced....rajinikanth summa summa kadvula sonnalum adhayum makkal reject pannirukkaanga.......when someone says rahman/raaja force the god thingy on everyone's throat in every stage speech then i wont be surprised too.... Originally Posted by equanimus
Yeah, and all this about what sounds like a completely innocuous remark. Again, wonder why nobody has anything to say about people like Kamal who is so vocal about his atheism. Or any paguthharivuvAdhi for that matter. Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
and why this morally self-righteous "paavam bala" line of arguements Originally Posted by equanimus
probably the last time you agreed to me was before christ - oh yeah, i meant christ .......i mean i find it strange that u dont see any "phoniness" in these "kadavul illa" preachings everywhere just to establish themselves as rationals......dint u find it smart alecky? why am i wrong when i say that Originally Posted by equanimus
- im not looking for a answer btw .........
Bala, naa sathyama kamal-a sollala - i somehow see some genuity in his repeated athiesm speech to educate people - though it comes of as naive - i cant discard kamal as entirely phony......he has a good, child-like intention behind this but others sound just like what scale has said - being Athiest is rational etc
-
From: kid-glove on 28th January 2010 01:54 PM [Full View]
He is intelligent/medhavi because he is an atheist
Maddy, That's kind of you to say. Best thing I've heard all day. 
-
From: Kalyasi on 28th January 2010 01:56 PM [Full View]
Sinsere rekost to all hubbers
Address Director Bala as "Balaperiyava"
Address annan hubber Bala (Karthik) as "Bala"
ore kanpees....
-
From: Bala (Karthik) on 28th January 2010 02:00 PM [Full View]
Maddy,
Your posts have the answers:
Kamal/Rajini stage speech la "thevai illama" naathigam/aathigam pesaraanga.
Bala, on the other hand, was replying specifically to a question.
Yet, you say Kamal is 'genuine' and Bala is fake. Not that i equate a tendency of digressing to being fake.
This is why Equa says Bala is hounded...
[Appadi paatha GPM-um hounded dhaanungo
]
-
From: equanimus on 28th January 2010 02:06 PM [Full View]
No, Maddy, you're missing the point. With Kamal, it's already a regular exercise and like you say enough complaints have been made about him. So the comments are mostly along the lines of "oh, there he goes again!" At least I haven't heard people say they find them "disgusting." Again note that Bala's case is the exact opposite of Kamal. We have heard him speak about the nonexistence of god may be twice or thrice! And still the reaction is so strong. Think about it. Originally Posted by MADDY
Ha! Not at all. It is precisely to avoid that I was discounting that line of argument! See, my interest was/is solely in making that observation and I didn't want others to hastily conclude that I'm reading too much into it when the case has a rather simple explanation (that it is easy to criticise Bala). So I added a note that I'm very much aware of that and I sense a 'difference' outside that. See what I mean? Originally Posted by MADDY
and why this morally self-righteous "paavam bala" line of arguements Originally Posted by equanimus
-
From: Bala (Karthik) on 28th January 2010 02:08 PM [Full View]
Maddy,
Are you having the subset of pro-Tamil anti-Hindu group in mind when you talk about atheist/medhavihood?
-
From: MADDY on 28th January 2010 02:09 PM [Full View]
the way he sounded was why im talking abt it.......if someone asks me abt rahman and i blast IR in response - then does it mean im talking only bcos i was asked to.....what is neccessary what is unneccessary - i cant tell Bala abt it but i can talk abt what i found phony and genuine - illainna sollunga Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
when kamal talks there is a deep sense of understanding in the subject, he tells us "untold" things and there is a intent to educate us and i completely understand his line of thinking bcos i know a lot abt the man and his personal life - maybe i dont know bala much......but what bala has told - i have heard everywhere right from tea shops to train journeys....it is cliche - however u look at itYet, you say Kamal is 'genuine' and Bala is fake. Not that i equate a tendency of digressing to being fake. This is why Equa says Bala is hounded...
[Appadi paatha GPM-um hounded dhaanungo ]
-
From: equanimus on 28th January 2010 02:13 PM [Full View]
Bala (the hubber), Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
Ah... well, that was not my point. The part that AravindMano has quoted is the essence of what I was trying to say. avar mattum eppadiyO correct 'A purinjukkittAr! (naNRi hai)
Guilty as charged, I suppose! Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
[Appadi paatha GPM-um hounded dhaanungo ]
-
From: kid-glove on 28th January 2010 02:14 PM [Full View]
Give him another decade. Originally Posted by AravindMano
Interesting, very well said! Originally Posted by equanimus
-
From: Bala (Karthik) on 28th January 2010 02:17 PM [Full View]
1. I'm not sure if both are the same Originally Posted by MADDY
2. If you mean what i think you mean, then i'm not in the group that "justifies" or "explains" this
-
From: Bala (Karthik) on 28th January 2010 02:20 PM [Full View]
Equa,
Ippo thavaritten, inime thavara maatten!
-
From: AravindMano on 28th January 2010 02:23 PM [Full View]
enakku therinju avar pEttigaL eppavumaE ipppadi aarpaattama dhaan irukkum. still remember an answer like "pongaLukkO deepaavaLikko release paNNa en padam oNNum karumbO pattaasO illa" (not verbatim). Originally Posted by Roshan
-
From: MADDY on 28th January 2010 02:24 PM [Full View]
adhu verum sub-seta, i thot all pro-tamil=anti-hindu Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
....not specifically them bala - neraya dhadava adha ketkirukken - periya lentil madhiri idha solluvaanga to believers with a scorn
Originally Posted by equa
now dont argue "why u hold bala for what others have said" Originally Posted by MADDY
.....thats all i have to say abt this - idhuve time waste
-
From: Plum on 28th January 2010 02:25 PM [Full View]
Wow! So much of antipathy to bala. I am a theist. I am not offended by Bala's remarks - and I cant even understand why I should be? I say God exists. He says God doesnt. Am I trying to prove that I am "conservative" or "conforming" or "good" or "nice phlow"? :wring_hands:
-
From: Plum on 28th January 2010 02:26 PM [Full View]
unga thalaivar GOD illainu sollaliyE? irundhA nallA irukkumnu dhAnE solraar? adhanAla dhAna avara mEdhavinnu solrOm Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
Originally Posted by equanimus
Originally Posted by Scale
Scale, Originally Posted by Scale
இப்படி எல்லாம் அவர் எப்போ சொன்னார்? அவர் சொல்லாததை எல்லாம் சொல்லிட்டு, "highly disgusting" 'னா என்ன அர்த்தம்?
This is like "thirumba thirumba pesara nee"
Intelligent, medhavi nu oruthar kooda sollala, neengale dhaan pesitrukkeenga
And Maddy, Thalaivar-a solreenga nu theriyidhu. Thalaivar "I don't believe in God" nu sonnadhukkaaga thaan avar indelligend, medhavi nu solrom nu eppadi oru mudivukku vandheenga?
-
From: AravindMano on 28th January 2010 02:26 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by equanimus
avar mattum eppadiyO correct 'A purinjukkittAr! (naNRi hai) welcome!
-
From: kid-glove on 28th January 2010 02:27 PM [Full View]
No, you're no medhavi. Originally Posted by Plum
-
From: Plum on 28th January 2010 02:27 PM [Full View]
As ever, Equa nails itThe point I'm trying to highlight here is that MADDY (the hubber) couldn't have been more wrong when he likens Bala to a paguththaRivuvAdhi.
-
From: Bala (Karthik) on 28th January 2010 02:27 PM [Full View]
Adhe dhaanya Originally Posted by Plum
-
From: MADDY on 28th January 2010 02:34 PM [Full View]
wats new Originally Posted by Plum
but u cant stop me from saying so :P ....the problem here is, equa and other bala supporters dont want me to talk at all even if i feel soAm I trying to prove that I am "conservative" or "conforming" or "good" or "nice phlow"? :wring_hands:
-
From: kid-glove on 28th January 2010 02:34 PM [Full View]
The context of this is here: Kamal goes around saying, that his "atheism" is born out of "rationalism". (Equa and I had spent quite a time clarifying this in one of the threads.The point I'm trying to highlight here is that MADDY (the hubber) couldn't have been more wrong when he likens Bala to a paguththaRivuvAdhi. )
Yet, he isn't touchable as against say Bala or young guys on the block.
-
From: Aalavanthan on 28th January 2010 02:35 PM [Full View]
exaaatly.. idhae madhiri ellaarum irundhutaa prechanaiyae illae.. but I think indha padathuku Naan kadavul paeru vecchadhuku badhilaa Non-kadavul vecchirukalaam Originally Posted by Plum
nethu oru partyki ponaen angaiyum idhae prechanai thaan. Theist said "kadavulai paakaa makkal kodi kodiyaa queuela mani kanakaa ninnu pakkaraanga"..
The agnostic said "naanum kadavul thaan" for which theist replied "unna paaka oru naai-yum queue-la nikkaadhu" (not offending anyone here or there or wherever though)
vidungaiyaa.. innum etthana naalaiki yaa indha paecha paesa poreenga.. Democratic Republic Independent countryla evan edhu vaenumnaalum pesalaam.. the problem here is the arrogance (vera kind-aana vaarthai irundhaa replace-ngo) that NK Bala showed while answering to the question.. with the immense theist population in a country, if one says like this, the others are charged up.. idhu pudhusu illaiyae.. E.Ve.Raa ellam paakadha protest-aa
-
From: Aalavanthan on 28th January 2010 02:36 PM [Full View]
is it BK or NK ? Originally Posted by MADDY
but u cant stop me from saying so :P ....the problem here is, equa and other bala supporters dont want me to talk at all even if i feel so
-
From: MADDY on 28th January 2010 02:40 PM [Full View]
iyam BK supporter yaa Originally Posted by Aalavanthan
is it BK or NK ? Originally Posted by MADDY
but u cant stop me from saying so :P ....the problem here is, equa and other bala supporters dont want me to talk at all even if i feel so
btw, kamal-e sollirukkaar - naan dhaan kadvul-nnu solravana nambadhennu - kamal-kku oru O podungappa
-
From: PARAMASHIVAN on 28th January 2010 02:45 PM [Full View]
adengappa, avaru periya philosopher parunga Originally Posted by MADDY
btw, kamal-e sollirukkaar - naan dhaan kadvul-nnu solravana nambadhennu - kamal-kku oru O podungappa
why do you guys give so much importance to cine artists 'personal' opinions??? cha just enjoy and appreciate their work and let them have their own views for god sake!
-
From: PARAMASHIVAN on 28th January 2010 02:45 PM [Full View]
Maddy
Unga per sendhamarai -a
-
From: Plum on 28th January 2010 02:50 PM [Full View]
equa. this also another important point you made apart from what AravindMano quoted right? I think this is a different point to what AM quoted. Originally Posted by Plum
-
From: Plum on 28th January 2010 02:52 PM [Full View]
Maddy, time for signature change Originally Posted by PARAMASHIVAN
Maddy
Unga per sendhamarai -a
-
From: Bala (Karthik) on 28th January 2010 02:53 PM [Full View]
Appadiya? nesamava? Originally Posted by PARAMASHIVAN
adengappa, avaru periya philosopher parunga Originally Posted by MADDY
btw, kamal-e sollirukkaar - naan dhaan kadvul-nnu solravana nambadhennu - kamal-kku oru O podungappa
why do you guys give so much importance to cine artists 'personal' opinions??? cha just enjoy and appreciate their work and let them have their own views for god sake!
-
From: Plum on 28th January 2010 02:53 PM [Full View]
BTW, Maddy, I wasnt agreeing on the "MADDY got it wrong" part of equa's comment. I was more into the "Is Bala really a pagutharivuvaadhi - genuine or even fake?"
-
From: Kalyasi on 28th January 2010 02:55 PM [Full View]
ada athu Raghu nga!! Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
Appadiya? nesamava? Originally Posted by PARAMASHIVAN
adengappa, avaru periya philosopher parunga Originally Posted by MADDY
btw, kamal-e sollirukkaar - naan dhaan kadvul-nnu solravana nambadhennu - kamal-kku oru O podungappa
why do you guys give so much importance to cine artists 'personal' opinions??? cha just enjoy and appreciate their work and let them have their own views for god sake!
-
From: MADDY on 28th January 2010 03:07 PM [Full View]
adhu irukkattum - unga peru enna?? Originally Posted by PARAMASHIVAN
Maddy
Unga per sendhamarai -a
-
From: PARAMASHIVAN on 28th January 2010 03:08 PM [Full View]
I think Thamarai would be better than 'Sen' thamarai Originally Posted by Plum
Maddy, time for signature change Originally Posted by PARAMASHIVAN
Maddy
Unga per sendhamarai -a
Nijamaana maddyitha ketarne rommba 'peel' panuvaru (vadivelu style)
-
From: PARAMASHIVAN on 28th January 2010 03:10 PM [Full View]
ennaku 108 per iruku (name of lord shiva) Originally Posted by MADDY
adhu irukkattum - unga peru enna?? Originally Posted by PARAMASHIVAN
Maddy
Unga per sendhamarai -a
-
From: MADDY on 28th January 2010 03:11 PM [Full View]
naa nijamaana maddy dhaan - nee nijamana raghu dhaane Originally Posted by PARAMASHIVAN
I think Thamarai would be better than 'Sen' thamarai
Nijamaana maddyitha ketarne rommba 'peel' panuvaru (vadivelu style)
-
From: MADDY on 28th January 2010 03:12 PM [Full View]
-
From: MADDY on 28th January 2010 03:12 PM [Full View]
108 ambulance no. illa UK-la? Originally Posted by PARAMASHIVAN
ennaku 108 per iruku (name of lord shiva) Originally Posted by MADDY
adhu irukkattum - unga peru enna?? Originally Posted by PARAMASHIVAN
Maddy
Unga per sendhamarai -a
-
From: Kalyasi on 28th January 2010 03:12 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by MADDY
naa nijamaana maddy dhaan - nee nijamana raghu dhaane Originally Posted by PARAMASHIVAN
I think Thamarai would be better than 'Sen' thamarai
Nijamaana maddyitha ketarne rommba 'peel' panuvaru (vadivelu style)
enna Maddy Guess vera??
-
From: MADDY on 28th January 2010 03:13 PM [Full View]
adhu punch dialaak :P Originally Posted by Kalyasi
Originally Posted by MADDY
naa nijamaana maddy dhaan - nee nijamana raghu dhaane Originally Posted by PARAMASHIVAN
I think Thamarai would be better than 'Sen' thamarai
Nijamaana maddyitha ketarne rommba 'peel' panuvaru (vadivelu style)
enna Maddy Guess vera??
-
From: PARAMASHIVAN on 28th January 2010 03:13 PM [Full View]
yadhum ore yaavarum kealeer Originally Posted by MADDY
108 ambulance no. illa UK-la? Originally Posted by PARAMASHIVAN
ennaku 108 per iruku (name of lord shiva) Originally Posted by MADDY
adhu irukkattum - unga peru enna?? Originally Posted by PARAMASHIVAN
Maddy
Unga per sendhamarai -a
-
From: Kalyasi on 28th January 2010 03:15 PM [Full View]
oh appo ok !! Originally Posted by MADDY
adhu punch dialaak :P Originally Posted by Kalyasi
Originally Posted by MADDY
naa nijamaana maddy dhaan - nee nijamana raghu dhaane Originally Posted by PARAMASHIVAN
I think Thamarai would be better than 'Sen' thamarai
Nijamaana maddyitha ketarne rommba 'peel' panuvaru (vadivelu style)
enna Maddy Guess vera??
-
From: PARAMASHIVAN on 28th January 2010 03:15 PM [Full View]
Mariyada koduthu pesina mariyadha kidaikum Originally Posted by MADDY
naa nijamaana maddy dhaan - nee nijamana raghu dhaane Originally Posted by PARAMASHIVAN
I think Thamarai would be better than 'Sen' thamarai
Nijamaana maddyitha ketarne rommba 'peel' panuvaru (vadivelu style)
-
From: equanimus on 28th January 2010 04:03 PM [Full View]
[Even if you weren't looking for an answer; ellAmE karuththup parimARRam dhAnE!] I think there are multiple problems here. Just because there is a "kadavuL illai" propaganda, you're simply assuming that every atheist is part of the same propaganda (or at any rate a propagandist). Secondly, how familiar are you with Bala and his viewpoints on this matter? Before the film's release, a lot of interviewers asked him the same question: Originally Posted by MADDY
i mean i find it strange that u dont see any "phoniness" in these "kadavul illa" preachings everywhere just to establish themselves as rationals......dint u find it smart alecky? why am i wrong when i say that - im not looking for a answer btw .........
indhap padam mUlamA kadavuL irukkArunnu sollap pORIngaLA, illainnu sollap pORIngaLA?
to which his standard answer was more or less along these lines:
maththavanga nambikkaiyai kEli seyyaRadhu en iyalbu illai. sAmi irukkunnu solla nAn bhakthi padamum edukkala!
idhai vida theLivA eppadi solla mudiyum? Anandha Vikatan'layO Kumudham 'layO vandha interview dhAn idhu. (The same interview that AravindMano refers to, where his films are not karumbu or pattAsu to come out during festivals.) idhu thavira 'nAn kadavuL' padamE irukku to understand Bala's perspective on the matter. Isn't it odd that you slotted him just on the basis of this single line without caring much for his past statements?
But Kamal has actively talked about atheism and always linked it to rationalism as well, just like any other paguththaRivuvAdhi. One could at best say that he's not parroting others' ideas but has a good perspective of what he's saying. Originally Posted by MADDY
-
From: Aalavanthan on 28th January 2010 04:17 PM [Full View]
This resolves the heat in here I guess. Originally Posted by NK Bala
Just thinking about the possibility of such an answer from Bala regarding God's involvement, the only defense is that there was a lot of sarcastic comments shared among the reporters and Bala, and when some reporter had asked "do u dedicate this to God", Bala with this ongoing sarcastic replies to the reporters, would have come up with such statements to shut the reporters mouth.
illaati, a person who understands others belief cannot produce such comments in a press meet
-
From: Plum on 28th January 2010 04:20 PM [Full View]
First of all, why should we ask someone that "Do you think it is GOD's grace that you have won this award?". Correct me if I am wrong, but if we are in the "getting offended" business, isnt it an attempt to offend and be sarcastic at the atheist when you are asking him about God's grace?
-
From: Aalavanthan on 28th January 2010 04:23 PM [Full View]
Thats our reporters.. I spent my day yesterday listening to such press meets with Dhanush and others.. There was a question to him that will he act with Simbu if there is a good script Originally Posted by Plum
ivaru ennamo Bhagyara style-a oru screenplay vecchirukira madhiri pesaraan.. But Dhanush reply was prompt but was a copy of Kamal's .. "rendu producers kum engaluku kaasu kodukanum, rendu fansum othukanum. etc etc "
Bottomline Plum here is, the reporters will ask any such stupid questions but its the receiver's choice to be calm and answer or fire back
-
From: Plum on 28th January 2010 04:25 PM [Full View]
I disagree that film personalities should be models of decorum, and be nice, likeable, humble blokes. Or, anyone, for that matter.
-
From: venkkiram on 28th January 2010 04:27 PM [Full View]
http://thenaali.com/thenaali.aspx?N=5398
பாலாவின் பிரஸ்மீட்.
எல்லாக் கேள்விகளும் அவர் இயக்கப்போகும் புதுப்படமான அவன் இவன் பற்றி மட்டுமே இருக்கும் என்று நம்பியிருந்தார் போலும். ஆனால், நான் கடவுள் பற்றியும் பல கேள்விகள். ஒரு நிருபர் நேரடியாகவே ஒரு கேள்வி கேட்டார். உங்களை வைத்துப் படம் எடுத்த தயாரிப்பாளர்கள் இப்போது எங்கே இருக்கிறார்கள் என்றே தெரியவில்லை. இனிமேலாவது அவர்கள் நலனுக்காகவும் படம் எடுப்பீர்களா? என்றார்.
பதில் சொல்ல வேண்டிய பாலா, "நீங்க எந்த பத்திரிகை?" என்று கேட்டு, "அதான் இப்படி கேட்டீங்க" என்றும் ஒரு கமெண்ட் அடித்தார். ஆனால் அவர் சொன்ன பதிலில் ஒரு நேர்மை இருந்தது. இதுவரை என்னுடைய தயாரிப்பாளர்கள் மனசு புண்படுகிற மாதிரி நடந்திருக்கேன். ஆனால் இனிமேல் அப்படி நடக்காது. இந்த படத்தை ஆறு மாதத்தில் முடித்துவிடுவேன். அதை உறுதியாக சொல்லிக்கொள்கிறேன் என்றார்.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
பரவாயில்லை, நிருபர்கள் தேறிவிட்டார்கள்!
-
From: joe on 28th January 2010 07:45 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
Originally Posted by equanimus
Originally Posted by Scale
Scale, Originally Posted by Scale
இப்படி எல்லாம் அவர் எப்போ சொன்னார்? அவர் சொல்லாததை எல்லாம் சொல்லிட்டு, "highly disgusting" 'னா என்ன அர்த்தம்?
This is like "thirumba thirumba pesara nee"
-
From: joe on 28th January 2010 07:48 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
1. Nobody should say "There is no God". The maximum permissible level is "I don't know God/i don't know if there is no god" but everybody is encouraged to say "God is great", "God's grace" etc. Originally Posted by Kalyasi
2. "He is intelligent/medhavi because he is an atheist" nu oru koottam suthitrukku, apparently and more importantly, that koottam would jaalra thattufy for such statements made by Bala, Kamal etc
3. It goes like:
"Ella pugazhum iraivanukke" -is a cliche
"There is no God" - this is also a cliche
Anban apparently must have questioned the motivation of the first utterance.
Hence it is fair to make points 1 and 2...
Something like this, not sure if i understood
-
From: joe on 28th January 2010 07:55 PM [Full View]
Athe! Originally Posted by Plum
-
From: Vivasaayi on 28th January 2010 07:58 PM [Full View]
apdi enna pudhusa aarpaatam pannitaru videola? Originally Posted by Roshan
Originally Posted by Appu s
Bala: naan pothuva ippalaam theatre la poi padam paakirathu illa, yenna mutha reel odittu irukkum pothey,oruthan Cell phone pesittto, illa sms-oo anuppittu iruppan,poi adichiduvomonnu bayathila than porathilla Originally Posted by Aalavanthan
reporter: Cell phone pesra level-kku than ippa tamizh padam irukku simple logic - idhukooda puriyala bala'ku. straight forwardaam
anyways, bala pEsuRatha pAthu yEnda award koduthOmnu NA committee varuthapada pOguthu. oru award'ke ivvaLavu aarpaattam. Probably it's going to be his last too. bala eppavume ipdithana
Bala NA vaangunadhe ungalukellam aarpaatama theriyudho?
prolly last?... lol ... !
regarding what bala has said abt people in theatres.... I watched Avatar at satyam cinemas(we can say it has the most cultured theatre audience) and a guy who sat near me was messaging with cell phone for long and the light from the cell phone was completely disturbing - avana angaye pottu midhikanumnu thonuchu.
-
From: P_R on 28th January 2010 08:11 PM [Full View]
இந்த பஞ்சாயத்து இன்னுமா ஓடுது !
Exactly. சும்மா நோண்டி நோண்டி கேட்டுட்டு இருந்தா ஓங்கி ஒண்ணு விட தான் செய்வாங்க. Originally Posted by Plum
கமல் கிட்ட கல்யாணம் என்கிற institution பத்தி கேப்பாங்க. என்னமோ அதை வச்சு சமூகவியல் கட்டுரை* எழுதப்போறாமாதிரி.
அப்புறம் அந்த ரெண்டு வரி quoteஐ வச்சு, ராமகோபாலன் கிட்ட ஒரு சலம்பலை வாங்கி (கமல் என்ற நடிகர் சனாதன தர்மத்தை...), அப்புறம் நாராயண ரெட்டி கிட்ட ஒரு 'கருத்தை' வாங்கி ('திருமணம் என்பது ஒரு ஆணும் பெண்ணும்..') ஒரு கவர்ஸ்டோரி போடுறது -கமல் திடுக் பேட்டி.
நல்லா வேணும்.
(* எழுதாத வரைக்கும் சமூகவியலுக்கு நல்லது)
-
From: Benny Lava on 28th January 2010 08:17 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by P_R
-
From: joe on 28th January 2010 08:20 PM [Full View]
PR
-
From: jaiganes on 28th January 2010 08:25 PM [Full View]
<ala kovai sarala in Karakattaakaaraan (appdi dhaan oru hindi ponnu TVla sollichu>
Enna inge sandai enna inge sandai
</ala KSIK>
naan inkoka saari heLikkaren
I AM GOD and
as a corollary
GOD IS GREAT.
Ellaaru vizundhu kumbidunga - ungalukku moksham(not the porasawaalkam one) one way ticket tharren.
Aththai vaanginu pongonnaa.
JA (jokes apart - jodha akbar illai)
My strictly theist friend was seriously joking to me that
பாலாவிற்கு கடவுள் நம்பிக்கை இல்லை - அதனால் தான் பிதாமகனுக்கு கிடைக்காத தேசிய விருது, ‘கடவுள்’ என்று அவர் அரை மனதுடன் அழைத்துப்பெயரிட்டவுடன் ‘நான் கடவுள்’ படத்திற்காக கிடைத்துள்ளது என்று....
I mentally clicked post reply to him and wrote something obscenely funny and canceled at the last moment.
How nice real world would have been if it was like hub, moderators hovering around like angels (to remove things from sabaikurippu) and people for and against - always forming a settu...
That apart - oru kaelvikku badhil sonna udaneve, dir bala's virodhis have found numerous opportunity to bash in the most irrational manner - I found the last few pages of diskusson very very phunny yaar. pazhaya hublendhu Rohit vandhirundhaarnaa inge irukkara ellarum andha level of budhdhist meta physics padichu hospital la poi self checkin aagi iruppaanga.
Sari viduvom, bala mosam saar so avaru eppadi badhil sollanumnu
edhir paakaraanganna...
<ala rajini and sendhil in padayappa>
வழிப்போக்கர் 1: ஏம்பா நல்லபடியா ஊர் வந்து சேந்திருக்கியே சாமிக்கு ஒரு 1 ரூபா எடுத்து வையி.
பாலா: இல்லாத சாமிக்கு எதுக்கு 1 ரூபா?
பாலா வின் அட்வைஸர் மேடி(கில்லி முத்துப்பாண்டி போல): ஏய் நீ ஏன் பகுத்தறிவைப்பத்தி பேசக்கூடாது. தப்பு தப்பு..
வழிப்போக்கர் 2: ஏம்பா நல்லபடியா ஊர் வந்து சேந்திருக்கியே சாமிக்கு ஒரு 1 ரூபா எடுத்து வையி.
பாலா: (நமக்கேன் வம்பு) நான் ஊர் வந்து சேந்துபுட்டேன். ஆனால் கடவுளப்பத்தி மட்டும் நான் பேச மாட்டேன்.
வழிப்போக்கர் 2: ஒன்ன யாரு இப்போ பேசச்சொன்னா? போவியா...
பாலா வின் அட்வைஸர் மேடி(கில்லி முத்துப்பாண்டி போல): ஆங் .. அது...
</ala rajini and sendhil in padayappa>
-
From: joe on 28th January 2010 08:43 PM [Full View]
Jai
-
From: HonestRaj on 28th January 2010 08:47 PM [Full View]
oh!!! idhu Raghu annachiya Originally Posted by PARAMASHIVAN
Mariyada koduthu pesina mariyadha kidaikum Originally Posted by MADDY
naa nijamaana maddy dhaan - nee nijamana raghu dhaane Originally Posted by PARAMASHIVAN
I think Thamarai would be better than 'Sen' thamarai
Nijamaana maddyitha ketarne rommba 'peel' panuvaru (vadivelu style)
vankkOm....
-
From: kid-glove on 28th January 2010 08:49 PM [Full View]
I miss his posts. He used to pawn the evangelists on his own.pazhaya hublendhu Rohit
-
From: equanimus on 28th January 2010 08:50 PM [Full View]
Yes. The two points are somewhat related, though, in that the former was about the general audience's reaction to the film (to be precise, how unsettling this film's ‘godlessness’ is in contrast to more hopeful constructions of the same) and the latter was about the filmmaker's worldview as reflected in the film (of course as I see it). Originally Posted by Plum
equa. this also another important point you made apart from what AravindMano quoted right? I think this is a different point to what AM quoted. Originally Posted by Plum
-
From: PARAMASHIVAN on 28th January 2010 09:20 PM [Full View]
Me to, I used to argue with him along with pradeep, pradeep often gets emotional about that some time. esp in the thread Originally Posted by kid-glove
I miss his posts. He used to pawn the evangelists on his own.pazhaya hublendhu Rohit
'Does GOD exist???'
-
From: PARAMASHIVAN on 28th January 2010 09:22 PM [Full View]
ada vidungappa antha manushana (bala va) summa noi noi noOndikittu (Goundar style)
-
From: Scale on 28th January 2010 09:45 PM [Full View]
Equa,
Would appreciate if you could re-read the whole context both Bala's reply and mine. Mine is just a forum post which you can simply ignore, chop, misinterpret, ingest to your favour .. What bala have done is a open/direct slanderous defamation of theism to a Q putforth by an interviewer that too after winning NA. Kamal will never do this. I have also blamed the interviewer. thirumba thirumba ketkarathaala enna venumnaalum pesalama just imagine what if he have said thise before pre release... padamum odirukaathu (ippa kooda vodala) NAm kedachirukkadhu.
Let him be a theist, atheist but why behave like a street $ in a press meet. I repeat why hurt belivers feelings!
idhukku mela I dont want to discuss any further for good reasons I back off :cheers: :shake hands:
-
From: equanimus on 28th January 2010 09:55 PM [Full View]
Scale,
I still am not able too see what's "slanderous" about Bala's remark, but I think this has already reached a moot point. Anyway, I hope there are no hard feelings.
-
From: P_R on 28th January 2010 10:12 PM [Full View]
-ரிலீசுக்கு முன்னாடியே சொல்லியிருந்தா உம்மாச்சி படத்தை அழிச்சுருப்பார் 'ன்றீங்களா ? Originally Posted by Scale
- btw படம் ஓடுறதுக்கும் NA-கும் என்ன சம்மந்தம் ? ஆடும் கூத்து-னு ஒரு படம் சிறந்த தமிழ் படம் விருது வாங்கிச்சு. சேரம்-நவ்யா நாயர். நானும் நான் ரிட்டயர் ஆகுறதுக்குள்ள ரிலீஸ் பண்ணுவாய்ங்களான்னு பாத்துகிட்டு இருக்கேன்.
Anywa, that Kamal has been perceived as relatively more sensitive and one who wouldn't hurt, is one startling revelation for me.
innaikku idhu podhum
-
From: Bala (Karthik) on 28th January 2010 10:29 PM [Full View]
Avarukke indha matter theriyadhunga! Originally Posted by P_R
He has been consistently scathing in his attacks. Hindus have mostly been the privileged lot at that
-
From: Bala (Karthik) on 28th January 2010 10:32 PM [Full View]
Scale, Originally Posted by Scale
Seriously it is you who should carefully go through what has been painstakingly been explained here. Ippadi adam pidicheenganna enna panna mudiyum?
-
From: venkkiram on 29th January 2010 12:12 AM [Full View]
நான் கடவுளின் முரண் என்னவென்றால், படத்தில் வரும் பாடல்கள்..
ஒன்று, ஆரம்பத்தில் காசி நகரை காட்டும்போது வரும் "மா கங்கா".
இரண்டாவது, பிச்சைக் காரர்களின் அல்லல்களை காட்டும்போது வரும் "பிச்சை பாதிரம்".
இரண்டுமே பக்தி ரசத்தை தருபவை. இவ்விரு பாடல்களில் பாலா இறைவன் இல்லை என்ற கருத்தை சொல்லவில்லை. இவ்விரு பாடல்களும் மக்களால்(என்னையும் சேர்த்து) பக்தி ரசத்திற்காகவே கேட்கப்படும்.
இறைவன் இல்லை என்று சொல்ல வரும் படத்தில் இருந்து இறைவனை துதிக்கும் இரு பாடல்கள் நிலைத்து நிற்கப் போகிறது.
-
From: MADDY on 29th January 2010 02:31 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by jaiganes
infact i want bala to talk more like this - its afterall fun to see all "ration guys" so charged up and worked out, making jokes, theories, breaking their heads to respond to slightest comment passed on bala........
i was talking to my frnd over this during Avatar's interval - he was like "dei, enna tamas panraar(n)a......nandha-la oru chichuveshan-la doctors-aal(science) kai vidapatta oru medical condition-a oru poosari(religion) seri pannuvaar theriyuma.....ippa vandhu yen kadavul illainnu solraan......bala solradhellam loose-la vidra machhi - avan(r) padathha mattum paaru"-nnu popcorn kadichhaan
anways, i dont remember that sequence in nanda
-
From: MADDY on 29th January 2010 02:44 AM [Full View]
r u reffering to my post on kamal? if it is yes, then why P_R - why are you twisting my words? Originally Posted by P_R
Anywa, that Kamal has been perceived as relatively more sensitive and one who wouldn't hurt, is one startling revelation for me.innaikku idhu podhum ......i just said, having known the man kamal (through lot of interviews, stage speeches, articles, poems that he writes), i found him more genuine in his attack on hinduism......there is a genuine sense of frustration and a child-like earnestness in him to teach us abt the ills of hinduism......i never said he was sensitive or he didnt hurt - he has hurt my faith a lot......but he is not a tea kadai phony "rational" - dei kadavul vandhu tea poduvaara - types guy as well......he is well read, avar kitta oru style irukku
(strange haan, 3 yrs back if someone had said i would be arguing "for" kamal, i would have laughed at him)
-
From: irir123 on 29th January 2010 06:12 AM [Full View]
I dont understand why ppl shd get offended when someone questions the existence of the 'flying teapot', sorry, god, (or the 'red-headed spaghetti monster') ??
If someone, say xyz does not accept/like a certain form of art, while someone else say abc likes it, does abc take offence to it ?? ex - i have a friend who just cannot understand/accept music, while i love it - so do i take offence to it ??
why when it comes to the god concept, everyone gets emotional ??
I recall from my college days, whenever i refused to join my friends on their visits to temples, they went around with this 'hurt/offended' look! later during my masters years, when i politely turned down an invitation to join my classmates on a trip to tirupathi (instead I went to chepauk to watch the australia-new zealand cricket match), they not only were offended, but immediately jumped to a conclusion about my morals! ditto with my friends amongst girls/women - 'dei, kovilukku pogaadha - indha prasadhamaavadhu vaangikko' - i turn down that rationalising its just some starch with little bit of glucose in it, and they get offended!!
what could be the freudian reasons for ppl getting offended, deeply hurt when it comes to god, religion ??
-
From: Scale on 29th January 2010 07:40 AM [Full View]
venkiram,
Thats the Q. What god has done to his film? Did he act, Did he put make up for the artist or Did he operate the camera?
2 songs irunthaalum title song Omsivoham podhum. Can someone please post the thooya tamil translation of this song since bala doesnt understand sanskrit we shall explain him what GOD has done to his film. Raaja music pottaar, lyricist eluthinar, vijay paadinaar naan caves la arthame theriyama sanskrit vedasla picture edhavadhu irukkaanu paathen udukkai satham mattum kettuchunnu mazhupunaarna interviewer illai naamale ingeye face slapping pannalam one afer the another repeatedly... Pleast post more...
PR,
Kamal is always a combination of Good & Bad be it his movies, writings or in any press meet. Moreover his passion is only film making. kadavul paathi mirugam paathi kaateri alla and also mirugam is not a maneater always. irai thedi .. He has never been so ugly <skip>...
-
From: MADDY on 29th January 2010 07:46 AM [Full View]
i get emotional for ARR, u for IR........why did bala, equa,P_R, Plum get offended when i called NK bala a phony-rational.......i dont think thats the problem here...... Originally Posted by irir123
i agree to equa when he says "what did bala say that you got offended" and to plum when he says "being a athiest should i get offended when ARR says ella pugazhum iraivanukke".......even i would say to scale and cinefan and other believers - is this guy serious enough to get offended by his remarks??
-
From: jaiganes on 29th January 2010 07:53 AM [Full View]
ayyo saamee - I am believer paa. I am the guy in the ration line (waiting for the free TV) - not the rational guy. I found your worked up responses to a very silly incident - very very funny. thats what prompted me to do the joke making(only effort was to type it in thamizh - but the visualization kinda fell into its place automatically..) - not what Bala told some stupid reporter. Originally Posted by MADDY
Originally Posted by jaiganes
infact i want bala to talk more like this - its afterall fun to see all "ration guys" so charged up and worked out, making jokes, theories, breaking their heads to respond to slightest comment passed on bala........
i was talking to my frnd over this during Avatar's interval - he was like "dei, enna tamas panraar(n)a......nandha-la oru chichuveshan-la doctors-aal(science) kai vidapatta oru medical condition-a oru poosari(religion) seri pannuvaar theriyuma.....ippa vandhu yen kadavul illainnu solraan......bala solradhellam loose-la vidra machhi - avan(r) padathha mattum paaru"-nnu popcorn kadichhaan
anways, i dont remember that sequence in nanda
unga prendu kuripidaradhu 'sethu'la varra saamiyaarai. not in nandhaa.
nirka...
avar solradhilirundhum, Naan kadavul padathil varum sila Aghori saamiyaar matterilum oru interesting visayam varudhu...
Bala saamiyaargaLai nambaraar aanaal Saamiyai alla. Equa will quote the poli saamiyaar in prison of pithamagan... (hard to genaralise, but there is a consistent trend of portraying Godmen)...
It is a direct opposite view of Kamal who says he is willing to give benefit of doubt to GOD not to GODmen. probably automatically manifested gold rings and lingams might do the trick.
-
From: MADDY on 29th January 2010 08:08 AM [Full View]
thanks for your "efforts" to explain this...... Originally Posted by jaiganes
yea, thats what i told him, i didnt remember any such sequence in nanda.......but the point was bala(director) might not be that consistent with his views - so why take him seriously...... Originally Posted by jaiganes
-
From: Kalyasi on 29th January 2010 08:20 AM [Full View]
innum mudiyalaya??
-
From: venkkiram on 29th January 2010 08:29 AM [Full View]
எப்படிங்க அவ்வளவு சீக்கிரத்துல முடிய விட்டுருவோமா? இறைவன் இல்லை என்ற நிலையில் ஒரு படத்தை மூணு வருஷம் எடுத்திருக்கிறார். நாங்க இங்க, இறைவன் இருக்கிறார் என வாதிட குறைஞ்சது ஒரு வருடமாவது எடுத்துப்போம்ல! Originally Posted by Kalyasi
-
From: AravindMano on 29th January 2010 08:38 AM [Full View]
போச்சு போங்க. நீங்க காலமெல்லாம் காத்திருக்க வேண்டியது தான். அந்த படத்த ஜீ தமிழ் சேனல்-ல எப்பவோ போட்டாங்க! Originally Posted by P_R
-
From: Plum on 29th January 2010 09:20 AM [Full View]
Maddy, in a way I understand your point more than that of others who got offended here. Probably because of the same reason you quoted for you understanding kamal's viewpoint better than Bala's. That is a good reference point. While I acknowledge that, I refuse to exercise the right of comparing your response to scale's or venkkiram's and placing them beneath you in my hiearchy. That's not fair. Btw, I didn't get offended at the backlash on Bala. Mine was a wonder and surprise that what is so offensive about it.
One more thing - by your own admission, your reaction to Bala is shaped by irritation at countless others in tn, who are given to phony rationalism. Now, again, that is a good peg to handle this discussion on. When we hear something, we react not just to what we hear but the history of our experience of that concept, thought and the people who have espoused that before. Is it possible that bala was reacting similarly? That is, he is equally irritated as you are(for anti god references) by constant references to god in the country and that question was just a trigger for him to rant? Quite possible right?
Reporters have an annoying way of thrusting their limited worldview on artists - who can claim to have a more sophisticated worldview and even if not, as the ones that are being sought out, the right to be obnoxious is a gift that I will not mind giving them. A reporter is doing his job - if he does his homework and pose questions to bala on his movie like "naan kadavul"-na enna solla varreenga? Or, the godman fixation that jai, av and equa have pointed out, or the perceptive points that equa made on the godlessness of NK; then, you'll see better responses. ChummA kEkkaNumEnnu kEkkaravanukku gounder pwnage(thanks k-g for introducing me to this phrase) response dhaan kedailkkum. And I support that fully. Especially as a gounder fan.
Not everyone can be buddha or ar rahman to be cool and calm in response to idiots.
-
From: MADDY on 29th January 2010 09:50 AM [Full View]
thats why i told - i dont know Bala(director), the person.....im just basing it on the comments he made in the interview......anyways, as my frnd suggested, i dont think it warrants such a serious discussion... Originally Posted by Plum
-
From: Plum on 29th January 2010 10:11 AM [Full View]
Moondaram Pirai: Originally Posted by MADDY
Kamal: நரி கலர் மாறிப் போச்சு பிறகு காடு தேடி போச்சு
Sridevi: நரி காடு மாறிப் போச்சு பிறகு கலர் தேடி போச்சு
Kamal:போச்சு போ
கதையையே மாத்திட்ட
-
From: Plum on 29th January 2010 10:14 AM [Full View]
Nothing that we discuss here in this forum possibly warrants serious discussion, Maddy. All flesh's as dust etc. To borrow from equa, oru karuthu parimAtram dhAnE.
When you say you dont know Bala, you probably can refer back to his movies - there are enough hints - and equa has helpfully highlighted for us as well - sprayed around that of all things, he isnt certainly a 'TN Rationalist' of the sort that Maddy despises.
-
From: Cinefan on 29th January 2010 10:14 AM [Full View]
Bala, Originally Posted by joe
Originally Posted by Bala (Karthik)
1. Nobody should say "There is no God". The maximum permissible level is "I don't know God/i don't know if there is no god" but everybody is encouraged to say "God is great", "God's grace" etc. Originally Posted by Kalyasi
2. "He is intelligent/medhavi because he is an atheist" nu oru koottam suthitrukku, apparently and more importantly, that koottam would jaalra thattufy for such statements made by Bala, Kamal etc
3. It goes like:
"Ella pugazhum iraivanukke" -is a cliche
"There is no God" - this is also a clicheAnban apparently must have questioned the motivation of the first utterance.
Hence it is fair to make points 1 and 2...
Something like this, not sure if i understood
1)God is great,God's grace-nnu ellorum sollanum-nnu naan kandippa ethir pakkalai/pakka matten.In fact even I do not attribute every thing to God
2)Are you saying no group exists which thinks/says non believers are intelligent and believers, Idiots????
3)There is No God and there is God are def cliches.
As for me,Maddy or Scale getting offended,maybe Plum or is it sombody else, is right when he/she says it is triggered by our previous experiences.
The media too might have played a role is asking the wrong question and triggering such a reaction.I agree that asking out of the blue if he attributes his success to God is stupid.Raaja/ARR madhiri avangale attribute panna vera vishyam.
Coming to kamal,he is def well read,rarely makes statements for effect and is def not phoney.But that he is scathing only on the one religion which gives max freedom and opportunity to think,debate and discuss while a silence is maintained on the others is a sore point.
Opportunity kedaicha the one thing I want to understand from him on, is this.
But I stand by my post that believing/not believing is one thing,saying there is God/there is no god is another.
Personally speaking,I believe that GOD is a feeling like anger,pain(oru comparison thaan).You cannot prove that GOd is there just like you cannot prove that you are in pain.Avanga avanga thaan unaranum.
Chumma okkandhu kadavul irrukkaru/ille nnu solradhu stupid.
If really interested,a lot of work in terms of reading,talking with the knowledgable,sadhanai is required.It's not something which is likely to happen overnight.
Oru degree vaanga 21 years venum-nna,kadavul-a ariya work panna vendama?(again oru comparison thaan)
Onnum seiyyama,kadavul ille yenna tsunami vandhadhu,earth quake yen varudhu,ennakku velai yen pochu,nallavan yen seekirama sethutan-nnu kekkaradhu is a very simplisitic approach to the subject.
-
From: Plum on 29th January 2010 10:18 AM [Full View]
Maddy/SCALE - just for the record, since somehow Maddy go the impression that I am an atheist, just want to emphasise that "ellA pugazhum iraivanukkE" is something that I agree lock, stock and barrel. Every small good thing that has happened in my life has been due to the grace of almight GOD *only*. I can have no other explanation for those. indha forum-la ipdi vandhu ezhudha vAippu kedaichadhE God's grace dhAn. Everytime I seee someone worse off, the thought that crosses my mind is "there, but for the grace of God, goes Plum"!
(idhu digression-la digression, nevertheless, mEdai kedaichA karuthu solla vEndiyadhu thamizhanin kadami allavA?)
-
From: Cinefan on 29th January 2010 10:32 AM [Full View]
Plum,
unga post sarcasm maadhiri irukke
-
From: Plum on 29th January 2010 10:38 AM [Full View]
naan sathyamA rowdy illappA! Originally Posted by Cinefan
Plum,
unga post sarcasm maadhiri irukke
-
From: Cinefan on 29th January 2010 11:02 AM [Full View]
ungala poyi rowdy-nnu solluvoma??????
lesa sarcasm madhiri therindadhu.
-
From: equanimus on 29th January 2010 11:15 AM [Full View]
வெங்கிராம், Originally Posted by venkkiram
இதில் முரண் ஏதும் இல்லை என்றே நினைக்கிறேன். கடவுள் என்ற குறியீடை எந்த வித “சந்தேகங்களும்” இல்லாமல் இப்படம் முழுவதுமாக “ஏற்கவே” செய்கிறது. அதாவது “கடவுள் இருக்கிறதா, இல்லையா?” என்பது குறித்து விவாதங்கள் ஏதும் படத்தில் இல்லை. உதாரணத்திற்கு ருத்ரன் கடவுள் இல்லை என்று நிறுவ எந்த நேரத்திலும் படம் முயல்வதில்லை என்பதைச் சொல்லலாம். கடவுளிடம் (‘இல்லாத’ கடவுளாகவே இருந்தாலும் கூட) முறையிடும் மனித (மன)நிலையை ‘இயல்பானது’ போலவே காட்டுகிறது. இதனால் தான் படத்தில் ‘அங்கிங்கெனாதபடி எங்கும்’ கடவுளின் பிம்பம் எவ்வித ‘மறுப்புகளும்’ இன்றி இடம் பெறுகிறது, நீங்கள் சொல்வது போல் ‘பக்தி ரசமும்’ இயல்பாக வெளிப்படுகிறது. படத்தின் ஒரு முக்கியமான காட்சியில் ராமப்பன் ஆசான் கடவுளை நேரடியாக நிந்திக்கிறார். சுருங்கக்கூறின், “ஏழாம் உலகில் வாழ்பவர்களுக்குக் கடவுள் ஏது?” என்ற கேள்வியே படத்தின் சாரமாக இருக்கிறது, யதார்த்தவாத அடிப்படையில் கடவுள் என்ற குறியீடை நிராகரிப்பதல்ல.
-
From: complicateur on 29th January 2010 11:37 AM [Full View]
equa: Originally Posted by equanimus
வெங்கிராம், Originally Posted by venkkiram
இதில் முரண் ஏதும் இல்லை என்றே நினைக்கிறேன். கடவுள் என்ற குறியீடை எந்த வித “சந்தேகங்களும்” இல்லாமல் இப்படம் முழுவதுமாக “ஏற்கவே” செய்கிறது. அதாவது “கடவுள் இருக்கிறதா, இல்லையா?” என்பது குறித்து விவாதங்கள் ஏதும் படத்தில் இல்லை. உதாரணத்திற்கு ருத்ரன் கடவுள் இல்லை என்று நிறுவ எந்த நேரத்திலும் படம் முயல்வதில்லை என்பதைச் சொல்லலாம். கடவுளிடம் (‘இல்லாத’ கடவுளாகவே இருந்தாலும் கூட) முறையிடும் மனித (மன)நிலையை ‘இயல்பானது’ போலவே காட்டுகிறது. இதனால் தான் படத்தில் ‘அங்கிங்கெனாதபடி எங்கும்’ கடவுளின் பிம்பம் எவ்வித ‘மறுப்புகளும்’ இன்றி இடம் பெறுகிறது, நீங்கள் சொல்வது போல் ‘பக்தி ரசமும்’ இயல்பாக வெளிப்படுகிறது. படத்தின் ஒரு முக்கியமான காட்சியில் ராமப்பன் ஆசான் கடவுளை நேரடியாக நிந்திக்கிறார். சுருங்கக்கூறின், “ஏழாம் உலகில் வாழ்பவர்களுக்குக் கடவுள் ஏது?” என்ற கேள்வியே படத்தின் சாரமாக இருக்கிறது, யதார்த்தவாத அடிப்படையில் கடவுள் என்ற குறியீடை நிராகரிப்பதல்ல. As requested earlier do post more in thamizh. BTW, Bhakathi Rasam-nA enna?
-
From: Sanjeevi on 29th January 2010 11:42 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by equanimus
வெங்கிராம், Originally Posted by venkkiram
இதில் முரண் ஏதும் இல்லை என்றே நினைக்கிறேன். கடவுள் என்ற குறியீடை எந்த வித “சந்தேகங்களும்” இல்லாமல் இப்படம் முழுவதுமாக “ஏற்கவே” செய்கிறது. அதாவது “கடவுள் இருக்கிறதா, இல்லையா?” என்பது குறித்து விவாதங்கள் ஏதும் படத்தில் இல்லை. உதாரணத்திற்கு ருத்ரன் கடவுள் இல்லை என்று நிறுவ எந்த நேரத்திலும் படம் முயல்வதில்லை என்பதைச் சொல்லலாம். கடவுளிடம் (‘இல்லாத’ கடவுளாகவே இருந்தாலும் கூட) முறையிடும் மனித (மன)நிலையை ‘இயல்பானது’ போலவே காட்டுகிறது. இதனால் தான் படத்தில் ‘அங்கிங்கெனாதபடி எங்கும்’ கடவுளின் பிம்பம் எவ்வித ‘மறுப்புகளும்’ இன்றி இடம் பெறுகிறது, நீங்கள் சொல்வது போல் ‘பக்தி ரசமும்’ இயல்பாக வெளிப்படுகிறது. படத்தின் ஒரு முக்கியமான காட்சியில் ராமப்பன் ஆசான் கடவுளை நேரடியாக நிந்திக்கிறார். சுருங்கக்கூறின், “ஏழாம் உலகில் வாழ்பவர்களுக்குக் கடவுள் ஏது?” என்ற கேள்வியே படத்தின் சாரமாக இருக்கிறது, யதார்த்தவாத அடிப்படையில் கடவுள் என்ற குறியீடை நிராகரிப்பதல்ல.
Venkiram, Why you people comparing Bala's speech out of the film and the film's content? "Mottai thalaikkum Muzhankalukkum muduchu". Bala, oops.. Nan Kadavul film didn't tell "there is no god" or even argue with the presence of god. Bala simply narrated scenes beautifully without any forced decision unlike some "Prachara Beerangi" movies like Cheran's etc. Bala is a true artist who simple tell the story not direct campaign.
-
From: equanimus on 29th January 2010 01:21 PM [Full View]
Compli / Sanjeevi,
நன்றி! பக்தி ரசம் 'னா... பக்தி ரசம். (ம்ம்... பக்தி வெளிப்பாட்டின் அழகியல் 'னு வெச்சிக்கலாமே.)
Maddy, Originally Posted by MADDY
Just for the record, I was not offended and I don't think any of my posts (or those of PR or Bala for that matter) suggest that. In fact, the self-absorbed person that I am, I was more interested in understanding/pointing out how this film and the audience's reaction to it is different from a signature-Kamal film. Most of my posts here were about that. Cheers.
-
From: P_R on 29th January 2010 01:26 PM [Full View]
யாராவது எதையாவது சரியா புரிஞ்சிக்கலைன்ன "அது அப்பிடி இல்லை..."-னு சொல்றதில்லையா. இதையெல்லாம் 'taking offense' னு எடுத்தக்கலாமா. இப்பிடி நீங்க எடுத்துக்கிட்டதுக்குக் கூட இப்பொ offend ஆகலை.
அப்பிடியெல்லாம் ஆனா for the past tonty seven years, offend ஆயிட்டே இருக்க வேண்டியது தான்.
-
From: Plum on 29th January 2010 01:28 PM [Full View]
adhAnE. equa en name vuttuputtAr.(avarukku eppOvu, sandhEga pArvai dhAn Originally Posted by P_R
), For the record, me also no offended!
-
From: P_R on 29th January 2010 01:31 PM [Full View]
That too with me Originally Posted by MADDY
(strange haan, 3 yrs back if someone had said i would be arguing "for" kamal, i would have laughed at him)
-
From: equanimus on 29th January 2010 01:32 PM [Full View]
அட, நீங்க தான் தனியா ஒரு தன்னிலை விளக்கம் கொடுத்துட்டீங்களே! அதான் விட்டுட்டேன். (முதல்ல போடலாம்னு யோசிச்சேன். "பெரியோர்களுக்கும், தாய்மார்களுக்கும், குழந்தைகளுக்கும்..." 'னு இழுக்க வேணாமேன்னு விட்டுட்டேன்.)
-
From: Plum on 29th January 2010 01:34 PM [Full View]
theriyum. kaalai vaara chance kedaichA vudalAmA? apram enga kulapperumai ennAgaradhu? Originally Posted by equanimus
-
From: SoftSword on 29th January 2010 01:55 PM [Full View]
murugesha... pei irukkuradha sila ariguriya vechu kandupidichidalaam.....
-
From: MADDY on 29th January 2010 03:04 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by P_R
That too with me Originally Posted by MADDY
(strange haan, 3 yrs back if someone had said i would be arguing "for" kamal, i would have laughed at him) remember the PM u sent me once quoting various scenes from kamal's movies which display his religious philosophy and taking pains to explain me (which led me to thinking that u were a retired case tortured by daughter-in-law and writing in HUB to get some relief )
ok, nobody took offense .......giving response and taking offense shouldnt be confused was my point actually......
Plum, i was just quoting ur POV with a example - i didnt imply u were athiest ......
-
From: Plum on 29th January 2010 04:04 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by MADDY
-
From: Plum on 29th January 2010 04:06 PM [Full View]
Moondram Pirai again: Originally Posted by MADDY
Sridevi(in a vulnerable and awwww voice): appO sari.
-
From: Aalavanthan on 29th January 2010 04:07 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Plum
Originally Posted by MADDY
oh appa thani group adhukunu irukA
-
From: Plum on 29th January 2010 04:09 PM [Full View]
equa, Originally Posted by complicateur
equa: Originally Posted by equanimus
வெங்கிராம், Originally Posted by venkkiram
இதில் முரண் ஏதும் இல்லை என்றே நினைக்கிறேன். கடவுள் என்ற குறியீடை எந்த வித “சந்தேகங்களும்” இல்லாமல் இப்படம் முழுவதுமாக “ஏற்கவே” செய்கிறது. அதாவது “கடவுள் இருக்கிறதா, இல்லையா?” என்பது குறித்து விவாதங்கள் ஏதும் படத்தில் இல்லை. உதாரணத்திற்கு ருத்ரன் கடவுள் இல்லை என்று நிறுவ எந்த நேரத்திலும் படம் முயல்வதில்லை என்பதைச் சொல்லலாம். கடவுளிடம் (‘இல்லாத’ கடவுளாகவே இருந்தாலும் கூட) முறையிடும் மனித (மன)நிலையை ‘இயல்பானது’ போலவே காட்டுகிறது. இதனால் தான் படத்தில் ‘அங்கிங்கெனாதபடி எங்கும்’ கடவுளின் பிம்பம் எவ்வித ‘மறுப்புகளும்’ இன்றி இடம் பெறுகிறது, நீங்கள் சொல்வது போல் ‘பக்தி ரசமும்’ இயல்பாக வெளிப்படுகிறது. படத்தின் ஒரு முக்கியமான காட்சியில் ராமப்பன் ஆசான் கடவுளை நேரடியாக நிந்திக்கிறார். சுருங்கக்கூறின், “ஏழாம் உலகில் வாழ்பவர்களுக்குக் கடவுள் ஏது?” என்ற கேள்வியே படத்தின் சாரமாக இருக்கிறது, யதார்த்தவாத அடிப்படையில் கடவுள் என்ற குறியீடை நிராகரிப்பதல்ல. As requested earlier do post more in thamizh. BTW, Bhakathi Rasam-nA enna?. Superb reading, writing, arithmetic etc.
-
From: HonestRaj on 29th January 2010 04:21 PM [Full View]
kadavul illainu solravanga.. ellaa kadavulum illainu solla mattanga.. adhula selective'athan kurai solvanga Originally Posted by Plum
-
From: MADDY on 29th January 2010 04:25 PM [Full View]
indha arguement onnu dhaan baakki Originally Posted by HonestRaj
......
-
From: HonestRaj on 29th January 2010 04:27 PM [Full View]
idhu argumentkkaga sollalai.. [idhukkuthan nan indha threadukkellam varradhillai] Originally Posted by MADDY
indha arguement onnu dhaan baakki Originally Posted by HonestRaj
......
namma naatu thalaivargal panra velai idhu... avangalai pathu maththavanga kedaranga
-
From: SoftSword on 29th January 2010 04:29 PM [Full View]
why not a special thread for this most wanted topic???
-
From: MADDY on 29th January 2010 04:31 PM [Full View]
ofcourse, u r 100% correct.....Atheism in TN is not really atheism - its a mixture of conveniences.........the reason why we(u and me) dread atheists and atheism is very deep rooted.....adha eloquent-a solla time illa (capacutty illa)...... Originally Posted by HonestRaj
-
From: kid-glove on 29th January 2010 04:35 PM [Full View]
Atheism in TN is not really atheism..its a mixture of conveniences
Same could be said of Hitler, Stalin, Pol pot, etc who have been claimed to have killed millions because of their atheistic inclinations. I suppose we should blame their 'mustaches' instead.
-
From: MADDY on 29th January 2010 04:47 PM [Full View]
KG, if u have problems with everything i post, why do u bother reading it and quoting it?
-
From: kid-glove on 29th January 2010 04:49 PM [Full View]
I'm in agreement with your statement.
It wasn't sarcastic.
Care for:
http://www.bostonherald.com/blogs/sp..._handshake.jpg
-
From: MADDY on 29th January 2010 04:51 PM [Full View]
chichuveshan-kku ethha madhiri ready-a foto vechhirukaar paa Originally Posted by kid-glove
-
From: kid-glove on 29th January 2010 04:56 PM [Full View]
I'm no lyrical.
I'm no musical.
I'm no literal.
I'm:
http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/...ual_effect.jpg
Visual.
-
From: joe on 29th January 2010 04:59 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by kid-glove
Atheism in TN is not really atheism..its a mixture of conveniences
Same could be said of Hitler, Stalin, Pol pot, etc who have been claimed to have killed millions because of their atheistic inclinations. I suppose we should blame their 'mustaches' instead. But Pol pot-kku mustache kidayathu.
-
From: kid-glove on 29th January 2010 05:01 PM [Full View]
'etc'-kkum kedaiyadhu. Originally Posted by joe
Originally Posted by kid-glove
Atheism in TN is not really atheism..its a mixture of conveniences
Same could be said of Hitler, Stalin, Pol pot, etc who have been claimed to have killed millions because of their atheistic inclinations. I suppose we should blame their 'mustaches' instead. But Pol pot-kku mustache kidayathu.
-
From: MADDY on 29th January 2010 05:06 PM [Full View]
brilliant...... Originally Posted by kid-glove
//have u tried watching stargate sequence in 2001 after a drink?? ......ultimate trip ......enakke kubrick-aa nnu nenaikkapadadhu //
-
From: kid-glove on 29th January 2010 05:10 PM [Full View]
Not yet. That would be interesting.
Isn't it ironic that after fuddling rounds of whiskey, one can't appreciate anything more than the state of 'meta-ness'. Except perhaps trance meesik and side-dish !
-
From: kid-glove on 29th January 2010 05:19 PM [Full View]
Lot of you visualize P_R as a man, his posts, when read by me, is of a voice that sounds both enticing and menacing as HAL in 2001. Originally Posted by Aalavanthan
Originally Posted by Plum
Originally Posted by MADDY
oh appa thani group adhukunu irukA
-
From: MADDY on 29th January 2010 05:20 PM [Full View]
//saadharana meesic-e trance madhiri dhaan kaadhula vizhum Originally Posted by kid-glove
//
-
From: kid-glove on 29th January 2010 05:21 PM [Full View]
Yeah. Originally Posted by MADDY
//saadharana meesic-e trance madhiri dhaan kaadhula vizhum Originally Posted by kid-glove
//
-
From: MADDY on 29th January 2010 05:27 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by kid-glove
.....
-
From: SoftSword on 29th January 2010 05:27 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by kid-glove
Yeah. Originally Posted by MADDY
//saadharana meesic-e trance madhiri dhaan kaadhula vizhum Originally Posted by kid-glove
//
enakku oru small ootthunga...
-
From: Plum on 29th January 2010 05:29 PM [Full View]
Ah! Discussion engEyO poyiruchu!
-
From: SoftSword on 29th January 2010 05:33 PM [Full View]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uA4iP...eature=related Originally Posted by MADDY
Originally Posted by kid-glove
.....
-
From: Plum on 29th January 2010 05:36 PM [Full View]
<Zoom up from boots...close up of hat, profile and P_R turns stylishly> Originally Posted by kid-glove
Lot of you visualize P_R as a man, his posts, when read by me, is of a voice that sounds both enticing and menacing as HAL in 2001. Originally Posted by Aalavanthan
Originally Posted by Plum
Originally Posted by MADDY
oh appa thani group adhukunu irukA
kid_glove(pErarasu): avar thani AL illai...
P_R: vishk, vishk, finger tricks
kid_glove: avar pinnAla oru kUttamE irukku
P_R: vish vishk again. <looks menacingly>
-
From: rangan_08 on 29th January 2010 06:01 PM [Full View]
idho, kaapatha vandhutten Originally Posted by Plum
Avan Ivan will surely be a welcome change for Bala & his fans as well. After all, trying different genres will only prove the director’s mettle yet again. At the same time, I feel that he will not let down his uniqueness to be over-shadowed by too much of commercial elements. Let’s wait and see how far he is compromising himself.
I don’t know how many of you have read this. After Nanda, there was a news in a magazine saying that Bala’s next venture is a rural thriller. That would really have been an altogether different stuff from the director.
-
From: raghavendran on 29th January 2010 06:12 PM [Full View]
true...bala has also promised balumahendra and IR that he wont make dark films here after.... Originally Posted by rangan_08
idho, kaapatha vandhutten Originally Posted by Plum
Avan Ivan will surely be a welcome change for Bala & his fans as well. After all, trying different genres will only prove the director’s mettle yet again. At the same time, I feel that he will not let down his uniqueness to be over-shadowed by too much of commercial elements. Let’s wait and see how far he is compromising himself.
I don’t know how many of you have read this. After Nanda, there was a news in a magazine saying that Bala’s next venture is a rural thriller. That would really have been an altogether different stuff from the director.
-
From: P_R on 29th January 2010 06:16 PM [Full View]
indha segment-ai mattum padichAlE prachanai enna-nu purinjirum Originally Posted by kid-glove
:aanandha kaNNeer: Originally Posted by kid-glove
Crazy Mohan (in one TV series): meesai ellAm vaLarththu pAththuttEn yA. oru paya bayappada maattEngurAn
-
From: rangan_08 on 29th January 2010 06:19 PM [Full View]
naan kooda oru pigara karpana panni vechirukken (after hearing the voice ) ! Originally Posted by P_R
-
From: Aalavanthan on 29th January 2010 06:21 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by rangan_08
naan kooda oru pigara karpana panni vechirukken (after hearing the voice ) ! Originally Posted by P_R
nalla kaapathareenga aiyaa Originally Posted by rangan_08 just before
just pointing out the irony Rangan
-
From: raghavendran on 29th January 2010 06:25 PM [Full View]
chellangala edha pathi pesureenga....related pesungappa Originally Posted by Aalavanthan
Originally Posted by rangan_08
naan kooda oru pigara karpana panni vechirukken (after hearing the voice ) ! Originally Posted by P_R
nalla kaapathareenga aiyaa Originally Posted by rangan_08 just before
just pointing out the irony Rangan
-
From: rangan_08 on 29th January 2010 06:25 PM [Full View]
pinna, usura vida vaakudhan perusu - unless you don't have a pistol pointed to your forehead. Originally Posted by Aalavanthan
nalla kaapathareenga aiyaa
just pointing out the irony Rangan
-
From: kid-glove on 29th January 2010 06:26 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by P_R
indha segment-ai mattum padichAlE prachanai enna-nu purinjirum Originally Posted by kid-glove
-
From: kid-glove on 29th January 2010 06:32 PM [Full View]
Oru vazhiya Bala-va thittadha madhiri senjAchu. Please save the hassle of sending thank-you PMs.
-
From: Plum on 29th January 2010 06:37 PM [Full View]
Yeah, Poonamallee under control again, although through un-poonamallee means Originally Posted by kid-glove
Oru vazhiya Bala-va thittadha madhiri senjAchu. Please save the hassle of sending thank-you PMs.
-
From: MADDY on 29th January 2010 06:41 PM [Full View]
poonnamalle(this thread) survives only bcos city dwellers visit there and create business oppurtunities
-
From: kid-glove on 29th January 2010 08:23 PM [Full View]
<digr>
Has Alicia Silverstone retired, Maddy? Not seen her for a while. Btw, that flick in your avatar, is one of my greatest guilty pleasures, along with "10 Things I Hate About You". Chick-flick, teen-com or whatever, I still admit to have liked 'em.
</digr>
-
From: MADDY on 29th January 2010 09:05 PM [Full View]
//clueless is indeed a iconic feel-good movie - its a pioneer in that genre....everything in that movie is abt her - thats really cute Originally Posted by kid-glove
<digr>
Has Alicia Silverstone retired, Maddy? Not seen her for a while. Btw, that flick in your avatar, is one of my greatest guilty pleasures, along with "10 Things I Hate About You". Chick-flick, teen-com or whatever, I still admit to have liked 'em.
</digr>...no harm in having chocolates once in a while, esp this was one of the best made chocolates ....
she is into TV serials i heard.......saw her after a gap in TV shows - that clueless charm was missing //
-
From: complicateur on 29th January 2010 09:20 PM [Full View]
Apologies for prolonging the digression. After her TV career went down in flames she went macrobiotic with a vengeance (her chef was my landlady). Recently she was 'seen' promoting PETA. Apparently 'saance kidaikkaaththaal nadigai padu glamourAga nadikkavum thayaar' isn't just a local cinema phenomenon. Originally Posted by MADDY
//clueless is indeed a iconic feel-good movie - its a pioneer in that genre....everything in that movie is abt her - thats really cute Originally Posted by kid-glove
<digr>
Has Alicia Silverstone retired, Maddy? Not seen her for a while. Btw, that flick in your avatar, is one of my greatest guilty pleasures, along with "10 Things I Hate About You". Chick-flick, teen-com or whatever, I still admit to have liked 'em.
</digr>...no harm in having chocolates once in a while, esp this was one of the best made chocolates ....
she is into TV serials i heard.......saw her after a gap in TV shows - that clueless charm was missing //
-
From: MADDY on 29th January 2010 09:27 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by complicateur
-
From: raghavendran on 29th January 2010 10:53 PM [Full View]
CAMERAVULLA MANJA SCREENA POTTU MOODUNGA PAA!!!!!!!
-
From: kid-glove on 30th January 2010 02:48 AM [Full View]
Thanks for all the info, you lads.
-
From: venkkiram on 30th January 2010 08:59 AM [Full View]
கடவுளைக் கண்டேன் என்ற சாருவின் சமீபத்திய கட்டுரையில் சில வரிகள்..
------------------------------------------------------------------------
சென்ற வாரம் நித்யாவை பாண்டிச்சேரியில் சந்தித்து உரையாடிக் கொண்டிருந்த போது அடியேனின் நரகத்திலிருந்து ஒரு குரல் மற்றும் தாந்தேயின் சிறுத்தை இரண்டு நூல்களையும் படித்து விட்டதாகக் கூறினார். அப்போது நான் கடவுள் பற்றிய பேச்சு வந்தது. படத்தில் மூன்று குறைகள் இருந்தன; அதைத் தவிர்த்து படம் தனக்குப் பிடித்திருந்தது என்று சொன்னார் நித்யா. அகோரிகள் யாரும் மரணத்தைத் தீர்வாகத் தர மாட்டார்கள். எவ்வளவோ சக்தி வாய்ந்த அகோரிக்கு அந்த வில்லனின் மனதை மாற்றி அவனை நல்லவனாக்குவதா பெரிய கஷ்டம்? இது முதல் குறை. இரண்டாவது, அகோரிகள் யாரும் இப்போது பிணத்தைத் தின்பதில்லை. அதெல்லாம் நூறு ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முன்பு இருந்த நிலை. நித்யாவும் அகோரி பாரம்பரியத்தைச் சேர்ந்தவரே. மூன்றாவது, அகோரிகள் யாரும் தங்களுடைய பூர்வாசிரமத்தின் சொந்தங்களை அப்படி வெறுப்புடனும், அசூயையுடனும் நடத்த மாட்டார்கள்.
-
From: jaiganes on 7th February 2010 09:27 PM [Full View]
Was reading Kahlil Gibran's collected works,
one small story he has written - a heart wrenching one 'Two infants'.
That story is the inspiration for a story in Jeyakanthan's short story collection. The ending of that story is exactly what the central theme of 'Naan Kadavul' is all about. A very difficult theme to digest even as a poetic short story, but having visualized it as a full length feature film and presented it in the way it has been is 'back breaking stuff'..
-
From: kid-glove on 3rd November 2010 05:02 PM [Full View]
When Rajini and Mani Ratnam were to present Bala with a shield in recognition of his NA. He politely requested Balu Mahendra to do the honors in stead.
-
From: MADDY on 3rd November 2010 05:05 PM [Full View]
must be a rumour Originally Posted by kid-glove
-
From: kid-glove on 3rd November 2010 05:06 PM [Full View]
That was my inclusion to not invite Bala haters to spew vitriol. Originally Posted by MADDY
must be a rumour Originally Posted by kid-glove
-
From: app_engine on 3rd November 2010 05:10 PM [Full View]
As per news reports this is what Bala said "தப்பா எடுத்துக்கக்கூடாது, என் குருநாதர் பாலு மகேந்திரா கையால இதை வாங்க விருப்பப்படுகிறேன்".
Polite indeed! It cannot be a rumor as the director's meet was publicised a lot and is also expected to play on Sun TV...
-
From: app_engine on 5th November 2010 09:15 PM [Full View]
-
From: app_engine on 5th November 2010 09:28 PM [Full View]
Unfortunate me
I went to that blog and read the story
மனதில் பயங்கர வலி. Will take a long time to recover.
-
From: jaiganes on 5th November 2010 09:55 PM [Full View]
http://www.sramakrishnan.com/?p=639 Originally Posted by app_engine
Unfortunate me
I went to that blog and read the story
மனதில் பயங்கர வலி. Will take a long time to recover.
this story synopsis itself is haunting... try reading this one - if u have access..
-
From: Vivasaayi on 5th November 2010 10:00 PM [Full View]
after reading the story thought abt people who move closely with urimai,with my family though they are not my relatives or whatever.. and taking them for granted with urimai! Originally Posted by app_engine
Unfortunate me
I went to that blog and read the story
மனதில் பயங்கர வலி. Will take a long time to recover.
hmm....awesome people they are..
-
From: Nerd on 6th November 2010 12:40 AM [Full View]
அருமையான நடை, பாத்திர படைப்பு Originally Posted by app_engine
-
From: rajkumarc on 6th November 2010 10:28 AM [Full View]
Thanks for the blog link app. Really touching story, leaves me with a heavy heart.
-
From: app_engine on 8th November 2010 07:38 PM [Full View]