Ameer's Paruthiveeran
Thread started by leosimha on 23rd February 2007 05:24 PM
How many of you saw Surya's brother Karthi starrer Ameer's Paruthiveeran?
Responses:
-
From: karthik_sa2 on 23rd February 2007 05:32 PM [Full View]
yes very eager to know.did anyone see the movie??
-
From: Warden on 23rd February 2007 08:43 PM [Full View]
-
From: kb on 23rd February 2007 08:50 PM [Full View]
padam nalla irruka illaiyaba
-
From: Selvan on 23rd February 2007 09:25 PM [Full View]
It was a terrific movie. I was not impressed with his earlier works of Ameer. Mounam pEsiyathe and Raam were decent movies, but not spectacular. But this one blew me off. Trust me, this is the best movie of the year, may not be best at the end of the year. Karthick has done a better job than what Surya would have done. He lived the character. What an actress Priya mani is?
BGM was also good.
-
From: Selvan on 23rd February 2007 09:28 PM [Full View]
Movie mozhi carries good reports, but haven't seen it
-
From: Aandavan on 23rd February 2007 10:21 PM [Full View]
Paruthiveeran
KArthi
Priya mani 
Saravanan
yuvan
Technically brilliant
Direction
Story
Climax
-
From: leosimha on 24th February 2007 08:04 AM [Full View]
Aandavaa...so is Paruthiveeran watchable...I am hearing many reviews that Paruthiveeran is very good....can I go with those reviews...
-
From: Aandavan on 24th February 2007 08:14 AM [Full View]
i had posted what i thought. its upto to u to decide
Originally Posted by leosimha
-
From: leosimha on 24th February 2007 08:35 AM [Full View]
yes aandavaa...I saw it...but by your opinion...the story and climax is Originally Posted by Aandavan
i had posted what i thought. its upto to u to decide Originally Posted by leosimha
....thats what made me ask again...
-
From: Aandavan on 24th February 2007 08:59 AM [Full View]
naan enna pannurathu. I even met Ameer yesterday at sathyam and told this. He said, its based on a real story Originally Posted by leosimha
yes aandavaa...I saw it...but by your opinion...the story and climax is Originally Posted by Aandavan
i had posted what i thought. its upto to u to decide Originally Posted by leosimha
....thats what made me ask again...
-
From: Surya on 24th February 2007 11:33 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Aandavan
naan enna pannurathu. I even met Ameer yesterday at sathyam and told this. He said, its based on a real story Originally Posted by leosimha
yes aandavaa...I saw it...but by your opinion...the story and climax is Originally Posted by Aandavan
i had posted what i thought. its upto to u to decide Originally Posted by leosimha
....thats what made me ask again...
That's Soo Cool!
-
From: karthik_sa2 on 25th February 2007 12:00 AM [Full View]
naan enna pannurathu. I even met Ameer yesterday at sathyam and told this. He said, its based on a real story did u really meet him and asked this?? didn he feel embarassed???[/code]
-
From: Aandavan on 25th February 2007 07:47 AM [Full View]
hey, satyam theatre-la FDFS appo directors actors irukkurathu romba romba normal.. Even gautham, surya, jothika were there. :P Originally Posted by karthik_sa2
naan enna pannurathu. I even met Ameer yesterday at sathyam and told this. He said, its based on a real story did u really meet him and asked this?? didn he feel embarassed???[/code]
-
From: karthik_sa2 on 25th February 2007 01:34 PM [Full View]
hey, satyam theatre-la FDFS appo directors actors irukkurathu romba romba normal.. Even gautham, surya, jothika were there. did u speak with surya or jo??
-
From: Aandavan on 25th February 2007 05:48 PM [Full View]
no no.. just 1 min with ameer.. :P Originally Posted by karthik_sa2
hey, satyam theatre-la FDFS appo directors actors irukkurathu romba romba normal.. Even gautham, surya, jothika were there. did u speak with surya or jo??
-
From: MrJudge on 25th February 2007 10:10 PM [Full View]
I think some trimming should be done to the climax, it was so disturbing. But on the whole, Ameer has raised his bar once again and the movie is so cool. No wonder they didn't care to release it along biggies, this movie is a sure-hit anyway. Summa solli adicha gilli mathiri irukku padam
-
From: Sanjeevi on 26th February 2007 12:06 PM [Full View]
http://sify.com/movies/tamil/fullstory.php?id=14397206
Paruthiveeran- Super opening
By Moviebuzz | Monday, 26 February , 2007, 11:45
Studio Greens Paruthiveeran, the debut film of Karthi directed by Ameer has taken a fantastic opening all over Tamilnadu. The audience especially in Madurai, NSC, Tiruchi and rural areas are treating it like a Thiruvizha(festival).
In Chennai city, Coimbatore considered as A+ area the film is neck-to-neck with Mozhi, which too has taken a good opening in urban areas. What has happened is that Paruthiveeran and Mozhi to a certain extent has eaten into Pachaikili Muthusaram second weekend collections. Paruthiveeran has collected a whopping Rs 3.69 Crore net from 92 prints in Tamilnadu, in its opening three days. The word-of-mouth on the film is very good, mainly in rural areas, and the viewers seems to have fallen in love with Karthi and Priya Mani.
Meanwhile the violent rape scene in the climax of the film has been trimmed voluntarily by the producers themselves. Says Gjanavel Raja of Studio Green, the producer of the film:" Paruthiveeran has taken a Ghajani like opening and has the potential to be a super hit. We have considerably trimmed the rape scene in the climax, as per initial request from the viewers and theatres screening the film. In the second week we will be increasing the number of prints, on the demand of our distributors."
And the review by sify
http://sify.com/movies/tamil/review....tid=5&cid=2429
--
Sorry NOV
-
From: karthik_sa2 on 26th February 2007 04:20 PM [Full View]
http://sify.com/movies/tamil/fullstory.php?id=14397206
Paruthiveeran- Super opening
By Moviebuzz | Monday, 26 February , 2007, 11:45
Studio Greens Paruthiveeran, the debut film of Karthi directed by Ameer has taken a fantastic opening all over Tamilnadu. The audience especially in Madurai, NSC, Tiruchi and rural areas are treating it like a Thiruvizha(festival).
In Chennai city, Coimbatore considered as A+ area the film is neck-to-neck with Mozhi, which too has taken a good opening in urban areas. What has happened is that Paruthiveeran and Mozhi to a certain extent has eaten into Pachaikili Muthusaram second weekend collections. Paruthiveeran has collected a whopping Rs 3.69 Crore net from 92 prints in Tamilnadu, in its opening three days. The word-of-mouth on the film is very good, mainly in rural areas, and the viewers seems to have fallen in love with Karthi and Priya Mani.
Meanwhile the violent rape scene in the climax of the film has been trimmed voluntarily by the producers themselves. Says Gjanavel Raja of Studio Green, the producer of the film:" Paruthiveeran has taken a Ghajani like opening and has the potential to be a super hit. We have considerably trimmed the rape scene in the climax, as per initial request from the viewers and theatres screening the film. In the second week we will be increasing the number of prints, on the demand of our distributors."
And the review by sify
http://sify.com/movies/tamil/review....tid=5&cid=2429
cant wait anymore!!booked tickets for tom
-
From: Aandavan on 26th February 2007 04:27 PM [Full View]
thalaivali vaangurathukku wait panna mudiyalayaam
-
From: rajasaranam on 26th February 2007 04:54 PM [Full View]
Surya and jothika were there in the evening show on 1st day for which i went and there was no ameer in that show :P Originally Posted by Aandavan
hey, satyam theatre-la FDFS appo directors actors irukkurathu romba romba normal.. Even gautham, surya, jothika were there. :P Originally Posted by karthik_sa2
naan enna pannurathu. I even met Ameer yesterday at sathyam and told this. He said, its based on a real story did u really meet him and asked this?? didn he feel embarassed???[/code]
-
From: MrJudge on 26th February 2007 04:56 PM [Full View]
Happy to know that you are going tomorrow. After some trimming in the climax, it will definitely overtake other movies at the BO and in south TN this movie is going to be one of the big hits in recent times. Originally Posted by karthik_sa2
cant wait anymore!!booked tickets for tom
-
From: MrJudge on 26th February 2007 05:00 PM [Full View]
rs, Originally Posted by rajasaranam
What's your opinion about the movie?
-
From: ajaybaskar on 26th February 2007 05:01 PM [Full View]
Gr8 movie..Disturbing climax...
-
From: karthik_sa2 on 26th February 2007 05:29 PM [Full View]
does this mean andavan is lyingSurya and jothika were there in the evening show on 1st day for which i went and there was no ameer in that show
-
From: rajasaranam on 26th February 2007 05:39 PM [Full View]
Judge,
I saw the movie twice and wanting to see it more in this weekend. This is one of the best movies in last ten years maybe. The first 2.5 hrs movie was pure fun and enjoyable while the climax was disturbing and the impact that it created made everyone empty and hollow, and i was not able to speak for few minutes after the movie ended. It creates the same emotion of emptiness in us like the movies moondram pirai, sethu, pithamgan etc., It is too morbid----more than sethu or pithamagan.
But its Ameer's climax anyway and i appreciate him for his daring approach. Without those scenes depicted as realistically as he had shown he would have never created the impact he wanted to create in us.
The movie is about love,valor and sacrifice of the Thamizh people and he had portrayed it in its fullest depth.
Priyamani and karthi proved way too ahead of others in the industry. Sure they should get their awards [though i dont care about them much] this year. Yuvan has done his best though i kept thinking what Raaja would have done to this great movie. 'May be he would have overtaken Ameer'
Is this the reason they are safely going behind other composers that their work will be overshadowed by Raaja
Ovvoru kaatchiyaaga rasithu poaarthen 2am murai. Innum niraiya thadavai paarka vendiya padam ithu. Maduraikku therkke thangal vaergalai vaithu irukkum ella manitharkkum intha padam miga arputhamaana anubavam. itharkku munn [not even BR or kamal] ithu pol antha makkalin vaazhkayai nitharsanamaaga urithu kaatiyathillai. Padathil varum pala kathapaathirangalin nadai udai bahavanai ellam naan kan munn paarthu pazhagiya pala manitharagalai ninavu paduthiyathu.....Ithu cinema!!!
I would love to thank AMEER for a wonderful movie experience
-
From: rajasaranam on 26th February 2007 05:45 PM [Full View]
I dont know maybe surya and jo came again for the evening show Originally Posted by karthik_sa2
does this mean andavan is lyingSurya and jothika were there in the evening show on 1st day for which i went and there was no ameer in that show
-
From: vasanth2006 on 26th February 2007 05:55 PM [Full View]
Thanks RS for ur review. your review increased my enthusiasm.
it seems, everybody is fall in love with this movie. all of my friends are saying that its a teriffic movie and must watch movie. They also saying that yuvan did wonderful job in BGM and songs.
I cant wait.....
-
From: karthik_sa2 on 26th February 2007 06:05 PM [Full View]
andavan what is ur ultimate opinion on the moviethalaivali vaangurathukku wait panna mudiyalayaam i thought ur review was positive.now i have to admit it is anyway i will see the movie for yuvan.rajasaranam vera over'a pugazhdhrukaru :P poi paapom
-
From: Sanjeevi on 26th February 2007 06:25 PM [Full View]
It seems Mozhi vs PV, at BO?
-
From: Aandavan on 26th February 2007 06:26 PM [Full View]
hey, why should i lie?? Originally Posted by karthik_sa2
does this mean andavan is lyingSurya and jothika were there in the evening show on 1st day for which i went and there was no ameer in that show
i saw the matinee show in mayajaal... MOZHI was getting a super response in the next screen.. then, i had to move to DEVI for our paradise unit meeting.. between, i stopped at sathyam, to check if i cud get tickets for MOzhi night show... appo thaan angey AMeer irunthaar... :P
-
From: Aandavan on 26th February 2007 06:32 PM [Full View]
Rajasaranam, i agree that the movie was almost flawless and technically super brilliant.... the Acting is just toooo natural... Originally Posted by rajasaranam
Ithu cinema!!!
I would love to thank AMEER for a wonderful movie experience
But, was there anything new in the story??? why this very sad ending??? is a sad ending very important to a great movie??? u said that the first 2.5 hours is pure fun.. i thought that the movie just dragged, without a story
-
From: joe on 26th February 2007 07:14 PM [Full View]
I request you guys avoid spoilers ..Looks like good movie,so encourage people go and watch in theatre.
I am planing to watch Paruththi Veeran and Mozhi.
-
From: rajasaranam on 26th February 2007 09:04 PM [Full View]
This is a very old concept that a movie should have story....movie making process have evolved so much world wide that now its about the narration and presentation of a movie which is more important than it should have a story. If you need stories you can back a 30 yrs and see movies like paasamalar or bagapirivinai which had good stories to tell. Movies nowadays are more about viewing experience and directors like ameer/bala are not from the old school to tell a tale of one man's life spanning many decades or a family drama/melodrama with a storyline. Originally Posted by Aandavan
Rajasaranam, i agree that the movie was almost flawless and technically super brilliant.... the Acting is just toooo natural...
But, was there anything new in the story??? why this very sad ending??? is a sad ending very important to a great movie??? u said that the first 2.5 hours is pure fun.. i thought that the movie just dragged, without a story
And i believe that the movie PV had also a thin storyline of childhood affection blooming into love in adulthood, casteist problems, family dramas and many other things amidst the beautiful narration of the events happening in two peoples life. What more do you need as cinema viewer???
Yeah sure it was full fledged fun IMO which seems dragging to you!!! and The fun I had for 2.5 hrs were gone in 15 mins of the climax. May be Ameer made this movie with the technique of 'Reverse thought' wherein the climax is plotted at first and then all other events happening before are knitted. And he shud have thought giving us so much fun in that portion just to catapult us more fiercely into the climax.
And definitely sad Ending is not a necessity for a great movie but movies like Bicycle thieves, braveheart, gladiator, guna, sethu, ramana, pithamagan, moondram pirai, nayagan, veedu, and many more movies with sad endings have become classics.
There are sure great movies with happy endings too and I do not wish to go into the deliberation of whether PV should've been like this or like that or not. It's Ameers movie and I can comment on it ONLY If i saw some major flaws in the narrative? there were none! except a heavily loaded, gory ending which could've been trimmed down IMO, apart from that i dont want to goad over His movie. Its well made and onto become a classic in its own rights.
-
From: Aandavan on 26th February 2007 09:26 PM [Full View]
I agree that it is very well made. But somehow, the climax spoiled my mood.
-
From: karthik_sa2 on 26th February 2007 11:06 PM [Full View]
i was just kidding andava..adhuku ivalo detailed explaination'ah??hey, why should i lie??
i saw the matinee show in mayajaal... MOZHI was getting a super response in the next screen.. then, i had to move to DEVI for our paradise unit meeting.. between, i stopped at sathyam, to check if i cud get tickets for MOzhi night show... appo thaan angey AMeer irunthaar...
coming to the point climax.sad ending'nu sonna udanae edho oru maadhiri irruka dhaan seidhu esp before going to the movie
-
From: Surya on 27th February 2007 02:42 AM [Full View]
Looks like Surya is gonna make a pretty penny outta the movie! Originally Posted by Sanjeevi
-
From: MrJudge on 27th February 2007 11:08 AM [Full View]
I think about the movie on the same lines too. The movie is based on some real story but did this climax really happen? I pray that Ameer will answer this question in one of his future interviews. But without this climax, I don't think the movie will mark its existence. It would have been another happy-feel-forget movie. Originally Posted by rajasaranam
Judge,
I saw the movie twice and wanting to see it more in this weekend. This is one of the best movies in last ten years maybe. The first 2.5 hrs movie was pure fun and enjoyable while the climax was disturbing and the impact that it created made everyone empty and hollow, and i was not able to speak for few minutes after the movie ended. It creates the same emotion of emptiness in us like the movies moondram pirai, sethu, pithamgan etc., It is too morbid----more than sethu or pithamagan.
But its Ameer's climax anyway and i appreciate him for his daring approach. Without those scenes depicted as realistically as he had shown he would have never created the impact he wanted to create in us.
The movie is about love,valor and sacrifice of the Thamizh people and he had portrayed it in its fullest depth.
Priyamani and karthi proved way too ahead of others in the industry. Sure they should get their awards [though i dont care about them much] this year. Yuvan has done his best though i kept thinking what Raaja would have done to this great movie. 'May be he would have overtaken Ameer' Is this the reason they are safely going behind other composers that their work will be overshadowed by Raaja
Ovvoru kaatchiyaaga rasithu poaarthen 2am murai. Innum niraiya thadavai paarka vendiya padam ithu. Maduraikku therkke thangal vaergalai vaithu irukkum ella manitharkkum intha padam miga arputhamaana anubavam. itharkku munn [not even BR or kamal] ithu pol antha makkalin vaazhkayai nitharsanamaaga urithu kaatiyathillai. Padathil varum pala kathapaathirangalin nadai udai bahavanai ellam naan kan munn paarthu pazhagiya pala manitharagalai ninavu paduthiyathu.....Ithu cinema!!!
I would love to thank AMEER for a wonderful movie experience
-
From: joe on 27th February 2007 11:10 AM [Full View]
Can't wait..Going to watch tommorow night.
-
From: MrJudge on 27th February 2007 11:20 AM [Full View]
Actor Saravanan has done wonderful performance in PV and receiving accolades from friends.
http://content.msn.co.in/Tamil/Enter.../0702-24-2.htm
-
From: leosimha on 27th February 2007 11:22 AM [Full View]
What is the spoiler when there is no new story as Aandavaa said? Originally Posted by joe
-
From: joe on 27th February 2007 11:29 AM [Full View]
Leo, Originally Posted by leosimha
What is the spoiler when there is no new story as Aandavaa said? Originally Posted by joe
Looks like the climax is very unexpected and distrubing ..After the preview kalainjar told "Ennapa ..3 NaLL thoonga mudiyathu pola irukkee" ..I am avoiding to read more since I am going to watch it tommorow ..If You want,I will PM you
-
From: leosimha on 27th February 2007 11:34 AM [Full View]
Okay....if that is the case...let me also watch it....I watched Ameer's Mounam Pesiyathae....it was good....so let me also watch this movie. When I saw the trailer...it was a completely different one....the rural backdrop has been captured very nicely by Ameer....it is evident in the trailer...let me also watch it...but I don't want to watch the film with cuts....hope they haven't cut much...later.. Originally Posted by joe
Leo, Originally Posted by leosimha
What is the spoiler when there is no new story as Aandavaa said? Originally Posted by joe
Looks like the climax is very unexpected and distrubing ..After the preview kalainjar told "Ennapa ..3 NaLL thoonga mudiyathu pola irukkee" ..I am avoiding to read more since I am going to watch it tommorow ..If You want,I will PM you
-
From: Nerd on 27th February 2007 07:52 PM [Full View]
Whats the big fuss about the disturbing climax Amir had made clear that its based on a true story. If things happened like that in real life I dont see a problem in showing them in the movie.
Even kAthal climax was criticized by many but again that was based on a true story. I have high hopes that I will like PV, but I don't think I can catch that in the theaters
-
From: Ramakrishna on 27th February 2007 08:42 PM [Full View]
I saw PV today. Good movie. I enjoyed the movie. Two songs are gud. Well, climax is bit harsh, but again i liked the climax too.There was nothing unbearable about the climax.
-
From: Aandavan on 27th February 2007 09:44 PM [Full View]
may be u had seen the cut version Originally Posted by Ramakrishna
I saw PV today. Good movie. I enjoyed the movie. Two songs are gud. Well, climax is bit harsh, but again i liked the climax too.There was nothing unbearable about the climax.
-
From: MADDY on 28th February 2007 08:23 AM [Full View]
no man, he seems to have watched the full version Originally Posted by Aandavan
may be u had seen the cut version Originally Posted by Ramakrishna
I saw PV today. Good movie. I enjoyed the movie. Two songs are gud. Well, climax is bit harsh, but again i liked the climax too.There was nothing unbearable about the climax. ........still he feels - nuthin is unbearable....
-
From: NOV on 28th February 2007 08:29 AM [Full View]
can anyone advise whether this movie is suitable for kids?
-
From: MADDY on 28th February 2007 08:34 AM [Full View]
please dont NOV Originally Posted by NOV
.....from wat i heard, its horrendous......i havent watched the movie.....no plans of watching it too.....
u can always ask our aandavan, who has watched the movie...
-
From: Aandavan on 28th February 2007 08:39 AM [Full View]
oh thiruttu VCD-aa Originally Posted by MADDY
no man, he seems to have watched the full version Originally Posted by Aandavan
may be u had seen the cut version Originally Posted by Ramakrishna
I saw PV today. Good movie. I enjoyed the movie. Two songs are gud. Well, climax is bit harsh, but again i liked the climax too.There was nothing unbearable about the climax. ........still he feels - nuthin is unbearable....
but, may be print sari illa pola...
-
From: selvakumar on 28th February 2007 09:56 AM [Full View]
A big "NO". I don't think Malaysian Censor Board will sleep like our censor board here. Originally Posted by NOV
I haven't seen it yet. But certainly not a movie that is suitable for even Adults
-
From: Nerd on 28th February 2007 09:58 AM [Full View]
selva: ungaLukku amir mElayum PV mElayum apdi enna kaduppu
-
From: Aandavan on 28th February 2007 10:00 AM [Full View]
selva, many are liking this movie very much Originally Posted by selvakumar
A big "NO". I don't think Malaysian Censor Board will sleep like our censor board here. Originally Posted by NOV
I haven't seen it yet. But certainly not a movie that is suitable for even Adults its a big hit ...
surprising but true...so let them decide... :P
-
From: Selvan on 28th February 2007 10:03 AM [Full View]
maybe for adults with child hearts Originally Posted by selvakumar
Although the climax is a bit disturbing, it is watchable. Mate, watch it before you take potshots at the film
-
From: selvakumar on 28th February 2007 10:12 AM [Full View]
Nerd : I don't have anything against Amir. "Mounam PeisyathaE" still remains as my NO.1 Amir Film. Whatever I am hearing is : "Amir has failed in the climax. It looks "Forced" I don't like such movies mate Sorry for the same. It is my opinion or prob Taste
Karthi : So, We are going to see a flood of brutal stories in the near future
Selvan : Sorry I missed one word. "Adults with Human Hearts" IF not "Adults with Animal Hearts"
Sorry for commenting on this without seeing the movie. But I am hearing all these things from all of my friends who are not fans of any actor / director.
-
From: NOV on 28th February 2007 10:31 AM [Full View]
its getting curiouser and curiouser.... should I take time off from office to watch this movie... ?
-
From: ajithfederer on 28th February 2007 10:32 AM [Full View]
Ungalukku GM mela enna kaduppo athey kadupu than
Originally Posted by Nerd
selva: ungaLukku amir mElayum PV mElayum apdi enna kaduppu
-
From: joe on 28th February 2007 10:33 AM [Full View]
NOV, Originally Posted by NOV
its getting curiouser and curiouser.... should I take time off from office to watch this movie... ?
I am going to watch tonight..I can give you my opinion tmr.
-
From: MrJudge on 28th February 2007 10:35 AM [Full View]
One of the best in recent times but I don't think it is suitable for kids unless they release it with minor cuts in the climax. Originally Posted by NOV
its getting curiouser and curiouser.... should I take time off from office to watch this movie... ?
-
From: Aandavan on 28th February 2007 10:35 AM [Full View]
selva, i had an extensive arguement with my friend abt this movie.. Originally Posted by selvakumar
Nerd : I don't have anything against Amir. "Mounam PeisyathaE" still remains as my NO.1 Amir Film. Whatever I am hearing is : "Amir has failed in the climax. It looks "Forced" I don't like such movies mate Sorry for the same. It is my opinion or prob Taste
Karthi : So, We are going to see a flood of brutal stories in the near future
Selvan : Sorry I missed one word. "Adults with Human Hearts" IF not "Adults with Animal Hearts"
Sorry for commenting on this without seeing the movie. But I am hearing all these things from all of my friends who are not fans of any actor / director.
he gave some valid points, in favour of the movie..
1. there are many sandiyars in south - TN, who just waste their lives like this... their life, has no substantial story... they just want to have fun.... Paruthiveeran is one such guy..
2. their daily life itself is very interesting unlike ours... so no separate story needed , in a movie which is abt them
3. the climax had to make a strong impact, because the first 2.4 hours was just abt having fun... if the movie had a happy ending, we wud have thought " story illaama, chumma jolly-a irukkaaaanga... enna padam ithu..
"
-
From: NOV on 28th February 2007 10:37 AM [Full View]
thanks joe. but based on some ppl's comments here, I am certain that I will enjoy the movie. Originally Posted by joe
-
From: NOV on 28th February 2007 10:39 AM [Full View]
thanks. no kids! Originally Posted by MrJudge
maybe I will take them for mozhi over the wknd...
-
From: selvakumar on 28th February 2007 10:45 AM [Full View]
Karthi, Originally Posted by Aandavan
3. the climax had to make a strong impact, because the first 2.4 hours was just abt having fun... if the movie had a happy ending, we wud have thought " story illaama, chumma jolly-a irukkaaaanga... enna padam ithu.. "
It should be noted that we are speaking about the climax. Apart from that there is nothing "New" in the story. Right ? (It is question)
"Kathai, Thiraikathaiyil pudumai illai - kathai kaLamum tamil cinemavukku pudithu allavae" ?
I agree with your friends' points #1 and #2. I also heard that 1 hour of the movie is watchable which fits well within "Commercial Angle"
So, at this stage - The climax is a forced one. Right ?? I don't think it is a movie with different story and screenplay which I should analyse. Right??
"Etho pannunum enbatharkaaga ippadi oru climax vachi nalla padamnnu peyar eduthukittu pogavaaa"
Or "Ippadi eduthaa thaan athu "class" padamaaga irukkum enabatharkaagavaa.
P.S: please note that I am speaking about a movie which everyone claim as a "great movie". So, I don't think it should be compared with MASALA MOVIES.
In that angle, give ur perception
-
From: joe on 28th February 2007 10:54 AM [Full View]
There is a hell lot of difference between story and screen play ..A small incident can be a story and screen play can make it enjoyable for 2 hours .
Some people think story means it should carry a life history of stleast 1 or 2 characters ,from childwood to succesfful love marriage or until kill the villain ..Even a collection of small incidents can be made as an interesting movie just by screen play.
Normally 50 years are happeings will be shown as 2.30 hours of movie ..But there are movies like 'Speed' which shows the happenings of 2 hours in 2 hours (almost) .Is it rejected because of no story ?
-
From: Selvan on 28th February 2007 10:55 AM [Full View]
selvakumar, I already watched it and enjoyed it. What am I supposed to do now? forget everything?? :P
-
From: selvakumar on 28th February 2007 11:06 AM [Full View]
There is a HELL lot of difference between "Understanding of Cinema" and "Social Responsibility" ! People never go to the theatre to see it and forget it there itself. Our brain is not that much efficient like a computer brain which can instantly erase the effects that get created. (Courtesy : Bill Gates) Originally Posted by joe
"Asingam", "Aruvaruppu" etc ithellam kaattuvatharku peyar "Realism" endraal "sila malayaala padangalil" kooda ithai nadraaga kaatuvaargal. "Athuvum realism thaan". Athaiyum 2.5 hours rasikkalam sila per. Boys padam kooda realism thaan. 5 per oru ponnai rape pannuratha solluvatharkku realism thevai pattal, 5 paiyangalin ichaiyai kaatiya iyakkunar kaiyaandathum realism thaan
Irandumae kandikka pada vendiyathu enbathe enathu vaatham
"Unarchikalin Vadigaalai" payanpaduthi, athai ubayogappadutha thinikkapadum kathaigalai "thookki vaithu kondu" kondaada naan virumbavillai endruthaan sonnen.
Ulagathil aayiram nadakkalaam. Seithi ooodagangaL kooda athai appadiyae kanbipathu thavaru. Cinema is powerful medium and many go there for sheer entertainment.
Oru nalla iyakkunarin thirmai kaatchiyai vilakkuvathil irukkirathae thavira. kaatchiyai thinnipathil illai
-
From: selvakumar on 28th February 2007 11:09 AM [Full View]
Mate, Originally Posted by Selvan
You misunderstood me. It is my opinion and take on the movie. Ofcourse I haven't yet seen the movie. I am not a person who suggests something to others. :P
Glad to hear that you enjoyed it
-
From: joe on 28th February 2007 11:12 AM [Full View]
Selva,
Thanks for your long explanation ..It may be true the climax of PV is 'Thinikkapattathu' ,but I think I can tolerate that 10 mins for rest of 2.20 mins ,if it is interesting ..But I can't stand many movies with happy ending heroisms which are 2.30 hours long tourches for me.(the latest one is Pokkiri)
Let us agree to disagree one more time.
-
From: selvakumar on 28th February 2007 11:16 AM [Full View]
Fine Joe. Let me stop here. Anyway, I am going to see this movie in my home town this weekend. Originally Posted by joe
Selva,
Thanks for your long explanation ..It may be true the climax of PV is 'Thinikkapattathu' ,but I think I can tolerate that 10 mins for rest of 2.20 mins ,if it is interesting .
Let us agree to disagree one more time.
Respect your taste and your preference and after all it is your preference..But I can't stand many movies with happy ending heroisms which are 2.30 hours long tourches for me.
I am talking about "whether PV is a great movie or not by correlating the same with great movies and not masala movies"
Let us agree to disagree
-
From: joe on 28th February 2007 11:30 AM [Full View]
Selva,
Since you talk about taste ,I need to tell you few things.
1. I am not totally serious movie goer .I love comedy movies .Only thing is ..If a movie characters doing something as if serious ,it should make me serious ,but movies like Pokkiri ,all are doing something serious ,but I can't get anything ,sometimes I laugh seeing them being serious for no reason (agree laughing helps for good health).
2. Movies like Thillu mullu,MMKR are said to be comedy movies and really made me laugh ,but many comedies made me seriously 'Verichifying'. same like many serious movies made me laugh.
3.I don't need a long story to enjoy ,but series of interesting scenes will satisfy.
4.Screen-la yaaravathu aruvaala oongunale kannai pothikkira aalu naan ..Most of Virumandi climax also I didn't see properly.Recently Veyil also ..I didn't like too much violence ,but for that I can't ignore Virumandi and Veyil for rest of the parts of them.
-
From: Aandavan on 28th February 2007 11:35 AM [Full View]
Selva,
Ameer, wanted to show the Life of a sandiyar. He had done that well.. the presentation is somewhat new.. we have to accept that... i didnt like the story.. but, ithu pola thaan niraya peroda story irukkuthu pola...
this movie is not suitable for all... some like us hate it... but many like it... u havent watched the movie... u may suddenly like it !!!!
i dont want to see such a movie again....
-
From: selvakumar on 28th February 2007 11:37 AM [Full View]
Joe,
Sorry. I was referring to your preference over "Good Movies" than "Masala movies" It was a complement.
Anyway, Nice to hear about your taste and preference
P.S: Innaikku enna naan romba serious ah argue panni irukken. romba naal kazhichu J / K
-
From: thinkfloyd on 28th February 2007 11:44 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by joe
-
From: selvakumar on 28th February 2007 11:49 AM [Full View]
Bala ! aahaa !!
I don't know why you put that disclaimer
Again I say:
I like GOOD movies and not masala movies. NO one will, I think.
I was a bit disturbed with the growing trend of violent movies in tamil.
Bala - PV paarthaachaa !
-
From: thinkfloyd on 28th February 2007 11:52 AM [Full View]
Selva,
My 2 paisa:
Traditionally in Tamil films, incidents like rape, murder, fights etc have been so removed from reality and sometimes stylized so that those scenes no longer affect us the way they SHOULD.
Rape - The man opening his mouth wide, bringing his face close the lady, pinning her hands down. Dress will be thrown ONLY to the fan and the next cut will show the lady's kungumam smeared and she will be huddled up with her knees to her chest. Formula
[Its a totally different and disgusting matter that almost al Tamil movies associate SHAME with a rape victim - "thappu", "karppu" etc and make the man marry her, the ultimate punishment]
The same with murder, fights etc... The kids will start "loving" it, like WWF.. there is no repulsion there....
Atleast with the movies where the scenes are realistic/brutal (they can show all this subtly also i agree), they can prevent the kids from watching it or even if they watch it, the reaction will definitely not be amusement.
P.S: Selva sonna madhiri, sila directors "realism" enum perla sila kaatchigala thinikka thaan seyyarainga.. dunno if PV climax is in the same category but usually its easy to tell a natural/realistic scene from a contrived/thinikkappatta scene...
-
From: thinkfloyd on 28th February 2007 11:55 AM [Full View]
Adhaane!! ippo eduthutten Originally Posted by selvakumar
Bala ! aahaa !!
I don't know why you put that disclaimer
Not yet.. Originally Posted by selvakumar
Bala - PV paarthaachaa !
Singapore la censor panniruppaingalo??
-
From: MADDY on 28th February 2007 12:11 PM [Full View]
superb post selva....... Originally Posted by selvakumar
......i would like to quote some BR movies/scenes where he has depicted embarassing/hurting scenes in a very subtle and suggestive manner.......i think Ameer should have followed that path.....on the one hand, we have normal villagers singing songs with IR's voice/YSR's music and on the other hand they want to show the brutality of a rape scene.........isnt this hypocrisy to choose realism for rape and cinematism(my word ) for character singing songs???
also, there is unwritten "ethics" which all media right from newspapers/news channels/websites/movies/serials/stage shows - all of them have to follow......avoid showing "disturbing" and "objectionable" behaviour/incidents.......but all seem to flout that unwritten rule....
-
From: Aandavan on 28th February 2007 12:20 PM [Full View]
maddy, IR voice/ YSR music has nothing to do with the brutality in the movie..
-
From: selvakumar on 28th February 2007 12:45 PM [Full View]
Agree with you. But my point is : They should not show that in such a crual and as a raw scene. The message that has to be conveyed may not get delivered to the present generation (Kids). Originally Posted by thinkfloyd
OTOH, It should be noted that "Kids" generally see "F Tv" etc kind of stuffs secretly IF not along with their parents. I think there is a control there. In the case of movies, Our censor board ensures that our audience will get confused everytime they go for a movie
Maddy - Yes, There should be some ethics while expressing your output in a media. One little correction: LIke how Karthik put, It is not "IR/YSR's voice" but it is "IR/YSR's BGM" IF so !
Karthi : I think Maddy referred to BR's movies and IR's part there. I don't think he meant IR's voice being used there.
-
From: cancer on 28th February 2007 01:00 PM [Full View]
Paruthi veeran- Awesome movie...
except those climax rape scene, (that was horrible, ) the movie is awesome.. this guy's direction style is wonderful,
screenplay,Music, camera.. Superb...
Priyamani- i don think any other heroens in recent times acted in the movie, :P wow.. Karuvaachi aakka Muthazhu.. kannula innum irukka.... :P but director climax la ippadi pannirukka koodathu... oru ponnai namma veettu ponnu mathree romba azhaka kaatti, arumaiyaa nadaikka vachu.. kadasila ippadi kavuthirukka koodathu...
karthi. this guy remind us surya in some area, but surya wont suit for this role... karthi did his best acting..
I liked Veyil... but This movie should be rated more than that..
and all those folk songs.. , enjoyable...
A must watch movie.... never get bore in any scene.....
-
From: cancer on 28th February 2007 01:16 PM [Full View]
Selva, this is not the climax like Villans raped heroine for revenge...
oru chinna mistake , naama seira paavam.. athoda Vilavu eppadi ngira maathree director kaatirukkaru....
its a lesson ...
first watch the movie then give ur comment...
there were lot of movies released in past had folk songs ... but i have seen the real "VILLU paattu" in this movie, if u r a village guy ,u would realize that...
the movie is good entertainment... class....
-
From: joe on 28th February 2007 01:19 PM [Full View]
Thanks cancer for your positive review
-
From: Sanjeevi on 28th February 2007 01:25 PM [Full View]
Wov, Cancer you've rated PV more than Veyil. IMO Veyil is a very good movie in tamil recent times.
-
From: MADDY on 28th February 2007 01:53 PM [Full View]
i meant, if Ameer wants movie to be so realistic, then y did he wanted to have songs??? arent songs cinematic?? y realism only for rape and not for songs??? Originally Posted by Aandavan
this is wat i mean...i never meant IR's voice and YSR's music were violent or anything.......infact, ayyayo song is my fav song.....
-
From: joe on 28th February 2007 01:59 PM [Full View]
Something is better than nothing Originally Posted by MADDY
Changes can be done step by step only..'Vacha kudumi adicha mottai'-nnu pesurathellam vithandavatham.
-
From: Sanjeevi on 28th February 2007 02:10 PM [Full View]
funny at the same time well said joe Originally Posted by joe
Something is better than nothing Originally Posted by MADDY
Changes can be done step by step only..'Vacha kudumi adicha mottai'-nnu pesurathellam vithandavatham.
-
From: thinkfloyd on 28th February 2007 02:10 PM [Full View]
Appadi na cinema ve vendaame Originally Posted by MADDY
Realism OBVIOUSLY means in the context of cinema or cinematic expresion. Cinema is a means of expression. Songs/BGM, or any props which are used are nothing but agents of delivering the idea that a creator has. They complement realism, depending on how they are made. When there is a BGM or a background song it doesn't necessarily mean someone is playing music in the background or somebody is singing. I thought even kids understood this
The point is how you portray or depict violence and what kind of movie it is. Being subtle like the example you have mentioned or being grahpic (NOT using graphics) are two ends of the same artistic spectrum. Kurosawa subtle-a solluvaaru na Scorsese brutal-a solluvaaru...
-
From: karthik_sa2 on 28th February 2007 02:12 PM [Full View]
saw pv yesterday.i didn like it overall.no story and no proper theme as well.just dancing<with shemales> ,fighting and ends with a sobbing climax<unnecessary>.opening was intersting and enjoyable with folk dapankuthu and dancing but then at one stage it gets irritating with too much noise.i understand those scenes r very common in villages but i feel it should have been cut down.surya's bro karthi has done a tremendous job.his looks and natural acting in his first film itself is just awsome.he has done what surya hasn done for almost 10 of his first films.priymani has done a equally tremendous job except for her voice which sounded a bit masqualine.its wonderful to see saravanan act for the first time .he has done a very different role of his previos and has done total justice.except for the power packed performances by these actors, superb bgms and songs i don find anuthing great in this movie.ameer disappointing atleast for me!!
andava u r right
-
From: MrJudge on 28th February 2007 02:24 PM [Full View]
It is not "villu paattu", it is karagattam! "Villu paattu" is performed on stage using Villu dude. Originally Posted by cancer
there were lot of movies released in past had folk songs ... but i have seen the real "VILLU paattu" in this movie, if u r a village guy ,u would realize that...
-
From: joe on 28th February 2007 02:27 PM [Full View]
I hope cancer didn't make mistake ,since He is from Kanyakumari where Villu Pattu is very common Originally Posted by MrJudge
It is not "villu paattu", it is karagattam! "Villu paattu" is performed on stage using Villu dude. Originally Posted by cancer
there were lot of movies released in past had folk songs ... but i have seen the real "VILLU paattu" in this movie, if u r a village guy ,u would realize that...
-
From: cancer on 28th February 2007 02:31 PM [Full View]
YA Originally Posted by joe
I hope cancer didn't make mistake ,since He is from Kanyakumari where Villu Pattu is very common Originally Posted by MrJudge
It is not "villu paattu", it is karagattam! "Villu paattu" is performed on stage using Villu dude. Originally Posted by cancer
there were lot of movies released in past had folk songs ... but i have seen the real "VILLU paattu" in this movie, if u r a village guy ,u would realize that...
i know the difference between both, Karakattam, sometimes they used to dance for "Villu Paattu"
If u go deeply, "villu paattu" They use to tell story and in between singing songs.. .. right?
-
From: joe on 28th February 2007 02:35 PM [Full View]
Cancer,
Yes, Villu Pattu is the one set of people sitting on the stage with Villu and Jalra ,then one explain a story or something as song while others says 'Aama'.
It is used in many many old movies ,Best is one from MGR movie 'Engal Thangam' ,Villu pattu about "Chandranukku Rocket vittathu"
-
From: joe on 28th February 2007 02:41 PM [Full View]
Cancer,
You should have heard this ...
Thanthanathom entru solliye ..aama
Villisai paada ..aama
villisai paada ..aama
vanthiduvaai ganapathiye
-
From: Sanjeevi on 28th February 2007 02:48 PM [Full View]
The only one mega hit villupattu in tfm is "En soka kathaiya kelu thaikulame" in thooral ninnu pochu
-
From: selvakumar on 28th February 2007 02:56 PM [Full View]
Bala - The problem is : We discuss on the role of cinema and how it should convey the intended things. For e.g., there are lots of silence in PP BGM (Pudupettai) which I loved than the 1000 violins playing in the background. I think it is also a part and parcel of movie making. Originally Posted by thinkfloyd
Appadi na cinema ve vendaame
Realism OBVIOUSLY means in the context of cinema or cinematic expresion. Cinema is a means of expression. Songs/BGM, or any props which are used are nothing but agents of delivering the idea that a creator has. They complement realism, depending on how they are made. When there is a BGM or a background song it doesn't necessarily mean someone is playing music in the background or somebody is singing. I thought even kids understood this
Cinema is a media and a mode of expression. IF we call it as a "Cinema", obviously things and overall perspective changes. Then Do we need raw realism? This is a bit confusing indeed.
Problem here is: Why such realism for "RAPE" alone ?
Konjam Manda kaayuthu indeed
BTW, Let me STOP here on PV. I will get back to this thread after having seen the movie.
Siva - Unakku villu paattunna enna vendrey theriyala. Idula Village guy ah irunthirunda enakku therinjirukkunnu vera sollura
Maattikittiyaa !!
Haiyooooooo !! Haiyoooooooo !!
-
From: cancer on 28th February 2007 03:09 PM [Full View]
i know the diff. between villu paattu and karakattam, Originally Posted by selvakumar
Siva - Unakku villu paattunna enna vendrey theriyala. Idula Village guy ah irunthirunda enakku therinjirukkunnu vera sollura
Maattikittiyaa !!
Haiyooooooo !! Haiyoooooooo !!
but here in this movie, its mixed of everthing... i cant able to find any word to mention... so just i mentioned "Villu paattu"
The guys in the movie who are singing those songs weared "Villu paattu kalaingar " dresses.... and the way they singing was remind me "Villu paattu"
Muthalla padathai poi paarungappa, appuram criticize pannunga...
somebody here posted that there is no story, Just look at the Screenply, its enjoyable, well moulded one... i don Ustd what u people mentioned here The so called "STORY"
-
From: selvakumar on 28th February 2007 03:20 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by cancer
Muthalla padathai poi paarungappa, appuram criticize pannunga...
somebody here posted that there is no story, Just look at the Screenply, its enjoyable, well moulded one... i don Ustd what u people mentioned here The so called "STORY" FYI, I didn't tell you that it is not VILLU PAATTU. I have already accepted that I have not seen the movie. But heard the EXACT NARRATION OF THE CLIMAX from my friends and I am giving my opinion on the same.
Don't worry. I will see this movie IF not in theatres atleast in VCD and will post the review and will answer the questions here
Who knows - I may like it
-
From: selvakumar on 28th February 2007 03:23 PM [Full View]
"I don't want to be typecast": Priya Mani
Priya Mani is bright, gutsy and extremely articulate. The dusky Malayalee beauty is getting lot of accolades for her performance in Paruthiveeran. Everybody who saw the film cannot stop raving about Muthazhagu the village girl who is the heart and soul of the film. Moviebuzz spoke to the actress who is on cloud nine after her debut film in Telugu also became a super hit. Excerpts
You are getting a lot of critical acclaim for Paruthiveeran as an actress of substance. Please comment?
I am glad that my hard work paid off. But at the same time I am also worried that now I will be typecast in village roles and heavy subjects. I am open to doing commercial films and comedies which I really enjoy.
But how did you bag this role?
Director Ameer called me up and I had gone to meet him. In fact I was in a casual jeans and top and for a minute, he was shocked and had doubts if I could carry the character of a village girl with conviction. To be honest I had never seen a village in my life. Then a test shoot was done in Theni and Ameer sir was convinced and I got selected.
But you were so convincing as a village girl..
Full credit goes to Ameer sir for that. I haven’t used any makeup and washed my face every 5 minutes before the shot. I worked hard on my body language and expressions. I shot for nearly 150 days and the locations were so barren and hot that I became so tanned. See I am yet to regain my colour (smiles). Even while dubbing, Ameer sir helped me get the Madurai slang correct.
How do you react to that much talked about rape scene in the film?
(Thinking) Even while we were shooting it, I thought that it was too long. Later for the dubbing of that portion, I use to cry and come out of the room. This continued for two days as I got emotional and finally my mother had to convince me to finish dubbing. But now when people are talking about it, as an actress I take it as a compliment as the pain that my character Muthazhagu went through has been well depicted on screen.
What did you feel after seeing the film?
I am yet to see the film.
A talented actress like you should be doing more number of films in Tamil. But why have you migrated to Telugu?
(Laughs) I think you should ask this question to Tamil producers and directors. I hope they take notice of my performance in Paruthiveeran. In Bollywood, top heroines like Rani Mukherjee experiment so much with their roles! In Malayalam too girls can do offbeat and commercial films simultaneously but in Tamil the case is different. I hope this trend change and top actors acknowledge and encourage girls from here rather than running after models and failed Hindi actresses who lack nativity and have no grasp of the language.
My debut film Pellaina Kottalo, in Telugu is a super hit and currently I am doing Yamadonga opposite NTR. I have also signed another film Toss opposite Raja. I play a blind girl and Kannada superstar Upendra plays my brother.
-
From: MrJudge on 28th February 2007 05:00 PM [Full View]
You didn't like it? I am surprised .......To me this is the best movie from Ameer so far. The opening song was too lengthy but Ameer wanted to show all things happening during thiruvizha in one song. Originally Posted by karthik_sa2
saw pv yesterday.i didn like it overall.no story and no proper theme as well.just dancing<with shemales> ,fighting and ends with a sobbing climax<unnecessary>.opening was intersting and enjoyable with folk dapankuthu and dancing but then at one stage it gets irritating with too much noise.i understand those scenes r very common in villages but i feel it should have been cut down.surya's bro karthi has done a tremendous job.his looks and natural acting in his first film itself is just awsome.he has done what surya hasn done for almost 10 of his first films.priymani has done a equally tremendous job except for her voice which sounded a bit masqualine.its wonderful to see saravanan act for the first time .he has done a very different role of his previos and has done total justice.except for the power packed performances by these actors, superb bgms and songs i don find anuthing great in this movie.ameer disappointing atleast for me!!
andava u r right
-
From: MrJudge on 28th February 2007 05:28 PM [Full View]
Ameer scores a hat-trick
IndiaGlitz [Wednesday, February 28, 2007]
It's three in a row for Ameer. After Mounam Pesiyadhae and Ram, his Paruthi Veeran released last week-end managed not just huge collections at the box office but also rave reviews. Ameer, who is down with fever in Madurai, is thrilled at the movie's fantastic opening. According to the director, “My faith in the script has been vindicated. The delay in the release has not hampered its prospects. It again proves that audiences are ready to welcome off-beat and out of the box ideas.”
Ameer was also appreciative of his cast and crew in Paruthi Veeran.
“A movie on rural theme with folk arts is a rarity these days. But if made sincerely, it would go on to succeed,” he says.
On his next, Ameer says, “The script for my next directorial venture is ready. It has been titled Kannabiran. Search for a suitable hero is on.”
On his plans to foray into acting, Ameer says, “For now, I want to direct a movie. But by next year, my acting venture will kick off and the film would be directed by Samuthirakani.”
-
From: Aandavan on 28th February 2007 06:06 PM [Full View]
all the songs in this movie are 100% realistic... theriyaama pesa koodaaathu Originally Posted by MADDY
i meant, if Ameer wants movie to be so realistic, then y did he wanted to have songs??? arent songs cinematic?? y realism only for rape and not for songs??? Originally Posted by Aandavan
this is wat i mean...i never meant IR's voice and YSR's music were violent or anything.......infact, ayyayo song is my fav song.....
-
From: Aandavan on 28th February 2007 06:10 PM [Full View]
oh yea joe.. thats a cool scene.. MGR with his kudumi getup Originally Posted by joe
-
From: MrJudge on 28th February 2007 06:24 PM [Full View]
The best villu pattu IMO is NSK's Nanthanar Kinthanar song!
-
From: MrJudge on 28th February 2007 06:42 PM [Full View]
The rape scene is not even realistic dude. They don't show EVERYTHING, only portions of it. But the problem is the pace, eventhough it comes for a few minutes everybody wants it to end so quick. Because you love a character all along the movie and don't want to see it suffering for long. That is the problem here. Originally Posted by MADDY
-
From: MrJudge on 28th February 2007 06:47 PM [Full View]
Is this song a villu paatu or katha kaataadshebam? Originally Posted by MrJudge
-
From: Nerd on 28th February 2007 08:45 PM [Full View]
Selva: You have committed a big mistake - talking through pages on a movie that you have not seen yet
If the rape is realistic, let it be. After all its a real life incident. Those kind of scenes will hit you hard. sEthu climax, kAdhal climax are excellent examples. I for one, absolutely loved both
-
From: MADDY on 28th February 2007 09:17 PM [Full View]
hayyo hayyo......karthi, i just told songs reduce realism in a movie.......i never told songs were not realistic.......i liked songs very much..... Originally Posted by Aandavan
all the songs in this movie are 100% realistic... theriyaama pesa koodaaathu Originally Posted by MADDY
wat i meant was, when villagers sing songs in their kalathhumettu, vayakaattu, theres no IR or YSR orchestra playing at their back......
>>disgression>>
bala, ur continual criticism of my understanding abilities or my IQ is very funny to say the least......u know why? last year we both were working in the same company for some point of time..............so we are supposed to have passed the same tests/interviews to get there which indirectly implies that our IQ and understanding abilities cannot be that different.... Originally Posted by thinkfloyd
>>end disgression>>
-
From: Selvan on 28th February 2007 09:25 PM [Full View]
<digression> Originally Posted by MADDY
bala, ur continual criticism of my understanding abilities or my IQ is very funny to say the least......u know why? last year we both were working in the same company for some point of time..............so we are supposed to have passed the same tests/interviews to get there which indirectly implies that our IQ and understanding abilities cannot be that different....
>>end disgression>>
maybe it shows that your company is the impedance to improving your IQs :P
-
From: joe on 28th February 2007 09:28 PM [Full View]
Just Back from theatre watching ParuthiVeeran.
Paruthi Veeran
Ameer
Saravanan
Karthi
PriyaMani
YSR
A person from Village of south Tamil Nadu ,I can relate each moment of the movie.
Well done Ameer
Disc : Ofcourse this is a movie for adults ..Avoid kids ..Kids can continue watching cartoons until they grow up
-
From: Nerd on 28th February 2007 09:30 PM [Full View]
And a few adults as well until they really grow up :P Originally Posted by joe
Kids can continue watching cartoons until they grow up
Anyway joe thanks for the recommendation, i would make it a point not to miss the movie
-
From: Aandavan on 28th February 2007 09:34 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Nerd
And a few adults as well until they really grow up :P Originally Posted by joe
Kids can continue watching cartoons until they grow up
Anyway joe thanks for the recommendation, i would make it a point not to miss the movie
-
From: thinkfloyd on 28th February 2007 09:34 PM [Full View]
Maddy, Originally Posted by MADDY
>>disgression>>
bala, ur continual criticism of my understanding abilities or my IQ is very funny to say the least......u know why? last year we both were working in the same company for some point of time..............so we are supposed to have passed the same tests/interviews to get there which indirectly implies that our IQ and understanding abilities cannot be that different.... Originally Posted by thinkfloyd
>>end disgression>>
Don't put word in my mouths-u
ahaa ore kuttaila oorna mattaigala naama?
-
From: Nerd on 28th February 2007 09:44 PM [Full View]
Who is saravanan karthi is the hero right
-
From: Ramakrishna on 28th February 2007 09:46 PM [Full View]
Saravanan is the actor who acts in Nandha along with rajkiran. Originally Posted by Nerd
Who is saravanan karthi is the hero right
-
From: Nerd on 28th February 2007 09:47 PM [Full View]
Oh that guy who once upon a time acted as a hero in a lot of movies
Anyway thanks!
-
From: joe on 28th February 2007 09:57 PM [Full View]
Nerd,
Yeah the same saravanan..antha aaLayellam naan oru actorave ninachathilla ..But He gave an hell of performance and ofcourse ameer made a good judgement by putting him in this character.
-
From: rocketboy on 28th February 2007 10:28 PM [Full View]
This is wrong. Who said cartoons are for kids alone. I still watch cartoons. Tom and Jerry, Popeye, He Man are still among my favs.
'Some things are worth fighting for,
some feelings never die.'
-
From: NOV on 1st March 2007 05:56 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Sanjeevi
-
From: NOV on 1st March 2007 05:58 AM [Full View]
you mean the vijayakanth lookalike? Originally Posted by Ramakrishna
am gonna watch tonite
-
From: joe on 1st March 2007 06:20 AM [Full View]
பருத்தி வீரன்
சினிமா என்பது வெறும் பொழுது போக்கு மட்டுமல்ல .நல்ல நகைச்சுவையை வழங்கும் பொழுது போக்கு திரைப்படங்களும் நமக்கு தேவையே .அதே நேரத்தில் நம் நம் சமூகத்தின் வாழ்வியல் கூறுகளை ,பழக்க வழக்கங்களை ,நாட்டின் இதயமான கிராமங்களின் நடைமுறைகளை பிரதிபலிக்கும் கண்ணாடியாக அமையும் திரைப்படங்களும் வரவேற்கப் படவேண்டியவை. ஒரு திரைப்படம் "பாட்டி வடை சுட்ட கதை' போன்று ஏதாவது ஒரு கதையோடு தான் அமைய வேண்டுமென்ற கட்டாயமில்லை .சுவாரஸ்யமான சம்பவங்களில் தொகுப்புகள் கூட ஒரு ரசிக்கத் தக்க திரைப்படமாக அமையலாம் .அந்த வரிசையில் ஒரு கிராமத்து சண்டியரின் கதையை அதன் பின்புலத்தோடு ,வாழ்க்கை முறையோடு ,அதன் சோகங்களோடு சொல்லும் ஒரு படம் 'பருத்தி வீரன்'.
தென் தமிழ்நாட்டின் கிராமங்களில் பிறந்து வளர்ந்தவர்களுக்கு இந்த படம் தன் கிராமத்தில் அல்லது பக்கத்து கிராமத்தில் நடந்த பல சம்பவங்களை கண்முன் நிறுத்தும் .கிராமம் என்றால் கண்டிபாக காட்டப்படும் மரத்தடி பஞ்சாயத்து ,ஊரை அடியாள்கள் தயவில் மிரட்டி வைத்திருக்கும் வில்லன் ,கதாநாயகனை வாழ்த்திப்பாடும் போது நூற்றுக்கணக்கில் வந்து நடனமாடும் தடியர்கள் மற்ற நேரத்தில் காணாமல் போய் விட மற்ற நேரங்களில் கிழவர்கள் மட்டுமே கதாநாயகனிடம் முறையிடும் அபத்தம் ,பட்டணத்துக்கு படிக்கப் போய் 10 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு பின்னரே முதல் முறையாக கிராமத்துக்கு வரும் டூ பீஸ் உடையணிந்த வில்லன் மகளான கதாநாயகி இப்படிப் பட்ட சமாசாரங்கள் இந்த படத்தில் இல்லை .ஆனால் கிராமத்து கூத்து ,கரகாட்டம் .கிராமத்து சாதாரண பள்ளியில் படிக்கும் சுமாரான அழகுள்ள கதாநாயகி ,விஷம் குடித்த கதாநாயகிக்கு செய்யப்படும் சிகிச்சை ,கிராமத்து வெளியில் சீட்டாட்டம் ,வெட்டித்தனமாக ஒரு சண்டியரின் வாழ்க்கை, எகத்தாளம் ,அவனை வெறித்தனமாக காதலிக்கும் கதாநாயகியின் செய்கைகள் இப்படி பல விடயங்கள் கண்முன் நடப்பவை போன்று யதார்த்தமாக விரிகின்றன.
சிவகுமாரின் இளைய மகன் 'கார்த்திக்' முதல் படத்திலேயே சிக்ஸர் அடித்திருக்கிறார் .கண்டிப்பாக நடிப்பில் நல்ல திறமையுள்ளவராக திகழ்வார் ,ஆனால் அண்ணன் போன்று இளமை துள்ளும் கதாபாத்திரத்தில் மிளிர்வாரா என்பது போகப் போகத் தான் தெரியும் .இருந்தாலும் ,தமிழ் சினிமாவுக்கும் திறமையுள்ள நடிகர் கிடைத்திருக்கிறார் என்பதில் சந்தேகமில்லை.
கதாநாயகனின் சித்தப்பாவாக வரும் சரவணன் (பழைய ஹீரோ) ஆச்சரியப்படுத்தியிருக்கிறார் .இவரிடம் இத்தனை நடிப்பாற்றலா என வியக்க வைக்கிறார் .கதாநாயகி பிரியாமணி மிக நன்றாக செய்திருக்கிறார் .இந்த கதாபாத்திரத்தில் நடிக்க ஒப்புக்கொண்டதற்காகவே அவரை பாராட்டலாம்.
சின்ன சின்ன காதாபாத்திரங்களில் வருபவர்கள் கூட நிறைவாக செய்திருக்கிறார்கள் .அதிலே இயக்குநரின் திறமை பளிச்சிடுகிறது .நீண்ட நேடிய கதை சொல்வது முக்கியமல்ல .காட்சிகளின் நேர்த்தி தான் இயக்குநரின் முக்கிய வேலை .அதிலே அமீர் தனது முந்தைய படங்களை மிஞ்சியிருக்கிறார்.
2 மணி நேரங்களுக்கு மேல் கலகலப்பாக செல்லும் திரைப்படம் ,நெஞ்சை பதற வைக்கும் சோகத்தோடு முடிகிறது .மனம் கனக்கிறது .அது படமாக்கப்பட்டிருக்கும் விதம் அதீதமாக வலிந்து திணிக்கப்பட்டதாக விமர்சனங்கள் எழுந்திருகின்றன .ஆனால் என்னைப் பொருத்தவரை அந்த காட்சிகள் நம் சமூகத்தின் இழிவான ஒரு பக்கத்தை ,பொறுப்பின்மையை குறித்த கோபத்தையும் ஆற்றாமையையுமே கொடுப்பதாக இருக்கிறது .அதே நேரத்தில் வாழ்க்கையை பொறுப்ற்ற விதமாக கழிப்பவர் தங்களுக்கு மட்டுமல்ல தங்களை சார்ந்தோருக்கும் கொடுக்கும் துன்பத்தை எடுத்துக்காட்டும் பாடமாக இருக்கிறது.
இத்தகைய முடிவைப்பற்றி கருத்து வேறுபாடுகள் இருந்தாலும் ,இத்தகைய திரைப்படங்கள் பெறும் வெற்றி,தமிழ் சினிமா எதார்த்தத்தை நோக்கிய பாதையில் இன்னொரு படி எடுத்து வைப்பதற்கான வழியாக இருக்கும்.
இயக்குநர் அமீருக்கு பாராட்டுக்கள்!
-ஜோ
-
From: great on 1st March 2007 06:34 AM [Full View]
Joe , orey dabba dabba-va theriyuthu
-
From: joe on 1st March 2007 06:39 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by great
Joe , orey dabba dabba-va theriyuthu why? Unicode-la thane post panniyirukken.
-
From: Sanguine Sridhar on 1st March 2007 06:42 AM [Full View]
Balaji,
Use this link
http://www.forumhub.mayyam.com/hub/v...p?t=57&start=0
Download the font, save it under c:\windows\fonts !!
All dabba's will become proper tamizh letters!!
Btw Joe thanks for a wonderful review
-
From: NOV on 1st March 2007 06:45 AM [Full View]
why is themovie released here as paruththi veeran dubai?
-
From: great on 1st March 2007 06:46 AM [Full View]
Thanks Sri
-
From: Sanguine Sridhar on 1st March 2007 06:56 AM [Full View]
Edhukkuda thanks ellam!! Originally Posted by great
Thanks Sri
-
From: MrJudge on 1st March 2007 07:23 AM [Full View]
Dubai-la oru Paruththioor-a? naama Vadivelu-Parthi comedy than nyabagaththu varuthtu Originally Posted by NOV
why is themovie released here as paruththi veeran dubai?
Have you seen it or not?
-
From: NOV on 1st March 2007 07:27 AM [Full View]
not yet. Originally Posted by MrJudge
going tonite.
but am wondering why this title? is this the original title?
-
From: Sanjeevi on 1st March 2007 09:32 AM [Full View]
I second Originally Posted by rocketboy
My fav channel - Toon Disney and Jetix, hehe
-
From: MrJudge on 1st March 2007 09:41 AM [Full View]
Nope, it is just Paruthti veeran. Originally Posted by NOV
May be just to make the locals feel related to the movie??
-
From: Sanjeevi on 1st March 2007 09:44 AM [Full View]
-
From: MrJudge on 1st March 2007 09:47 AM [Full View]
Heard my friend that Kumudam has given thumbs-up for PV in this week's edition
-
From: selvakumar on 1st March 2007 09:56 AM [Full View]
As I already said, my friends gave enough information on the climax. Originally Posted by Nerd
Selva: You have committed a big mistake - talking through pages on a movie that you have not seen yet
If the rape is realistic, let it be. After all its a real life incident. Those kind of scenes will hit you hard. sEthu climax, kAdhal climax are excellent examples. I for one, absolutely loved both I didn't lie that I have seen the movie
As I said in my last reply, my problem is : I cannot appreciate brutal, cruel, rude and raw scenes in the name of realism
Even IF my THALA comes up with that, I will certainly criticise him for the output.
I don't think climax of Sethu and Kaathal were brutal.
Originally Posted by Nerd
And a few adults as well until they really grow up :P Originally Posted by joe
Kids can continue watching cartoons until they grow up
Anyway joe thanks for the recommendation, i would make it a point not to miss the movie
-
From: Nerd on 1st March 2007 10:03 AM [Full View]
selva: I was saying that in a lighter tone. AFAIK everyone that uses a hammer here does not really intend to hit others. It was for pure fun. I dont have problems with you not liking the movie but vouching against it without even watching the movie was not a very nice idea, I thought
And the grow up comment was not for you. Heck, I just realized how can a casual thing be interpreted in different ways by different people
-
From: selvakumar on 1st March 2007 10:10 AM [Full View]
Agree with this 100%. I have said in my previous replies. I hope I wasn't "FORCING" my opinion on others. Sorry IF my replies sound so Originally Posted by Nerd
I dont have problems with you not liking the movie but vouching against it without even watching the movie was not a very nice idea, I thought
Ofcourse Nerd. I took that one on a lighter tone only. Wasn't serious there Originally Posted by Nerd
Here I was serious. I agree. Apart from Karthi, I am the only guy who is bashing PV. (EVen kaarthi was complaining about the climax only)And the grow up comment was not for you. Heck, I just realized how can a casual thing be interpreted in different ways by different people
So, It narrows down to me.
Anyway, Nice to hear that that comment wasn't for me.
Nerd - I didn't take your post seriously I think we (both of us) know this very well in the hub Right ?
Let me stop here !
Good to hear that many are loving the movie. Joe - Thanks for review as well
-
From: kb on 1st March 2007 10:12 AM [Full View]
how is the comedy in the movie..
-
From: joe on 1st March 2007 10:20 AM [Full View]
Selva,
You will love this movie too if you love 'Veyil'.
Btw,The Kid comment is for NOV ,who asked whether it is fit for kids
-
From: selvakumar on 1st March 2007 10:27 AM [Full View]
Ofcourse Joe. Veyyil is one movie which I loved a lot in the recent times. Too bad it went onto become one of the biggest flops
Going to watch this movie in "Sivakasi" this weekend.
-
From: Selvan on 1st March 2007 10:28 AM [Full View]
Selvakumar, I happened hear the following from an elder person, who is virtually an encyclopedia as far as tamil cinema is concerned . Couldn't refute him
enakku paruthi veeran migavum pidithullathu, aanaal antha padathil climax kaathichiyil varum katRpazhippu kaatchi satRu koduuramaaga edukka pattuLLathu naangal ingae kai thatti, padam siRappaaga uLLathu enRu paaraatukirOm, aanal antha kaatchiyil oru nadigai avvaLavu kEvalamaaga nadikka vEndiyuLLathu. eenendral, engalukku niyaththai kaatta pOgiraarkalaam. nijam enRal, avarkalai nirvaanamaagavum kaatta vEndum allavaa? Cinema enpathu niyam illai, pOliyum illai. Cinemavai satRu niyamaaga kaata vEndum, athatkaaga asingamaa kaata kuudathu. Naan intha padathai mattum kuRai sollavillai. Ippozhu varuginra padangalil irattai artha vasanangal, pengalai uNarchi illathavargalaaga kaatuvathu ellavatRaiyum sErthu thaan pEsukirEn. hollywood hollywood enRu solli, seekiram thamizh cinemavai hollywood cinema aakividuvaargal emathu kalainjarkaL.
antha kaatchiyai kaaraNam kaati, antha padathai sari illai enRu kuuRa maatEn. antha kaatchikku mun varum kaatchikal mugavum jathaarthamga uLLathu. aanaalum, een intha maathiri kaatchikalai thiniththu makkaLai paarkaamal seikiraargalO theriyavillai. padangal makkaL paarpathatku thaanE edukiraargal? appuRam een ippadi?
cheers
-
From: selvakumar on 1st March 2007 10:39 AM [Full View]
Selvan,
Must say: Few of my friends (Girls) commented like this. Anyway, Opinion always differ.
Atleast, I am a bit happy that my friends have company for their views
Let me watch it and post my views
P.S: Would be better IF you could post / PM the complete review of that person
-
From: NOV on 1st March 2007 10:55 AM [Full View]
veyyil a flop?
my expectations for this movie is now sky high. hope I dont get disapoointed
-
From: Sanjeevi on 1st March 2007 11:39 AM [Full View]
selva, Veyil is not flop infact it is a hit or above average in BO
-
From: selvakumar on 1st March 2007 01:18 PM [Full View]
AFAIK, Veyyil is an average grosser. It didn't run well even in "Virudhungar" It is definitly not a HIT.
-
From: rajasaranam on 1st March 2007 02:05 PM [Full View]
Watched the movie for 3rd time. The climax rape scene is cut off totally and the Impact the movie created earlier is missing Earlier I was the one who commented it could have been trimmed down.....But!
Even when i watched the movie for second time and knowing that, this is what is going to happen, tears started rolling down when the rape scene came. but this time it became just another normal movie.
The success of the movie earlier was that normal persons feel disgusted by whatever happens to a girl during a rape and want to save her by some miracle " venaamda ennai vittundungada enakku naalaikku kalayanam....Valikuthudaaa" all these dialogues created a feeling inside me which went against rape and wanted to kill off all those Ba***ds who rape. Now that the scene is cutoff Iam not able to relate as earlier to the emotion of a girl getting raped.
Ameer's attempt trying to portray the scenes realistically would have woken upon the moral instincts of we human beings to take a strong stand against rape and rapists. the dilution has hindered the process IMHO.
-
From: ThalaNass on 1st March 2007 02:06 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by NOV
why is themovie released here as paruththi veeran dubai?
r u sure NOV? i tought they didnt change the title here..? its still paruthi veeran what..?
-
From: Hulkster on 1st March 2007 02:37 PM [Full View]
RS sir i guess the producers did not understand the meaning of trim..they shud have let the scene reach its focal point which is getting chased..trapped down..raped and then to the emotional part..now when i want to watch the movie i will be looking at a empty climax instead as well...
-
From: thinkfloyd on 1st March 2007 03:10 PM [Full View]
At the risk of "padam-paakkaama-overa-pesing" i declare hereby that this is a knock-out post. Originally Posted by rajasaranam
Watched the movie for 3rd time. The climax rape scene is cut off totally and the Impact the movie created earlier is missing Earlier I was the one who commented it could have been trimmed down.....But!
Even when i watched the movie for second time and knowing that, this is what is going to happen, tears started rolling down when the rape scene came. but this time it became just another normal movie.
The success of the movie earlier was that normal persons feel disgusted by whatever happens to a girl during a rape and want to save her by some miracle " venaamda ennai vittundungada enakku naalaikku kalayanam....Valikuthudaaa" all these dialogues created a feeling inside me which went against rape and wanted to kill off all those Ba***ds who rape. Now that the scene is cutoff Iam not able to relate as earlier to the emotion of a girl getting raped.
Ameer's attempt trying to portray the scenes realistically would have woken upon the moral instincts of we human beings to take a strong stand against rape and rapists. the dilution has hindered the process IMHO.
This is exactly what i've been trying to say.
P.S: I know, people may counter with the question "Amaam, Ameer appadi kaatlenna engalukku enna rape pidikkuma? Appattama kaattina dhaan engalukku puriyuma?".
Well, the keyword is impact
-
From: karthik_sa2 on 1st March 2007 07:59 PM [Full View]
no juge i didn mean the opening song.infact i liked it very much.village based movie'ku ithoda super start kidaikaadhu.it was enjoyable that too with bunch of my friends whistling and clapping.i meant the song that somes after interval.a bit too long and unnecessary.You didn't like it? I am surprised .......To me this is the best movie from Ameer so far. The opening song was too lengthy but Ameer wanted to show all things happening during thiruvizha in one song.
nerd,
i felt the movie lacked substance .i agree he has shown totally whaty happens in village very natural but is it a panorama show just to depict village scenes.the movie lacked a proper theme or story which made the climax look totally unfit."thun vinay thannai chudum"dhaan concept'ah?? if so it is extreeeeeeeeemely childish is my opinion.
-
From: NOV on 2nd March 2007 04:33 AM [Full View]
Paruthi Veeran - One of the most horrible movies I have ever watched.
-
From: kb on 2nd March 2007 04:36 AM [Full View]
comments on both extremes
nalla irrungkuravanga ellam kaiya thookukunga pa
-
From: NOV on 2nd March 2007 05:26 AM [Full View]
yes, I even checked with the counter. he too didnt understand. Originally Posted by ThalaNass
r u sure NOV? i tought they didnt change the title here..? its still paruthi veeran what..?
but see the cinema listings in The Star. Again today.
-
From: Ulaganayagan on 2nd March 2007 06:31 AM [Full View]
vaat a interesting thread
hope the movie is even half as fun :P
-
From: ajithfederer on 2nd March 2007 06:36 AM [Full View]
Lastaa adichathu Vat aa?? adhu what
Originally Posted by Ulaganayagan
vaat a interesting thread
hope the movie is even half as fun :P
-
From: NOV on 2nd March 2007 06:36 AM [Full View]
Don't miss it! Originally Posted by NOV
-
From: Wibha on 2nd March 2007 06:42 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by NOV
Don't miss it! Originally Posted by NOV
-
From: joe on 2nd March 2007 06:42 AM [Full View]
NOV,
enna kuLappureenga?
Padam pidichirukka ?Illiya?
-
From: Selvan on 2nd March 2007 06:42 AM [Full View]
I did not miss IT. Already watched it. 
-
From: Ulaganayagan on 2nd March 2007 06:47 AM [Full View]
Village effect :P Originally Posted by ajithfederer
Lastaa adichathu Vat aa?? adhu what
Originally Posted by Ulaganayagan
vaat a interesting thread
hope the movie is even half as fun :P
-
From: Ulaganayagan on 2nd March 2007 06:49 AM [Full View]
padam ungala romba badhichirukkunnu theriyudhu Originally Posted by NOV
Don't miss it! Originally Posted by NOV
-
From: NOV on 2nd March 2007 06:49 AM [Full View]
kuzhappam Edhummilla Joe. movie was HORRIBLE. it turned my insides out. Originally Posted by joe
Raw, Crude, Chilling, Nightmarish....
-
From: ajithfederer on 2nd March 2007 06:50 AM [Full View]
wogayy
Originally Posted by Ulaganayagan
Village effect :P Originally Posted by ajithfederer
Lastaa adichathu Vat aa?? adhu what
Originally Posted by Ulaganayagan
vaat a interesting thread
hope the movie is even half as fun :P
-
From: NOV on 2nd March 2007 06:51 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Ulaganayagan
padam ungala romba badhichirukkunnu theriyudhu
its like being there living among the characters and witnessing what is going on in their lives.
-
From: joe on 2nd March 2007 06:52 AM [Full View]
NOV,
Innum athigama kuLappureenga
Is the whole movie horrible ? or only the climax?
-
From: NOV on 2nd March 2007 06:53 AM [Full View]
good. Originally Posted by Selvan
I did not miss IT. Already watched it.
say goodbye to normal life again.
yeah, ellOrum paarkka vEndiya padam idhu
pudhusaa onnum illa
periya kadhainu onnum illa
aanaal......
-
From: Surya on 2nd March 2007 06:55 AM [Full View]
rape scene-kaage paaka solreengala?! Originally Posted by NOV
good. Originally Posted by Selvan
I did not miss IT. Already watched it.
say goodbye to normal life again.
yeah, ellOrum paarkka vEndiya padam idhu
pudhusaa onnum illa
periya kadhainu onnum illa
aanaal......
-
From: NOV on 2nd March 2007 06:55 AM [Full View]
horrible means terrifying. romba thathroobamaa irukku... Originally Posted by joe
-
From: joe on 2nd March 2007 06:55 AM [Full View]
NOV,
I understand now..
Glad to know you (a person born and brought up outside TN) can feel it. and agree with my review
-
From: NOV on 2nd March 2007 06:58 AM [Full View]
kandippaa! it will give a new meaning to the word pain. Originally Posted by Surya
rape scene-kaage paaka solreengala?!
adhaavadhu nee oru eevu irakkammulla manudhana irundhaa
-
From: Surya on 2nd March 2007 06:59 AM [Full View]
Mercy....That's something I don't Have! Originally Posted by NOV
kandippaa! it will give a new meaning to the word pain. Originally Posted by Surya
rape scene-kaage paaka solreengala?!
adhaavadhu nee oru eevu irakkammulla manudhana irundhaa
Hmm...anywayz, looking at the reviews, I"ll still watch it for sure.
-
From: joe on 2nd March 2007 06:59 AM [Full View]
Surya, Originally Posted by Surya
rape scene-kaage paaka solreengala?! Originally Posted by NOV
good. Originally Posted by Selvan
I did not miss IT. Already watched it.
say goodbye to normal life again.
yeah, ellOrum paarkka vEndiya padam idhu
pudhusaa onnum illa
periya kadhainu onnum illa
aanaal......
What NOV says is the whole movie is nearly realistic ..rape scene-kaka mattum paakkuravangalukku padam pidikkathu, unmai thaan
-
From: Surya on 2nd March 2007 07:02 AM [Full View]
Gotcha!
-
From: NOV on 2nd March 2007 07:03 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by joe
Glad to know you (a person born and brought up outside TN) can feel it.
do you remember sindhu bhairavi scene where suhasini will clap with her eyes moist? oru varuuththamaana sandhOsham? thats how I feel.....
shall we talk about the negative points in the movie?
not much actually, but just so that we can remain human.
1. kids being in love and doing adhimEdhavi stuff - i thot that was maniratnam's domain.
simply cannot accept the activities of the kids.
2.
3.
Selvan & Joe and others who have seen the movie, pls add on.
-
From: NOV on 2nd March 2007 07:08 AM [Full View]
do you see the focus is always on the rape scene? Originally Posted by joe
What NOV says is the whole movie is nearly realistic ..rape scene-kaka mattum paakkuravangalukku padam pidikkathu, unmai thaan
WHY????!!!!
because of the impact it causes on the viewer.
actually the more stunning scenes happens just AFTER the rape. ameer takes your heart and squeezes it. NOTHING is overdone.
p/s: btw, malaysian censors saw to it that we were protected. the 1st guy closes the door and then the last guy adjusts his loongi and comes out.
luckily tom and jerry didnt come in between.
-
From: joe on 2nd March 2007 07:08 AM [Full View]
NOV,
Negatives
1.Ponvannan's dilaogue delivery seems out of madurai slag and tone sometimes -this is what I felt
2.Heroine has mad love just because hero saved her life in childwood.
will add more later..
-
From: joe on 2nd March 2007 07:12 AM [Full View]
Exactly! I also felt more for it than the rape scene . Originally Posted by NOV
I think in singapore no cut.
-
From: NOV on 2nd March 2007 07:15 AM [Full View]
opening scene - long but very impactful. sets the tone for the whole movie.
naattupura paadalgal (not villu pattu) was very appropriate, rustic and highly realistic.
gave a feel of actually being present there.
saravanan's and karthik's introductions were apt. also ganja karuppu.
-
From: joe on 2nd March 2007 07:17 AM [Full View]
Yeah, Cancer's claim of Villu Pattu is wrong .There was no villupattu ..Only nattupura pattu and koothu.
-
From: joe on 2nd March 2007 07:19 AM [Full View]
Saravanan and Karthi in tea stall ,making fun on others..really hilarious. Originally Posted by NOV
[b]
saravanan's and karthik's introductions were apt. also ganja karuppu.
Kanjakaruppu's sonmapodi box crushed in between a serious scene and his reaction
-
From: NOV on 2nd March 2007 07:27 AM [Full View]
Acting - *****
Karthik - Duplicate Surya. In almost all scenes. Even has the same voice.
When priyamani hugs karthik on seeing the heart tattoo, his reaction was exactly Surya's (maayavi?)
Very good attempt for first movie.
Saravanan - Needless to say. Didnt know he could act so well.
Priyamani - Certain candidate for best actress of the year! chancE illa....
I looked fwd to every scene involving her. No glamour just pure unadulterated acting!
Ponvannan - ? Is that really him. Subdued at times, roaring at others.
Ganja Karuppu - Comedy without distracting the main plot
Extras - All were good, from the small kids to the cooling glass paatti. So, so natural
ALL glories Goes to Director Ameer!
-
From: joe on 2nd March 2007 07:29 AM [Full View]
NOV,
Priyamani and Karthi are too good..But My vote goes to Saravanan for best performance.
-
From: joe on 2nd March 2007 07:30 AM [Full View]
NOV,
Naan en review-la sonnathellam neengalum sollureenga .Nov en kooda inthalavu oththu porara..Nane ennai killi paathukuren
-
From: NOV on 2nd March 2007 07:32 AM [Full View]
sorry Joe, endha reviewsum naa innum padikkala. Originally Posted by joe
Naan en review-la sonnathellam neengalum sollureenga .Nov en kooda inthalavu oththu porara..Nane ennai killi paathukuren
I usually skip all reviews of movies I wanna watch.
oththu pOradhu onnum pudhusilla. only flaw was POI.
btw, my award for best acting goes to PRIYAMANI!
-
From: selvakumar on 2nd March 2007 07:34 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by NOV
oththu pOradhu onnum pudhusilla. only flaw was POI.
-
From: NOV on 2nd March 2007 07:37 AM [Full View]
Selva -
-
From: joe on 2nd March 2007 07:40 AM [Full View]
Ippo than padam parthuteengale..Go back and read my review Originally Posted by NOV
I usually skip all reviews of movies I wanna watch.
-
From: selvakumar on 2nd March 2007 07:41 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by NOV
Selva -
-
From: joe on 2nd March 2007 07:43 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by selvakumar
Originally Posted by NOV
Selva -
-
From: NOV on 2nd March 2007 07:46 AM [Full View]
STORY - no spoilers
Ponvannan is a hard core casteist but who has no qualms living off the fruits of a lower caste family. Due to business rivalry, the lower caste couple are killed. Ponvannan is aghast to learn that his wife's brother marries the couple's surviving daughter and chases him from the house. This sets for the rivalry between both families. The newly married couple are killed living their baby son in the protection of his father's brother Chevvalai (Saravanan) who raises the boy as his son.
The boy grows up and messes with Ponvannan's daughter and after an incident they become thick friends (lovers? ) .
This background is shown in a series of flashbacks interestingly captured in sepia tone.
They grow up as Paruthiveeran (Karthik) and Muthazhagu (Priyamani). The hostilities between the families continue, but Muthazhagu is determined to marry an indifferent Paruthiveeran.
What happens next is the story of Paruthi Veeran.
-
From: NOV on 2nd March 2007 07:56 AM [Full View]
Music was excellent. Yuvan Shankar Raja knows what he is doing. Songs were perfect fit. very folkish, very rustic. BGM was excellent too - nothing out of place.
Even in the climax,when a lesser MD would have become excited, YSR shows his maturity and allowed the scene to dominate.
-
From: joe on 2nd March 2007 07:57 AM [Full View]
NOV,
Do you find difficult to understand rural madurai slang dialogues?
How do you feel seeing the village and life pattern in TN?
-
From: NOV on 2nd March 2007 08:01 AM [Full View]
not at all. except when they went very soft (poor dts recording) - especially mandaiyila kottu vaangina punniyavaan Originally Posted by joe
enna ippadi kEttuputtenga? naangalum bharathi raja padam ellaam paaththirukkOmla Originally Posted by joe
-
From: NOV on 2nd March 2007 08:04 AM [Full View]
speaking of bharathiraja, PV is actually a brought-to present-times BR story. I could see several semblances. :P
-
From: joe on 2nd March 2007 08:07 AM [Full View]
Nov,
Hero is a chandiyar .Heroine also a bold girl .They left their village to marry .but the heroine is killed ..enakku konjam virumandi gnapagam vanthathu..ungkalukku
-
From: thinkfloyd on 2nd March 2007 08:11 AM [Full View]
Trailor paatha konjam andha saayal irundhudhu - the court scene.. after Virumaandi, court scene-a remba natural-a eduthirukkaanga nu nenaikkaren.... Originally Posted by joe
Nov,
Hero is a chandiyar .Heroine also a bold girl .They left their village to marry .but the heroine is killed ..enakku konjam virumandi gnapagam vanthathu..ungkalukku
-
From: NOV on 2nd March 2007 08:12 AM [Full View]
adhaan sonnEnla, kadhai onnum pudhusu illa.
what is amazing is the characterisation!
I am very happy that there are a lot of new directors with new ideas.
neenga kOchukkalanaa oru vishayam sollrEn.
after watching PV, i told my friend, "ippadi ellaam padam edukkura director irukkura pOdhu, chEran maadhiriyaana saadharna directorgala thalala thooki vechu aaduraanga."
-
From: joe on 2nd March 2007 08:18 AM [Full View]
Ameerukku pathila Cheran-a yaarum thalayila thooki vachu aadalla..But Cheran-kku pathila Perarasu ,Hari.P.Vasu intha maathiri aalungala thalayila thooki vachu aadum pothu thaan erichal varuthu. Originally Posted by NOV
"ippadi ellaam padam edukkura director irukkura pOdhu, chEran maadhiriyaana saadharna directorgala thalala thooki vechu aaduraanga."
Maatram ellam oru Naalla vanthudathu ..Ameer intha maathiri 4 step munnala vachu padam edukkurathukkee Cheran maathiri directors atleast 2 step -vathu vachu padam eduthu Jeyithu kaattiyathu thaan paathai amachu koduththathu .atha marakka koodathu.
-
From: NOV on 2nd March 2007 08:24 AM [Full View]
marukkalaamla? :P
I am happy - two good movies in two months!
I am sure mozhi will also live up to my expectations (seeing this wknd)
-
From: joe on 2nd March 2007 08:25 AM [Full View]
Nov,
What I heard is Mozhi is even better,,Let us see
-
From: NOV on 2nd March 2007 08:28 AM [Full View]
how to compare?
someone asked me to compare PV with Veyyil. I also felt that it is hard to compare.
but anyhow conceded that PV is indeed better than Veyil (while Veyyil itself was a very good movie).
-
From: cancer on 2nd March 2007 08:56 AM [Full View]
Amirr kku nalla mariyathai kidaithu Vittathu Movie is hit...
Mozhi. yet to watch..
-
From: cancer on 2nd March 2007 09:04 AM [Full View]
in Madurai,Kamal fans supporting Paruthi veeran, when i was there in madurai last week end ,
Kamal fans arranged one function in Karimedu to support PA, Ameer was there with Azhakar(President of Kamalahassan's narpani iyakkam)
-
From: joe on 2nd March 2007 09:08 AM [Full View]
Interesting ..In the movie ,they have shown Ajith,Vijay posters and Kamal Hassan Narpani Iyakkam banner is shown throughout the koothu sequence ..is there any relevant ? Is Ameer a kamal fan? Originally Posted by cancer
in Madurai,Kamal fans supporting Paruthi veeran, when i was there in madurai last week end ,
Kamal fans arranged one function in Karimedu to support PA, Ameer was there with Azhakar(President of Kamalahassan's narpani iyakkam)
-
From: Aandavan on 2nd March 2007 09:10 AM [Full View]
Ameer is a Madurai Kamal Haasar Narpani mandram Urupinar.. thats why :P Originally Posted by cancer
in Madurai,Kamal fans supporting Paruthi veeran, when i was there in madurai last week end ,
Kamal fans arranged one function in Karimedu to support PA, Ameer was there with Azhakar(President of Kamalahassan's narpani iyakkam)
-
From: Selvan on 2nd March 2007 10:32 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by NOV
You've changed your opinion on Paruthi veeran after the healthy discussions? :P :P
-
From: Selvan on 2nd March 2007 10:38 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by NOV
chEranukku enna kuRaichchal? avar padangal jathaarthamaaga irukirathu. avarOda interivew pidikalai endraal, avar nalla director illaya?
None of Ameer's movie could match either potkaalam or Autograph. National award board is not too stupid to acknowledge Autograph and Bharathi kannamma.
-
From: cancer on 2nd March 2007 11:23 AM [Full View]
ya.. Ajith vijay posters in same banner Originally Posted by joe
Interesting ..In the movie ,they have shown Ajith,Vijay posters and Kamal Hassan Narpani Iyakkam banner is shown throughout the koothu sequence ..is there any relevant ? Is Ameer a kamal fan? Originally Posted by cancer
in Madurai,Kamal fans supporting Paruthi veeran, when i was there in madurai last week end ,
Kamal fans arranged one function in Karimedu to support PA, Ameer was there with Azhakar(President of Kamalahassan's narpani iyakkam)
and they showed kamalhassar's narpani iyakkam as well as ajith's narpani iyakkam banners
-
From: NOV on 2nd March 2007 11:26 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Selvan
You've changed your opinion on Paruthi veeran after the healthy discussions? :P :P
what is this all about?
pls read my postings once again.
-
From: joe on 2nd March 2007 12:43 PM [Full View]
Super star Rajinikanth attended spl show of 'paruthi Veeran' .He was full of praise on Director Ameer
-
From: ThalaNass on 2nd March 2007 05:35 PM [Full View]
cha.. Originally Posted by NOV
do you see the focus is always on the rape scene? Originally Posted by joe
What NOV says is the whole movie is nearly realistic ..rape scene-kaka mattum paakkuravangalukku padam pidikkathu, unmai thaan
WHY????!!!!
because of the impact it causes on the viewer.
actually the more stunning scenes happens just AFTER the rape. ameer takes your heart and squeezes it. NOTHING is overdone.
p/s: btw, malaysian censors saw to it that we were protected. the 1st guy closes the door and then the last guy adjusts his loongi and comes out.luckily tom and jerry didnt come in between. appo rape scene kidayatha..?? hehe :P
-
From: Nerd on 2nd March 2007 08:59 PM [Full View]
Really!! Thats one thing I like about Rajini. He WATCHES almost all the new movies and he is always appreciative of the fellow actors. He in fact is KH's first fan Originally Posted by joe
Super star Rajinikanth attended spl show of 'paruthi Veeran' .He was full of praise on Director Ameer
Anyway great going guys, cant wait to watch the movie. Downloaded version dhaan-nu nenaikkirEn
-
From: Nerd on 2nd March 2007 09:35 PM [Full View]
http://www.hindu.com/fr/2007/03/02/s...0200250200.htm
Kind of a negative review looks like. I will just read the first and the last sentance of the reviews of films that I have not watched yet
Vikatan -- 46/100
-
From: joe on 2nd March 2007 10:05 PM [Full View]
Nerd,
Vikatan PV climax 'Vakkiram'-nnu sollurathellam peththal.
-
From: Nerd on 2nd March 2007 10:25 PM [Full View]
Oh :P
Thanks for the information Joe!
-
From: thinkfloyd on 3rd March 2007 01:36 AM [Full View]
Watched Paruthiveeran midnight show tonight.
Suffice to say that WHOEVER SAYS THE CLIMAX/RAPE SCENE IS UNREALISTIC OR UNNECESSARY OR VULGAR OR "VAKKIRAM", please stop what you are doing and go watch it again.
[My wife broke down and i could hear some sobs from other women as well. Not many can handle the climax]
Rajasaranam got it spot on. idhu dhAn rape. 'tha indha reaction-a evoke pannanum.
Hats off to Ameer for that scene
He has shown tremendous courage (you need balls to show a scene like that). Thamizh directors are growing up, its time for the audience to grow up and wake up as well
In the interval i was wondering if our people had gone overboard and overrated what seemed to be a 'decent' attempt at good film-making. Ameer second half la padatha thookki niruthittaaru. I think Ameer must have loved Virumaandi - the feel is there and some cues have been taken as well.
Dialogues, locale, cinematography, attention for detail, are noteworthy. Saravanan is a revelation. Yuvan kalakkittAru, though none of the songs has stuck in my mind. pAdAma irundhirukkalAm.
Its a remarkable debut for Karthi. However, its ironic that he is so much like Surya, it will be achallenge for him to stand apart. Not that he copies Surya but he just happens to sound and look like Surya! avar thappu illai
Cribs: Not a childhood-sweetheart "love" flashback again!!!
pOdhum!
The humor/comedy has come in the way of the the otherwise natural portrayal. Overboard in a few places.
I don't find Priya Mani's acting as good as many have posted here. Not only is her accent unconvincing, her body language doesn't look like that of a village girl.
Aandavar banner is another big bonus
P.S: Has anyone watched "Twenty Nine Palms" (French)?
-
From: NOV on 3rd March 2007 06:55 AM [Full View]
PM me after watching the movie and I will tell you what you missed. (A couple of heart twisting dialogues). Originally Posted by ThalaNass
cha.. appo rape scene kidayatha..?? hehe :P
-
From: Cinefan on 3rd March 2007 11:32 AM [Full View]
Dig: Originally Posted by thinkfloyd
Hey Man,when did you get married?Belated congratulations.
End Dig.
Guess for me here,PV,Mozhi&PKMC will have to be watched on pirated Cd's.
BTW,my 75 year old grandmom saw PKMC in Chennai&has given it a 'Very good film'review.
-
From: joe on 3rd March 2007 11:39 AM [Full View]
ThinkFlyod,
Glad your review has many similar points with mine ,especially the climax ,Saravanan's best performance more than Priyamani.
GV Yushun -la kootam irunthutha?
-
From: ThalaNass on 3rd March 2007 11:42 AM [Full View]
wokey thalaiva.. Originally Posted by NOV
PM me after watching the movie and I will tell you what you missed. (A couple of heart twisting dialogues). Originally Posted by ThalaNass
cha.. appo rape scene kidayatha..?? hehe :P
-
From: thinkfloyd on 3rd March 2007 01:20 PM [Full View]
Midnight show, crowd kammi dhAn, but better than the crowd for PKMC last week which was 9PM show.. Originally Posted by joe
-
From: joe on 3rd March 2007 01:31 PM [Full View]
OK.I went to 9PM show last wednesday ,50% of the seats occupied ,good for a weekday. Originally Posted by thinkfloyd
Midnight show, crowd kammi dhAn, but better than the crowd for PKMC last week which was 9PM show.. Originally Posted by joe
-
From: joe on 3rd March 2007 03:26 PM [Full View]
பருத்தி வீரன் படத்தை பார்த்த சூப்பர் ஸ்டார் ரஜினிகாந்த், இயக்குநர் அமீர் இயக்கிய விதத்தைப் பார்த்து அசந்து போய், போனில் அமீரைப் பிடித்து பாராட்டித் தள்ளிவிட்டாராம்.
இயக்குநர் அமீரின் முத்துப் படம் பருத்தி வீரன். பார்த்து பார்த்து இழைத்து எடுத்துள்ள இப்படம் பல்வேறு சிக்கல்களைத் தாண்டி ரிலீஸ் ஆகியுள்ளது. சூப்பர் ஸ்டார் ரஜினி இப்படத்தை பார்க்க வேண்டும் என்று விரும்பியதால், அவருக்காக பிரத்யேக காட்சிக்கு ஏற்பாடு செய்யப்பட்டிருந்தது.
ரஜினிக்காக ஃபோர் பிரேம்ஸ் பிரிவியூ தியேட்டரில் பருத்தி வீரன் பிரிவியூவுக்கு ஏற்பாடு செய்யப்பட்டிருந்தது. ரஜினி, மனைவி லதா, மகள்கள் ஐஸ்வர்யா, சௌந்தர்யா ஆகியோருடன் படம் பார்க்க வந்தார். மாலை 6.30 மணிக்கு உள்ளே நுழைந்த ரஜினி குடும்பத்தோடு படத்தைப் பார்த்து ரசித்தார்.
படத்தைப் பார்த்து முடித்த ரஜினியின் கண்களில் பிரமிப்பையும், வியப்பையும் காண முடிந்தது. தனது ஸ்டைலில் சட்டென்று போனை எடுத்து அமீரை பிடித்தார்.
மிகப் பிரமாதமாக எடுத்துள்ளீர்கள். திரைக்கதை அமைப்பில் பின்னியுள்ளீர்கள். உங்களுக்கு தேசிய விருது நிச்சயம் கிடைக்கும், வாழ்த்துக்கள் என்று கூறி அமீரை மனதார பாராட்டினார்.
அப்படியே அருகில் நின்ற ஹீரோ கார்த்தியையும் ரஜினி வெகுவாகப் பாராட்டினார். புதுமுக ஹீரோ போலவே நடிக்கவில்லை, எக்ஸல்லன்ட் நடிப்பு என்று கூறி கட்டித் தழுவினார் ரஜினி.
அப்படியே சிவக்குமாரையும் ஒரு வார்த்தை பாராட்டி விட்டு குடும்பத்தோடு கிளம்பிச் சென்றார் ரஜினி.
-
From: Hulkster on 3rd March 2007 03:51 PM [Full View]
I guess rajini's comments about the screenplay was to the point..if i am not wrong rajini used to be a film critic(not job,just a hobby) before he came to cinema and still continues that hobby although his criticism is always positive
I wish to see the film but once you guys said the rape scene has been trimmed, i doubt whether the movie has its impact still there
-
From: Aandavan on 3rd March 2007 04:13 PM [Full View]
Ameer was Madurai KAMAL HAASAR narpani mandra PORULAARAR.. (treasurer)
-
From: thinkfloyd on 3rd March 2007 04:48 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Aandavan
Ameer was Madurai KAMAL HAASAR narpani mandra PORULAARAR.. (treasurer)
-
From: joe on 3rd March 2007 05:17 PM [Full View]
Andavan,ThinkFlyod,
Kamal 'Paruththi veeran' paakalliya ?He should encourage his fan for his wonderful effort
-
From: Sanjeevi on 3rd March 2007 05:32 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by thinkfloyd
Originally Posted by Aandavan
Ameer was Madurai KAMAL HAASAR narpani mandra PORULAARAR.. (treasurer)
Kamal fans rasanai , super padam koduthirukar Amir
-
From: joe on 3rd March 2007 05:39 PM [Full View]
Like wise his guru Bala also NT,Kamal fan Originally Posted by Sanjeevi
Originally Posted by thinkfloyd
Originally Posted by Aandavan
Ameer was Madurai KAMAL HAASAR narpani mandra PORULAARAR.. (treasurer)
Kamal fans rasanai , super padam koduthirukar Amir
-
From: karthik_sa2 on 3rd March 2007 09:12 PM [Full View]
wow!!!i change my opinion now.paruthiveeran superb movieAmeer was Madurai KAMAL HAASAR narpani mandra PORULAARAR.. (treasurer)
-
From: joe on 3rd March 2007 11:42 PM [Full View]
Paruththi Veeran -Thirutti VCD ..Hero karthi complained Police commisioner..Karthi himself bought VCD for 50rs and handed over to commissioner as a proof
-
From: karthik_sa2 on 4th March 2007 01:36 AM [Full View]
karthi himself bought ah??how?did he go in maaru vaesham?Paruththi Veeran -Thirutti VCD ..Hero karthi complained Police commisioner..Karthi himself bought VCD for 50rs and handed over to commissioner as a proof
-
From: villan007 on 4th March 2007 01:45 AM [Full View]
avaru dhaadi illama pala perthuku adayalam theriadhu Originally Posted by karthik_sa2
... :P
-
From: Hulkster on 4th March 2007 01:16 PM [Full View]
Can anyone tell me if there has been any trimming in the paruthi veeran movie over here in singapore?..i do not want to lose the impact of the movie
-
From: thinkfloyd on 4th March 2007 01:20 PM [Full View]
No Hulkster, Originally Posted by Hulkster
Can anyone tell me if there has been any trimming in the paruthi veeran movie over here in singapore?..i do not want to lose the impact of the movie
I watched it in Yishun GV and i *believe* there was no trimming
[I would be very surprised if it was trimmed. because idhuvE bayangarama irundhudhu]
-
From: Hulkster on 4th March 2007 01:22 PM [Full View]
Thats good news...most of you have been saying its disturbing..let me hope it wunt dampen my mood somehow
..thanks for the info floyd
-
From: joe on 4th March 2007 01:43 PM [Full View]
As far as I know,There was no triming . Originally Posted by thinkfloyd
-
From: thimuru on 4th March 2007 03:06 PM [Full View]
kamal-ameer combo would be good...as a fan he would shape the movie well and also as a good film maker ...the movie would be classy!
-
From: MrJudge on 4th March 2007 05:10 PM [Full View]
NOV,
I was on the road for the last two days and didn't get a chance to read your reacations to PV. After reading your 'horrible' comment, I thought you didn't like it. But after completing all your posts, I am glad to know that you liked it.
RS is a lucky guy and have seen it thrice already. I like to watch it again for a few more times but couldn't do it. May be this coming week.....
-
From: NOV on 4th March 2007 05:16 PM [Full View]
like it is too mild a statement. I am stunned by it. Originally Posted by MrJudge
have watched alwar, pokkiri, PKMC and PV so far this year.
PV winds hands down as the best of everything so far: acting, direction, music, camera, screenplay, etc etc.
-
From: MrJudge on 4th March 2007 05:18 PM [Full View]
[tscii]
I was sure that the movie will do wonders in the sourthern parts of TN but little bit hesitant about Chennai. But looks like it is doing good in chennai too.
Paruthiveeran
Cast: Karthi, Priyamani
Director: Ameer
Music: Yuvan Shankar Raja
Production: K.E. Gnanavel
Not the spot where you expect to find a film starring a debutant. But Paruthiveeran breaks the rules. The fact that Ameer’s movies carry great expectations and that Karthik is Sivakumar’s son and Surya’s brother have helped the movie take a good opening. But those factors pale before the truth that the movie has been brilliantly executed. A mix of action, comedy and romance that is sure to click with all categories. The performance by a rookie starcast could outshine ones by seasoned stars.
Screen Talk:
It has got everything for everyone. Ameer enhances his reputation as a master craftsman. Among other factors, Yuvan’s music and Ramji’s camera add strength to the movie. It is a film about people who lead a rowdy’s life, but not just another rowdy film. The story and script have been treated to make the concept feel almost new.
Trade Talk:
Great expectations, great opening and great word of mouth have put the movie on the track to victory. Within a week of its release, it has managed to make a total collection of 3 crores, this equals the first week collections of the Vijay starrer, Pokkiri. Currently doing 30 shows in the city, it has been running to full houses at almost all release centers. Advance booking counters too are busy with tickets completely sold out till Wednesday.
N.O. Shows in Chennai: 30.
N.O. Weeks Completed: 1.
Average Theatre Occupancy: 100%.
Verdict: Super hit
-
From: MrJudge on 4th March 2007 05:19 PM [Full View]
-
From: joe on 4th March 2007 05:44 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by MrJudge
-
From: NOV on 4th March 2007 05:46 PM [Full View]
varra varra indha BO ellaam enakku puriyaamE pOchu. 1 vaaraththula super hit'nu declare pannuraanga!
-
From: great on 4th March 2007 06:15 PM [Full View]
SathylamLa saturday ticket book panniyum paaka mudiyala, few of my friends could not make it Originally Posted by NOV
varra varra indha BO ellaam enakku puriyaamE pOchu. 1 vaaraththula super hit'nu declare pannuraanga! . so we had to reschedule
-
From: NOV on 4th March 2007 06:28 PM [Full View]
thats fine balaji, but how can it be declared a super hit in one week?
nvm, i'll be one happy man if the movie is a box office success but hope tat ameer doesnt despair us like this again.
-
From: Sanjeevi on 4th March 2007 07:44 PM [Full View]
NOV we can assume (or declare) a movie as a super hit movie based on the Rush in advance booking of tickets and Word of mouth. In-fact we define a movie's BO status Originally Posted by NOV
thats fine balaji, but how can it be declared a super hit in one week?
nvm, i'll be one happy man if the movie is a box office success but hope tat ameer doesnt despair us like this again.
-
From: Kollywoodfan on 4th March 2007 08:55 PM [Full View]
wow! this movie in one word: powerful
I didn't like the story that much because there were others like it, village based and all...but I think the climax was something that tamil cinema hasn't seen in a long time, or at least something that I haven't seen in a long time.
Karthi and Priya Mani were simply mindblowing!! Knock-out performances and with the news of them dubbing for themselves, they definitely should be in the running for numerous, even including National awards. They were cute, angry, lovable, and in the brutal fates at the end and their acting brought tears to my eyes. Karthi was awesome, kinda was expected based on his lineage but Priya Mani was a revelation! She has used the first meaningful role she got since her debut and passed with flying colors. A film that stuck with me long after I left the theatre. Wow!
-
From: MrJudge on 5th March 2007 07:59 AM [Full View]
Yeah, everyone is reacting the same way NOV. After watching PV, I was talking non-stop about the movie for the next few days with my friends. Don't know how I will react after the minor cuts made in the climax. This is one movie made me thinking about it after a very long long time. Originally Posted by NOV
like it is too mild a statement. I am stunned by it.
have watched alwar, pokkiri, PKMC and PV so far this year.
PV winds hands down as the best of everything so far: acting, direction, music, camera, screenplay, etc etc.
-
From: MrJudge on 5th March 2007 08:04 AM [Full View]
BO verdict in TN is somewhat vague IMO. Mostly they consider only couple of complexes in Chennai and declare it a hit or not. some movies do well in B and C centers. They don't care about it as long as they do well in Sathyam or Devi or Mayajaal, it is a hit according to them. But looks like PV is doing good in A centers too. A good movie appreciated by all classes is a good thing and should be a hit definitely. Originally Posted by NOV
varra varra indha BO ellaam enakku puriyaamE pOchu. 1 vaaraththula super hit'nu declare pannuraanga!
-
From: karthik_sa2 on 5th March 2007 09:36 AM [Full View]
hmm...feels good thoughBO verdict in TN is somewhat vague IMO. Mostly they consider only couple of complexes in Chennai and declare it a hit or not. some movies do well in B and C centers. They don't care about it as long as they do well in Sathyam or Devi or Mayajaal, it is a hit according to them. But looks like PV is doing good in A centers too. A good movie appreciated by all classes is a good thing and should be a hit definitely
-
From: Aandavan on 5th March 2007 09:53 AM [Full View]
these the BO verdict depends on how quickly the movie breaks even... a movie like paruthiveeran would have been sold for less than 5 crores.. If it collected more than 3 crores in the first week itself.. then clearly we can see, that from the second week itself, the movie will give profits for its distributors and theatre owners.. and if the word of mouth is great as it is for PV, u expect a huge profit for all concerned with the movie.. hence PV can be definitely called a super hit, even in its firstweek itself.. Originally Posted by NOV
thats fine balaji, but how can it be declared a super hit in one week?
nvm, i'll be one happy man if the movie is a box office success but hope tat ameer doesnt despair us like this again.
-
From: joe on 5th March 2007 10:47 AM [Full View]
well said! Originally Posted by Aandavan
these the BO verdict depends on how quickly the movie breaks even... a movie like paruthiveeran would have been sold for less than 5 crores.. If it collected more than 3 crores in the first week itself.. then clearly we can see, that from the second week itself, the movie will give profits for its distributors and theatre owners.. and if the word of mouth is great as it is for PV, u expect a huge profit for all concerned with the movie.. hence PV can be definitely called a super hit, even in its firstweek itself.. Originally Posted by NOV
thats fine balaji, but how can it be declared a super hit in one week?
nvm, i'll be one happy man if the movie is a box office success but hope tat ameer doesnt despair us like this again.
-
From: MADDY on 5th March 2007 11:24 AM [Full View]
yes wat aandavan says is true......even Guru which was made at Rs15 crores, had a collection of 22 crores in first 2 weeks only which was directly called a 'Hit' within first 2 weeks..... Originally Posted by Aandavan
these the BO verdict depends on how quickly the movie breaks even... a movie like paruthiveeran would have been sold for less than 5 crores.. If it collected more than 3 crores in the first week itself.. then clearly we can see, that from the second week itself, the movie will give profits for its distributors and theatre owners.. and if the word of mouth is great as it is for PV, u expect a huge profit for all concerned with the movie.. hence PV can be definitely called a super hit, even in its firstweek itself.. Originally Posted by NOV
thats fine balaji, but how can it be declared a super hit in one week?
nvm, i'll be one happy man if the movie is a box office success but hope tat ameer doesnt despair us like this again.
-
From: Sanjeevi on 5th March 2007 11:37 AM [Full View]
Yes Guru is the first maniratnam's direct super hit movie in hindi and it collected around 50 crores (domestic + overseas)
-
From: MrJudge on 5th March 2007 12:01 PM [Full View]
Yeah, even Dhoom-2 collected more than any other hindi movies. Who cares about hindi films here anyways? Originally Posted by Sanjeevi
-
From: sakaLAKALAKAlaa Vallavar on 5th March 2007 12:07 PM [Full View]
in the 1st song, there were banners in background, bearing ulaganayagan's name Originally Posted by Aandavan
Ameer was Madurai KAMAL HAASAR narpani mandra PORULAARAR.. (treasurer)
-
From: k_vanan on 5th March 2007 01:06 PM [Full View]
first i don't like the oororam puliyamaram and tanga dunga songs but after watching the movie this songs really fit that scene and enjoyable. I think Yuvan done fantastic job in songs and BGM.
-
From: cancer on 5th March 2007 01:16 PM [Full View]
oororam Puliyamaram song rocks.. Originally Posted by k_vanan
especially that old ladie's voice...
-
From: joe on 5th March 2007 01:38 PM [Full View]
cancer,
There was no villu pattu as you mentiined before .
-
From: cancer on 5th March 2007 01:44 PM [Full View]
yes... Originally Posted by joe
vaarthai maari vittathu... that is naatu pura paattu...
Thavaruthalukku varunthukiren...
-
From: Sanjeevi on 10th March 2007 11:49 PM [Full View]
Saw paruthi veeran. Nice and bold attempt by Ameer.
Very better than his previous ventures MP and RAM (an overrated film).
-
From: joe on 12th March 2007 03:19 PM [Full View]
Kamal Hassan Watches Paruthi Veeran
[Monday, March 12, 2007]
Ace actor Kamal Hassan watched a special screening of Paruthi Veeran, the most talked about film in industry circles today. This film directed by Ameer stars Karthi and Priya Mani in the lead roles.
Actor Sivakumar, with his sons Suriya and Karthi, welcomed Kamal Hassan at Four Frames preview theatre where the special screening took place.
http://www.indiaglitz.com/channels/t...nts/11793.html
-
From: MrJudge on 12th March 2007 05:48 PM [Full View]
Ameer is happy and contended
IndiaGlitz [Monday, March 12, 2007]
Director Ameer has played down criticism from few quarters on the climax of his Paruthi Veeran.
The movie starring Karthi and Priya Mani released a couple of weeks ago and has been doing good business. However, a section had said that the climax scenes were gory and the rape scene was needless.
However, Ameer says, “The climax was necessary for the movie and I find no fault with it. When Sekhar Kapur had a similar sequence for Bandit Queen, everyone appreciated it. I wonder why they ridicule it when I opt for such a scene in Paruthi Veeran.”
“It is one of the most satisfying films for me and I am confident that it would bring the cast and crew of the movie more laurels,” he adds.
-
From: MrJudge on 12th March 2007 05:49 PM [Full View]
Ameer is happy and contended
IndiaGlitz [Monday, March 12, 2007]
Director Ameer has played down criticism from few quarters on the climax of his Paruthi Veeran.
The movie starring Karthi and Priya Mani released a couple of weeks ago and has been doing good business. However, a section had said that the climax scenes were gory and the rape scene was needless.
However, Ameer says, “The climax was necessary for the movie and I find no fault with it. When Sekhar Kapur had a similar sequence for Bandit Queen, everyone appreciated it. I wonder why they ridicule it when I opt for such a scene in Paruthi Veeran.”
“It is one of the most satisfying films for me and I am confident that it would bring the cast and crew of the movie more laurels,” he adds.
-
From: Warden on 14th March 2007 09:46 PM [Full View]
Paruthiveeran is now without director
By Behindwoods News Bureau.
March 14, 2007
This news is sponsored by www.behindbikes.com
Absurd as it may sound, but Paruthiveeran's producers seem to have decided to do without the director. In the recently released promo trailers of the already successful movie, director Ameer's name is seemingly missing, well almost. Earlier, Ameer's name
Ameer
appeared with the title, however in the latest trailers he has been pushed to the end of the trailers where the credentials roll. However, Ameer does not seem to be the one who let this get him down. "People know whose product the movie is and the rest of the world know whose name is responsible for the grand opening of the movie", he replies nonchalantly.
Has he not been watching the trailers aired repeatedly on prominent television channels? "I am totally out of the Paruthiveeran character and is in a different mood for my next venture. I intentionally keep away from Paruthiveeran's character since that will distract my work for the upcoming project" he adds.
Nanri ketta jenmangal
-
From: villan007 on 14th March 2007 09:53 PM [Full View]
PV was produced by ameer , rite ?
-
From: karthik_sa2 on 14th March 2007 10:02 PM [Full View]
i don understand this.in most of the trailers directors name comes only in the last na.also the recent trailor would be a different version from the previous one.chuma ivanga aethivudraanga..i think.BTW ameer is also the producer of paruthiParuthiveeran is now without director
By Behindwoods News Bureau.
March 14, 2007
This news is sponsored by www.behindbikes.com
Absurd as it may sound, but Paruthiveeran's producers seem to have decided to do without the director. In the recently released promo trailers of the already successful movie, director Ameer's name is seemingly missing, well almost. Earlier, Ameer's name
Ameer
appeared with the title, however in the latest trailers he has been pushed to the end of the trailers where the credentials roll. However, Ameer does not seem to be the one who let this get him down. "People know whose product the movie is and the rest of the world know whose name is responsible for the grand opening of the movie", he replies nonchalantly.
Has he not been watching the trailers aired repeatedly on prominent television channels? "I am totally out of the Paruthiveeran character and is in a different mood for my next venture. I intentionally keep away from Paruthiveeran's character since that will distract my work for the upcoming project" he adds.
Nanri ketta jenmangal
-
From: great on 14th March 2007 11:26 PM [Full View]
No Studio green Originally Posted by villan007
PV was produced by ameer , rite ?
-
From: karthik_sa2 on 15th March 2007 12:06 AM [Full View]
-
From: k_vanan on 15th March 2007 06:44 AM [Full View]
1 st its produce by studio green but due to over budget (5 crore oru qualityana padathuku over budget?) than this project take over by Ameer himself but can't sold the film because of budget. after that studio green take over again the project with just 3 crore. ammer had no choice because its finance by kanta vatti. this is the becoming mis- understanding between ammer and surya. now the movie was big hit they don't bother the director.
what warden says is correct, ithuthan nandri ketta cinema ulagam.
-
From: Surya on 15th March 2007 06:48 AM [Full View]
Paruthiveeran is a SUPERHIT! According to the SIFY Weekend Box Office Report...For What It's Worth. :P
-
From: joe on 15th March 2007 06:58 AM [Full View]
Kamal hugs Karthi and congratulates him! - 14.03.2007
Kamal is very economical with his compliments, but 'Paruthiveeran' has made him generous.
'Paruthiveeran' continues to be screened specially for VIPs. The first on the list was Karunanidhi who professed his appreciation that the climax scenes gave him 3 sleepless nights.
Rajini was next to congratulate Ameer, wondering where he had been hiding all this while and said 'Paruthiveeran' was a poem on celluloid.
The younger generation of Kodambakkam like Bharath, Vishal and Jayam Ravi have praised, the film, Ameer, Karthi and Priyamani.
Last Sunday, 'Paruthiveerean' was screened for Kamal. He hugged Karthi and congratulated him. Kamal also expressed his appreciation of Ameer, Saravanan and Priyamani.
Since compliments from Kamal are rare and he has generously praised the film and those connected with it, the entire 'Paruthiveeran' unit is in seventh heaven.
-
From: great on 15th March 2007 07:46 AM [Full View]
Initially this movie was produced by Ameer , Studio Green joined much later . Originally Posted by karthik_sa2
-
From: kamalsurya on 16th March 2007 12:00 PM [Full View]
Watched the movie last night I and I have to disagree with all who said that Paruthiveeran is better movie then Veyil.I think the scenes in Veyil were more strong and very well picturised.
The Pasupathi acting is still standing so firmly in my heart that when i watched Veyil i think no one matched his acting for what he gave to Veyil. But again it not fair to compare the both the movie but i took it for example because both are village movies.
I think Ameer has very closely followed Virumandi and and made changes here and there the stroyline is very similar.
In Virumandi also had rape scenes invovling Abirami and in Pv we had Muthuazghu.The we had very similar charcter in Virumandi was Pasupathi and in PV it is Muthuazhu Dad.Then Kamal in Virumandi and Paruthiveern had very similar charcteristics.Like the very nonchalant type not caring about about anything just drinking.etc till the latter part both character gets serious.
Overall the movie was good I did not find it great maybe because i not from a village and don't understand certain sentiments.But i enjoyed Veyil to max still remains one of the best movies i have ever seen.I guess the dancing with troops and the starting part of the movie with all the festivals did not really appeal to me.I would not rate this movie as a great movie but a good movie.
-
From: cancer on 16th March 2007 12:05 PM [Full View]
when???? Originally Posted by kamalsurya
-
From: Wibha on 16th March 2007 12:12 PM [Full View]
wen da flash back is said...dey tell it like abhirami is raped Originally Posted by cancer
when???? Originally Posted by kamalsurya
-
From: kamalsurya on 16th March 2007 12:13 PM [Full View]
Sorry it's been a long time since i watched the movie.Ya like WIbha said I think it will be kamal who will be telling the reporter that his wife was raped Originally Posted by cancer
when???? Originally Posted by kamalsurya
-
From: Wibha on 16th March 2007 12:15 PM [Full View]
actually da villains tel dat she was raped.and den kamal tells dat they actually got married and she was not raped Originally Posted by kamalsurya
Sorry it's been a long time since i watched the movie.Ya like WIbha said I think it will be kamal who will be telling the reporter that his wife was raped Originally Posted by cancer
when???? Originally Posted by kamalsurya
-
From: kamalsurya on 16th March 2007 12:17 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Wibha
actually da villains tel dat she was raped.and den kamal tells dat they actually got married and she was not raped Originally Posted by kamalsurya
Sorry it's been a long time since i watched the movie.Ya like WIbha said I think it will be kamal who will be telling the reporter that his wife was raped Originally Posted by cancer
when???? Originally Posted by kamalsurya
Okok weakness ella veliya solla koodathu
-
From: Wibha on 16th March 2007 12:22 PM [Full View]
i hope m rite 
-
From: cancer on 16th March 2007 12:28 PM [Full View]
oh athuvaaa... naan paakum pothu trim pannitangalonnu ninachen... Originally Posted by Wibha
wen da flash back is said...dey tell it like abhirami is raped Originally Posted by cancer
when???? Originally Posted by kamalsurya
-
From: MrJudge on 16th March 2007 01:33 PM [Full View]
First it was by Studio Green, then Ameer's Teamwork production Originally Posted by villan007
PV was produced by ameer , rite ?
took over and completed it. Studio Green bought it back and released.
-
From: MrJudge on 16th March 2007 01:36 PM [Full View]
Karthik: Originally Posted by karthik_sa2
It was "Ameer's Paruththi Veeran" and now just "Paruththi Veeran". They have taken out Ameer from the title. I don't understand why Sivakumar is doing like this.
-
From: k_vanan on 16th March 2007 01:51 PM [Full View]
may be ameer request for balance money 2cr to recovered his lost.
-
From: karthik_sa2 on 16th March 2007 02:28 PM [Full View]
Karthik:
It was "Ameer's Paruththi Veeran" and now just "Paruththi Veeran". They have taken out Ameer from the title. I don't understand why Sivakumar is doing like this. how can they possibly do this !!!and what has sivakumar to do with this judge??
-
From: kamalsurya on 16th March 2007 02:34 PM [Full View]
What does Sivakumar got to do with this?? Originally Posted by MrJudge
Karthik: Originally Posted by karthik_sa2
It was "Ameer's Paruththi Veeran" and now just "Paruththi Veeran". They have taken out Ameer from the title. I don't understand why Sivakumar is doing like this.
-
From: villan007 on 16th March 2007 02:36 PM [Full View]
studio green is surya's banner
-
From: karthik_sa2 on 16th March 2007 02:47 PM [Full View]
enna pa kuzhaparinga K E Gyanavelraja is the one who holds studio greenstudio green is surya's banner
-
From: MrJudge on 16th March 2007 02:55 PM [Full View]
Studio Green is being run by Gnanavelrajan (?), he is one of Sivakumar's relatives and running it on behalf of Sivakumar. Legally it is owned by Gnanavelrajan. So I don't think without Sivakumar's consent these things can happen or atleast he must be knowing it. I think Studio Green still owes some money to Ameer. In his recent interview, he said that he would get his share because of the movie running well. Originally Posted by karthik_sa2
Also Ameer who was interested to do his next project with Surya keeps silence about it now.
-
From: selvakumar on 16th March 2007 03:01 PM [Full View]
@ whom ever is responsible for this. It is pretty bad to see a director's name being whipped off from the credits of a successful movies.
Ameer - Please plan your next production works before getting your fingers dirty in this political world !
Just wondering whether Ameer was present when KH watched the movie
Ultimately, even the great gentlemen of the industry doesn't seem to respect the human values
-
From: thinkfloyd on 16th March 2007 03:16 PM [Full View]
Ameer wasn't present... Originally Posted by selvakumar
Just wondering whether Ameer was present when KH watched the movie
-
From: vasanthgt on 16th March 2007 03:20 PM [Full View]
Ameer is the main reason for the films hit and credit goes to him.
Removing his name form the title is like trying to hide sun's rays with hands
-
From: selvakumar on 16th March 2007 03:22 PM [Full View]
Too bad for a KH fan ! Originally Posted by thinkfloyd
Ameer wasn't present... Originally Posted by selvakumar
Just wondering whether Ameer was present when KH watched the movie Why he wasn't present? Didn't they inform him because of all these financial problems?
-
From: karthik_sa2 on 16th March 2007 03:58 PM [Full View]
Studio Green is being run by Gnanavelrajan (?), he is one of Sivakumar's relatives and running it on behalf of Sivakumar. Legally it is owned by Gnanavelrajan. So I don't think without Sivakumar's consent these things can happen or atleast he must be knowing it. I think Studio Green still owes some money to Ameer. In his recent interview, he said that he would get his share because of the movie running well.
Also Ameer who was interested to do his next project with Surya keeps silence about it now. its not nice to see two great film personalities having misunderstanding like this.would like to see another surya-ameer combo.its not fair to blame studio green alone for this cos we don know what really happened for such a misunderstanding.generally sivakumar famil and ameer use to have a good wrap out.however as seva said taking off the directors name is a total injustice and an act of ingratitude
-
From: MrJudge on 16th March 2007 06:41 PM [Full View]
Not only for KH, even for the CM and other film personalities, only Sivakumar family was there inviting and showing the movie at FourFrames. Originally Posted by thinkfloyd
Ameer wasn't present... Originally Posted by selvakumar
Just wondering whether Ameer was present when KH watched the movie
-
From: selvakumar on 16th March 2007 06:52 PM [Full View]
Seems many are keen to push their sons,daughters etc to the top in the film field with great dedication, hardwork etc ! Originally Posted by MrJudge
Good trend emerging in tamil cinema indeed !
This illustrates one thing: The proverb "Pookkadaikku Vilambaram vendumaa" no longers holds.
-
From: MrJudge on 16th March 2007 06:56 PM [Full View]
Karthik, Originally Posted by karthik_sa2
Add this to the list, now small 30 second ads coming on channels, I think on Vijay TV and Sun music.... people coming out of the theater praising only Karthi's acting and nothing else. There also Ameer's name was removed and they project only Karthi's performance in the movie now.
-
From: MrJudge on 16th March 2007 07:51 PM [Full View]
Ameer has talked about this controversy on Behindwoods video interview. Haven't checked it out yet, may be we will have some inside info there.
-
From: MrJudge on 16th March 2007 09:16 PM [Full View]
Selvakumar, Originally Posted by selvakumar
Seems many are keen to push their sons,daughters etc to the top in the film field with great dedication, hardwork etc ! Good trend emerging in tamil cinema indeed !
This illustrates one thing: The proverb "Pookkadaikku Vilambaram vendumaa" no longers holds.
Sorry, I take my words back, Ameer was present during the show screened for CM. He was explaining his experience seeing the movie with him in his interview to Behindwoods.
http://www.behindwoods.com/features/...ran/ameer.html
-
From: Kollywoodfan on 16th March 2007 10:04 PM [Full View]
Regardless of whose fault the whole mess is, Ameer needs to be give credit...He took a total risk by introducing a newcomer for the sake of friendship and weaved a brilliant film. It's not fair that he's not include in the success of the film.
About the whole awards news, IMO Raam deserved them more than PV.
-
From: thamiz on 16th March 2007 11:20 PM [Full View]
So much critical acclaim for this movie!!!
Does this movie really deserve such an appreciation?
-
From: kamalsurya on 16th March 2007 11:30 PM [Full View]
I've got to agree with you.I think it just good movie not a great one Originally Posted by thamiz
So much critical acclaim for this movie!!!
Does this movie really deserve such an appreciation?
-
From: itsmuls on 17th March 2007 11:09 AM [Full View]
I will take Tamil cinema to the world screen - Ameer
http://www.cinesouth.com/masala/hotn...032007-5.shtml
-
From: kb on 17th March 2007 11:46 AM [Full View]
ameer is turning hero in his next movie
-
From: karthik_sa2 on 17th March 2007 12:21 PM [Full View]
again its only one version of the ad judge and i have seen nobody praising the director while coming out of theatre in any films for that matter.they just say music was good or acting was good.Karthik,
Add this to the list, now small 30 second ads coming on channels, I think on Vijay TV and Sun music.... people coming out of the theater praising only Karthi's acting and nothing else. There also Ameer's name was removed and they project only Karthi's performance in the movie now.
i saw the usual trailer yesrterday .i noticed ameer's paruthiveeran missing as u all said.the reason one way i could think is initially ameer was the producer.since he did everything direction,story,screenplay and production.thats y it was ameer's paruthi.now that he is not involved in production probably his name is taken out.may be.....
-
From: karthik_sa2 on 17th March 2007 12:25 PM [Full View]
So much critical acclaim for this movie!!!
Does this movie really deserve such an appreciation?
i told this earlier also.except for the power packed performance from all the actors and music,the movie lacked a proper story or theme and an unfit climax.but great credit should go to the director atlest for making all these actors to perform extrtrdinarily
-
From: karthik_sa2 on 17th March 2007 12:28 PM [Full View]
hope he choses a subject that suits himameer is turning hero in his next movie
-
From: MrJudge on 17th March 2007 12:52 PM [Full View]
Nobody is saying "Padam sooper" in the ad, usually atleast a few people will admit that the movie is good on the camera, that is missing. That is my point. Originally Posted by karthik_sa2
Come on, what will the current producer gain just by removing Ameer's name from the title? This action looks very childish to me. Konjamaavathu perunthanmai venum. Originally Posted by karthik_sa2
-
From: MrJudge on 17th March 2007 12:56 PM [Full View]
Opinions differ always Originally Posted by kamalsurya
I've got to agree with you.I think it just good movie not a great one Originally Posted by thamiz
So much critical acclaim for this movie!!!
Does this movie really deserve such an appreciation? PV is definitely one of the best films in recent tamil film history.
-
From: karthik_sa2 on 17th March 2007 01:04 PM [Full View]
oh!!hmm..u may be rightNobody is saying "Padam sooper" in the ad, usually atleast a few people will admit that the movie is good on the camera, that is missing. That is my point
s obviously childish but might be the reasonCome on, what will the current producer gain just by removing Ameer's name from the title? This action looks very childish to me. Konjamaavathu perunthanmai venum
-
From: kamalsurya on 17th March 2007 02:01 PM [Full View]
I saw the interview Ameer gave regarding the financial issues he said that he was not given his director's salary.
The initial producer of the movie 1st gave alot of promise saying he wanted to do this movie to give his banner a good name blah blah blah....But Ameer told him that bujdet is quite high for the movie and plans to do it himself.Even then producer told him "no" we'll do it together.
But after taking a fliming a scenes Ammer realised it will go a little bit above budjet.But when he told the producer he said no and will not go on and give more money for the flim.That is when Ameer had decided to do the film himself.
But after the movie is all made and done.The initial producer saw the movie and wanted to buy the movie from him.And suceeded in doing that too.Now Ameer is not paid his due plus the own money he forked out to do the movie.So he left in the lurch and has to wait till the producer council helps him out with this.
The initial producer is thought to be ganavel or something like that.But i do not know how Sivakumar or Surya come into the picture
-
From: karthik_sa2 on 17th March 2007 02:19 PM [Full View]
The initial producer is thought to be ganavel or something like that.But i do not know how Sivakumar or Surya come into the picture
Studio Green is being run by Gnanavelrajan (?), he is one of Sivakumar's relatives and running it on behalf of Sivakumar. Legally it is owned by Gnanavelrajan. So I don't think without Sivakumar's consent these things can happen or atleast he must be knowing it. I think Studio Green still owes some money to Ameer. In his recent interview, he said that he would get his share because of the movie running well.
-
From: karthik_sa2 on 17th March 2007 02:23 PM [Full View]
how could this be true.the movie running so well and salary not given to the director soundsI saw the interview Ameer gave regarding the financial issues he said that he was not given his director's salary.
-
From: MrJudge on 17th March 2007 02:44 PM [Full View]
If you hear his comments properly on behindwoods, you will know that there is no separate paycheck for his direction. Because in the middle he took over the project and turned himself as a producer, so he is looking for whatever he spent on it. He is looking for whole-package I guess.
-
From: kamalsurya on 17th March 2007 06:10 PM [Full View]
Pls see this http://www.behindwoods.com/features/...ran/ameer.html Originally Posted by karthik_sa2
how could this be true.the movie running so well and salary not given to the director soundsI saw the interview Ameer gave regarding the financial issues he said that he was not given his director's salary.
If u listen to the way he replies for the question "have got ur director's pay" u'll understand he nvr got it
-
From: Jabroni on 17th March 2007 09:01 PM [Full View]
what now? ameer must be congtratulated for showing courage in avoiding mindless skin shows, laughable punch dialogues , disgusting dialogues inteding at a set of people and, in one word, heroisms and making a movie with 'maN vaasanai.' it just gives you a consumate feeling. it is what a MOVIE is. i lamented after my first watch, but now PV gives me goosebumps. it's untimely to draw a conclusion about his talent but i can vouch he is a decent talent and will guide tamil cinema in a right direction. ameer, don't repeat films like raam and mounam pesiyathe for they were dissapointing.
-
From: thamiz on 17th March 2007 09:31 PM [Full View]
Could you offer a justification by getting intothe details of it so that everybody can understand why it is so great Originally Posted by MrJudge
Opinions differ always PV is definitely one of the best films in recent tamil film history.
-
From: joe on 17th March 2007 09:40 PM [Full View]
If you care to read my justification ,here you go.. Originally Posted by thamiz
Could you offer a justification by getting intothe details of it so that everybody can understand why it is so great
http://cdjm.blogspot.com/2007/03/blog-post.html
-
From: Erica on 17th March 2007 09:40 PM [Full View]
i liked his statement on rating movies by a numeric value Originally Posted by kamalsurya
mudhalla indha vaathiyargaloda ukkandhu naan pesa aasapaduren
-
From: thamiz on 17th March 2007 09:42 PM [Full View]
Thanks, milton! Originally Posted by joe
If you care to read my justification ,here you go.. Originally Posted by thamiz
Could you offer a justification by getting intothe details of it so that everybody can understand why it is so great
http://cdjm.blogspot.com/2007/03/blog-post.html
I will read through it and get back to you if there is anythng needs to be clarified!
-
From: thamiz on 18th March 2007 05:52 AM [Full View]
Your review is carefully written joe. Dont have any complains at this time!
-
From: joe on 18th March 2007 06:45 AM [Full View]
Thanks Originally Posted by thamiz
Your review is carefully written joe. Dont have any complains at this time!
-
From: MrJudge on 18th March 2007 12:32 PM [Full View]
me too... Originally Posted by Erica
i liked his statement on rating movies by a numeric value
mudhalla indha vaathiyargaloda ukkandhu naan pesa aasapaduren
I hope AV takes note of his points and stops doing it or comes up with valid answers.
-
From: MrJudge on 18th March 2007 12:46 PM [Full View]
Basically watching a movie is an experience. It differs from person to person. You may feel the movie is not up to the mark just because you hadn't seen characters like these in your real life. On the other hand, I may have first hand experience watching these characters in life and can easily relate to them and enjoying the movie more. That could be one reason. Do we really have to have first hand experience to enjoy everything? Not really. If a movie makes you a part of it for the hours it is being played, then I think it is a great movie. On that count, PV scores well above. When I watched it, I felt like I was part of it and nothing more. What else do I need to rate PV a great movie? Originally Posted by thamiz
Could you offer a justification by getting intothe details of it so that everybody can understand why it is so great
-
From: MrJudge on 18th March 2007 07:39 PM [Full View]
From his discussion that was aired on 'kollywood court' on Jaya TV, Ameer said that there is another version of complete movie had been taken keeping the international film festivals on mind. It is lying at Prasad studios because of disputes. Once they are over, it will be screened at festivals and will be released here also.
Is this could be the tussel between Studio green and Teamwork?
Also his next venture may be a pakka masala movie
-
From: Tia on 19th March 2007 02:51 AM [Full View]
Heya, this is nothing about paruthiveera (the movie) but its about suryas bro!
did anyone see the interview on suntv? It was soo cool and funny! loved it!
He had a sweetheart since year1, and now she's married!
Anywayz i'm really looking forward to seeing paruthiveeran now!
-
From: thamiz on 19th March 2007 04:20 AM [Full View]
Thanks. Originally Posted by MrJudge
Basically watching a movie is an experience. It differs from person to person. You may feel the movie is not up to the mark just because you hadn't seen characters like these in your real life. On the other hand, I may have first hand experience watching these characters in life and can easily relate to them and enjoying the movie more. That could be one reason. Do we really have to have first hand experience to enjoy everything? Not really. If a movie makes you a part of it for the hours it is being played, then I think it is a great movie. On that count, PV scores well above. When I watched it, I felt like I was part of it and nothing more. What else do I need to rate PV a great movie? Originally Posted by thamiz
Could you offer a justification by getting intothe details of it so that everybody can understand why it is so great
I am watching the movie now. I will get back with my comments!
-
From: Roshan on 19th March 2007 01:51 PM [Full View]
This week.. Gauthami's "Anbudan" with Karthi was coooool !! They have extended the program to 1 hr , but Coffee with Anu'va almost 100% copy paNNi irukaanga. We can expect some changes in CWA soon.
-
From: swathy on 20th March 2007 08:31 AM [Full View]
I watched few scenes in SUN TV. I am very eager to watch the movie. I dunno when they'l release in Bangalore
-
From: smith on 20th March 2007 01:38 PM [Full View]
Paruthi veeran is a good film but the violence, specially the gore rape scene at the end could have been avoided.
Wonder what the censors were doing.
-
From: MrJudge on 21st March 2007 12:00 PM [Full View]
Watched it?? looking forward to your comments. Originally Posted by thamiz
-
From: MADDY on 21st March 2007 02:59 PM [Full View]
best u1 composition in a long time........ Originally Posted by kb
but picturisation , hmmmm ok......nuthin g8......
-
From: swathy on 21st March 2007 03:31 PM [Full View]
new yorkla poi ayyanarai paathalum un ninaippu thanda nnu paadina nalla irundhi irukkumla Originally Posted by MADDY
best u1 composition in a long time........ Originally Posted by kb
but picturisation , hmmmm ok......nuthin g8......
-
From: nerdy on 21st March 2007 03:52 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by swathy
new yorkla poi ayyanarai paathalum un ninaippu thanda nnu paadina nalla irundhi irukkumla Originally Posted by MADDY
best u1 composition in a long time........ Originally Posted by kb
but picturisation , hmmmm ok......nuthin g8......
-
From: MADDY on 21st March 2007 05:11 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by swathy
appadi illa......picturisatrion was "edhaartham" and apt for the song.......but there are some directors who with the same situation wud have made it more artistic and a better visual package than this......theres no need for Newyork and Europe when India itself is a beautiful country
again, i agree that Ameer didnt want that to happen......he wanted to retain the raw reality in the songs......
-
From: great on 25th March 2007 07:48 PM [Full View]
oru valiya paruthiveeranNa paathachu. Theatre owner`s should be sued for trimming the climax . First half was let loose with comedy and few scene but the second half was good
Karthik was simply superb paruthiveeran doesnt look like his first movie. His body languange and dialogue delevery was simply superb but his voice is more like Surya .
Saravanan he was too good .Never thought he can perform like this
yuvan shankar Raja and Ramji songs were too good . But intha padathukku Illayaraja re-recording iruntha innum nalla irunthurukum.
-
From: kamalsurya on 25th March 2007 09:28 PM [Full View]
Guess what, my uncle came to my house the other time and said the movie paruthiveeran is superb and the music by illayaraja was fantastic. Originally Posted by great
oru valiya paruthiveeranNa paathachu. Theatre owner`s should be sued for trimming the climax . First half was let loose with comedy and few scene but the second half was good
Karthik was simply superb paruthiveeran doesnt look like his first movie. His body languange and dialogue delevery was simply superb but his voice is more like Surya .
Saravanan he was too good .Never thought he can perform like this
yuvan shankar Raja and Ramji songs were too good . But intha padathukku Illayaraja re-recording iruntha innum nalla irunthurukum.
I and my bro was shocked and surprised he said illayaraja was the MD of the movie and he still aruged with us it was his movie after showing him the info on the net then did he believe us. So I guess Yuvan is really getting to his dad place but still has a ,long way to go.Cause my Raja sang one song in the movie so he might have got confused
-
From: A.ANAND on 26th March 2007 07:03 AM [Full View]
Romba nalukku apparam oru nalla movie'ya patta thiruppthi intha 'paruti veeran'summa solla kudathu,ameer kitta ippa di oru arumaiyana movie[kaviyam]koduppar innu nenaikka villai . fist half'la konjam sila scenes cut panni irukkalaminnu thonuthu. to ameer
-
From: NOV on 26th March 2007 01:46 PM [Full View]
saw karthik's interview yesterday. vaayaadi.
apparently he and surya have never really got on well.
he mentioned a good joke.
he and 10 of his friends took up Hindi classes hoping to meet NI girls. Later when they joined the class, he realised that NI girls dont need hindi classes.
-
From: joe on 26th March 2007 01:51 PM [Full View]
Singapore maathiri malaysia-layum Sun Tv program one week kaLichu thaan varumaa? Originally Posted by NOV
-
From: NOV on 26th March 2007 01:57 PM [Full View]
adhE neengal paarththu kondirukkiradhu sun tvyin thamizh maalai thaan. :P Originally Posted by joe
Singapore maathiri malaysia-layum Sun Tv program one week kaLichu thaan varumaa?
-
From: Freedom on 27th March 2007 03:58 AM [Full View]
just watched Paruthiveeran DVD.
My honest opinoin:
Verdict: Watchable. Film could have been little bit crisper. 2 or3 songs were totally unwanted and spanned close to 7 minutes each.
Climax was personally very very disturbing for me (when she says 'Valikudhuda').
Camera work is awesome....I think very good. After a long long time I'm watching a village subject with native languaue(after kizhakku chemayile!). Karthi's & priyamani's performances are very good and very natural. Very good movie. Never had been a fan of Ameer(I hated Ram for some reasons), but this movie is excellent(of course much much better than the media hyped and screwed up pachaikili muthucharam)
-
From: great on 27th March 2007 07:28 AM [Full View]
that was THE best scene Originally Posted by Freedom
Priya Mani`s acting in that scene was
Nee Ellam pEriya Sandiyara Da
-
From: MrJudge on 4th April 2007 09:47 AM [Full View]
In this month's Urimmai, none other than Charu Nivethitha (yes, the same post-MSV (?) era TFM basher) praised PV like anything. Seems like he watched the movie four times in one week itself. He closed his comments with a tag 'PV is an epic'. Hehehe....
-
From: joe on 4th April 2007 09:50 AM [Full View]
Hope you mean Uyirmai Originally Posted by MrJudge
Is it available at charuonline.com?
-
From: Sanjeevi on 4th April 2007 11:27 AM [Full View]
he has already praised Pudupettai too Originally Posted by joe
Hope you mean Uyirmai Originally Posted by MrJudge
Is it available at charuonline.com?
-
From: ajaybaskar on 4th April 2007 11:33 AM [Full View]
Charu Nivethitha is a kind of 'Half-Baked' Originally Posted by MrJudge
-
From: MrJudge on 4th April 2007 06:07 PM [Full View]
Yes, it's Uyirmmai, not Urimmai Originally Posted by joe
Hope you mean Uyirmai Is it available at charuonline.com?
Not sure it is available or not at charuonline.com, it is a new article.
-
From: thimuru on 4th April 2007 06:13 PM [Full View]
ellaam therinja vennainu nenappu avanukku Originally Posted by ajaybaskar
Charu Nivethitha is a kind of 'Half-Baked' Originally Posted by MrJudge
-
From: NOV on 4th April 2007 06:25 PM [Full View]
how old is he? what kind of respect are you showing to an elder person?
regardless of differing opinions, one should always maintain's one's decorum.
-
From: nemesis786 on 4th April 2007 06:40 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by NOV
Neengadhaan Mariyadhai Raman
-
From: thimuru on 4th April 2007 06:42 PM [Full View]
does he show any decorum in his writings on elderly persons like ilayaraja? Originally Posted by NOV
or others whom he hate?
-
From: joe on 4th April 2007 06:43 PM [Full View]
I am a regular reader of Charu ,though I don't agree with his most of the concepts .But I have to admit that he has rich knowledge about world cinema ,beyond just Hollywood.
As Nov said ,he is an elder and we need to respect him.
-
From: joe on 4th April 2007 06:45 PM [Full View]
Thimiru,
I know he criticised IR a lot,but Did he write anything vulgur on IR?
-
From: NOV on 4th April 2007 06:46 PM [Full View]
this trend among some of the younger generation is worrying to say the least.
what happened to culture?
what happeend to the adage I may totally disagree to what you said but will fight for your right to say it?
sad!
-
From: joe on 4th April 2007 06:47 PM [Full View]
Thanks! Uyirmai available online ,but not updated for long time Originally Posted by MrJudge
Yes, it's Uyirmmai, not Urimmai Originally Posted by joe
Hope you mean Uyirmai Is it available at charuonline.com?
Not sure it is available or not at charuonline.com, it is a new article.
-
From: maithree on 4th April 2007 10:39 PM [Full View]
It's out on DVD already?just watched Paruthiveeran DVD. Usually Superhit movies take a while to come out on DVD.
Thiruttu Print-a?
-
From: sakaLAKALAKAlaa Vallavar on 4th April 2007 11:02 PM [Full View]
there are also some ppl in the gen x who discards and make fun on country-side cultures like villupaattu, karagaattam, its sad truth that they dont respect old and seior's thoughts....
what kamal said in the malaysian interview(part 2) is correct
-
From: Sanjeevi on 4th April 2007 11:27 PM [Full View]
Appadi podu aruvala Originally Posted by thimuru
does he show any decorum in his writings on elderly persons like ilayaraja? Originally Posted by NOV
or others whom he hate?
-
From: nemesis786 on 5th April 2007 02:35 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by sakaLAKALAKAlaa Vallavar
It is not necessary for one to appreciate something he/she doesnt like. India is a democratic country
-
From: MrJudge on 5th April 2007 11:39 AM [Full View]
Though I don't agree with his points about IR, I read his column in Uyirmmai regularly. I was impressed with his recent articles about MKT, PUC etc. It was interesting to read about the past especially TFM related articles. I was wondering how come this guy knows/writes about TFM, I was under the impression that he always talks about world cinema/music. Originally Posted by joe
And this month, his praising about recent tamil movies, PV,Mozhi and PKMC came as a sweet surprise.
-
From: NOV on 5th April 2007 11:51 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by MrJudge
exactly my choice of 2007!
-
From: selvakumar on 5th April 2007 12:06 PM [Full View]
so ! Why there should be a "?" ! Originally Posted by NOV
Originally Posted by MrJudge
exactly my choice of 2007!
-
From: MrJudge on 5th April 2007 12:16 PM [Full View]
NOV, Originally Posted by NOV
Originally Posted by MrJudge
exactly my choice of 2007!
haven't seen Mozhi and PKMC yet due to workload, heard Mozhi is a good one, and I like to see PKMC for Gowtham Menon. Hopefully watch both of them soon. I think recent tamil movie trend is really encouraging. I just wish this trend continues and all masala movie makers take backseat.
-
From: NOV on 5th April 2007 01:21 PM [Full View]
oru vElai naan thaan andha charu'vO engira oru chinna sandhEgam. Originally Posted by selvakumar
so ! Why there should be a "?" !
-
From: NOV on 5th April 2007 01:25 PM [Full View]
I would rate them as follows: Originally Posted by MrJudge
1. Mozhi
2. PV
3. PKMC
that is after ignoring the 2nd climax in PKMC
yes, I see a new trend this year and fervently hope that masalas will no longer rule.rayers:
-
From: MADDY on 5th April 2007 01:25 PM [Full View]
NOV - tell u wat , i had this doubt for long time Originally Posted by NOV
oru vElai naan thaan andha charu'vO engira oru chinna sandhEgam. Originally Posted by selvakumar
so ! Why there should be a "?" !
this guy also called "Guru" - a milestone in Indian cinema ....
-
From: thimuru on 5th April 2007 01:27 PM [Full View]
this guy in that guru article i guess said that ...he doesnt know that there is a director called maniratnam till agni natchathiram reached 200 days!
doesnt know abt nayagan ....
idhellam epdi nambaradhubaaaaaaaaaa
-
From: MADDY on 5th April 2007 01:47 PM [Full View]
hey, this guy is pretty hollow........can see that......but he is the only guy in TN who questioned IR's supposed-symphony.......but yes, cant call him a good thinker just bcos of this......
-
From: thinkfloyd on 5th April 2007 01:50 PM [Full View]
?? Originally Posted by MADDY
hey, this guy is pretty hollow........can see that......but he is the only guy in TN who questioned IR's supposed-symphony.......but yes, cant call him a good thinker just bcos of this......
-
From: MADDY on 5th April 2007 02:00 PM [Full View]
no, he questioned the authenticity of IR's symphony when the entire "junta" were believing it including ARR......i thot he had some guts to oppose a man of IR's stature..... Originally Posted by thinkfloyd
?? Originally Posted by MADDY
hey, this guy is pretty hollow........can see that......but he is the only guy in TN who questioned IR's supposed-symphony.......but yes, cant call him a good thinker just bcos of this......
-
From: thimuru on 5th April 2007 02:01 PM [Full View]
or u could call him a good thinker just because he called guru an "epic" Originally Posted by MADDY
hey, this guy is pretty hollow........can see that......but he is the only guy in TN who questioned IR's supposed-symphony.......but yes, cant call him a good thinker just bcos of this......
-
From: thinkfloyd on 5th April 2007 02:10 PM [Full View]
Do you mean the unreleased 'symphony'? Originally Posted by MADDY
-
From: thimuru on 5th April 2007 03:08 PM [Full View]
no tfd...
thiruvasagam
-
From: smith on 5th April 2007 03:16 PM [Full View]
Coming to IR's symphony, there are some who believe that he has not composed it.
If he has, what prevents him from releasing it in India?
Does anyone know the real reason?
-
From: thinkfloyd on 5th April 2007 04:02 PM [Full View]
Oh ok Originally Posted by thimuru
Maddy,
Thiruvasagam was not a symphony - It was Thiruvasagam In Oratorio....
Did Charu criticize it *musically*??
avar yaaru? enna kulam? enna gothram?
If i'm not wrong, he accused it was casteist or something...
idha vera neenga paraatreengala?
-
From: thimuru on 5th April 2007 05:11 PM [Full View]
he said that "tis was made like cine song...lyrics for tune...not tune for lyrics" Originally Posted by thinkfloyd
Oh ok Originally Posted by thimuru
Maddy,
Thiruvasagam was not a symphony - It was Thiruvasagam In Oratorio....
Did Charu criticize it *musically*??
avar yaaru? enna kulam? enna gothram?
If i'm not wrong, he accused it was casteist or something...
idha vera neenga paraatreengala?
and etc etc!
his seems to be a hypocrite ! but very interesting fellow!
-
From: sakaLAKALAKAlaa Vallavar on 5th April 2007 05:19 PM [Full View]
eventho i dont like chaaru nivethitha and like thivuvaasagam&its composer very much, i agree with what charu said abt thiruvaasagam
Raja was wandering for funds needed for thiruvaasagam and once he got that from some other source - mainly tamil mayyam, he completed that job and lated Raja gifted 27 lack woth ornaments to kollur mooghamikha temple, ivaraa pisaaththu oru kodi kku wait panniyathu??
that was the question asked by charu. i accept his standpoint. Isayaal vaazhum raaja antha 27 lakhs ayum ammanukku podaamal than isayikku selavu seythirukkalaam enbathu chaaruvin karuththu, i accept thsi opinon.
apart, whatever charu said related to the contents of Thiruvaasagam is just a crap. On the whole also, charu is a thimir piththa crap. but that doesnt mean that he is a dumb.
even this guy charu is in need of money to write some critical reviews of tamil cinema, i mean, tamil cinemavai thitti book poda kaasu venumaam.
if u dont understnd my point, no probs, onnum mukkiyam illai, poi vera velayai \ thread ai paarunga!!
-
From: thimuru on 5th April 2007 05:22 PM [Full View]
thats his personal sentiment Originally Posted by sakaLAKALAKAlaa Vallavar
-
From: Sanjeevi on 5th April 2007 05:40 PM [Full View]
Aaha ingeyum arambichuttengala
Eerkanavae IR Section-la 150 pages mela pesi pesi, mutti mothi, pothumappa pothum Thiruvasagam controversy
-
From: MADDY on 5th April 2007 05:57 PM [Full View]
a big sorry guys......
i just checked those articles by charu on TIS...........chaa, i thot he was questionning the authenticity of the "unreleased symphony" which was shared by many of us.....but this guy was criticising TIS and bringing religious/caste equations in it ......sorry Bala.....
back to PV:
as u all know, PV dint release in b'lore and i just saw the thiruttu VCD version..... ........but still dont have the guts to watch the climax scene as i have d/l-eded the uncut version
till climax, it is really a path breaking film with its 100% nativity......... ......but i was shocked at the rude language that they speak in villages......hmmm
-
From: great on 5th April 2007 10:36 PM [Full View]
Evlov paerukku antha language purinjithuNu therla . Originally Posted by MADDY
-
From: thimuru on 6th April 2007 10:38 AM [Full View]
cityla....wtf nu use pandradhillaya! Originally Posted by MADDY
a big sorry guys......
i just checked those articles by charu on TIS...........chaa, i thot he was questionning the authenticity of the "unreleased symphony" which was shared by many of us.....but this guy was criticising TIS and bringing religious/caste equations in it ......sorry Bala.....
back to PV:
as u all know, PV dint release in b'lore and i just saw the thiruttu VCD version..... ........but still dont have the guts to watch the climax scene as i have d/l-eded the uncut version
till climax, it is really a path breaking film with its 100% nativity......... ......but i was shocked at the rude language that they speak in villages......hmmm
aanaa...inga citila use pandra O**a -va gramathula use panna koodadhu ..enga ooru pakkam sonna pichipuduvainga pichu
-
From: smith on 6th April 2007 10:58 AM [Full View]
Paruthiveeran has been remade in english, dubbed & released as "300 paruthiveerargal".
-
From: great on 6th April 2007 11:00 AM [Full View]
s(j)oke-a Originally Posted by smith
Paruthiveeran has been remade in english, dubbed & released as "300 paruthiveerargal". sirikanuma
-
From: smith on 6th April 2007 11:35 AM [Full View]
aama.
-
From: great on 6th April 2007 11:37 AM [Full View]
ok done
-
From: Sanjeevi on 20th April 2007 11:39 AM [Full View]
http://www.musicindiaonline.com/n/i/tamil/4059/
'Paruthiveeran' continues dream run
By IANS
Apr 18, 2007, 03:51
Printer friendly page
Chennai, April 18 Even though the Tamil New Year films have reached the theatres, there is none that can beat Ameer's 'Paruthiveeran' at the box office. The top five Tamil films are:
1. 'Paruthiveeran' - Director: Ameer. Even the urban crowd is going crazy about the film with a rural theme.
2. 'Unnale Unnale' - Director: Jeeva. This love story is cinematographer Jeeva's gift to the youngsters and they have lapped it up.
3. 'Mozhi' - Director: Radhamohan. Mozhi continues to have houseful shows in all cities and has been declared a blockbuster.
4. 'Mayakkannadi' - Director: Cheran. This realistic film by Cheran is sure to hit it off with the people of Tamil Nadu.
5. 'Pokkiri' - Director: Prabhu Deva. The Vijay-starrer won a fresh lease of life on the Tamil New Year weekend.
-
From: Querida on 23rd April 2007 01:24 AM [Full View]
sigh 27 pages later and by now the comparisons of flicks of the year have come out...and here i am to declare....i have finally watched it. Needless to say it wrenched my heart....and left me as shocked and saddened and crying but overall amazed at the risk that the director took to be so realistic...the acting was so natural, kudos to Karthi and Priyamani....(her last scene (when she said it hurts, when she asked finally what's the use of who you say you are?), her begging Karthi to accept her love, her knowing all his trespasses yet accepting, her need to hold her ideal love together by even going to the extent of offering herself) (is this as immature as Uma in Thendral?)
i am left with the same feeling as the end of Kasi...though against popular opinion...Ameer was not gross or voyeuristic in the rape scene...(you will not believe unless you've watched Bandit Queen....that one movie has changed the amount of gruesomeness that can be conveyed....even on skipping numerous parts i wish i never saw it)
Overall i am angered/disgusted/my skin literally crawled..for those who think this story was unrealistic have never comforted a girl who fell in love with a boy because he remembered to return her pencil.....some are just like this hopelessly infatuated and somehow find it in their hearts to accept the other person's infidelities, trepasses, failings and carelessness.
-
From: P_R on 23rd April 2007 01:31 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Querida
sheesh... and I thought I had been clever all my life, nicking pencils from classmates.
-
From: Querida on 23rd April 2007 01:46 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Prabhu Ram
Originally Posted by Querida
sheesh... and I thought I had been clever all my life, nicking pencils from classmates. Prabhu....just showing extent of naivete....hey this was the one guy in class who let his fist do the talking for him....he was the bad boy in class....maybe that's why....
-
From: selvakumar on 5th June 2007 01:07 PM [Full View]
-
From: joe on 5th June 2007 01:43 PM [Full View]
Selva, Originally Posted by selvakumar
http://puthagapiriyan.blogspot.com/2007/06/blog-post.html
Originally Posted by சிறில் அலெக்ஸ்
I read this already and I am totally againts this review ..It is written in a way a wrong character potrayed as a role model .I don't think people appreciate that character agree with what the character does,but only appreciate how the characters was potrayed ..I am sure ,most of the audience (atleast me) don't take paruthiveeran character as role model..
ARivujeevi thamana ezuthanumnnu ninachu uLari vachirukkar ..I put the same comment there,but it was not published .
-
From: selvakumar on 5th June 2007 07:59 PM [Full View]
பருத்திவீரன் - உணர்ச்சிச் சுரண்டல்
சினிமாவில் "இயற்கையான" வாழ்வை (அதாவது 90 சதவீதம் நமது வாழ்வில் நடைபெறும் சம்பவங்களை) மறைத்து விட்டு, "செயற்கையான சினிமாத்தன வாழ்வை" யதார்த்தம் என்ற பெயரில் திணிக்கும் / பறைசாற்றும் படங்களில் இப்படமும் ஒன்று. கதை நாயகன் (பருத்தி வீரன் ) காட்டுத்தனமாய் கத்தி, போலீஸின் காதை அறுத்து, பறந்து பறந்து மல்யுத்தம் செய்து, திருநங்கைகளை இழிவுபடுத்தி (அவர்களை சரியான முறையில் சித்தரித்த படங்கள் மிக மிக அரிது என்பது வேறு விஷயம்) , விபசாரிகளுடன் உல்லாச வாழ்வு வாழ்ந்து இறுதியில் தான் காதலிக்கும் பெண்ணை பலிகொடுத்துவிட்டு மண்ணில் சாய்கிறான்.
இத்தகைய கதை நாயகனை, ஒரு பெண் துரத்தி துரத்தி காதல் செய்வதுதான் தமிழ் சினிமாவின் இன்றைய யதார்த்தம்.சிறு வயதில் கிணற்றில் தவறி விழுந்த நாயகியை காப்பாற்றுவதிலிருந்து நாயகிக்கு நாயகன் மேல் பற்றிக் கொள்கிறது காதல். அது தீப்பற்றி எறிந்து, இறுதியில் கதை நாயகன் எப்படியான தெரு பொறுக்கியாக இருந்தாலும் அவனை விழுந்து விழுந்து காதலிக்கும் அளவுக்கு செல்கிறது நமது கதை நாயகி, பம்புசெட்டுக்குள் தனது தலைவன் செய்யும் தவறுகளை தெரிந்தும், அவனுக்காக விஷம் குடிப்பது, காதலை மிகவும் செயற்கையாக சித்தரிக்கும் நிலையின் உச்ச கட்டம். மசாலா படத்தில் மட்டுமே வரும் ஒரு தியாக சின்னம் நமது நாயகி. அதுவும் கதை நாயகி தனது தந்தை, தாய் இவர்களை எல்லாம் மிக சாதாரணமாக எதிர்த்து, சுதந்திரமாக காதலிக்க முடிகிறது. இவர்கள் குடும்பத்துக்குள் ஜாதிய ரீதியில் பிரச்சனை இருக்கிறது என்பது வேறு விஷயம்.
அமீரின் படங்களை இது வரை பார்த்த வரை அவரது எல்லா படங்களிலுமே, கதை நாயகி, தலைவன் எவ்வளவு கொடூரமானவனாக இருந்தாலும் அவனை துரத்தி துரத்தி காதலிப்பாள். அவன் சமூகத்திற்கு ஒட்டாதவனாக இருப்பன். அதே கலவையை இதற்கும் பயன்படுத்தி இருக்கிறார். இதில் ஒன்றும் ஆச்சர்யப்படுவதற்கு இல்லை. இன்று உள்ள இயக்குனர்கள் அனைவருமே "உணர்ச்சி சுரண்டலை" யதார்த்தம் என்ற பெயரில் தமிழ் சினிமாவில் அறிமுகப்படுத்தி வருகின்றனர். அதில் அமீரும் ஒருவர் என்பது மறுக்க முடியாத உண்மை. கதா பாத்திரங்கள் இவர்கள் ஏற்படுத்தியுள்ள செயற்கைத்தனமான சினிமாத்தன யதார்த்தத்தில் மிதக்கும் பிண்டங்களாகத் தெரிவது வருந்தத்தக்க விஷயம்.
காவல்துறை அதிகாரியின் காதை அறுத்தால் என்ன ஆகும் என்பது எல்லோருக்கும் தெரிந்ததே. ஆனால் இங்கு அது நடக்க வில்லை. இங்கு, கதா பாத்திரம் "சராசரி மனித எல்லையை மீறுகிறது".
இயற்கையான இன்னும் அழுத்திச் சொல்லப்போனால், இயல்பான படங்களை ஆதரிப்பது மக்களின் இரசிப்புத்தன்மையின் மேன்மைக்கு ஒரு நல்ல உதாரணம். ஆனால், உணர்ச்சி மற்றும் மிகவும் மாறுபட்ட, மிருகத்தனமான பாத்திரச் சித்தரிப்புகளுக்கு மக்கள் அடிமை ஆகிவிட்டனர் என்பது இப்படம் மூலம் தெரிகிறது. தமிழ் சினிமாவில் ஜாதியை வைத்து புரட்சிப்படம் எடுக்க வேண்டுமானால், நீங்கள் ஒரு குறிப்பிட்ட உயர்ந்த ஜாதியை உயர்த்தி ஒரு வசனமாவது வைக்க வேண்டும். அப்படி இல்லை என்றால் உங்கள் படம் ஓடாது. இந்த படத்திலும் அது இருக்கிறது. "என்னடா ஜாதி, .............. காப்பாற்றுபவன் தானடா *** " இம்மாதிரியான வசனங்கள் இல்லாவிட்டால் உங்கள் படம் ஓடாது. எனவே கோழைத்தனமாக இவ்வசன நெறிமுறைக்கு நீங்கள் உட்பட்டு நடக்க வேண்டும். (பாரதி கண்ணம்மா படம் இது முழுவதும் இல்லை என்பதாலேயே பல எதிர்ப்புகளை சந்தித்தது )
இதில் மனதில் நிற்பது கதை களம் மட்டுமே. சுட்டெரிக்கும் வெய்யில் காலத்தில், நிலத்தில் நடந்தால் எப்படி உணர்வோமோ அப்படி ஒரு உணர்ச்சியை ஏற்படுத்திகிறது. ஒளிப்பதிவாளரை நிச்சயம் பாராட்டியே தீர வேண்டும். அதன் பிறகு இசை. யுவன் தானா இது. எனக்கு இதன் பாடல்கள் பிடிக்கவில்லை. ஆனால், இதில் யுவன் சங்கர் ராஜாவின் கடின உழைப்பு நன்றாக தெரிகிறது. ஆனால் இளைய ராஜாவுடன் அவரை ஒப்பிட்டே இன்னும் கொஞ்ச காலத்தில் அழித்து விடுவார்கள் போல. நான் பார்த்த திரை அரங்கு ஒலி நுட்பத்தில் முகவும் பழையது. அதில் அரண்மனை கிளி பார்த்த போது அது இனிய அனுபவம். ஆனால், அந்த ஒரு அலைய இங்கு யுவன் ஏற்பத்தவில்லை. ஆனால், அவரளவில் நன்றாக செய்துள்ளாமர். படத்தின் மிகப்பெரிய பலம் யுவன்.
இந்த படம் மூன்றாம் பிறை, 16 வயதினிலே, வேதம் புதிது போன்ற படங்கள் ஏற்படுத்திய பாதிப்பில் 20% கூட ஏற்பத்தவில்லை. இறுதியில் வரும் கற்பழிப்பு காட்சியில், உணர்ச்சி அது காட்டப்பட்ட விதத்தில் எரிச்சலாய் தான் வெளிவருகிறதே தவிர, அடிமனதில் இருந்து கதாபாத்திரங்களின் பிரதிபலிப்பாக வரவில்லை. இதன் பிறகு இனி ஒரு பெண்னை 100, 200, 300 பேர் கற்பழிக்கும் நிலைக்கு காட்சி அமைப்புகள் மாறும் என்பதில் சந்தேகம் இல்லை.
நல்ல கொஞ்சம் மசாலா தூவிய படங்களில் இதுவும் ஒன்று. இது சிறந்த படம் அன்று.
-
From: selvakumar on 5th June 2007 08:04 PM [Full View]
btw,
Friends,
I have written what I felt after seeing that movie. It is just my opinion. You can leave it if u don't find it worthy
-
From: joe on 5th June 2007 09:11 PM [Full View]
Selva,Is it written by you?
Even though I don't agree with you ,you have a wonderful style in thamizh writing ..Congrats and keep it up!
-
From: Roshan on 5th June 2007 11:01 PM [Full View]
Kalakkiteenga Selva Originally Posted by selvakumar
பருத்திவீரன் - உணர்ச்சிச் சுரண்டல்
சினிமாவில் "இயற்கையான" வாழ்வை (அதாவது 90 சதவீதம் நமது வாழ்வில் நடைபெறும் சம்பவங்களை) மறைத்து விட்டு, "செயற்கையான சினிமாத்தன வாழ்வை" யதார்த்தம் என்ற பெயரில் திணிக்கும் / பறைசாற்றும் படங்களில் இப்படமும் ஒன்று. கதை நாயகன் (பருத்தி வீரன் ) காட்டுத்தனமாய் கத்தி, போலீஸின் காதை அறுத்து, பறந்து பறந்து மல்யுத்தம் செய்து, திருநங்கைகளை இழிவுபடுத்தி (அவர்களை சரியான முறையில் சித்தரித்த படங்கள் மிக மிக அரிது என்பது வேறு விஷயம்) , விபசாரிகளுடன் உல்லாச வாழ்வு வாழ்ந்து இறுதியில் தான் காதலிக்கும் பெண்ணை பலிகொடுத்துவிட்டு மண்ணில் சாய்கிறான்.
இத்தகைய கதை நாயகனை, ஒரு பெண் துரத்தி துரத்தி காதல் செய்வதுதான் தமிழ் சினிமாவின் இன்றைய யதார்த்தம்.சிறு வயதில் கிணற்றில் தவறி விழுந்த நாயகியை காப்பாற்றுவதிலிருந்து நாயகிக்கு நாயகன் மேல் பற்றிக் கொள்கிறது காதல். அது தீப்பற்றி எறிந்து, இறுதியில் கதை நாயகன் எப்படியான தெரு பொறுக்கியாக இருந்தாலும் அவனை விழுந்து விழுந்து காதலிக்கும் அளவுக்கு செல்கிறது நமது கதை நாயகி, பம்புசெட்டுக்குள் தனது தலைவன் செய்யும் தவறுகளை தெரிந்தும், அவனுக்காக விஷம் குடிப்பது, காதலை மிகவும் செயற்கையாக சித்தரிக்கும் நிலையின் உச்ச கட்டம். மசாலா படத்தில் மட்டுமே வரும் ஒரு தியாக சின்னம் நமது நாயகி. அதுவும் கதை நாயகி தனது தந்தை, தாய் இவர்களை எல்லாம் மிக சாதாரணமாக எதிர்த்து, சுதந்திரமாக காதலிக்க முடிகிறது. இவர்கள் குடும்பத்துக்குள் ஜாதிய ரீதியில் பிரச்சனை இருக்கிறது என்பது வேறு விஷயம்.
அமீரின் படங்களை இது வரை பார்த்த வரை அவரது எல்லா படங்களிலுமே, கதை நாயகி, தலைவன் எவ்வளவு கொடூரமானவனாக இருந்தாலும் அவனை துரத்தி துரத்தி காதலிப்பாள். அவன் சமூகத்திற்கு ஒட்டாதவனாக இருப்பன். அதே கலவையை இதற்கும் பயன்படுத்தி இருக்கிறார். இதில் ஒன்றும் ஆச்சர்யப்படுவதற்கு இல்லை. இன்று உள்ள இயக்குனர்கள் அனைவருமே "உணர்ச்சி சுரண்டலை" யதார்த்தம் என்ற பெயரில் தமிழ் சினிமாவில் அறிமுகப்படுத்தி வருகின்றனர். அதில் அமீரும் ஒருவர் என்பது மறுக்க முடியாத உண்மை. கதா பாத்திரங்கள் இவர்கள் ஏற்படுத்தியுள்ள செயற்கைத்தனமான சினிமாத்தன யதார்த்தத்தில் மிதக்கும் பிண்டங்களாகத் தெரிவது வருந்தத்தக்க விஷயம்.
காவல்துறை அதிகாரியின் காதை அறுத்தால் என்ன ஆகும் என்பது எல்லோருக்கும் தெரிந்ததே. ஆனால் இங்கு அது நடக்க வில்லை. இங்கு, கதா பாத்திரம் "சராசரி மனித எல்லையை மீறுகிறது".
இயற்கையான இன்னும் அழுத்திச் சொல்லப்போனால், இயல்பான படங்களை ஆதரிப்பது மக்களின் இரசிப்புத்தன்மையின் மேன்மைக்கு ஒரு நல்ல உதாரணம். ஆனால், உணர்ச்சி மற்றும் மிகவும் மாறுபட்ட, மிருகத்தனமான பாத்திரச் சித்தரிப்புகளுக்கு மக்கள் அடிமை ஆகிவிட்டனர் என்பது இப்படம் மூலம் தெரிகிறது. தமிழ் சினிமாவில் ஜாதியை வைத்து புரட்சிப்படம் எடுக்க வேண்டுமானால், நீங்கள் ஒரு குறிப்பிட்ட உயர்ந்த ஜாதியை உயர்த்தி ஒரு வசனமாவது வைக்க வேண்டும். அப்படி இல்லை என்றால் உங்கள் படம் ஓடாது. இந்த படத்திலும் அது இருக்கிறது. "என்னடா ஜாதி, .............. காப்பாற்றுபவன் தானடா *** " இம்மாதிரியான வசனங்கள் இல்லாவிட்டால் உங்கள் படம் ஓடாது. எனவே கோழைத்தனமாக இவ்வசன நெறிமுறைக்கு நீங்கள் உட்பட்டு நடக்க வேண்டும். (பாரதி கண்ணம்மா படம் இது முழுவதும் இல்லை என்பதாலேயே பல எதிர்ப்புகளை சந்தித்தது )
இதில் மனதில் நிற்பது கதை களம் மட்டுமே. சுட்டெரிக்கும் வெய்யில் காலத்தில், நிலத்தில் நடந்தால் எப்படி உணர்வோமோ அப்படி ஒரு உணர்ச்சியை ஏற்படுத்திகிறது. ஒளிப்பதிவாளரை நிச்சயம் பாராட்டியே தீர வேண்டும். அதன் பிறகு இசை. யுவன் தானா இது. எனக்கு இதன் பாடல்கள் பிடிக்கவில்லை. ஆனால், இதில் யுவன் சங்கர் ராஜாவின் கடின உழைப்பு நன்றாக தெரிகிறது. ஆனால் இளைய ராஜாவுடன் அவரை ஒப்பிட்டே இன்னும் கொஞ்ச காலத்தில் அழித்து விடுவார்கள் போல. நான் பார்த்த திரை அரங்கு ஒலி நுட்பத்தில் முகவும் பழையது. அதில் அரண்மனை கிளி பார்த்த போது அது இனிய அனுபவம். ஆனால், அந்த ஒரு அலைய இங்கு யுவன் ஏற்பத்தவில்லை. ஆனால், அவரளவில் நன்றாக செய்துள்ளாமர். படத்தின் மிகப்பெரிய பலம் யுவன்.
இந்த படம் மூன்றாம் பிறை, 16 வயதினிலே, வேதம் புதிது போன்ற படங்கள் ஏற்படுத்திய பாதிப்பில் 20% கூட ஏற்பத்தவில்லை. இறுதியில் வரும் கற்பழிப்பு காட்சியில், உணர்ச்சி அது காட்டப்பட்ட விதத்தில் எரிச்சலாய் தான் வெளிவருகிறதே தவிர, அடிமனதில் இருந்து கதாபாத்திரங்களின் பிரதிபலிப்பாக வரவில்லை. இதன் பிறகு இனி ஒரு பெண்னை 100, 200, 300 பேர் கற்பழிக்கும் நிலைக்கு காட்சி அமைப்புகள் மாறும் என்பதில் சந்தேகம் இல்லை.
நல்ல கொஞ்சம் மசாலா தூவிய படங்களில் இதுவும் ஒன்று. இது சிறந்த படம் அன்று. All what I have put in bold letters are aptly written I cannot disagree with any of it. Very well done
PS: Selva, thamizhil miga nanraaga ezhuthukireergaL ... pArAttukkaL thodarnthu ezhuthungaL
-
From: Devar Magan on 6th June 2007 12:25 AM [Full View]
Over Rated movie
-
From: kannannn on 6th June 2007 12:45 AM [Full View]
I haven't seen the movie yet, but a very different review from what I have read before. BTW, உணர்ச்சி சுரண்டல்.. கதாபாத்திரங்களின்? ரசிகர்களின்?
-
From: thamiz on 6th June 2007 04:33 AM [Full View]
Selva!
Such rape is happening in real life. It was wonderfully justified in the climax (vinai vithaiththavan vinai aRuppAn). I have seen it happening in real life!
So, please dont bring down paruththiveeran by writing your own review which is certainly a great movie!
-
From: Nerd on 6th June 2007 09:22 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by joe
Selva,Is it written by you?
Even though I don't agree with you ,you have a wonderful style in thamizh writing ..Congrats and keep it up! I liked your flow, it would have been better if your comments were a bit rational.
-
From: thamiz on 6th June 2007 10:13 AM [Full View]
Not only irrational but THERE is NO TRUTH in any of the statements! Originally Posted by selvakumar
It is really sad and unfortunate!
-
From: crajkumar_be on 6th June 2007 10:19 AM [Full View]
I agree with this Originally Posted by selvakumar
-
From: Roshan on 6th June 2007 10:38 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by thamiz
Not only irrational but THERE is NO TRUTH in any of the statements! Originally Posted by selvakumar
It is really sad and unfortunate!
Thamiz,
I can agree completely with all what you have quoted above from Selva's review. Opinions and perceptions vary. To me PV is one of the over rated movies, and I think as usual we can agree to disagree
-
From: buddysathi on 6th June 2007 10:51 AM [Full View]
Someone tell me which is the best movie they had ever seen ( any indian or world movies for that matter) and I can definitely find atleast 10-20 logical, physical, pyschological, philosophical etcc.. errors in it. IMHO,PV is a gud movie and lets appreciate it rather than finding faults!
BTW, I spent my childhood in tirunelveli villages and I know abt those men's " nayandithanam" and "nakkal" even in very serious situations! (kolayae ulanthulum sirippanga)! So I dint find many cinematic moments in PV.
-
From: selvakumar on 6th June 2007 11:26 AM [Full View]
Thanks Roshan, Nerd and Joe. Thamizhil ezhuthi romba naal aayiduchu. Plus - system la thamizh type pannurathu romba kastam ! That is why I prefer writing in English !
Originally Posted by Roshan
Thamiz,
I can agree completely with all what you have quoted above from Selva's review. Opinions and perceptions vary. To me PV is one of the over rated movies, and I think as usual we can agree to disagree
Friends,
That is why I put that disclaimer after my review. This is my perception alone and I have already appreciated Ameer's guts in the portrayal of the lead character as a -ve one.
But I would like to tell one thing:
Many agreed with my perceptions. enna naan sollittaen.. Sila per sollala.. And SELVA solli thaan ippadam nalla padam aaganumnnu illai.
So,
thamizh, Joe and Nerd - Free ya vidunga
-
From: selvakumar on 6th June 2007 11:27 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by kannannn
Neenga innum paarkala
-
From: joe on 6th June 2007 11:33 AM [Full View]
எனக்கு தெரிந்த வரை ,90% எதார்த்தமும் 10% எதார்த்தமின்மையும் கலந்த படம் இது. Originally Posted by selvakumar
கதையின் நாயகன் செய்பவை நியாயப்படுத்தப்படவோ அல்லது அது உதாரணமாகவோ காட்டப்படவோ இல்லை என்பதே நான் புரிந்து கொண்டது .ஒரு கதாபாத்திரத்தின் செய்கைகளை இயக்குநர் வலியுறுத்தும் கருத்தாக சொல்லி குறை சொல்வது ,கதாநாயகன் என்றாலே முன்மாதிரியாக எடுத்துக்கொள்ளப்பட வேண்டியவன் என்ற தங்கள் மிக சாதாரணமான பார்வையைக் காட்டுகிறது.கதை நாயகன் (பருத்தி வீரன் ) காட்டுத்தனமாய் கத்தி, போலீஸின் காதை அறுத்து, பறந்து பறந்து மல்யுத்தம் செய்து, திருநங்கைகளை இழிவுபடுத்தி (அவர்களை சரியான முறையில் சித்தரித்த படங்கள் மிக மிக அரிது என்பது வேறு விஷயம்) , விபசாரிகளுடன் உல்லாச வாழ்வு வாழ்ந்து இறுதியில் தான் காதலிக்கும் பெண்ணை பலிகொடுத்துவிட்டு மண்ணில் சாய்கிறான்.
இத்தகைய தகுதியில்லாத ஒருவனை மிகவும் செயற்கைத்தனமாக காதலிக்கும் ஒரு பெண்ணைக்கூட நீங்கள் அறிந்திருக்கவில்லை என்பது உங்கள் தனிப்பட்ட அனுபவப் பிழை .மேலும் இந்த காதல் செயற்கையானதாகவே இருக்கட்டுமே .அது தான் இயக்குநர் சொல்ல வருவதும் .இந்த கதாநாயகியின் பாத்திரப்படைப்பே அளவுக்கு மீறிய செயற்கையான ஒரு காதலை கொட்டும் பாத்திரமாக நீங்கள் ஏன் நினைக்கக்கூடாது .பாத்திரப்படைப்பில் செயற்கைதன்மைக்கும் பாத்திரத்தின் செயலில் இருக்கும் செயற்கைத்தன்மைக்கும் வேறுபாடு உண்டு.இத்தகைய கதை நாயகனை, ஒரு பெண் துரத்தி துரத்தி காதல் செய்வதுதான் தமிழ் சினிமாவின் இன்றைய யதார்த்தம்.சிறு வயதில் கிணற்றில் தவறி விழுந்த நாயகியை காப்பாற்றுவதிலிருந்து நாயகிக்கு நாயகன் மேல் பற்றிக் கொள்கிறது காதல். அது தீப்பற்றி எறிந்து, இறுதியில் கதை நாயகன் எப்படியான தெரு பொறுக்கியாக இருந்தாலும் அவனை விழுந்து விழுந்து காதலிக்கும் அளவுக்கு செல்கிறது நமது கதை நாயகி, பம்புசெட்டுக்குள் தனது தலைவன் செய்யும் தவறுகளை தெரிந்தும், அவனுக்காக விஷம் குடிப்பது, காதலை மிகவும் செயற்கையாக சித்தரிக்கும் நிலையின் உச்ச கட்டம்.
காதாநாயகி பாத்திரத்தை தியாகச்சின்னமாக இயக்குநரும் காட்டவில்லை .எனக்கும் அப்படி தோன்றவில்லை .உங்களுக்கு தோன்றியது துரதுருஷ்டமே .ஒரு கதாநாயகி தாய்,தந்தையை மிகச்சாதாரணமாக எதிர்த்து காதலிக்க முடிவது தமிழ் சினிமாவில் இப்போது தான் நிகழ்ந்துள்ளது போல நீங்கள் சொல்லுவது நல்ல வேடிக்கை.மசாலா படத்தில் மட்டுமே வரும் ஒரு தியாக சின்னம் நமது நாயகி. அதுவும் கதை நாயகி தனது தந்தை, தாய் இவர்களை எல்லாம் மிக சாதாரணமாக எதிர்த்து, சுதந்திரமாக காதலிக்க முடிகிறது.
இருக்கலாம் .அப்படிப் பார்த்தால் எல்லா இயக்குநருக்கும் பொதுவாக பல விஷயங்களை பட்டியலிடலாம் .அமீரின் படங்களை இது வரை பார்த்த வரை அவரது எல்லா படங்களிலுமே, கதை நாயகி, தலைவன் எவ்வளவு கொடூரமானவனாக இருந்தாலும் அவனை துரத்தி துரத்தி காதலிப்பாள். அவன் சமூகத்திற்கு ஒட்டாதவனாக இருப்பன். அதே கலவையை இதற்கும் பயன்படுத்தி இருக்கிறார். இதில் ஒன்றும் ஆச்சர்யப்படுவதற்கு இல்லை
இதில் உணர்ச்சி சுரண்டல் எங்கிருந்து வந்தது என தெரியவில்லை ..சரி 'உணர்ச்சி தூண்டல்' என்று வைத்துக்க்கொண்டாலும் ,இன்றுள்ள பல இயக்குநர்களில் பலர் மிகவும் சீரியஸாக சொல்லுவதாக நினைத்து எடுக்கும் காட்சிகள் பல எந்த உணர்ச்சியையும் ,சில நேரம் எதிர்மறையான உணர்ச்சிகளையே (சீரியஸ் காட்சி காமெடியாக இருப்பது ) தூண்டுவதாக இருக்கும் போது ,அமீருக்கு உணர்ச்சிகளை தூண்டும் திறமையாவது இருக்கிறதே என்பதை ஒப்புக்கொள்ள வேண்டும்.இன்று உள்ள இயக்குனர்கள் அனைவருமே "உணர்ச்சி சுரண்டலை" யதார்த்தம் என்ற பெயரில் தமிழ் சினிமாவில் அறிமுகப்படுத்தி வருகின்றனர். அதில் அமீரும் ஒருவர் என்பது மறுக்க முடியாத உண்மை.
கதா பாத்திரங்கள் இவர்கள் ஏற்படுத்தியுள்ள செயற்கைத்தனமான சினிமாத்தன யதார்த்தத்தில் மிதக்கும் பிண்டங்களாகத் தெரிவது வருந்தத்தக்க விஷயம்.
மிகவும் மேலோட்டமான கருத்து .என்னால் ஏற்றுக்கொள்ள முடியவில்லை.
ஆக இந்த படத்தை ஆதரிப்பவர்கள் எல்லாம் மிருகத்தனமான பாத்திர சித்தரிப்புகளுக்கு அடிமையானவர்கள் என்பது உங்கள் கருத்து .அப்படி நான் அடிமையாயிருந்தால் அதே காலகட்டத்தில் வந்த 'மொழி' படத்தை நான் பாராட்டியிருக்க மாட்டேன்.இயற்கையான இன்னும் அழுத்திச் சொல்லப்போனால், இயல்பான படங்களை ஆதரிப்பது மக்களின் இரசிப்புத்தன்மையின் மேன்மைக்கு ஒரு நல்ல உதாரணம். ஆனால், உணர்ச்சி மற்றும் மிகவும் மாறுபட்ட, மிருகத்தனமான பாத்திரச் சித்தரிப்புகளுக்கு மக்கள் அடிமை ஆகிவிட்டனர் என்பது இப்படம் மூலம் தெரிகிறது.
சுத்தமாக புரியவில்லை!இறுதியில் வரும் கற்பழிப்பு காட்சியில், உணர்ச்சி அது காட்டப்பட்ட விதத்தில் எரிச்சலாய் தான் வெளிவருகிறதே தவிர, அடிமனதில் இருந்து கதாபாத்திரங்களின் பிரதிபலிப்பாக வரவில்லை.
அப்படி வந்தால் மக்கள் அதை புறக்கணிப்பார்கள் என்பதில் சந்தேகமில்லை.இதன் பிறகு இனி ஒரு பெண்னை 100, 200, 300 பேர் கற்பழிக்கும் நிலைக்கு காட்சி அமைப்புகள் மாறும் என்பதில் சந்தேகம் இல்லை.
கொஞ்சமாக மசாலா தூவப்பட்ட சிறந்த படம் என்பது என் கருத்து.நல்ல கொஞ்சம் மசாலா தூவிய படங்களில் இதுவும் ஒன்று. இது சிறந்த படம் அன்று.
-
From: buddysathi on 6th June 2007 11:38 AM [Full View]
nandru kooruneergal joe!
-
From: shobana_in on 6th June 2007 11:56 AM [Full View]
the love blossoming at young age..........people must stop makin film on that.
irritating...
did anyone of you love during 6 years old?
-
From: ajaybaskar on 6th June 2007 11:57 AM [Full View]
u stole my words... Originally Posted by shobana_in
-
From: Pras on 6th June 2007 12:00 PM [Full View]
ya sure ! Originally Posted by shobana_in
at that time i loved radha, ambika, amala ... a lot of girls
-
From: shobana_in on 6th June 2007 12:01 PM [Full View]
neenga pinjulaye palutha caseu mamu Originally Posted by Pras
ya sure ! Originally Posted by shobana_in
at that time i loved radha, ambika, amala ... a lot of girls
-
From: Roshan on 6th June 2007 12:22 PM [Full View]
athai aarambithu vaitha pugazh BR-ai chaarum Originally Posted by shobana_in
-
From: shobana_in on 6th June 2007 12:26 PM [Full View]
in alaigal oivadhillai they dint love in young age....only when they become a little older they love Originally Posted by Roshan
athai aarambithu vaitha pugazh BR-ai chaarum Originally Posted by shobana_in
-
From: Roshan on 6th June 2007 12:28 PM [Full View]
I am not talking about AlaigaL Oyavathillai
-
From: crajkumar_be on 6th June 2007 12:40 PM [Full View]
EXACTLY! Originally Posted by shobana_in
indha pinju lovesu rousu thaanga mudiyala pa
-
From: Roshan on 6th June 2007 12:41 PM [Full View]
-
From: dsath on 6th June 2007 01:59 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by shobana_in
It is ridiculous to say the least. How long are they going to come up with such stories.
I mostly agree with Selva's observation of the movie.
The movie did have realistic approach in depicting a small village in the Southern district. But the realism stops there, the story was
Ameer sure has talent, if only he chooses a good story......
-
From: Roshan on 6th June 2007 02:38 PM [Full View]
dsath
-
From: joe on 6th June 2007 02:48 PM [Full View]
dsath,
Nobody denies that there are flaws in PV .And here some people are succesfful in seraching for flaws and able to list out ..But for me ,It is a movie with less flaws compare to 95% of the movies releasing nowadays ..Isn't it far better than usual flicks ?
-
From: selvakumar on 6th June 2007 03:03 PM [Full View]
If something is a good movie, it should be analysed as a good movie.
To prove its worth, we should not compare it with other cheap products in the market.
To prove the worth of a Diamond, I should compare it with Gold / silver/ pearl etc
But I should not prove its worth by comparing it with iron.
Nalla padangalai nalla padangaludan thaan compare seithu nirai / kurai galai solla vendum.
Otherwise, even we can justify masala films by comparing them with Shakeela films.
"Atha vida ithu tharamaanathu endra" manapaangai vida vendum ! (Atleast for VERY good movies)
-
From: joe on 6th June 2007 03:05 PM [Full View]
So PV nalla padamnnu othukureenga Originally Posted by selvakumar
..Athu pothume
-
From: selvakumar on 6th June 2007 03:17 PM [Full View]
"NaLLa padangalil ithuvum ondru". Aanaaal ithu thaan REALISM, Ithu thaan classic. Neraya CLASSICs ah vida ithu thaan better endru sonna, naan accept panna mattaen. Originally Posted by joe
So PV nalla padamnnu othukureenga Originally Posted by selvakumar
..Athu pothume As I said, Konjam Masala thadavi, story, ethuvum illaamaa EXECUTION la mattum concentrate panni seyya patta padam thaan PV
Originally Posted by Joe
-
From: joe on 6th June 2007 03:21 PM [Full View]
Selva,
Agreed ..But In last five years ,Can you list out Tamil movies which you consider more realistic and class than PV ? ...So that I can understand what is your preference.
-
From: crajkumar_be on 6th June 2007 03:21 PM [Full View]
I think overall, PV was a well executed movie.
There are 2 kinds of movies. One kind which is plot-driven and the other which is character-driven. PV is of the latter kind.
ulaga cinema-vin pala pugazh petra, potRa patta padangaLil "kadhai" yendru pArthAl peridhAga ondRum iruukAdhu.
I'm not saying PV is on the same level as those renowned classic are but just that lack of story cannot be held against the movie *if* the execution is good.
It had its flaws and excesses - the romance angle was totally unconvincing as was Priya Mani's acting, Priya Mani starting an impromptu carnatic teachin session out of the blue, Karthi biting off the cop's ear, and the slightly overstretched and contrived "comedy" bits which were the masala elements, playing to the gallery etc..
However, it largley worked when it came to attention to detail, cinematography, acting and screenplay. To me, the best part of the film was the climax. If not for anything else, the attempt to show what rape is(*). It works at two levels, from a director's point of view. It jolts the audience and also, more importantly, shakes the belief and practice of the trivial and almost comic manner in which rape is portrayed in Tamil films. That's what rape has come to be in Tamil films and thanks to Ameer for breaking that.
(*) - "Realism-ngara perla rape ellam kaamikkanuma? apparam ellathayum kaamikka vendiyadhu dhaane?" appadi nu sila per kekkalaam. Well, a creator will show what he deems necessary to the story he wants to tell. It must fit into the narrative whole. In Pesum Padam, there is a little bit of toilet humor. It wasn't included for the sake of "realism" but just to brilliantly illustrate that humor exists everywhere and to show what 'pains' the main character undergoes to hide the man in his house.
P.S: The public showed a similar outcry in Sweden in the 50's(?) when Ingmar Bergman's "Virgin Springs" was released, which included a rape scene, which was then considered brutal. oruvar sAthirangaLai udaikkumbodhu edirpugaL vara thaan seyyum
-
From: joe on 6th June 2007 03:28 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by crajkumar_be
Yen Naama kathai kathai-nnu adichukirom-nnu theriyalla ..All we need is 2.30 hours presentation ..Even it can be a incident takes 2.30 hours ..I beleive 'speed' is such a movie.
-
From: dsath on 6th June 2007 03:34 PM [Full View]
Joe, i respect your views on the movie. I don't watch movies that often. PV was recommended by some friends and decided to watch it. After watching the movie i felt i wasted 2£ on the DVD and missed couple of hours of sleep. Originally Posted by joe
dsath,
Nobody denies that there are flaws in PV .And here some people are succesfful in seraching for flaws and able to list out ..But for me ,It is a movie with less flaws compare to 95% of the movies releasing nowadays ..Isn't it far better than usual flicks ?
The direction was good, the village setting was caught brilliantly and the actors did a good job. To counter this, the story just repelled me. Yes directors like BR has depicted child love (that is one of pet hates), but that was in a different time. Now India is more open and when we are starting to shake off some not so good elements in our society, there comes a movie like PV and becomes a hit. Try as I might, but am unable to justify the story. Not elements of it, but the whole story. Sorry PV’s story is beyond my comprehension.
Also in a state where hero worship is common place, coming up with stories like this is irresponsible movie making(esp from someone as talented as Ameer). Its high time the young guns start having a positive attitude towards our society and film making.
-
From: selvakumar on 6th June 2007 06:48 PM [Full View]
/ dig Originally Posted by joe
Selva,
Agreed ..But In last five years ,Can you list out Tamil movies which you consider more realistic and class than PV ? ...So that I can understand what is your preference.
Five years would be difficult. Apart from the regular popular movies, the movie that I consider as a classic is : "Karuvelam pookkal". (Radhika, Nassar) That was one hell of a movie that portrayed the village atmosphere present in a typical southern district of TN in a natural and down-to-earth manner. Nothing "Over-The-Top" in the name of realism. The performances of Raadhika and Nassar were too good. After that movie, I loved VEYYIL a lot ! Indha rendu padangalum Anu Anu vaa Rasichu paartha padangal. I rate KP better than Veyyil though ! Too bad, it went unnoticed. After this, eagerly expecting "PaLLi koodam" a lot !
Recently, Chennai - 28 without crap ennamo song ( Well, not a classic. But I have never seen a movie that portrayed chennai life in this way )
/ dig
-
From: joe on 6th June 2007 07:00 PM [Full View]
Selva,
Good ..I agree that KP and Veyil are good ..havn't seen Chennai-28..
You see..you can list only 2 or 3 recent movies which you think more realestic than PV ..So it is a proof that PV is not a movie to be ignored by listing few flaws (Which I can also do for Veyil ,But I won't do since I rate Veyil also a movie to be welcomed).
My point is ,PV might not be a extrodinary movie ..But it is one among very few rare movies which gives different experience and approach compare to movies followed typical Tamil-movie formulas ..I feel success of movies like Veyil,PV,Mozhi will encourage producers,directors to come out of usual circle.
Appapa varra intha maathiri padangala naama (sila kuRaigalukkaga) ignore pannina ,things will not move for Tamil cinema.
-
From: thamiz on 6th June 2007 07:39 PM [Full View]
I only wish PV wins a national award to prove its quality to the world!
-
From: thamiz on 6th June 2007 07:43 PM [Full View]
The scene in which kanjA karuppu is working in the teas-shop and the comedy "douglas aNNE" by SaravNan and Karthi was hilarious!
Never have seen such a natural sarcastic -realistic- scene in Tamil cinema for a LONG TIME!
Ameer certainly has done a wonderful job!
-
From: seran on 6th June 2007 07:54 PM [Full View]
national awards are a total waste these days... even NT has not won a single national award. many will agree to it Originally Posted by thamiz
I only wish PV wins a national award to prove its quality to the world!
Ammer in one of his interview said he has another version of PV, and said it is for international film festivals and it will be good if PV win some awards.
-
From: shobana_in on 6th June 2007 08:33 PM [Full View]
thamiz...think abt the logic Originally Posted by thamiz
The scene in which kanjA karuppu is working in the teas-shop and the comedy "douglas aNNE" by SaravNan and Karthi was hilarious!
Never have seen such a natural sarcastic -realistic- scene in Tamil cinema for a LONG TIME!
Ameer certainly has done a wonderful job!
thats a village and paruthiveeran is born and brought up in that village...
wont paruthiveeran,teashop owner and douglas know each other obviously...telling the owner that douglas is the owner is unrealistic.
that scene is actually without realism...but excellent comedy
-
From: Nerd on 6th June 2007 08:45 PM [Full View]
I felt the love portrayed in that movie was very REALISTIC. South tamizh naatla ellAm ipdi dhAn. Many of my friends are from the south and they absolutely loved the movie
-
From: thamiz on 6th June 2007 10:26 PM [Full View]
LOGIC!!!! Originally Posted by shobana_in
thamiz...think abt the logic Originally Posted by thamiz
thats a village and paruthiveeran is born and brought up in that village...
wont paruthiveeran,teashop owner and douglas know each other obviously...telling the owner that douglas is the owner is unrealistic.
that scene is actually without realism...but excellent comedy
What LOGIC???
It is not uncommon, the workers have a BIG MOUTH, and go on gossip about the owner and tell lies around!
There are towns in which they chop the head off for a "beedi fight" and there wont be any logic there either. It does happen!
Anyway, go on interpret in your own logical way and I think you cant understand these illogical logics as you were brought up in Chennai!
-
From: thamiz on 6th June 2007 10:27 PM [Full View]
It is very TRUE, nerd! Originally Posted by Nerd
I felt the love portrayed in that movie was very REALISTIC. South tamizh naatla ellAm ipdi dhAn. Many of my friends are from the south and they absolutely loved the movie
-
From: shobana_in on 6th June 2007 10:41 PM [Full View]
heiii...im from a village side....thats why Im saying. Originally Posted by thamiz
LOGIC!!!! Originally Posted by shobana_in
thamiz...think abt the logic Originally Posted by thamiz
thats a village and paruthiveeran is born and brought up in that village...
wont paruthiveeran,teashop owner and douglas know each other obviously...telling the owner that douglas is the owner is unrealistic.
that scene is actually without realism...but excellent comedy
What LOGIC???
It is not uncommon, the workers have a BIG MOUTH, and go on gossip about the owner and tell lies around!
There are towns in which they chop the head off for a "beedi fight" and there wont be any logic there either. It does happen!
Anyway, go on interpret in your own logical way and I think you cant understand these illogical logics as you were brought up in Chennai!
every guys knows abt every people in the small villages...
working boy telling that he is the owner is
-
From: thamiz on 6th June 2007 10:44 PM [Full View]
nilavu:
Did you hear a Kh interview about cases his dad (criminal lawyer) had to deal with from paramakkudi neighborhood?
Ask someone and get to know the story he told if you dont know about the stories he told as it really happened.
You cant see any logic there either!
-
From: shobana_in on 6th June 2007 10:46 PM [Full View]
see...beediku sanda podradhellam gramathula sagajam... Originally Posted by thamiz
not this one
-
From: thamiz on 6th June 2007 10:48 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by shobana_in
OK!
-
From: great on 7th June 2007 12:28 AM [Full View]
Its just a comedy and it was well executed comedy aswell !!! We should not find logic in each and every scene of the movie. I liked PV more than Veyyil and Karthik did a fabulous joib Originally Posted by shobana_in
thamiz...think abt the logic Originally Posted by thamiz
The scene in which kanjA karuppu is working in the teas-shop and the comedy "douglas aNNE" by SaravNan and Karthi was hilarious!
Never have seen such a natural sarcastic -realistic- scene in Tamil cinema for a LONG TIME!
Ameer certainly has done a wonderful job!
thats a village and paruthiveeran is born and brought up in that village...
wont paruthiveeran,teashop owner and douglas know each other obviously...telling the owner that douglas is the owner is unrealistic.
that scene is actually without realism...but excellent comedy
-
From: MrJudge on 7th June 2007 01:30 PM [Full View]
There is no scene depicting douglas was born and brought up in that same village. So he might have come to this village for work. But obviously these guys know who the teashop owner is. They just make fun of both douglas and the tea shop owner who gave some unwanted free advice in the starting of this sequence. Originally Posted by shobana_in
I don't see any logical error here.
-
From: kannannn on 13th June 2007 05:20 AM [Full View]
Appadi ennathaan irukkunnu paarthe vitten. IMO, highly overrated movie. Sirukadhaiyai muzhuneeLa novel aakiyirukkirar Ameer. Kaarthi's characterization is the best part part of the movie. However, Priya Mani's character negates that effect (avangalukku yaar voice kudutha? Andha aambala kural kaadhai kudaindhu konde irandhadhu..). The flashback sequences were also very badly made. Overall, only Kaarthi impresses
-
From: littlemaster1982 on 13th June 2007 05:26 AM [Full View]
Kannan,
The Heroine is Priya Mani, not Priya Raman. And, it's her own voice
-
From: kannannn on 13th June 2007 05:34 AM [Full View]
Aaha, Ippo maathiputten. Romba nanRi Originally Posted by littlemaster1982
Kannan,
The Heroine is Priya Mani, not Priya Raman. And, it's her own voice . Paravayilla, sondha kuralndradhaala mannichidalam. Atleast she is better than those who depend on dubbing artistes even after living here for so long.
-
From: littlemaster1982 on 13th June 2007 05:36 AM [Full View]
. Bang on target about the heroines depending on dubbing
-
From: Nerd on 13th June 2007 07:45 AM [Full View]
I really liked the movie, barring a few cliches :P
-
From: selvakumar on 29th June 2007 05:21 PM [Full View]
Our EX-HUBBER Jai GAnesh's review on Paruthiveeran.
Quite interesting !
http://silencerocks.blogspot.com/
Since it has few things that may be outside the scope of this thread, I have just posted the link here
-
From: raaja_rasigan on 2nd July 2007 10:17 PM [Full View]
திரையிட்ட பல இடங்களில் ரஜினியின், "சந்திரமுகி'யை முறியடித்து, வசூல் சாதனை, புரிந்து விட்டது, "பருத்தி வீரன்!' இதனால், வரலாறு காணாத சாதனையை "சந்திரமுகி' புரிந்து விட்டதாக மார்தட்டிய அப்பட வட்டாரம் வாயடைத்து நிற்கிறது. அதே சமயம், மலையையே சாய்த்து விட்ட மமதை மனதிற்குள் இருந்தும், அதை வெளிக்காட்டிக் கொள்ளாமல் இருக்கிறது கார்த்தி வட்டாரம்; அப்பாவுக்குத் தப்பாத பிள்ளை.
http://www.dinamalar.com/2007july01varamalar/THUNUK.ASP
-
From: kb on 2nd July 2007 10:33 PM [Full View]
paruthiveeram sila edangalil CM vasool muriadichiduchunu sonna.. evanaachum sandaiku varaana.. inthanaiki paruthiveeram is a super HIT only.
athey
-
From: selvakumar on 3rd July 2007 11:28 AM [Full View]
Who accepted this news? Originally Posted by kb
paruthiveeram sila edangalil CM vasool muriadichiduchunu sonna.. evanaachum sandaiku varaana.. inthanaiki paruthiveeram is a super HIT only.
athey
Hype given for PV was infact pretty less compared to the movie that claimed that they have broken CM record !
There is no surprise in this news IMO
AFA I've observed, PV is the biggest hit of the year till now (Not including Sivaji here for obvious reasons)
-
From: ajaybaskar on 3rd July 2007 11:44 AM [Full View]
Business booms for Tamil cinema
SREEDHAR PILLAI
Round-up The first half of 2007 has seen a number of hits with content-driven, smartly packaged films doing the trick.
Tamil films never had it so good during the first half of the year. There have been 50 releases from January 1 to June 29, 2007, eight more than last year’s 42 releases during the same period. Kollywood has enough reasons to smile as there has been more number of hits than last year which augurs well for the industry. The hits of the year are ‘Pokkiri’(blockbuster), ‘Mozhi’ (super hit), ‘Paruthiveeran’ (super hit), ‘Naan Avan Illai’ (hit), ‘Unnale Unnale’(hit) and ‘Chennai-600028’ (above average).
Rajinikanth’s ‘Sivaji’ which released on June 15 to record openings, does not feature here as it will take some more weeks to gauge its success. Though the industry is superstar-driven, formulaic films clicked at the box-office.
The message is once again loud and clear — stars alone cannot make a film a hit, a novel script and presentation do matter.
Coming of age
In a way, the new trend of content-driven films in attractive packaging with essential commercial ingredients and smart marketing show that Tamil films have come of age.
The Vijay-Asin starrer ‘Pokkiri’ became a blockbuster because of its packaging as a mass entertainer, music and the larger-than-life image of its hero Vijay. Says Vijay: “I think ‘Pokkiri’ clicked because it had all the essential ingredients. Added to that there was a twist in the story, rib-tickling comedy, great songs picturised beautifully, sentiments and never-before-seen action…”
The film made on a budget of around Rs. 12 crores should have done business worth Rs. 35 crores worldwide, according to trade estimates. ‘Pokkiri’ also created new records in Kerala and overseas.
The Prakash Raj-produced ‘Mozhi’ was a surprise packet, as it did extraordinary business in the Chennai multiplexes and overseas. It is the highest collecting film at Inox in Chennai. ‘Mozhi’ had a bold storyline and director Radha Mohan showed a hearing-impaired and mute person in a way that struck a chord with the audience. Says Radha Mohan: “ ‘Mozhi’ was not a steamy tearjerker, instead we told a real story humorously, with great performances from the lead actors especially Jo, and it also had some melodious music.” The aggressive marketing of Pyramid Saimira, the distributors, also was a big help. ‘Mozhi’ made around Rs 2.25 crores and is likely to do business worth Rs 8 to 10 crores from theatre, television and DVD rights.
Ameer’s ‘Paruthiveeran,’ which had blood and gore, did extraordinary business in Tamil Nadu, while overseas and in Kerala it has not been as impressive. It has made a star out of its hero Karthi, who is the discovery of the year. ‘
Naan Avan Illai,’ a remake of Gemini Ganesan’s 1979 film by the same name also turned out to be a hit, especially in B and C centres due to its glamour, songs and Jeevan’s image as an anti-hero.
The cameraman-turned-director, Jeeva, also churned out a hit with the candy floss love story ‘Unnale Unnale,’ which again was a multiplex-centric movie that did very well in Chennai and Coimbatore. . Jeeva, whose demise has left the industry shocked, had said: “I think ‘Unnale Unnale’ appealed to the urban youth who love my kind of soft romantic movies, which have exotic locations, and Harris Jayaraj’s peppy music.”
Another surprise packet is ‘Chennai-600028,’ which is still doing well in Chennai and its surrounding areas. Nobody expected a film on Chennai’s gully cricket with no stars, other than Yuvan Shankar Raja who scored the music, to become a rage among the youth.
Says Venkat Prabhu, who made his directorial debut with the movie: “I would say that the audiences are on the lookout for fresh and innovative ideas and not necessarily stars. I agree that star films take an extraordinary opening but they will not sustain, if the content is not satisfactory.”
* * Future looks bright
Excerpts from an interview with Ramanarayanan, president of Tamil Film Producers Association:
How has 2007 been for the Tamil film industry?
So far so good! The first six months have seen the release of 50 films and at least 10 of them will turn profitable for their producers.
This has come about because of the State Government’s path-breaking decision to exempt films with Tamil titles from entertainment tax. It has had a big impact along with a reduction in admission rates. Now the public can see more films at affordable rates. The proof is there in the success of films such as ‘Mozhi’ and ‘Paruthiveeran,’ which have done well all over the State.
What is the current trend in the industry?
I think big movies will have to co-exist with small, meaningful films within the commercial format. Even a bio-pic such as ‘Periyar’ has found its audience. People do appreciate good cinema.
I think the boom in production is going to last, as low budget films are able to recover their cost.
What is the future of Tamil cinema?
I think the future looks bright especially after the way ‘Sivaji’ opened outside Tamil Nadu. Today Tamil films are going global, which is a good augury. — SP
-
From: kb on 3rd July 2007 11:58 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by selvakumar
dude.. i dont know whats hard in accepting facts
-
From: ajaybaskar on 3rd July 2007 12:00 PM [Full View]
Thats y i have posted THE HINDU article again in this thread.. Bcoz ppl shud not be mislead. Originally Posted by kb
Originally Posted by selvakumar
dude.. i dont know whats hard in accepting facts
-
From: selvakumar on 3rd July 2007 12:22 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by kb
Originally Posted by selvakumar
dude.. i dont know whats hard in accepting facts
Which clearly states that they have taken into account of overseas collections and other states' collections. IF this has to considered, no movie in the present generation can come under the scanner until or otherwise false info are spread by PRO / media. I am just wondering how the other movie collected in these areas if they can be compared to CM ! I mean - AP, Karnataka, FMS etc. I have ruled out both the movies in surpassing CM collections.Ameer’s ‘Paruthiveeran,’ which had blood and gore, did extraordinary business in Tamil Nadu, while overseas and in Kerala it has not been as impressive. It has made a star out of its hero Karthi, who is the discovery of the year. ‘
I have seen many neutrals seeing PV for more than 3 times. Reach of PV was amazing among everyone.
I may not like PV (The movie). But its BO success is still under-rated IMO
-
From: selvakumar on 3rd July 2007 12:29 PM [Full View]
And IF we take into account of ticket rates and if we have to go by the collections alone, then comparison with CM & other films that became blockbusters will look odd.
That is the truth.
-
From: kb on 3rd July 2007 12:31 PM [Full View]
are u saying PV is bigger in BO than anyother movie released in 2007 till now other thaan shivaji
-
From: selvakumar on 3rd July 2007 12:36 PM [Full View]
Yes. (Based on what I observed in TN). I am sure about how PV ran in Bangalore as well inspite of its delayed release. I have no idea about other areas like UK, malaysia / singapore, US though I have a rough idea on Kerala Originally Posted by kb
are u saying PV is bigger in BO than anyother movie released in 2007 till now other thaan shivaji So, In terms of reach PV is a bigger hit and when it comes to BO collections, in TN PV must be the one.
-
From: ajaybaskar on 3rd July 2007 12:40 PM [Full View]
Thambi, Can u tell me wat was mode of observation? Originally Posted by selvakumar
Yes. (Based on what I observed in TN). I am sure about how PV ran in Bangalore as well inspite of its delayed release. I have no idea about other areas like UK, malaysia / singapore, US though I have a rough idea on Kerala Originally Posted by kb
are u saying PV is bigger in BO than anyother movie released in 2007 till now other thaan shivaji So, In terms of reach PV is a bigger hit and when it comes to BO collections, in TN PV must be the one.
Do u think that ur observations are valid and comparable to an article posted in THE HINDU?
-
From: NOV on 3rd July 2007 12:41 PM [Full View]
unfortunately PV was not released in general screens (like GSC and TGV) in Malaysia. otherwise it enjoyed a decent run. Originally Posted by selvakumar
Discounting Sivaji, Pokkiri had the best run as well as exposure in Malaysia in 2007.
-
From: selvakumar on 3rd July 2007 12:43 PM [Full View]
Thanks for Your information NOV
-
From: selvakumar on 3rd July 2007 12:45 PM [Full View]
Let me put it this way : Originally Posted by ajaybaskar
Do u think all the observations posted in THE HINDU are valid and all observations from my side are invalid ?
Mode of Observations : Primarily, Word of Mouth This is reg TN only. I have not rejected anything that I donno. I posted this primarily when doubts were asked based on the handling of a media info on PV and correlation with CM. I raised my own voice on that
-
From: kb on 3rd July 2007 12:47 PM [Full View]
did u know how many shows pokkiri was housefull when it was released..
reach pathi pesura...
how many centers pokiri was released and how many PV was released..
oru vishayam othuka maateenga.. avlo kasakuthu..
anyway... gud luck next week at BO
-
From: rockydeva on 3rd July 2007 12:48 PM [Full View]
hmmmm THREAD Sodaguthu pOla...
KB and selva argumenta vidunga plz
-
From: selvakumar on 3rd July 2007 12:51 PM [Full View]
1) Ya. I know the information and how PHOTOSHOP was used in an intelligent way by capturing everything in DEVI complex alone forgetting other theatres Originally Posted by kb
1) did u know how many shows pokkiri was housefull when it was released..
2) reach pathi pesura...
3) how many centers pokiri was released and how many PV was released..
4) oru vishayam othuka maateenga.. avlo kasakuthu..
anyway... gud luck next week at BO
2) Yes, Reach pathi thaan pesuraen
3) I think PV released with Mozhi alone without any competition in B & C centres of ||| nature compared to the other movie
4) Did I ever ruled out info on other areas like Malaysia / singapore / uk ?
Accept panna kasakkuthaa
Oru Padam FLOP aanatha accept panna ungalukku 200 naaL eduthuchae ! Atha vidavaa
-
From: kb on 3rd July 2007 12:59 PM [Full View]
gud atleast u support karthik now for BO..
avatar maathiko nalla irrukum
-
From: ajaybaskar on 3rd July 2007 01:00 PM [Full View]
Yes. I do think that the points mentioned in the paper are valid. its not Dinakaran or Dinathanthi where manipulations are possible. U know a lot of neutral friends (neutralngra term indha contextla yaen vandhuchunnu theriyala..) who watched PV 3 times. I know lot of ppl who didnt like the movie in any case. It happens anytime. Originally Posted by selvakumar
Let me put it this way : Originally Posted by ajaybaskar
Do u think all the observations posted in THE HINDU are valid and all observations from my side are invalid ?
Mode of Observations : Primarily, Word of Mouth This is reg TN only. I have not rejected anything that I donno. I posted this primarily when doubts were asked based on the handling of a media info on PV and correlation with CM. I raised my own voice on that
-
From: selvakumar on 3rd July 2007 01:38 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by kb
gud atleast u support karthik now for BO..
avatar maathiko nalla irrukum
Let me clarify !
I was supporting PV here based on my observation in TN. I have clearly said that I don't have any information on BO in other areas.Who accepted this news?
Hype given for PV was infact pretty less compared to the movie that claimed that they have broken CM record !
There is no surprise in this news IMO
AFA I've observed, PV is the biggest hit of the year till now (Not including Sivaji here for obvious reasons)
1) How come Karthik came into the picture?
2) Why should I change my avatar ?
3) Is it because you change the avatars often to support the movie ?
You have given your own proof from Hindu written by SP & sometimes by SK which we hardly take into account based on our observation and their own hyped up articles.
You are questioning something based on Dinamalar article that hardly presented on what criteria they posted it ! (CM vs PV)
For that, I said PV's run in TN was more !
- Adhu eppadi ?
1) Should we have to judge the entire BO status of a movie with overseas market alone forgetting the flip side of it in TN? This has become a trend now.
2) Atleast area wise status poduraangala ? Athuvum illa
Then, how can we conclude on all these things ? Biggest, Smallest - Idu ellam collections area wise potta thaana varum ?
P.S: I will never support Karthik. & my hatred towards HYPED UP VAARISU's using their father's name well known in the hub PERIOD
-
From: NOV on 3rd July 2007 01:42 PM [Full View]
who is karthik?
muthuraman's vaarisu?
-
From: ajaybaskar on 3rd July 2007 01:43 PM [Full View]
Not karthik, NOV Anna. Its Karthi, Sivakumar's son.. Originally Posted by NOV
who is karthik?
muthuraman's vaarisu?
-
From: selvakumar on 3rd July 2007 01:44 PM [Full View]
Well,
Let me put it this way :
AFA I have seen, PV had a splendid run in rural and semi-urban areas while the urban area was dominated completed by Mozhi & partially by PV.
So, my observation is that : PV must have been the biggest hit since it could have collected more than any other movie with the same level of ticket rates.
I don't have any idea on the overseas performance of any movie. IF we consider that, PV might not have done well in overseas compared to other movies.
-
From: ajaybaskar on 3rd July 2007 01:46 PM [Full View]
Kudos Selva, U have cleverly excluded a film which ran(runs) more than these films. Originally Posted by selvakumar
-
From: selvakumar on 3rd July 2007 01:50 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by ajaybaskar
Kudos Selva, U have cleverly excluded a film which ran(runs) more than these films.
On the bolded one :
-
From: Devar Magan on 3rd July 2007 01:51 PM [Full View]
Paruthi Veeran's reach all over TN is tremendous, much more than any other movie in recent times
-
From: ajaybaskar on 3rd July 2007 01:55 PM [Full View]
Wats ur problem in accepting a movie being declared a hit? Paruthi veeran is a very good film and its a super hit movie. Agreed. But y dont u guys accept a simple fact. Ketta Sridhar Pillai, Sudhish Kamath ellam biased apdinnu oru mokkaiya podureenga. Shame on u, guys..
Edho onnu kanna mooditta ulagamae iruttunnu nenaikkumam..
-
From: selvakumar on 3rd July 2007 02:03 PM [Full View]
1) Originally Posted by ajaybaskar
When did we refused the success of a movie ? & that too after these many days. Projecting a Flop movie as a hit is not in our area I never denied the success of the other movie (atleast in the hub)
2) May be : I posted by observation
3) I repeat for the umpteenth time that rejecting facts is not in our league unless they are false & written with an intention to mislead
4) Unmai thaan. Ellarukkum Idhu porundhum
-
From: raaja_rasigan on 4th July 2007 12:35 PM [Full View]
‘இயக்குநர் அமீர் கதாநாயக-னாக அறிமுகமாவது உறுதியாகி-விட்டது. அப்படத்தின் கதை, திரைக்கதை, வசனத்தை அமீரே எழுதுகிறார். ‘திருடா திருடி’ இயக்குநர் சுப்ரமணிய சிவா இப்படத்தை இயக்குகிறார். (தாடியோடவா?)
:courtesy: kumudam
-
From: ThalaNass on 4th July 2007 12:38 PM [Full View]
AMIR, what happened.. plz concentrate only on direction..
-
From: Sinthiya on 31st July 2007 07:22 AM [Full View]
...Paruthiveeran...let's discuss here...
-
From: selvakumar on 31st July 2007 10:10 AM [Full View]
Warm welcome to the new MOD !
Originally Posted by Sinthiya
...Paruthiveeran...let's discuss here...
-
From: Sinthiya on 1st August 2007 04:50 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by selvakumar
Warm welcome to the new MOD ! Selva for commenting (usually just '' or '' among some words) at some of my posts ...thanks
i just wondered why we have two threads for Paruthiveeran...that's all ...
-
From: thamiz on 1st August 2007 04:58 AM [Full View]
You did good sinthiya!
-
From: ajithfederer on 1st August 2007 05:03 AM [Full View]
Sinthiya mela appadi enna kolai veri
Originally Posted by selvakumar
Warm welcome to the new MOD !
Originally Posted by Sinthiya
...Paruthiveeran...let's discuss here...
-
From: Sinthiya on 1st August 2007 05:25 AM [Full View]
i think it's my Sada avatar Originally Posted by ajithfederer
Sinthiya mela appadi enna kolai veri...
end digression....
-
From: Wibha on 1st August 2007 05:30 AM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Sinthiya
i think it's my Sada avatar Originally Posted by ajithfederer
Sinthiya mela appadi enna kolai veri...
end digression....
-
From: smith1 on 1st August 2007 03:26 PM [Full View]
amir as hero?
Idhukkellam cheran thaan karanam.
-
From: rockydeva on 1st August 2007 03:28 PM [Full View]
Cherane oru vethu vEttu Originally Posted by smith1
-
From: MrJudge on 13th December 2007 07:30 PM [Full View]
Etha enga sollanumgra kavanam venum. Originally Posted by littlemaster1982
Radhamohan is also in touch with guys like Jayamohan, RM reads a lot.
-
From: littlemaster1982 on 13th December 2007 07:35 PM [Full View]
Thanks for proving my point Originally Posted by MrJudge
Etha enga sollanumgra kavanam venum. Originally Posted by littlemaster1982
Radhamohan is also in touch with guys like Jayamohan, RM reads a lot.
-
From: MrJudge on 13th December 2007 07:49 PM [Full View]
That is not your point, that is a fact. RM reads lot of novels, I assume he must be in touch with JM. Originally Posted by littlemaster1982
He doesn't have to compare it with Mozhi or any film. He can very well compare it with samurai/kathal and tell us how the director has improved himself in story telling from his last films and whether this movie scores up/down.
-
From: littlemaster1982 on 13th December 2007 07:51 PM [Full View]
You haven't got what I said. I'm in no mood to explain. Have a good time.
-
From: MrJudge on 13th December 2007 07:57 PM [Full View]
I do understand what you said. You said I will find some way to bring them together and my reply was to point out that they are indeed known to each other. Anyway Originally Posted by littlemaster1982
-
From: Shakthiprabha. on 14th December 2007 07:46 AM [Full View]
ChEran kku enna kuraichal Originally Posted by rockydeva
Cherane oru vethu vEttu Originally Posted by smith1
-
From: littlemaster1982 on 14th December 2007 10:18 AM [Full View]
Oru actor romba mukkiyamaana vishayam, acting. Athaan kuraichal. Originally Posted by Shakthiprabha
ChEran kku enna kuraichal Originally Posted by rockydeva
Cherane oru vethu vEttu Originally Posted by smith1
-
From: joe on 14th December 2007 10:21 AM [Full View]
So vethu vettu nadicha Autograph silver Jublee oduthu . Originally Posted by littlemaster1982
Oru actor romba mukkiyamaana vishayam, acting. Athaan kuraichal. Originally Posted by Shakthiprabha
ChEran kku enna kuraichal Originally Posted by rockydeva
Cherane oru vethu vEttu Originally Posted by smith1
-
From: littlemaster1982 on 14th December 2007 10:23 AM [Full View]
Avar nadikkalainna innum 50 naal kooda odi irukkumo ennavo
-
From: joe on 14th December 2007 10:24 AM [Full View]
Irukkalam ..Aana mukkiyamaana vishyam illamale silver jublee saathanai thaan Originally Posted by littlemaster1982
Avar nadikkalainna innum 50 naal kooda odi irukkumo ennavo
-
From: MrJudge on 20th December 2007 09:19 AM [Full View]
Paruthiveeran’s 300-day prophecy comes true
By Behindwoods News Bureau.
December 19, 2007
Paruthiveeran came as a whiff of fresh air at a time when the film industry was churning out vacuous movies. This film was bold attempt and a trendsetter in its own way. Based on a real-life incident, Paruthiveeran was a perfect launchpad for Karthi, son of actor Sivakumar and brother of Surya.
It is worth mentioning here that this movie made it to many international film festivals, which made others notice the Tamil film industry. Paruthiveeran, a critically acclaimed movie, was also a commercial success and is marching towards 300 days.
-
From: MrJudge on 14th February 2008 11:05 PM [Full View]
Paruthiveeran at Berlin Film Fest
February 14, 2008, 3:10:49 PM
Ameer must me in the seventh heaven with the continuous appreciation that his Paruthiveeran is getting. The movie that released last summer tugged at everyone�s heartstrings and ran for several weeks of 'House Full' shows. In fact, the movie still has its share of audience and is today celebrating it's 357th day, which is no mean feat!
Paruthiveeran, which won rave reviews at the Osian Cinefan awards last year, was recommended by the panel to be screened at the Berlin Film Festival which is currently under way. The Berlin Film Festival is a ten-day extravaganza that showcases the best in English and German films. One of the films will win the Best Film award. This year Paruthiveeran will be in the list of contenders for that award! Ameer should be proud of himself for having a movie that has won over even the critical global audience!
-
From: MrJudge on 16th February 2008 04:07 PM [Full View]
PARUTHIVEERAN
In a rural area in southern India, young Muthazhagu is determined to marry her cousin, who had once saved her life when she was a child. But Paruthiveeran enjoys the company of prostitutes, likes getting in trouble with the law, and snubs her. When the ne’er-do-well finally acknowledges Muthazhagu and asks for her hand, the families of the two provoke a tragic conflict because of the caste system that both sides are caught up in, and that is the basis for their mutual disdain. The unconditionality of this young woman’s love meets the powerful underdog charm of Paruthiveeran in high drama. Also the villagers are swept into the archaic family feud, just as they are by their wild, loud religious festivals. The characters’ strengths and weaknesses give the story an intense palpable authenticity. With exploding colors and fast music, that are here more experimental than one is used to from Bollywood films, Paruthiveeran at the same time conveys realistic insights into the rough rural life in Tamil Nadu, formerly Madras. In India the film is a huge success. Its main actors are the young stars of the Tamil cinema called “Kollywood,” after its place of origin, Kodambakkam.
-Ingrid Arnold
http://www.berlinale.de/en/programm/...lm_id=20080076
-
From: MrJudge on 16th February 2008 04:09 PM [Full View]
-
From: Devar Magan on 16th February 2008 04:11 PM [Full View]
ippo elllorum 300 days keela onnuthukkume othukka maattanga pola irukku
-
From: rocco1976 on 17th February 2008 07:36 AM [Full View]
58th Berlin International Film Festival(Prizes Of The Indepe
NETPAC Prize
The Network for the Promotion of Asian Cinema (NETPAC) is an alliance of festival organisers and film critics whose aim is to support Asian film. The jury awards a prize to an Asian film screened in the Forum. Jury members this year are Aditya Assarat, Garin Nugroho and Meenakshi Shedde.
The members of the jury award the NETPAC Prize to
United Red Army
by Wakamatsu Koji
Special Mention
Paruthiveeran
by Ameer Sulthan
-
From: Sanjeevi on 17th February 2008 10:03 AM [Full View]
-
From: MrJudge on 17th February 2008 10:13 AM [Full View]
Only a special mention and that too from the independent jury?
Disappointed a little bit but on the positive side, this is a good step forward taking the tamil movies to the next level. Go Ameer!
-
From: Sanjeevi on 17th February 2008 11:28 AM [Full View]
-
From: Sanjeevi on 17th February 2008 03:15 PM [Full View]
Ok OK
However special mention is not bad
-
From: Sanjeevi on 17th February 2008 10:28 PM [Full View]
http://thatstamil.oneindia.in/movies...cognition.html
பெர்லின்-அமீருக்கு சிறந்த இயக்குநர் விருது
பெர்லின் சர்வதேச திரைப்பட விழாவில் பருத்திவீரன் இயக்குநர் அமீருக்கு, சர்வதேச அளவிலான சிறந்த இயக்குநருக்கான சிறப்பு விருது கிடைத்துள்ளது.
படவிழாவின் நிறைவு நாளான நேற்று இந்த விருதினை விழா கமிட்டி மற்றும் நீதிபதிகள் குழு அமீருக்கு வழங்கியது.
இதுவரை மூன்று சிறந்த படைப்புகளை தமிழில் தந்துள்ள அமீர், சர்வதேச அளவில் பெறும் இரண்டாவது விருது இது. தனது ராம் படத்துக்காக இரண்டாண்டுகளுக்கு முன்பு நடந்த சைப்ரஸ் சர்வதேச பட விழாவில் சிறந்த இயக்குநருக்கான விருதினை முதல்முறை பெற்றார் அமீர்.
தமிழின் வேறு எந்த இயக்குநருக்கும் கிடைக்காத மிகப் பெரிய அங்கீகாரம் இது என்பது குறிப்பிடத்தக்கது.
ஜெர்மனியின் பெர்லின் நகரில் 58வது சர்வதேச திரைப்பட விழா நடைபெற்றது.
இவ்விழாவில் பல்வேறு நாடுகளைச் சேர்ந்த திரைப்படங்கள் நூற்றுக்கும் மேற்பட்ட புகழ்பெற்ற திரைப்படங்கள் பங்கேற்றன. ஜெர்மன் மொழி அல்லாத படங்களுக்கான விழா என்பதால் அந்நாட்டு படங்கள் மட்டும் இதில் அனுமதிக்கப்படவில்லை.
ஜப்பான் இயக்குனர் வகாமட்சு கோஜி இயக்கிய யுனைடெட் ஆர்மி விழாவின் சிறந்த படமாகத் தேர்ந்தெடுக்கப்பட்டது. தமிழ் படமான பருத்தி வீரன் மொத்தம் ஐந்து நாட்கள் ஜெர்மனி மற்றும் ஆங்கில சப் டைட்டில்களுடன் திரையிடப்பட்டது. சர்வதேச பத்திரிகையாளர்களுக்கான காட்சியும் தனியாக காட்டப்பட்டது.
அனைத்து திரையிடல்களின் போதும் படத்தின் இயக்குநர் அமீரும் உடனிருந்தார். இந்நிகழ்ச்சிகளில் படத்தின் ஹீரோ கார்த்தியும் கலந்து கொண்டார்.
விழாவின் நிறைவு நாளான நேற்று, பருத்தி வீரன் படம் ஆசிய பிராந்தியத்தின் மிகச்சிறந்த படங்களுள் ஒன்று என விழாக் குழு பாராட்டி அமீருக்கு விருது வழங்கியது.
இதுகுறித்து இயக்குனர் அமீர் கூறுகையில், என் வாழ்நாளில் மறக்க முடியாத தருணம் இது. இந்தப் படத்தை எடுத்ததற்காக உண்மையிலேயே சந்தோஷப்படுகிறேன். படத்துக்கு இவ்வளவு பெரிய அங்கீகாரம் கிடைக்கக் காரணமாக இருந்த அனைவருக்கும் நன்றி தெரிவித்துக் கொள்கிறேன்.
இந்தப் படத்தை எடுத்த போதும், வெளியிட்ட போதும் ஏற்பட்ட வலிகளை ஒட்டுமொத்தமாக மறக்கடிக்கச் செய்துவிட்டது, சர்வதேச திரைப்பட படைப்பாளிகள் அதற்கு அளித்த கவுரவம். இன்னும் பல பருத்தி வீரன்களைத் தரும் தூண்டுதலை எனக்குள் விதைத்திருக்கிறது பருத்தி வீரனுக்கு கிடைத்து வரும் அங்கீகாரங்கள் என்றார் அமீர்.
------------------------------------------------------------
I think, Ameer missed best director award in Cyprus film festival. But he has bagged now
PS: Again wrong news in thatstamil.com about Cyrus film festival director award
-
From: selvakumar on 18th February 2008 10:43 AM [Full View]
Congrats Ameer
-
From: MrJudge on 18th February 2008 10:44 AM [Full View]
I don't think this is true, as usual our media just cooks things up. But Ameer's movies will take him to new heights in the coming years.
-
From: MrJudge on 25th February 2008 03:36 PM [Full View]
Berlin Award and Ameer’s regret
IndiaGlitz [Monday, February 25, 2008]
Director Ameer, who should be in cloud nine over the international recognition for his film ‘Paruthi Veeran’, seems to be in a dull mood. The special award given in Berlin film fest has definitely made him feel proud but the lack of proper recognition in his homeland for the honor puts him off.
He met with same kind of lackluster response when he got an award in Cyprus film fest for his Ram. No organization in the field has sent even a bouquet as a sing of appreciation on both occasions.
It is not that the poor response from his own industry has come as a shock to the director. When a London based journalist asked Ameer about the possible reception for him in India for getting such an honour, he replied saying that, “back home, it would be news for most of them when I talk about it”.
Ameer has also denied the news that Tamil Nadu CM had conveyed his wishes to him. He has plans to meet the CM to show the award to him.
However, he is happy that his friends in the industry have been making calls to congratulate him.
-
From: rangan_08 on 25th February 2008 03:49 PM [Full View]
that's really very bad...Ameer should be honored by the State & the Indian government. Its a pity that we in India know only Cricket & only cricketers are Gods. Rest of the art forms & sports are nothing to us.
-
From: dinesh13284 on 25th February 2008 05:05 PM [Full View]
well said Rangan.. even when they perform badly, those cricketers are paid in crores.. Originally Posted by rangan_08
and the government also praises them with huge sum of money.. but they fail to appreciate the talent that really needs to be appreciated..
-
From: joe on 25th February 2008 09:02 PM [Full View]
I am very happy for Ameer getting this award Originally Posted by MrJudge
At the same time ,I have no sympathy for ameers regret for not getting due recognition in Tamil nadu.
-
From: MrJudge on 26th February 2008 11:54 AM [Full View]
me too. He should brush off these petty things and concentrate more on his upcoming projects. Also I want him to just keep quiet instead of complaining. He is on the right track, first Cyprus, Osian and now Berlin show. I don't think even he would have dreamed of this path a few years back. Originally Posted by joe
-
From: thamiz on 6th July 2008 10:36 PM [Full View]
somebdy tell me how many marks it earned in AV, please!
Thanks!
-
From: Nerd on 13th July 2008 08:16 AM [Full View]
46! Originally Posted by thamiz
somebdy tell me how many marks it earned in AV, please!
Thanks!
Looks like PV has won about 5-6 awards in this years filmfare!
-
From: ThalaNass on 13th July 2008 11:55 AM [Full View]
best actor :- karthi Originally Posted by Nerd
46! Originally Posted by thamiz
somebdy tell me how many marks it earned in AV, please!
Thanks!
Looks like PV has won about 5-6 awards in this years filmfare!
best actress :- priyamani
best music director :- arr
best film :- parutheeveeran
best director :- ameer
best supoorting actor - female :- Sujatha(Priyamani's mother)
best supporting actor - male :- Saravanan
best cinematographer :- KV anandh
-
From: MrJudge on 13th July 2008 12:10 PM [Full View]
KV Ananth-a? Originally Posted by ThalaNass
unga award-a thookki kuppaila podungappa....namma makkal
-
From: Vivasaayi on 13th July 2008 12:22 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by MrJudge
KV Ananth-a? Originally Posted by ThalaNass
unga award-a thookki kuppaila podungappa....namma makkal
-
From: Vivasaayi on 13th July 2008 12:23 PM [Full View]
music award should have gone for
YUVAN SHANKAR RAJA - Katradhu tamil and paruthiveeran easily
-
From: MrJudge on 13th July 2008 12:37 PM [Full View]
atha naan inge sollakoodathu, periya kalavaram vedikkum. That's why I didn't inlcude the music category intentionally in my reply Originally Posted by Vivasaayi
-
From: selvakumar on 13th July 2008 12:38 PM [Full View]
Congrats to the PV team
-
From: littlemaster1982 on 13th July 2008 12:55 PM [Full View]
Congrats to all the winners
-
From: joe on 13th July 2008 01:00 PM [Full View]
Congrats to Ameer
-
From: thamiz on 13th July 2008 06:51 PM [Full View]
Vikatan review committee should be dissolved and, they should form a new committee! Originally Posted by Nerd
46! Originally Posted by thamiz
somebdy tell me how many marks it earned in AV, please!
Thanks!
Looks like PV has won about 5-6 awards in this years filmfare!
-
From: Cinefan on 14th July 2008 12:15 PM [Full View]
Music to ARR for Sivaji&K V Anand for cinematography is a crime.
Every single award incl the National awards are losing credibility.Situation is so bad that even when a deserving person receives an award,there is no value to it.
-
From: NOV on 14th July 2008 12:33 PM [Full View]
Sivaji music was innovative and therefore deserving, altho I prefered ATM songs.
But Harris provided the best album in Unnale Unnale.
-
From: MADDY on 14th July 2008 12:47 PM [Full View]
summa oru pechhukku - if Kamal gets best actor award for 10A ahead of Jai in Subramaniapuram - will u tell the same thing??? Originally Posted by Cinefan
Filmfare is a popular award - voting counts.....stop complaining and vote
-
From: sibicalls on 14th July 2008 12:56 PM [Full View]
And most probably Ameer's movie will win award in music category soon.......
If the desire which he expressed in Sakarakatti Audio release materialises
-
From: RajaRam on 14th July 2008 01:20 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by Cinefan
you are 200% correct.
My vote goes to Harris for 'Unnale Unnale'.
-
From: MADDY on 14th July 2008 01:24 PM [Full View]
pls share that with "Blue" band as well Originally Posted by RajaRam
you are 200% correct.
My vote goes to Harris for 'Unnale Unnale'.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPBX5vvXYBM
-
From: Mahen on 14th July 2008 02:02 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by MADDY
pls share that with "Blue" band as well Originally Posted by RajaRam
you are 200% correct.
My vote goes to Harris for 'Unnale Unnale'.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPBX5vvXYBM Good one..
Supporting video...Check out harris's reply when asked why he copied blue...
-deleted-
-
From: NOV on 14th July 2008 02:15 PM [Full View]
Mahen, pls do not post links to any site that encourages downloading of songs or movies. Piracy must be discouraged.
-
From: selvakumar on 14th July 2008 02:16 PM [Full View]
Mahen,Supporting video...Check out harris's reply when asked why he copied blue..
What did he say ?
-
From: Mahen on 14th July 2008 06:23 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by NOV
When did i promote piracy?? Anway, selva, you should watch the clip..You should see his face and the way he replied...I'll try to get the clip from a different source..
-
From: MrJudge on 14th July 2008 06:47 PM [Full View]
What is his desire? Haven't seen/read the function related news, can you please post it? Originally Posted by sibicalls
And most probably Ameer's movie will win award in music category soon.......
If the desire which he expressed in Sakarakatti Audio release materialises
-
From: selvakumar on 14th July 2008 06:55 PM [Full View]
Director Ameer said, ' I've made three films and have received accolades from many parts of the world including the Berlin Film Festival, but I am not able to work with Rahman and hope I could achieve this very soon'. [/quote] Originally Posted by MrJudge
What is his desire? Haven't seen/read the function related news, can you please post it? Originally Posted by sibicalls
And most probably Ameer's movie will win award in music category soon.......
If the desire which he expressed in Sakarakatti Audio release materialises
http://www.indiaglitz.com/channels/t...cle/39928.html
-
From: MrJudge on 14th July 2008 07:19 PM [Full View]
yennappa intha vendaatha velai ameerukku? Originally Posted by selvakumar
I hope he will not be able to in the future also.
-
From: NOV on 14th July 2008 07:23 PM [Full View]
I clicked on the link you gave and was shocked to see downloads for not only latests songs, but new movies too. Originally Posted by Mahen
When did i promote piracy??
-
From: Mahen on 14th July 2008 07:34 PM [Full View]
You should have scrolled down..MY intention was to show the video clip.. Originally Posted by NOV
I clicked on the link you gave and was shocked to see downloads for not only latests songs, but new movies too. Originally Posted by Mahen
When did i promote piracy??
-
From: selvakumar on 14th July 2008 07:46 PM [Full View]
-
From: ajithfederer on 15th July 2008 01:35 AM [Full View]
Congrats to the paruthiveeran team
-
From: ajaybaskar on 11th February 2011 02:05 PM [Full View]
Why amavasai is married to abdul khader?
-
From: raajarasigan on 11th February 2011 02:19 PM [Full View]
me too wondering why he posted in this thread.. athum remba kashtapattu thedi (kadaisi post 2008la) thappana idathula postirukkar..
-
From: ajaybaskar on 11th February 2011 02:29 PM [Full View]
Naanum "Paruthiveeran 2" edhum announce pannittaangalaannu padhattapattu odi vandhen.
-
From: selvamohankumar on 11th February 2011 03:18 PM [Full View]
Nan ninga atha pathi yetho news potu irukinga nu vanthen ajay! Originally Posted by ajaybaskar
Naanum "Paruthiveeran 2" edhum announce pannittaangalaannu padhattapattu odi vandhen.
-
From: SoftSword on 11th February 2011 03:24 PM [Full View]
ajay purilayaa....
avar pudhusa join pannirukka ajith fan....
avar pudhusunradhaala avarukku enga epdi post panradhunu therila...
neenga yaarum avara duplicate id'nu sandhegappatraadheenga...
-
From: printhan on 11th February 2011 04:22 PM [Full View]
Originally Posted by SoftSword
enakku avar mela kuda anthekam illai... after reading this
-
From: arthi2780 on 11th February 2011 06:00 PM [Full View]
Avar duplicate ila ... ASAL lu
But why Ajith pic In 2 yrs old Paruthiverran thread ? THALA suthuthu ...