|
| The Hub : Tamil Films Archived | Hello Guest, Login to post. |
kushboo controversy
| Topic started by nilavupriyan on Mon Sep 26 11:57:34 2005. |
(please...or the moderator will lock it) on that issue
| RSS Feed
| Email me when a reply is posted
| From: Sinthiya on Mon Sep 26 12:00:28 2005. |
| From: Justice on Mon Sep 26 12:00:40 2005. |
| nilavupriyan wrote: |
| have u all heard news.....
kushboo have said something filthy about tamil girls.....lets discuss decently (please...or the moderator will lock it) on that issue |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Mon Sep 26 12:01:48 2005. |
| From: Justice on Mon Sep 26 12:02:04 2005. |
| Sinthiya wrote: |
| a thread for this?
what happened |
| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Sep 26 12:02:46 2005. |
| justice wrote: | ||
| Naan oru thamizh kudi magan.
enga naatu, ladies-i avamaan seithittaru mannikka mudiyaatha kuttram.
|
| From: m_23_bayarea on Mon Sep 26 12:03:02 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Mon Sep 26 12:04:07 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Sep 26 12:06:06 2005. |
| m_23_bayarea wrote: |
| Khushboo should leave Tamilnadu - virginity issue gets serious
- 26.09.2005 http://www.cinesouth.com/masala/hotnews/new/26092005-1.shtml People generally turn a blind eye to acts of violence, but when it comes to matters of religion or virtue/virginity, they are anything but silent spectators. "There is no necessity to remain a virgin till you get married," said Khushboo. And the puritans rose in protest. In response, Khushboo tried to justify her remarks and the crowd set off with brooms and anything they could get hold of. These are not the ordinary lay people, nor do they belong to a woman activist group. They are members of Thirumavalavan's Viduthalai Siruthaigal party. Khushboo was only expressing her personal opinion. But the Viduthalai Siruthaigal gathered in front of the Nadigar Sangam, and brandishing brooms and slippers, they raised anti-Khushboo slogans. Khushboo hails from Mumbai and they want her to get out of Tamilnadu. Khushboo had been vociferous in raising objections to Thankar Bachchan's tasteless remarks. Thankar's friend Thirumavalavan took offence to this. "A temple for Mumbai's Khushboo? But an aplogy for Tamilian Thankar Bachchan?" were some slogans adorning wall posters. In such a situation, when Khushboo let loose her statements, the Thirumavalavan group grabbed on to it immediately. If the police gave permission, the normal course of action would have been to protest outside Khushboo's house. So, why did they go and protest outside the Nadigar Sangam? "Thankar Bachchan had to apologise for his remarks at the Nadigar Sangam. Keeping this in mind, Thirumavalavan's men want to create a cheap ruckus in front of the Nadigar Sangam and try to besmirch our reputation," says a Nadigar Sangam member in fury. After the protest had died down, many of the Nadigar Sangam members arrived at the scene, including many female members. Anti-Thirumavalavan and anti-Viduthalai Siruthaigal slogans were heard. They also asked for a ban on Thirumavalavan's Viduthalai Siruthaigal party. This counter action by the actors and actresses has put Thirumavalavan in a spot. |
| From: Sanjeevi on Mon Sep 26 12:07:00 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Sep 26 12:09:08 2005. |
| Sanjeevi wrote: |
| m_23_bayarea, unga alumbu thanga mudiyalana. |
| From: Justice on Mon Sep 26 12:11:01 2005. |
| From: Sinthiya on Mon Sep 26 12:13:57 2005. |
) for some women in TN, so i think she should have been careful in what she said...she apologized for her statements...| From: Sanjeevi on Mon Sep 26 12:14:06 2005. |
| justice wrote: |
| I won't reply to this thread because I"m too young for it. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Sep 26 12:16:29 2005. |
| Sinthiya wrote: |
| it's her personal opinion...but she acts as a role model (some may question that ) for some women in TN, so i think she should have been careful in what she said...she apologized for her statements... |
| From: stranger on Mon Sep 26 12:17:34 2005. |
| Sinthiya wrote: |
| it's her personal opinion...but she acts as a role model (some may question that ) for some women in TN, so i think she should have been careful in what she said... |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Mon Sep 26 12:18:38 2005. |
| nilavupriyan wrote: | ||
enna oru sincearity avarukku......neengalum than irukkeengale...vettithanama |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Mon Sep 26 12:21:41 2005. |
| From: Sinthiya on Mon Sep 26 12:22:18 2005. |
| nilavupriyan wrote: | ||
kushboo as role-model..."enna koduma sindhiya idhu"(like prabhu in chandramukhi)................. |
| From: Sinthiya on Mon Sep 26 12:27:21 2005. |
| m_23_bayarea wrote: |
| My honest opinion is that, I dont think Kushboo said anything wrong in the first place. And also, in a democracy, ppl are entilted for their opinions and there is supposed to be freedom of speech. If stupids and fanatics go after ppl for their opinions, then India will become a Hitler or Musharaf's nation....
BTW, all movies are taken so modern and western...Then what is so wrong abt premarital sex especially when both parties are in love....Anyways, just my opinion, and dont pounce on me ok .... |
| From: Sanjeevi on Mon Sep 26 12:28:39 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Sep 26 12:32:37 2005. |
| stranger wrote: | ||
well said, sinth!
I dont think she meant anything bad there.
But these "scums" are just politicising it as there are no issues to talk about! |
| From: Sanjeevi on Mon Sep 26 12:34:19 2005. |
| nilavupriyan wrote: | ||||
so...,having sex before marriage is right for u? |
| From: stranger on Mon Sep 26 12:39:25 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Sep 26 12:43:30 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
| sanjeevi!
That was hilarious! |
| From: stranger on Mon Sep 26 12:44:41 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Sep 26 12:46:34 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
| Are you a viduthalai siruththai or WHAT????
First clarify that. Then I will answer your question! |
| From: stranger on Mon Sep 26 12:54:07 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Sep 26 12:56:19 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
| Escape from who???
My opinion is mine! Do you think I care for anyone???? 8) |
| From: stranger on Mon Sep 26 13:03:44 2005. |
| From: Nerd on Mon Sep 26 13:04:33 2005. |
cool it, guys| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Sep 26 13:05:38 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
| I said, I dont think she meant anything bad there.
She definitely did not meant to suggest that everybody to get engaged in premarital s life. it is being politicised by people those who have "multiple partners" and dirty politicians! That is the FACT! |
| From: stranger on Mon Sep 26 13:06:28 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Sep 26 13:07:28 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
| You want to burn them all???
Or WHAT???? |
| From: stranger on Mon Sep 26 13:08:18 2005. |
| From: Scale on Mon Sep 26 13:09:12 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
| I said, I dont think she meant anything bad there.
She definitely did not meant to suggest that everybody to get engaged in premarital s life. it is being politicised by people those who have "multiple partners" and by "dirty politicians"! That is the FACT! BTW, Dr. KH has said the "similar thing" several occasions! |
| From: stranger on Mon Sep 26 13:09:17 2005. |
| From: Sinthiya on Mon Sep 26 13:10:19 2005. |
| kasi_sce wrote: |
| This controversy is getting bigger cool it, guys |
...carry on...we all have opinions...| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Sep 26 13:10:23 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
| The one who had premarital sex!
What do you wnat to do with them???? |
| From: stranger on Mon Sep 26 13:11:34 2005. |
| From: Sinthiya on Mon Sep 26 13:11:44 2005. |
| Scale wrote: | ||
Nilavu! How did you skip that ??? |
it's not a Kamal vs. Rajni thread...| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Sep 26 13:13:31 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
| That is what I am saying!
She was sort of "consoling them"! Not to worry too much about it and move on! That is what she meant I think! 8) |
| From: stranger on Mon Sep 26 13:16:13 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Sep 26 13:18:07 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
| Why did not you make a big deal when Kh say the same thing???
Dont look in my bedroom and so on and so forth??? is that because once you were married, that is not premarital anymore?? ANSWER this!!!!!!!!!! |
| From: stranger on Mon Sep 26 13:19:50 2005. |
| From: Sanjeevi on Mon Sep 26 13:20:27 2005. |
| From: Scale on Mon Sep 26 13:20:31 2005. |
| Sinthiya wrote: | ||||
it's not a Kamal vs. Rajni thread... |
| From: Sinthiya on Mon Sep 26 13:21:03 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Sep 26 13:23:27 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
| KH believes in living together concept! 8)
That implies that he supports premarital sex! 8) |
| From: stranger on Mon Sep 26 13:26:49 2005. |
| nilavupriyan wrote: |
|
living togethor is different from pre marital sex.... |
| From: Sanjeevi on Mon Sep 26 13:28:03 2005. |
| nilavupriyan wrote: | ||
she didnt compell others..but she supported for premarital sex...... thats the fact |
| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Sep 26 13:29:27 2005. |
| stranger wrote: | ||
Dont be SO KIDDISH! |
| From: Scale on Mon Sep 26 13:29:31 2005. |
| From: Sanjeevi on Mon Sep 26 13:29:58 2005. |
| stranger wrote: | ||
Dont be SO KIDDISH! |
| From: stranger on Mon Sep 26 13:31:03 2005. |
| nilavupriyan wrote: | ||||
whats so kiddish here? |
| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Sep 26 13:32:39 2005. |
| stranger wrote: | ||||||
You dont seem to know the meaning of "living together" 8) |
| From: Sanjeevi on Mon Sep 26 13:33:26 2005. |
| From: stranger on Mon Sep 26 13:34:27 2005. |
| From: Scale on Mon Sep 26 13:34:39 2005. |
| Sanjeevi wrote: | ||
yeah there are lot of scale's messages like page can't be displayed. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Sep 26 13:36:40 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
| Kh supports living together, that means he SUPPORTS premarital sex!
If u dont unederstand that, talk to people those who live together! 8) |
| From: Sanjeevi on Mon Sep 26 13:38:04 2005. |
| Scale wrote: | ||||
Sanjeevi! Its right time you change your avatar now. |
| From: stranger on Mon Sep 26 13:38:27 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Sep 26 13:39:30 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
| it all depends on how on defines "paththini"! 8) |
| From: stranger on Mon Sep 26 13:40:45 2005. |
| From: Crab on Mon Sep 26 13:41:09 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Sep 26 13:41:30 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
| have you heard of "kolaiyum seyvaaL paththini"!??? |
| From: stranger on Mon Sep 26 13:43:20 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Sep 26 13:44:56 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
| It has lot to do with paththini.
go watch "thookku thooki"! u will know what it means! 8) |
| From: stranger on Mon Sep 26 13:46:13 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Sep 26 13:47:35 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
| Please watch thookku thooki or talk to someone who watched it. And know the meaning of it! |
| From: stranger on Mon Sep 26 13:48:48 2005. |
| From: stranger on Mon Sep 26 13:50:26 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Sep 26 13:54:20 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
| BTW, premarital sex partners do get married and she stays as "paththini"!!! 8) |
| From: Sanjeevi on Mon Sep 26 13:55:25 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Sep 26 13:55:35 2005. |
| From: Justice on Mon Sep 26 14:43:50 2005. |
| From: Justice on Mon Sep 26 21:02:27 2005. |
| Sanjeevi wrote: | ||
Sorry justice, i thought that kushboo told about you. |
| From: Sinthiya on Mon Sep 26 21:20:11 2005. |
| justice wrote: | ||||
thambi dai, how do you know I'm a girl?
|
i knew you were a girl! i figured... | From: Justice on Mon Sep 26 21:32:22 2005. |
| Sinthiya wrote: | ||||||
i knew you were a girl! i figured... |
| From: Alien on Mon Sep 26 21:44:07 2005. |
| ssanjinika wrote: |
|
Personally I feel sex premarital or otherwise should be between 2 people within 4 walls.No one else has the right to comment on whether it is right or wrong.It totally depends on the people involved and the feelings between them.Just my opinion . |
| From: Sinthiya on Mon Sep 26 21:44:32 2005. |
| From: Alien on Mon Sep 26 21:51:28 2005. |
| From: Justice on Mon Sep 26 21:52:07 2005. |
.
| From: Sinthiya on Mon Sep 26 23:20:22 2005. |
| vasanth_luv wrote: |
| |
was not referring to your comment...it was for justice mocking me as if i caught bin laden...
| From: Alien on Mon Sep 26 23:27:51 2005. |
| Sinthiya wrote: | ||
jana, was not referring to your comment...it was for justice mocking me as if i caught bin laden...
i support what you support as well...
sorry that you misunderstood...my bad... |
....
| From: Justice on Mon Sep 26 23:31:02 2005. |
.
| Sinthiya wrote: | ||
jana, was not referring to your comment...it was for justice mocking me as if i caught bin laden...
i support what you support as well...
sorry that you misunderstood...my bad... |
| From: Sinthiya on Mon Sep 26 23:33:15 2005. |
| justice wrote: |
| sinthiya, you sound like you caught bin laden
|
... yes, you are still a kid...| From: Justice on Mon Sep 26 23:35:31 2005. |
| Sinthiya wrote: | ||
... yes, you are still a kid... |
| From: Sinthiya on Mon Sep 26 23:42:47 2005. |
| justice wrote: | ||||
| was my post very rude or something?
I feel guilty of myself, I think I may lose the sleep tonight
|
| From: Justice on Mon Sep 26 23:45:25 2005. |
. thanx. feeling better.
finished studying?
| Sinthiya wrote: |
|
no... it wasn't rude... i didn't know what to say, so ...
don't lose yourself over something silly |
| From: Sinthiya on Mon Sep 26 23:51:51 2005. |
| justice wrote: | ||
| 8) . thanx. feeling better.
the topic is very hot today. finished studying?
|
| From: Justice on Mon Sep 26 23:54:26 2005. |
| From: Sinthiya on Tue Sep 27 0:02:27 2005. |
too late...i've read all the chapters of the controversy this morning...interesting!
| From: Justice on Tue Sep 27 0:06:02 2005. |
.
| From: Sinthiya on Tue Sep 27 0:09:58 2005. |
| From: Justice on Tue Sep 27 0:11:18 2005. |
| From: Scale on Tue Sep 27 0:55:15 2005. |
| nilavupriyan wrote: | ||
there is only one definition for pathini.......a women who have relationship with only one guy...now get my point? |
will define it now? | From: nilavupriyan on Tue Sep 27 0:57:41 2005. |
| From: Alien on Tue Sep 27 1:12:57 2005. |
Now the muslim community !!
| From: saradhaa_sn on Tue Sep 27 5:34:21 2005. |
| m_23_bayarea wrote: |
| My honest opinion is that, I dont think Kushboo said anything wrong in the first place. And also, in a democracy, ppl are entilted for their opinions and there is supposed to be freedom of speech. If stupids and fanatics go after ppl for their opinions, then India will become a Hitler or Musharaf's nation....
BTW, all movies are taken so modern and western...Then what is so wrong abt premarital sex especially when both parties are in love....Anyways, just my opinion, and dont pounce on me ok .... |
| From: saradhaa_sn on Tue Sep 27 5:49:09 2005. |
| nilavupriyan wrote: |
| The muslim women association comes for the support for kushboo.They say that kushboo is an example for a lady who reached a great height from a muslim society.The protest against her is protest against a muslim lady.So they want this to end or they may also get into the events going on and make it complex....
They are also dragging politics by saying that suntv is regularly telecasting this protest against kushboo which is untolerable.The d.m.k which seeks muslim ladies support must stop it and also they have mentioned that in past also d.m.k have been supported by them. they have threatened that the d.m.k alliance may lose its muslim vote bank......its getting hotter and hotter |
| From: Sanjeevi on Tue Sep 27 6:50:38 2005. |
| saradhaa_sn wrote: | ||
Ask your Kushboo, when Thanker Bachan took this freedom of speech, why she was jumping to the sky?. We saw how she was argued with him. Tanker told "THAT WORD" about the actresses only. But now Kushboo is telling the "SAME WORD" against total Tamil ladies. Not only 'Viduthalai Siruththaigal', but the whole Tamil world should oppose her statement. Now she is balming the medias about her statement, in this way also she is following the way of Thanker Bachan. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Tue Sep 27 7:26:54 2005. |
| saradhaa_sn wrote: | ||
I cant understand how the Muslim Community support Kushboo. She may be a Muslim before, but now she married a Hindu (Dir. Sunder.C), having pottu in her forehead, and announced that she is worshipping all Gods. Muslim community will never accept a person as Muslim, who is worshipping others, except Allah. She is not following any Muslim formalities, like their prayers, fastings etc. When she married a Hindu, she became a Hindu. I am surprising how few Muslims supporting Kushboo, who has gone away from their religion. |
| From: mr_karthik on Tue Sep 27 8:08:23 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Tue Sep 27 8:10:44 2005. |
| mr_karthik wrote: |
| Nilavupriyan...
It is well known that, ADMK party, Jaya TV, Dinamalar magazine are behind Kushpu and supporting her, because Viduthalai ChiruthaikaL Iyakkam involved against her. But Kushpu sonnathu thavaRuthAn. Adhukku avar mannippu ketka vENdum (bagirangamAga mike mun nindru). Avarathu pEchu kalAchAra seerazhivukku vazhi vagukkum. Avangaludaiya "idhu mAdhiriyAna" puratchiyai ellAm avanga cinemAvOdu niRuthikoLLattum. |
| From: interz on Tue Sep 27 17:33:36 2005. |
| From: Kumar on Tue Sep 27 18:48:15 2005. |
| From: dlaxmi16 on Tue Sep 27 18:56:52 2005. |
8)| From: Crab on Tue Sep 27 20:11:05 2005. |
| From: Sanjeevi on Tue Sep 27 23:59:25 2005. |
| dlaxmi16 wrote: |
| Yeah India a democratic country..Bullshit..
They have gone too far making a women cry on Media & making a big issue out of nothing..Not really worth talking about this topic..Only shows Indians are hypocrites..Specially TN's attitude ..Incorrigible..
Its high time Indians change ... 8) |
| From: Justice on Wed Sep 28 0:04:57 2005. |
. you can argue, go ahead. ask her why. please respect India and its women and men. when I read her post, it sounds like encouraging us. | From: rachel on Wed Sep 28 0:06:49 2005. |
| From: Justice on Wed Sep 28 0:21:39 2005. |
| From: Sanjeevi on Wed Sep 28 0:33:15 2005. |
| justice wrote: |
| dlaxmi worried about one women crying. I'm worried about billion of women's feelings |
| From: mr_karthik on Wed Sep 28 2:33:22 2005. |
| saradhaa_sn wrote: | ||
I cant understand how the Muslim Community support Kushboo. She may be a Muslim before, but now she married a Hindu (Dir. Sunder.C), having pottu in her forehead, and announced that she is worshipping all Gods. Muslim community will never accept a person as Muslim, who is worshipping others, except Allah. She is not following any Muslim formalities, like their prayers, fastings etc. When she married a Hindu, she became a Hindu. I am surprising how few Muslims supporting Kushboo, who has gone away from their religion. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Wed Sep 28 2:49:18 2005. |
| dlaxmi16 wrote: |
| Yeah India a democratic country..Bullshit..
They have gone too far making a women cry on Media & making a big issue out of nothing..Not really worth talking about this topic..Only shows Indians are hypocrites..Specially TN's attitude ..Incorrigible..
Its high time Indians change ... 8) |
| From: mr_karthik on Wed Sep 28 2:55:38 2005. |
| dlaxmi16 wrote: |
| Yeah India a democratic country..Bullshit..
They have gone too far making a women cry on Media & making a big issue out of nothing..Not really worth talking about this topic..Only shows Indians are hypocrites..Specially TN's attitude ..Incorrigible..
Its high time Indians change ... 8) |
| From: Scale on Wed Sep 28 3:01:08 2005. |
| From: Scale on Wed Sep 28 3:03:46 2005. |
| From: Scale on Wed Sep 28 3:04:33 2005. |
| From: rachel on Wed Sep 28 3:14:38 2005. |
| Scale wrote: |
| http://www.cinesouth.com/masala/hotnews/new/27092005-1.shtml |
| From: Sanguine Sridhar on Wed Sep 28 3:26:04 2005. |
| Kumar wrote: |
| Can someone tell me what Thankar Bachan said? Thanks. |
| From: rachel on Wed Sep 28 3:28:59 2005. |
| From: saradhaa_sn on Wed Sep 28 5:01:50 2005. |
| Beckham wrote: | ||
The scenario was Thangar's heroine Navya Nayar's make-up woman didn get her salary balance.So Navya refused to act in that movie.Thangar was explaining those things to the press and almost compared Heroines to Prostitutes.Protest against Thangar went on..under the leadership of Sripriya,Manorama and Kushboo.Thangar was the "Thamizhkudithaangi" in tamizh cinema who was fully supported by Thirumavalavan of Puratchi thamizhagam party.Thangar appologised for his statement Later Kushboo's statement that, Pre-marital sex is not a big issue for a tamizh female and how many female in tamizh nadu are virgin before marriage?---- is smartly used by Thirumavalavan as a weapon against Kushboo which is a definite tit for tat for the Thangar's case |
| From: saradhaa_sn on Wed Sep 28 5:28:11 2005. |
| Scale wrote: |
| http://www.cinesouth.com/masala/hotnews/new/27092005-1.shtml |
| From: Sanjeevi on Wed Sep 28 5:39:01 2005. |
| saradhaa_sn wrote: | ||
I read the apology of Kushboo. Sariyaana 'SAPPAI KATTU' statement. As usual she blammed the media that, they have twisted her interview. All of us know, "India Today" is not a twisting magazine. What she told is: "Premarital sex is not a harm or wrong concept. But they should do it with safety to avoid pregnency and deseaces. I know MOST of the Tamil ladies are having premerital sex". Now she is making bulti, with 'poosi mezhugum' vilakkangal and kanneer poses. She did not get any best actress award for cinema or for TV serial. Now she is trying to get 'Best interview actress award'. This is a shame not only for Thirumavalavan's family ladies, but for whole ladies in Tamil Nadu. Just apology is not enough. She must be imprisoned. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Wed Sep 28 7:31:19 2005. |
| Beckham wrote: | ||
The scenario was Thangar's heroine Navya Nayar's make-up woman didn get her salary balance.So Navya refused to act in that movie.Thangar was explaining those things to the press and almost compared Heroines to Prostitutes.Protest against Thangar went on..under the leadership of Sripriya,Manorama and Kushboo.Thangar was the "Thamizhkudithaangi" in tamizh cinema who was fully supported by Thirumavalavan of Puratchi thamizhagam party.Thangar appologised for his statement Later Kushboo's statement that, Pre-marital sex is not a big issue for a tamizh female and how many female in tamizh nadu are virgin before marriage?---- is smartly used by Thirumavalavan as a weapon against Kushboo which is a definite tit for tat for the Thangar's case |
...| From: Sanguine Sridhar on Wed Sep 28 7:41:17 2005. |
didn support Kushboo here..| From: Justice on Wed Sep 28 7:56:06 2005. |
| From: Crab on Wed Sep 28 7:57:38 2005. |
| From: Crab on Wed Sep 28 7:59:43 2005. |
| From: Crab on Wed Sep 28 8:07:28 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Wed Sep 28 8:29:24 2005. |
| Crab wrote: |
| TN is 48% urban today in 2005 (33% in 1990). The silent majority support Kushbu. There is a vocal minority that still clings to ideology and backwardness under the guise of culture.
Chastity is not public affairs. It's a personal priority. |
| From: Crab on Wed Sep 28 9:07:50 2005. |
| From: pillong_super on Wed Sep 28 9:23:01 2005. |
| Mod wrote: |
| Ban alert |
| From: nilavupriyan on Wed Sep 28 9:25:20 2005. |
| Crab wrote: |
| Nilavu,
Do you know that AIDS is the largest killer disease in India? Do you know that TN tops the nation in child labour and incest? Your idea of "Tamil culture" is shaped by ideology-driven cinema of the Sixties. Do you know Tamil cuisine is a 20th century invention? Have you read any of Balakumaran's brutally honest historical novels? Have you ever heard of Kajuraho at all? Have you ever heard of the matriarchal societies of Africa? The real Tamil culture before 1000AD is lost. Do you know ancient Tamils were eating dogmeat and pork? Truth is disgusting. Culture is a relative word. It is what you prefer to adopt not what you are forced to adopt. Do you know philandering is higher in rural communities compared to urban ones? I am not telling you that we Tamils must change. I am telling you that we Tamils have already changed. Culture is a dynamic. It is not a static that lasts for thousands of years. We have changed even our gods so many times. Incase you didn't notice, we have changed even our language so many times in the past decade alone thanks to development of telecommunications technologies. Change is the only constant. |
| From: Sanguine Sridhar on Wed Sep 28 9:45:30 2005. |
| From: buddysathi on Wed Sep 28 9:59:50 2005. |
| From: Crab on Wed Sep 28 10:29:11 2005. |
| From: stranger on Wed Sep 28 10:33:14 2005. |
| saradhaa_sn wrote: |
|
Thats what I mentioned in my previous post. When Thanger Bachan used that word WHICH IS QUIT TRUE, this Kushboo protested it, as it affects her. |
| From: Surya on Wed Sep 28 11:33:20 2005. |
| From: stranger on Wed Sep 28 11:56:17 2005. |
| Quote: |
| On the Kushboo issue, the association observed that it was the personal view of the actress and she has sought a public apology and the association has nothing to do with it. |
| From: Surya on Wed Sep 28 14:17:32 2005. |
| From: stranger on Wed Sep 28 15:05:52 2005. |
| From: dlaxmi16 on Wed Sep 28 15:18:59 2005. |
| Quote: |
| But the way, you are supporting Kushpu's statement. My suggestion, why not you start to follow "KUSHPU REVOLUTION" FROM YOUR FAMILY MEMBERS ITSELF, and be a roll model for others.............????????????????????.
The easiest job in the world is "Oorukku ubadhEsam pannuvathu |
| From: interz on Wed Sep 28 15:42:03 2005. |
| From: Justice on Wed Sep 28 16:22:30 2005. |
| dlaxmi16 wrote: |
|
also hubbers like justice & others who use mocking statements or smileys..pls this is no chat thread.. |
| From: Surya on Wed Sep 28 17:46:10 2005. |
| From: stranger on Wed Sep 28 17:59:18 2005. |
| From: Kumar on Wed Sep 28 19:53:31 2005. |
| Beckham wrote: | ||
The scenario was Thangar's heroine Navya Nayar's make-up woman didn get her salary balance.So Navya refused to act in that movie.Thangar was explaining those things to the press and almost compared Heroines to Prostitutes.Protest against Thangar went on..under the leadership of Sripriya,Manorama and Kushboo.Thangar was the "Thamizhkudithaangi" in tamizh cinema who was fully supported by Thirumavalavan of Puratchi thamizhagam party.Thangar appologised for his statement Later Kushboo's statement that, Pre-marital sex is not a big issue for a tamizh female and how many female in tamizh nadu are virgin before marriage?---- is smartly used by Thirumavalavan as a weapon against Kushboo which is a definite tit for tat for the Thangar's case |
| From: Badri on Wed Sep 28 20:12:32 2005. |
| From: rachel on Wed Sep 28 22:15:30 2005. |
| Quote: |
| also hubbers like justice & others who use mocking statements or smileys..pls this is no chat thread.. |
| From: rachel on Wed Sep 28 22:19:13 2005. |
| Quote: |
| First of all, I implore EVERYONE out there, including AND ESPECIALLY the men in the cine industry to stop thinking of actresses as prostitutes. I just find this demeaning; but more so, it reflects on the trashy, backward attitudes of men- it only shows that they SEE actresses as nothing but worthy of paid sex. This double standard is just proof that overall, men in the industry don’t have a healthy, respectful view of women in the industry. (In fact I must say that many men, in general, have this kind of attitude towards actresses, but they view actors as their leaders, demi gods, etc.) Seriously, do you think all men in the industry are the prime examples of morality? |
| From: rachel on Wed Sep 28 22:23:06 2005. |
| Quote: |
| I think she should have thought carefully about this before making such a statement publicly. |
| From: gta129 on Wed Sep 28 22:36:55 2005. |
| From: MrJudge on Thu Sep 29 6:04:15 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
| Thankgar Bachan insulted his own FAMILY as he is one another artiste. He should not insult another artisite who is part of his cine family.
"athu oru keezhtharamaana seyal" 8) |
| From: Cinefan on Thu Sep 29 6:43:02 2005. |
| From: Justice on Thu Sep 29 7:04:02 2005. |
.
| gta129 wrote: |
| What is the bottom line? What is the punishment for Kushboo? |
| From: Justice on Thu Sep 29 7:06:13 2005. |
| Cinefan wrote: |
|
it's more surprising to see young ppl like Beckham,Nilavu,Justice,Sanjeevi talk like this. |
| From: saradhaa_sn on Thu Sep 29 7:09:35 2005. |
| Cinefan wrote: |
| As for Thankar,as a producer it's his duty to see the employees are paid on time.He says for a paltry 600/-,shooting was stopped.If it was paltry why the f#$* did he not give it to the hairdresser on time.it might be a lot of money fo her right?
|
| From: Cinefan on Thu Sep 29 7:19:54 2005. |
| saradhaa_sn wrote: |
|
For that hair dresser, this 600 rupees is a big amount. No doubt. But this Navya Nayer, who is getting salary in lakhs, why not settle that 600 from her part and co-operate for shooting..??. As an actress, does she not know haow a producer will be affected, if they cancel shooting for one day..??, that too for an unfair reason. We can tell anything, because we do not know the pain of a producer who is affected by money when a shooting was cancelled. Many actors, like Sathyaraj, Vijay etc. are helping producers financillay, when they are struggling to conduct the shooting. Let it be the mistake of Thanger not to settle for the hair dresser. Why not the heroine settle this negligible (for them) amount for her hair dresser, and continue the shooting. WHY ONLY ACTRESSES ARE SO GREEDY AND STUPIDS..?? |
| From: MrJudge on Thu Sep 29 7:22:20 2005. |
| Cinefan wrote: |
| As for Thankar,as a producer it's his duty to see the employees are paid on time.He says for a paltry 600/-,shooting was stopped.If it was paltry why the f#$* did he not give it to the hairdresser on time.it might be a lot of money fo her right?
At least did he make any attempt to tell Navya about his problems&give a date when he would settle the amount?His ego prevented him from doing it&he kept on giving reasons. His statement was that ppl who act only for money are prostitutes.It's a sweeping statement&I don't accept Nattamai's interpretation of it.On top of it,he is a member of the film fraternity.It certainly looks bad&he deserved to apologize. This is not the first time he has put his foot in the mouth&something like this had to happen. . |
| From: MrJudge on Thu Sep 29 7:36:03 2005. |
| Cinefan wrote: |
| For what is Thankar producing the film,charity?????He too wants to see a profit right?
And Navya is on record saying her salary was not paid too but she left it.Why should she take Thankar's problems on herself???? If he was so much in financial trouble,why did he venture to produce the film? Assuming,what Navya did is wrong,does it give Thankar the liberty to call her a prostitute?SHAME ON HIM |
| From: Cinefan on Thu Sep 29 8:10:45 2005. |
| From: MrJudge on Thu Sep 29 9:01:39 2005. |
| Cinefan wrote: |
| Nattamai,
The issue is not whether Navya was right/wrong in stopping shooting over monetary matters. |
| Cinefan wrote: |
| I also don't doubt Thankar's intentions but to go about acting as if he is the only one worried about the state of tfm&berating/being sarcastic about his fellow industry ppl is a bad attitude to have. |
| Cinefan wrote: |
| Also none of his 3 movies(not seen COA,so no comments.But it's a remake)are classics which will stand the test of time. |
| Cinefan wrote: |
| Money matters are solved by ppl on a case to case basis. Vikram might be soft on Bala but be stubborn with some one else.No one can question the diff standards he is adopting.The producers duty is to pay the agreed salary on time,period.. |
| Cinefan wrote: |
| Also even if Navya is morally wrong,who is Thankar to equate her to a pros?? |
| From: ssanjinika on Thu Sep 29 10:05:41 2005. |
| From: stranger on Thu Sep 29 10:24:23 2005. |
| MrJudge wrote: | ||
I am not sure his statement is wrong or right. But Bachchan did not call all heroines prostitutes. His statement was "Heroines who do not involve with their characters and act only for money are like prostitutes" |
| From: MrJudge on Thu Sep 29 13:02:02 2005. |
| ssanjinika wrote: |
| I ask you, how many of us in respectable well paying jobs will work without pay just because the management is under duress .Wont our first inclination be to look for another job?? |
| From: stranger on Thu Sep 29 14:54:56 2005. |
| From: Kumar on Thu Sep 29 18:19:38 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
|
What the heck are you talking about????
Let me define very appropriatately here! well, if he had said heroines are "protitutes-like" then thankar bachan is "pimp-like"! If he meant heroines are prostitutes then thanker bachan is a pimp! Now you pick what he said and decide thankar bachan is a pimp or pimp-like based on whatever comment he made on actresses whom he uses for running his filthy business and LOW-LIFE ! It is up to you Mr. misjudge! |
| From: lancelot on Thu Sep 29 18:48:38 2005. |
| stranger wrote: | ||||
What the heck are you talking about????
Let me define very appropriatately here! well, if he had said heroines are "protitutes-like" then thankar bachan is "pimp-like"! If he meant heroines are prostitutes then thanker bachan is a pimp! Now you pick what he said and decide thankar bachan is a pimp or pimp-like based on whatever comment he made on actresses whom he uses for running his filthy business and LOW-LIFE ! It is up to you Mr. misjudge! |
| From: Surya on Thu Sep 29 20:54:09 2005. |
| From: MrJudge on Thu Sep 29 22:34:24 2005. |
| From: Justice on Thu Sep 29 23:58:01 2005. |
| MrJudge wrote: |
| Stranger,
I think you missed my point. If you are in a big position in a company and do not have problems of paying your bills ontime and you are getting paid but your secretary did not get her check, will you close the whole unit? don't you think you have more responsibility than your secretary? |
| From: MrJudge on Fri Sep 30 0:19:52 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
| well, if he had said heroines are "protitutes-like" then thankar bachan is "pimp-like"!
If he meant heroines are prostitutes then thanker bachan is a pimp! Now you pick what he said and decide thankar bachan is a pimp or pimp-like based on whatever comment he made on actresses whom he uses for running his filthy business and LOW-LIFE ! [/size] [/color] |
| From: Justice on Fri Sep 30 0:27:48 2005. |
ore post-ta panreenga?
| MrJudge wrote: | ||
I think it would have been appropriate if all actresses who stood against bachchan making a statement like "directors who do not show any involvement with their movies are like pimps". If they had done it then I don't think bachchan would have asked for their apology like they requested from him because he knows that he is involved and serious about his (filthy as you say) business. |
| From: rachel on Fri Sep 30 0:32:44 2005. |
| MrJudge wrote: |
| Stranger,
I think you missed my point. If you are in a big position in a company and do not have problems of paying your bills ontime and you are getting paid but your secretary did not get her check, will you close the whole unit? don't you think you have more responsibility than your secretary? |
you or she?
| From: MrJudge on Fri Sep 30 0:33:26 2005. |
| justice wrote: |
| neengala intha casu-ku judge? ore post-ta panreenga? |
| From: rachel on Fri Sep 30 0:37:39 2005. |
| MrJudge wrote: | ||
unmaiya solren |
| From: Justice on Fri Sep 30 0:38:22 2005. |
| rachel wrote: | ||||
what unmaiya solreenga...judgeju |
| From: MrJudge on Fri Sep 30 0:43:03 2005. |
| rachel wrote: |
| the secretary did not get her check.
so she quits???
who closes the company? you or she?
i don't understand...mr judge |
| From: MrJudge on Fri Sep 30 0:47:33 2005. |
| rachel wrote: |
| the secretary did not get her check.
so she quits???
who closes the company? you or she?
i don't understand...mr judge |
| From: Justice on Fri Sep 30 0:49:42 2005. |
.
| MrJudge wrote: | ||
Rachel, Please read couple of previous messages of mine and ssanjinika. You will understand better. She will make the boss to close the company. Got it? |
| From: rachel on Fri Sep 30 0:51:13 2005. |
| MrJudge wrote: | ||
Well, she knows that he cannot run his business if she quits. That is why she did. If she knows that he can run his business even if she quits the company then she will not do it. She will come up with a mutual understanding plan with her boss and secretary. |
| From: rachel on Fri Sep 30 1:05:16 2005. |
| MrJudge wrote: | ||
Rachel, Please read couple of previous messages of mine and ssanjinika. You will understand better. She will make the boss to close the company. Got it? |
| From: Justice on Fri Sep 30 1:06:10 2005. |
| rachel wrote: | ||||
you fool..then she can't be just secretary. she is very important person in the project... project depends on her....he should satisfy her first... |
| From: Cinefan on Fri Sep 30 1:36:18 2005. |
| MrJudge wrote: |
|
The statement would not have come out if Nayva did not stop the shooting. How could you see only reaction without considering the action? He knows better about the industry people than you and me. As I was jsut chatting the same issue with one of my friends, he told me that even Sivakumar faced similar criticisms when he wrote about heroines in his "raajapattai". I have not heard/read the book before. If it is true then, what is your stand against Sivakumar? Yes, he is worried about the products that are coming out in tf industry. He is part of that industry and he has every right to talk/criticise about them. Tell me who else can criticise the movie industry? Outsiders? peopel like tamilkudithangi? Who told you they are classics? They are only better than the current movies that are being churned out without any stories. I have not seen his thendral yet and I did not like his SMK either. But even if he fails, atleast his intention to make good movies is a genuine one and he tries continuously that is what matters. Yes, it is case to case basis, I agree. Vikram might not be soft with AVM/AMRatnam.. but when an artiste knows that the production house is smaller and struggles, he/she should be prepared to adjust acc. to environment if he/she loves what he/she does. I will answer your question later. First can you answer my question? what are the professions that do not need any involvement other than money? |
| From: MrJudge on Fri Sep 30 3:31:22 2005. |
| rachel wrote: |
| you fool..then she can't be just secretary. she is very important person in the project...
project depends on her....he should satisfy her first... |
| From: MrJudge on Fri Sep 30 4:10:16 2005. |
| Cinefan wrote: |
| I know Sivakumar has written a book called 'Ithu Rajapattai Alla'-Part 1&2.I have not read them&no one has made an issue out of them.So why drag it here? |
| Cinefan wrote: |
| Of course Thankar has the right to criticise ppl who make bad films but he can't act as if he is saviour of tfm.Is it not insulting to so many others before him/along with him who are doing a better job in making great films? |
| Cinefan wrote: |
| You say actors should adjust when working with small production houses.But what if the actor is not very 'well to do' him/her self&badly requires money?In this case Navya was also not paid on time,she did not mind it.Shooting was stopped because the hair dresser was not paid her money. |
| Cinefan wrote: |
| It's stupid to say she should have done the payment herself without stopping shooting.Why should she????Forget her money&go about paying others salaries too. Nonsense. |
| Cinefan wrote: |
| I didn't understand your final question.All professions require money,even NGO's,spiritual organisation which work for the welfare of the people.So if Navya is working for money,so is Thankar. |
| From: Cinefan on Fri Sep 30 12:42:43 2005. |
| From: stranger on Fri Sep 30 13:08:05 2005. |
| MrJudge wrote: |
| Stranger, I think you missed my point. |
| From: ssanjinika on Fri Sep 30 13:25:48 2005. |
| MrJudge wrote: |
|
My final question was only in Prostitution the workers will not like to get involved with their work, they simply work for money. do you know any other professions that require similar attitude? |
| From: nilavupriyan on Fri Sep 30 13:29:35 2005. |
| ssanjinika wrote: | ||
People who work solely for monetary gain are called MECENARY Not Prostitutes!!! |
| From: ssanjinika on Fri Sep 30 13:31:06 2005. |
| nilavupriyan wrote: |
|
i dont know whether they are enjoying their work...but certainly they are pushed...most of those are pushed to that work......most of them want to come out of it and lead a normal life like others.It itself says that they dont enjoy that work...... to be right...,only sex doesnt mean anything...sex with love is what matters.....they lack love...and they need it..they need that compassion from their fellow beings |
| From: stranger on Fri Sep 30 14:08:54 2005. |
| From: j.chenkalvarayan on Fri Sep 30 15:14:20 2005. |
its not to wise to brand thankar a traitor/pimp/lowlife for some comment he made when he was not in total control of himself.anyways he apologized .didn't he? his films speak for him. he is not a third rated director. his films are all critically acclaimed. he is cheran's mentor.and we all know what a great director cheran is . what is really intriguing is the veiled support kushboo gets from some of the hubbers. | From: stranger on Fri Sep 30 16:27:14 2005. |
| j.chenkalvarayan wrote: |
| for some comment he made when he was not in total control of himself.? |
| From: stranger on Fri Sep 30 16:54:25 2005. |
| j.chenkalvarayan wrote: |
| what is really intriguing is the veiled support kushboo gets from some of the hubbers. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Fri Sep 30 17:02:18 2005. |
| From: Miss Chennai on Fri Sep 30 17:04:38 2005. |
| j.chenkalvarayan wrote: |
| nattamai i am with you. its not to wise to brand thankar a traitor/pimp/lowlife for some comment he made when he was not in total control of himself. what is really intriguing is the veiled support kushboo gets from some of the hubbers. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Fri Sep 30 17:06:17 2005. |
| From: Miss Chennai on Fri Sep 30 17:10:20 2005. |
| From: j.chenkalvarayan on Fri Sep 30 22:33:29 2005. |
| From: Justice on Fri Sep 30 22:35:45 2005. |
| From: j.chenkalvarayan on Fri Sep 30 22:38:06 2005. |
| From: Justice on Fri Sep 30 22:45:25 2005. |
| j.chenkalvarayan wrote: |
| i've got better works to do than argue with you, jackass. |
| From: j.chenkalvarayan on Fri Sep 30 22:55:25 2005. |
| From: Justice on Fri Sep 30 23:05:36 2005. |
| j.chenkalvarayan wrote: |
| arguing with ajith fans is like wrestling in the mud with a pig. after sometime you realize you are becomming dirty and stop. but the pig enjoys. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Fri Sep 30 23:17:23 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
| nilavu!
I think you misunderstood the "scenario" here and carried away! He should never ever ever ever call any actress as "prostitute" no matter what she did! Especially to the media! If he had lost his temper and used a slur in the "work-place" which can be taken easy and forgiven, maybe. But not when "airing" out to the public. Because he is in the same business! 8) |
| From: Justice on Fri Sep 30 23:22:17 2005. |
| nilavupriyan wrote: |
|
good point
oh!......if he had talked about people in other business will it make sense....that is much worser |
| From: Querida on Fri Sep 30 23:45:10 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Fri Sep 30 23:47:33 2005. |
| Querida wrote: |
| geez how can you ppl get so worked about a woman who has given you all an excuse = if ya get caught say Kushboo said it was ok
what she says changes nothing...i think it's irresponsible but it happens...and i won't apologize for my view ever...does anyone ever ask/care if the guy is a virgin? |
| From: great on Sat Oct 1 4:12:08 2005. |
| Quote: |
| she dint talk about her or her family member...she talked about tamil ladies....it includes our and your family members.... |
| From: nilavupriyan on Sat Oct 1 4:15:06 2005. |
| great wrote: | ||
Its not about any family .... Its her general comment of the survey carried out nothing wrong in giving her comment but the issue is blown up |
| From: great on Sat Oct 1 4:18:23 2005. |
| Quote: |
| "TAMIL LADIES"....MEANS WHAT? |
| From: nilavupriyan on Sat Oct 1 4:19:05 2005. |
| great wrote: | ||
She has mentioned about ladies in general but cheap politicians stated tamil ladies .... |
| From: mr_karthik on Sat Oct 1 9:26:37 2005. |
| great wrote: | ||
She has mentioned about ladies in general but cheap politicians stated tamil ladies .... |
| From: Justice on Sat Oct 1 9:35:58 2005. |
.| From: mr_karthik on Sat Oct 1 9:43:26 2005. |
| From: lancelot on Sat Oct 1 10:05:54 2005. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Sat Oct 1 11:06:11 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Sat Oct 1 11:07:23 2005. |
| Shakthiprabha wrote: |
| Well its her opinion and view. What big deal in creating
such a big hungama? If she says premarital sex is ok, that does nto mean she is coercing every TAMIZH PONNU or EDUCATES every tamizh lady to have premarital sex. Its her royal opinion and SHE IS ENTITLED to have it. Btw, Where did she mention 'TAMIZH LADIES' HERE? |
| From: j.chenkalvarayan on Sat Oct 1 11:33:45 2005. |
| From: Sanjeevi on Sat Oct 1 11:51:39 2005. |
| nilavupriyan wrote: | ||
she dint say pre-marital sex is ok....she is said tamil ladies are under-going it
by the way are u a tamil man or woman..ur name is kinda confusing |
| From: Sanjeevi on Sat Oct 1 12:04:05 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Sat Oct 1 12:16:52 2005. |
| Sanjeevi wrote: | ||||
Nilavu, thirumavalavan unkitta vanthu sonnara? Naanum yaru India today tamil magazine padichanu kettukitte iruken. yarumae pathil solla mattennu adam pidukurenga. I am not one in the sheap crowd to follow some quarrel person like thiruma, etc. I want to know the said words by kushboo exactly. |
| From: Sanjeevi on Sat Oct 1 12:22:26 2005. |
| nilavupriyan wrote: | ||||||
dont worry...,she mentioned tamil ladies...,i shall give u the appropriate link... |
| From: Nerd on Sat Oct 1 12:23:46 2005. |
| j.chenkalvarayan wrote: |
| arguing with ajith fans is like wrestling in the mud with a pig. after sometime you realize you are becomming dirty and stop. but the pig enjoys. |
| From: Justice on Sat Oct 1 12:24:53 2005. |
| kasi_sce wrote: | ||
Whoa JC.. way to go man
Sorry for the dig.. guys.. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Sat Oct 1 12:25:54 2005. |
| Sanjeevi wrote: | ||||||||
link? from India Today? Otherwise I wonder about the reliability. Because I or you can also make a postings on internet with adding (also subtracting) some extra words as told by kusboo. |
| From: Sanjeevi on Sat Oct 1 12:35:48 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Sat Oct 1 13:56:57 2005. |
| From: j.chenkalvarayan on Sat Oct 1 14:10:24 2005. |
| From: karthik_sa2 on Sat Oct 1 16:34:11 2005. |
| Quote: |
| to be honest i'm least bothered about kushboo's remarks.i never held her in high opinion.so this doesn't come as a betrayal. i'm a great admirer of arundhathi roy and if you read her 'god of small things' ,it appears as if she is sending the wrong signals to the readers. what the heck.how many of us will be ready to donate 1 million dollars to NGOS or will be sacrificing the booker prize to support the narmada bachao andolan movement.
i salute you great lady |
| From: mr_karthik on Sun Oct 2 6:51:26 2005. |
| Sanjeevi wrote: | ||||
Nilavu, thirumavalavan unkitta vanthu sonnara? Naanum yaru India today tamil magazine padichanu kettukitte iruken. yarumae pathil solla mattennu adam pidukurenga. I am not one in the sheap crowd to follow some quarrel person like thiruma, etc. I want to know the said words by kushboo exactly. |
| From: evolution on Sun Oct 2 7:22:36 2005. |
| From: rachel on Sun Oct 2 15:41:25 2005. |
| kasi_sce wrote: | ||
Whoa JC.. way to go man
Sorry for the dig.. guys.. |
| Quote: |
| After wandering in court warandas, Kushpu will understand what Tamil culture is. |
| From: Justice on Sun Oct 2 19:48:26 2005. |
| j.chenkalvarayan wrote: |
| arguing with ajith fans is like wrestling in the mud with a pig. after sometime you realize you are becomming dirty and stop. but the pig enjoys. |
| From: Scale on Mon Oct 3 1:21:02 2005. |
| justice wrote: | ||
|
| From: Justice on Mon Oct 3 21:50:53 2005. |
this is the one and only post that took at least one minute think or to create the idea
| Scale wrote: | ||||
Justice, We all are having fun here. Posting here in forumhub is 1/100 what you do? rite! |
| From: j.chenkalvarayan on Mon Oct 3 23:17:21 2005. |
| From: Justice on Mon Oct 3 23:18:35 2005. |
| j.chenkalvarayan wrote: |
| justice quotes:
arguing with ajith fans is likewrestling in the mud with a pig. after sometime you realize you are becoming dirty and stop. but the pig enjoys. |
| From: Nerd on Mon Oct 3 23:18:53 2005. |
@ JC
| From: stranger on Tue Oct 4 14:32:50 2005. |
| Quote: |
| That means they have strong evidence with copies of 'India Today' English and Tamil editions.
After wandering in court warandas, Kushpu will understand what Tamil culture is. |
| From: alwarpet_andavan on Wed Oct 5 6:49:49 2005. |
| From: cellvi2003 on Wed Oct 5 7:28:22 2005. |
| Quote: |
| Can someone please explain on what legal/judicial grounds has the case been framed against Kushboo? TN is the laughing stock of the nation and even Bihar looks like a Beverly Hills type society compared to ours.
What is the point about "evidence" in India Today or whatever? Freedom of speech is guaranteed for every man and woman by our constitution. Even the only obstacle to that, the abusive POTA has been repealed. If someone doesn't like what Kushboo says, they always have the option of not reading or not listening to her. By a stunning jump-cut which the best among our directors would be proud of, Tamil Nadu has taken a quantum leap aeons backwards. These perverted and so-called protectors of Tamil Culture rot...... |
| From: salaikumar on Thu Oct 6 2:53:05 2005. |
| From: mr_karthik on Thu Oct 6 4:24:08 2005. |
| salaikumar wrote: |
| What Kushbu had said is her personal opinion...Nothing wrong with that. But she should not have declared such opinion in public.
Since she has already apologised, its better to forgive her. Moreover, Though she is a punjabi, she has been married to a tamilian and living as a perfect tamilian with her husband, children and in-laws. All these agitations are unnecessary which are mainly triggered by some political parties... There are so many other issues which has to be solved out seriously. Let these people take a look into them... |
| From: Kollywoodfan on Thu Oct 6 20:18:08 2005. |
| j.chenkalvarayan wrote: |
| justice quotes:
arguing with ajith fans is likewrestling in the mud with a pig. after sometime you realize you are becoming dirty and stop. but the pig enjoys. |
JC, wow, that evoked some serious laughter for me after a while! I don't think it is this way with all Ajith fans, but I can definitely pinpoint the ones that you may have been targeting...don't worry, my lips are sealed. 
| From: Justice on Thu Oct 6 20:36:15 2005. |
| Kollywoodfan wrote: | ||
JC, wow, that evoked some serious laughter for me after a while! I don't think it is this way with all Ajith fans, but I can definitely pinpoint the ones that you may have been targeting...don't worry, my lips are sealed. |
| From: j.chenkalvarayan on Thu Oct 6 21:28:31 2005. |
and did someone tell you i sell 'porai'.
| From: Justice on Thu Oct 6 21:43:13 2005. |
)
| j.chenkalvarayan wrote: |
|
long live justice the upholder of truth. |
| From: rachel on Thu Oct 6 21:52:57 2005. |
| From: j.chenkalvarayan on Thu Oct 6 21:57:05 2005. |
| From: rachel on Thu Oct 6 22:00:36 2005. |
| From: Justice on Thu Oct 6 22:03:12 2005. |
.
| From: j.chenkalvarayan on Thu Oct 6 22:06:58 2005. |
| From: rachel on Thu Oct 6 22:07:59 2005. |
| From: Justice on Thu Oct 6 22:08:18 2005. |
| j.chenkalvarayan wrote: |
| and take this from me. i am no wimp either. i am a black mamba, the most ferocious snake in this world. i can be quite ruthless if the situation demands. |
| From: j.chenkalvarayan on Thu Oct 6 22:08:52 2005. |
| From: Justice on Thu Oct 6 22:10:30 2005. |
| j.chenkalvarayan wrote: |
| and i will get you a 'porai'. |
| From: rachel on Thu Oct 6 22:11:38 2005. |
| From: Nerd on Fri Oct 7 0:18:55 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Tue Oct 18 12:00:04 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Tue Oct 18 12:05:31 2005. |
| m_23_bayarea wrote: |
| “Kushboo was wrong in her comments” – Jayalalitha
- 18.10.2005 Cinesouth.com Those who had opposed Kushboo would have slept peacefully last night. They had not been content with protesting and posting anti-Kushboo posters. Yesterday, the matter came to a full stop with Chief Minister Jayalalitha’s comments. In a rare interview with the media, she was questioned on the Khushboo matter. Even as people are divided in their support for Kusbhoo or against her, Jayalalitha’s name figured in the controversy since Jaya TV had aired comments in favor of Khushboo. The media has generally been exploiting comments in favor of and against Kushboo in this matter. So, when the media asked Jayalalitha for clarification, she gave a short and clear response that, “Kushboo should not have made such remarks in violation of Tamil culture.” The opposition is using this as a hydrogen bomb against Kushboo. For a person struggling against the tide, even a weed will look like a banyan tree! |
for bay.......u give only important info man...| From: interz on Tue Oct 18 12:07:26 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Tue Oct 18 12:11:08 2005. |
| interz wrote: |
| man didnt know kollywood has such big power, when even CM has to comment on it. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Tue Oct 18 12:16:15 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Tue Oct 18 12:16:51 2005. |
| nilavupriyan wrote: |
| for bay.......u give only important info man... |
| From: nilavupriyan on Tue Oct 18 12:19:05 2005. |
| m_23_bayarea wrote: | ||
Thanks Nilavu Anne !!! |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Tue Oct 18 12:21:08 2005. |
| nilavupriyan wrote: | ||||
anne
does bay means thambi whats ur age bay |
| From: nilavupriyan on Tue Oct 18 12:22:33 2005. |
| m_23_bayarea wrote: | ||||||
26....Neenga epdi ??? Don't worry, if you're younger than me, I'll cut that Anne word from there....Or no, oru mariyathaikunu vachukuvomae !! |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Tue Oct 18 12:24:28 2005. |
| nilavupriyan wrote: | ||||||||
im 19 anne |
| From: nilavupriyan on Tue Oct 18 12:28:27 2005. |
| m_23_bayarea wrote: | ||||||||||
Appo inimae Nilavu thambi sariya !!! |
| From: Justice on Tue Oct 18 15:47:08 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Tue Oct 18 15:50:07 2005. |
| From: Justice on Tue Oct 18 15:56:05 2005. |
how do you know?
| m_23_bayarea wrote: |
| justice thambi, go to the previous page if you want some REAL news abt Kushboo... |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Fri Oct 21 13:39:53 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Fri Oct 21 13:56:36 2005. |
| From: Surya on Fri Oct 21 13:58:28 2005. |
| From: Justice on Fri Oct 21 16:33:38 2005. |
| Surya wrote: |
| Kushboo has become a victim of Cheap Politics! |
| From: Surya on Fri Oct 21 18:38:15 2005. |
Immature imbeciles who have no idea what the hell is going on are not worth my typing!! | From: Justice on Fri Oct 21 18:49:37 2005. |
. no need to explain it to you but feel sorry for you guy.
| Surya wrote: |
| If u've got something to say about what is being discussed in the thread, say it. Or if ur just going to blabber on and on about nothing...shut up.
Anything else coming form u, I'm ignoring. Immature imbeciles who have no idea what the hell is going on are not worth my typing!! |
| From: Crab on Fri Oct 21 19:01:58 2005. |
| Surya wrote: |
| Kushboo has become a victim of Cheap Politics! |
| From: Surya on Fri Oct 21 19:04:00 2005. |
| Crab wrote: | ||
Like Rasini thatha? |
| From: Surya on Fri Oct 21 19:04:37 2005. |
| Crab wrote: | ||
Like Rasini thatha? |
| From: Justice on Fri Oct 21 19:05:55 2005. |
Rajini now in kushboo's thread. how cheap he's gone
| Crab wrote: | ||
Like Rasini thatha? |
| From: Crab on Fri Oct 21 19:57:00 2005. |
| justice wrote: | ||||
Rajini now in kushboo's thread. how cheap he's gone
|
| From: Surya on Fri Oct 21 20:06:55 2005. |
And that's evident in teh AseTHOO the real Superstar thread!
ACHOO!!
........| From: Surya on Tue Oct 25 20:48:41 2005. |
How cheap has TN gone?? | From: Sanguine Sridhar on Tue Oct 25 22:01:19 2005. |
| From: njv on Tue Oct 25 23:12:19 2005. |
| Surya wrote: |
| It seems that the Cheap Low Class crew made up of the PMK morons have gotten Kusboo arrested! How cheap has TN gone?? |
| From: Crab on Tue Oct 25 23:13:49 2005. |
| From: Justice on Tue Oct 25 23:15:26 2005. |
| njv wrote: | ||
If Kusboo didnt make a big fuss abt TB and made him fall on the feet of actress including herslef, i would support kushboo, but I care the less. Its cheap politics, but atleast someone is there to police these people. who is she to talk about virginity in tamilnadu? can he let her daughter sleep with people before marriage? may be she will. |
| From: Surya on Wed Oct 26 0:25:07 2005. |
| njv wrote: | ||
If Kusboo didnt make a big fuss abt TB and made him fall on the feet of actress including herslef, i would support kushboo, but I care the less. Its cheap politics, but atleast someone is there to police these people. who is she to talk about virginity in tamilnadu? can he let her daughter sleep with people before marriage? may be she will. |
| From: Surya on Wed Oct 26 0:32:06 2005. |
| Beckham wrote: |
| Surya,
How cheap has TN gone?? This Politics is everwhere...Not only in tamizh nadu |
Politicians are using them left and right.| From: nilavupriyan on Wed Oct 26 8:28:22 2005. |
| Surya wrote: | ||
Beck,
There have been bollywood actreses who have said "It's a big issue over a small tissue" when asked about Virginity. That wasn't blown out of proportion like this is. And that was a lot more blunt and worse than what Kushboo has said. It seems that Tamils are very easily misguided now-a-days. Politicians are using them left and right. |
| From: njv on Wed Oct 26 10:13:10 2005. |
| nilavupriyan wrote: |
|
our people stick to the culture.....but the reaction was really over-reaction...but it is necessary |
| From: Surya on Wed Oct 26 12:34:18 2005. |
| Quote: |
| I am ashamed of my fellow tamilians who built temples for this "virgin" god. |
| Quote: |
| our people stick to the culture.....but the reaction was really over-reaction...but it is necessary |
Like I said, she didn't say that everyone practices it, but she says that it does exist. Isn't it the truth? Doesn't Premarital sex exist in Tamil Nadu?
| Quote: |
| Well said. They overreacted for TB and getting it back now. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Wed Oct 26 12:45:14 2005. |
| Surya wrote: | ||||||
That's true. The Tamil that do so are idiots. Infact, I hear that there is a temple for Trisha in Canada!! :bandhead: Nilavu wrote:
Necessary for what Nilavu?? Like I said, she didn't say that everyone practices it, but she says that it does exist. Isn't it the truth? Doesn't Premarital sex exist in Tamil Nadu?
So u agree that the reaction was out of proportion? |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Wed Oct 26 12:54:36 2005. |
| From: Surya on Wed Oct 26 13:00:26 2005. |
| Quote: |
| So, Khushboo has had a lucky escape from the arrest warrant. |
I just don't want these cheap PMK morons to win.
| From: nilavupriyan on Wed Oct 26 13:01:45 2005. |
| Surya wrote: | ||
Thank God! I just don't want these cheap PMK morons to win.
Nilavu, I agree that they souldn't have taken her words seriously. Ok she said it was right....then it's her opinion.......why make such a big deal out of it?? Because PMK moron Ramadass doesn't have anything else to do politics with. |
| From: Surya on Wed Oct 26 13:06:23 2005. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Wed Oct 26 13:30:11 2005. |
| From: Surya on Wed Oct 26 13:46:52 2005. |
| Shakthiprabha wrote: |
| Cant she poor woman, have her own FREEDOM OF SPEECH!?
Tamilians are WONDERFUL to either lift u up so high that they build temples, or push u so fiercely and burn u down to ashes as if a single woman's personal view IS POWERFUL ENOUGH TO COLLAPSE the long found tradition and culture of the whole tamilnadu. Guess this is what is called BARBARIC |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Wed Oct 26 14:16:16 2005. |
| Surya wrote: | ||
Lets not forget the burning of her effigies, and calling her cheap names. |
| From: rachel on Thu Oct 27 12:01:30 2005. |
| From: lordstanher on Tue Nov 8 2:31:31 2005. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Tue Nov 8 2:55:52 2005. |
| From: Anesh on Tue Nov 8 3:22:14 2005. |
| From: nirosha sen on Tue Nov 8 4:47:31 2005. |
I'm amazed it's still such a raging controversy, Pa!! Are they ever going to give it a rest or are they still baying for blood????| From: mr_karthik on Tue Nov 8 5:07:52 2005. |
| rachel wrote: |
| uummmmmm...interesting.... |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Tue Nov 8 5:45:14 2005. |
| From: lordstanher on Tue Nov 8 8:51:16 2005. |
| Shakthiprabha wrote: |
| Well obviously MALLIKA SHERAWAT has nothing to with TAMIZHNADU. So does aishwarya.
Kushboo now an accepted tamilian, maried to a tamilian, how can she give SUCH A STATEMENT!! Moreover point to be noted is that, they all spoke about INDIA, whilst our KUSHBOO spoke about TAMIL GIRLS(now THATS BADDDD!) WORLD OF DIFFERENCE dont u think |
| From: nirosha sen on Tue Nov 8 9:35:26 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Tue Nov 8 14:05:52 2005. |
| From: karthik_sa2 on Tue Nov 8 14:52:43 2005. |
| Quote: |
| i hate ramados........silly guy....but the issue is not that silly |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Tue Nov 8 14:54:13 2005. |
| karthik_sa2 wrote: |
| is ramadoss a doctor<MBBS>?i wonder how he wud have done that.may be like vasoolraja MBBS |
| From: Surya on Tue Nov 8 20:09:01 2005. |
| karthik_sa2 wrote: | ||
is ramadoss a doctor<MBBS>?i wonder how he wud have done that.may be like vasoolraja MBBS |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Wed Nov 9 1:30:58 2005. |
| From: mr_karthik on Wed Nov 9 7:51:27 2005. |
| From: lordstanher on Wed Nov 9 10:54:40 2005. |
| Shakthiprabha wrote: |
| She did not defame anybody. She did not do any character-assasination. All she said was HER VIEWS.
Comon ppl should have more practical sense, rather than emotional outburst |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Wed Nov 9 11:41:12 2005. |
| From: lordstanher on Wed Nov 9 13:34:59 2005. |
| Shakthiprabha wrote: |
| lord @ nah. I did nto refer u. why would I? |
| Shakthiprabha wrote: |
| yup. First time issue is raised PROBABLY because its a WOMAN who talks about it now? :confused:???? |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Wed Nov 9 14:02:47 2005. |
| Surya wrote: |
| Ramadoss must have been famous for his "Aruvai Vaithiyam" back in Med school!
The funny thing is that he claims that every single letter, spoken, written, thought in Tamiz Naadu should be in Tamiz, but he didn't care enough to choose it as his majour or even take a course in it later on in his life!! |
| From: Surya on Wed Nov 9 20:07:09 2005. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Wed Nov 9 23:21:41 2005. |
| lordstanher wrote: | ||||
Phew.......tats a relief!
Aahaaa......yes I shud've thot it obvioussssss!!!! |
I am sure, u know what I meant.
| From: m_23_bayarea on Thu Nov 10 13:01:16 2005. |
| From: mr_karthik on Thu Nov 10 13:28:55 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Thu Nov 10 14:03:59 2005. |
| From: just_hubber on Fri Nov 11 1:38:58 2005. |
| From: saradhaa_sn on Fri Nov 11 6:42:28 2005. |
| mr_karthik wrote: |
| Mr. Bayarea..
The speeches of Kushboo and Suhasini are nice "seruppadi" for those who invited them to the function as Cheif Guests. Are they eligible for that, who used that valuable function for their personal bla...blas...?. At that time Suhasini was in America or somewhere...ok. But now she is in Chennai only. Why not she face the cases against Kushboo and make them withdrawn or cancel them in courts?. KushboovaiyAvathu oru kaNakkil sErkalAm. AnAl indha Suhasini?. Can she prove that, Ladies in India are still in same level and position where they were in 1947?. The only thing for Suhasini is always blamming gents for each and everything. How she became an actor and director(?), without the help of her appA, chiththappA, husband and others?. are they not gents?. Shortly telling, regarding Suhasini. 'Andavan pengaLukku vAyai padaithiruppathu sAppitta nEram, thoongiya nEram pOga matRa neRam AngaLalai thittuvathaRkuthAn'. It is her policy always. |
| From: alwarpet_andavan on Fri Nov 11 6:59:58 2005. |
| saradhaa_sn wrote: |
| If she really hate 'male chavanism', then she should not get married and should live alone, then we can appreciate. She is not ready to sacrifice any benefit and enjoyment from gents.
There is no surprise, Suhasini supports Kushpoo, because 'rendum orey kuttaiyil ooriya mattaigal'. |
| From: arvind on Fri Nov 11 7:10:30 2005. |
| From: saradhaa_sn on Fri Nov 11 7:14:59 2005. |
| From: interz on Fri Nov 11 7:44:07 2005. |
Feel like kicking Ramdos' and Thirumalavans butt.| From: umaramesh on Fri Nov 11 8:00:29 2005. |
| From: saradhaa_sn on Fri Nov 11 8:45:59 2005. |
| umaramesh wrote: |
| Khushboo now says she answered to a question on AIDS and people mistook it. She expressed her view to a magazine.That's it. We are giving unnecessary importance to her statement.
I thnk very are giving too much importance to film personalities and following them everywhere. To make things worse parties like PMK taking advantage of this and using for mere political stunt. SUHASHINI IS IN USUAL MOOD
ramesh |
| From: lordstanher on Fri Nov 11 8:54:07 2005. |
| saradhaa_sn wrote: |
| Suhasini always attack gents by words un-necessarily, whenever she get chance and mike. But till now what she has done for the development of female society here..?. NOTHING. Just talking, thatsall. In our view, Suhasini is a Big Zero. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Fri Nov 11 9:29:06 2005. |
| mr_karthik wrote: |
| Mr. Bayarea..
The speeches of Kushboo and Suhasini are nice "seruppadi" for those who invited them to the function as Cheif Guests. Are they eligible for that, who used that valuable function for their personal bla...blas...?. At that time Suhasini was in America or somewhere...ok. But now she is in Chennai only. Why not she face the cases against Kushboo and make them withdrawn or cancel them in courts?. KushboovaiyAvathu oru kaNakkil sErkalAm. AnAl indha Suhasini?. Can she prove that, Ladies in India are still in same level and position where they were in 1947?. The only thing for Suhasini is always blamming gents for each and everything. How she became an actor and director(?), without the help of her appA, chiththappA, husband and others?. are they not gents?. Shortly telling, regarding Suhasini. 'Andavan pengaLukku vAyai padaithiruppathu sAppitta nEram, thoongiya nEram pOga matRa neRam AngaLalai thittuvathaRkuthAn'. It is her policy always. |
....
| From: m_23_bayarea on Fri Nov 11 17:30:06 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Fri Nov 11 17:37:39 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Fri Nov 11 17:45:46 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Fri Nov 11 18:00:35 2005. |
| From: mr_karthik on Sat Nov 12 5:24:29 2005. |
| arvind wrote: |
| Thol(unoi) Thirumavalavan is a scoundrel who makes a career out of raking muck on celebrities' wives.
Suhasini was right indeed. All self-respecting Tamils should be ashamed of what happened to Kushbu. Both these courageous women deserve a round of applause. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Sat Nov 12 12:55:08 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Sat Nov 12 13:00:51 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Sat Nov 12 13:55:42 2005. |
| From: Surya on Sat Nov 12 15:39:19 2005. |
| From: Surya on Sat Nov 12 16:14:21 2005. |
| Mr.Karthick wrote: |
| She said: "Pre marital sex is not a harm or sin (ok..it is her personal openion). But they should do it with safe to avoid deseases like AIDS and other sexual deseases (ok...it is also her personal openion). Nowadays pre-marital sex is increasing in Tamil Nadu (!!..??..!!). Can you tell, howmany ladies in Tamil Nadu are virgin during their marriage..? (this is also personal openion...???) |
| Mr.Karithick wrote: |
| Premarital Sex is not a harm or sin. (Ok....Her Opinion) |
| Karthick wrote: |
| But they should do it with safe to avoid deseases like AIDS and other sexual deseases (ok...it is also her personal openion). |
| Karthick wrote: |
| Nowadays pre-marital sex is increasing in Tamil Nadu (!!..??..!!). |
| Karthick wrote: |
| Can you tell, howmany ladies in Tamil Nadu are virgin during their marriage..? (this is also personal openion...???) |
| From: mr_karthik on Sun Nov 13 3:17:06 2005. |
| Surya wrote: |
| There are people who have lost their homes, there are people who have lost family members, people have lost all their property and belongings. Tamil Nadu is facing a Natural Catastrophe now, and these galactic morons are going around doing politics about what some actress said about Virginity, which took up a line, in a magazine.
A bunch of jobless imbeciles.
Why has a portion of the Tamiz Crowd become this Low Class?
Didn't Sathyaraj say that he supported Kushboo also? Why didn't they mess with him? Because he's a DMK Sympathizer! Galactic, Moronic, Hypocritical, Idiotic Enuches! |
| From: Avenger on Sun Nov 13 7:14:46 2005. |
| From: Surya on Sun Nov 13 15:15:52 2005. |
| Surya wrote: | ||||||||||
There are different ways to look @ the statement in a logical manner. But not matter how one looks @ it, it isn't wrong, or false.
Ok, no matter how much we Indians would like to fool ourselves, it's not a sin. Sin in clearly pertaining to Religion, and no religion says that Premarital sex is a SIN. Hinduism doesn't, Xtianity doesn't, I'm not sure about Islam, maybe better informed hubbers can let us know. This whole thing about Virginity is more of a Cultural Thing. So it is in NO WAY a SIN!
So it is not a Personal Opinion, it is a fact!
How is it her opinion? Isn't it not true that people should have safe sexual intercourse to avoid Sexually Transmitted Diseases like Aids, Siphilus, Crabs etc? How is her Personal Opinion? It isn't. It is also a fact!!
Now, this is also a fact. The number of women have Premarital Sex has increased, because people have more freedom now. And many people are using that freedom in bad ways. ESPICIALLY in big cities like Chennai. This is also a Fact!!!
That is true too, can you tell how many girls are virgins when they get married? No, you cannot. Unless of course you ask the girl to take a viginity test before marraige. And if you do, you're a moron because no girl will ever admit to that even if they ARE Virgins. There is an increasing number of girls involved in Premarital Sex! This is an undeniable fact! I'm not a supporter of Premarital Sex because it completly goes against our Moral Values, but it does happen, and there's no way to stop it, all we can hope for is that the ppl involved do it in a safe manner, and don't spread STD's. And for Some Reason it seems that many Tamils are happy living in their own, culturally perfect Dreamworld Tamil Nadu. And that is a Shame.
As for the imbeciles, I said this earlier, but I just want to say this again: There are people who have lost their homes, there are people who have lost family members, people have lost all their property and belongings. Tamil Nadu is facing a Natural Catastrophe now, and these galactic morons are going around doing politics about what some actress said about Virginity, which took up a line, in a magazine. A bunch of jobless imbeciles. Why has a portion of the Tamiz Crowd become this Low Class? Didn't Sathyaraj say that he supported Kushboo also? Why didn't they mess with him? Because he's a DMK Sympathizer! Galactic, Moronic, Hypocritical, Idiotic Enuches! I agree with Aravindh. I think that Kushboo and Suhasani desearve a HUGE round of Applause for having the balls to come out with this, which obviously so many Tamils are reluctant to face.
Regards. |
| mr_karthik wrote: | ||
I am surprising, why you people always drag DMK in all matters, when they noway connected with any of these agitations. (I am not a supporter of DMK). It is conducted by PMK party and Thirumavalavan party only. None of the DMK party leaders or its members opened their mouth for this issue. Atleast CM Jayalalitha once said that, what Kushboo told is not correct. That was also NOT said any of the DMK partymen. Because of SunTV telecasting this news means do you want to connect DMK in it?. Sun TV is a business orgo and they want to telecast what are all hot topics going on the state and country. They also telecested Jayendrar case, Jayalakshmi case, Train accidents, Bomb blastings in several parts of the world. Do you want to connect DMK in all of them, because Sun TV telecasted them?. As a Citizen of India (Tamil Nadu), what is your contribution for the people who lost their homes, except typing some letters in key board?. |
| From: Surya on Sun Nov 13 22:16:00 2005. |
| From: Nerd on Sun Nov 13 22:20:38 2005. |
| From: Surya on Sun Nov 13 22:26:39 2005. |
| From: Alien on Sun Nov 13 22:29:27 2005. |
for the longest post in the hub
| Surya wrote: | ||||||||
|
There are different ways to look @ the statement in a logical manner. But not matter how one looks @ it, it isn't wrong, or false.
Ok, no matter how much we Indians would like to fool ourselves, it's not a sin. Sin in clearly pertaining to Religion, and no religion says that Premarital sex is a SIN. Hinduism doesn't, Xtianity doesn't, I'm not sure about Islam, maybe better informed hubbers can let us know. This whole thing about Virginity is more of a Cultural Thing. So it is in NO WAY a SIN!
So it is not a Personal Opinion, it is a fact!
How is it her opinion? Isn't it not true that people should have safe sexual intercourse to avoid Sexually Transmitted Diseases like Aids, Siphilus, Crabs etc? How is her Personal Opinion? It isn't. It is also a [b] fact!!
Now, this is also a fact. The number of women have Premarital Sex has increased, because people have more freedom now. And many people are using that freedom in bad ways. ESPICIALLY in big cities like Chennai. This is also a [b] Fact!!! [/b]
That is true too, can you tell how many girls are virgins when they get married? No, you cannot. Unless of course you ask the girl to take a viginity test before marraige. And if you do, you're a moron because no girl will ever admit to that even if they ARE Virgins. There is an increasing number of girls involved in Premarital Sex! This is an undeniable fact! |
| From: Nerd on Sun Nov 13 22:46:52 2005. |
| From: Sanjeevi on Mon Nov 14 0:32:45 2005. |
| From: Surya on Mon Nov 14 1:34:40 2005. |
I don't think that we have people here who are that Narrow minded, and idiotic to think this was right and that Tamil Nadu is the "Chastity Capital" of the world.
| Sanjeevi wrote: |
| Thirumavalavan, Ramadoss and kushboo ethiragavum, suhasinikku ethiragavum thudappakattai, seruppu, vilakkumar thooki kaati poraduna pengal (??) ponra ellarum unmaiyilae inthe samuthayatha pidithirukura intha viyathikku ethira porada varuvargala? |
Selfish Vindictive Politicians, or brainwashed, easily mislead citizens, or the biased Media or...there are soo many "Viyathies" in this issue which has lead to what it has turned out to be. | From: Sanjeevi on Mon Nov 14 5:31:36 2005. |
| From: Cinefan on Mon Nov 14 6:51:40 2005. |
| From: Sanguine Sridhar on Mon Nov 14 7:40:13 2005. |
| From: mr_karthik on Mon Nov 14 7:46:31 2005. |
| From: mr_karthik on Mon Nov 14 8:01:49 2005. |
| From: mr_karthik on Mon Nov 14 8:18:49 2005. |
| From: alwarpet_andavan on Mon Nov 14 8:22:20 2005. |
| From: lordstanher on Mon Nov 14 8:37:22 2005. |
| alwarpet_andavan wrote: |
| The collective hypocrisy of Tamil Nadu shines. Yesterday, i saw some scenes in the Captain flick Narasimha. It was sprinkled with a generous dose of butt/boobs close-ups, not to mention the lead pair locked in coital positions in 2 scenes. I wonder where the censor board was and what the hell all the watchdogs of Tamil paNbAdu were doing? |
| alwarpet_andavan wrote: |
| Ever heard of Thandhai Periyar, on whose back many politicians are riding piggy-back? He was one forward thinker who stood for the cause of women. |
| From: alwarpet_andavan on Mon Nov 14 8:45:51 2005. |
| lordstanher wrote: |
|
My qsn. is Is there a censor board for Tamil films at all?? Its not tat this is the 1st Tamil film w/ such dose of vulgarity.....! |
| lordstanher wrote: |
|
Um........I read in a recent article abt the kushboo issue tat Periyar'd even made statements encouraging married women to hav affairs (ie, if a married man cud hav a concubine, a mrd. woman cud hav 2 lovers!)........atleast Kushboo wasn't really promoting such acts abt sex.......! |
| From: mr_karthik on Mon Nov 14 10:11:42 2005. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Mon Nov 14 10:15:43 2005. |
| From: lordstanher on Mon Nov 14 10:25:31 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Nov 14 10:29:21 2005. |
| Shakthiprabha wrote: |
| Anyone remember the ad for safe-sex? It was promoted for the welfare of ppl who want secure healthy life.
Why was not the ISSUE RAISED THEN? If I remember right, there was a talk about a guy being advised to use safe-sex may it be PREMARITAL OR POST MARITAL.(For every man involving in pre-marital sex, A WOMAN WOULD BE INVOLVED TOO. That calculation is fair enough for ppl to understand aint not?) The issue was not raised then, cause... SIMPLE... A 'WOMAN' DID NOT POKE HER NOSE THEN.. IN moral matters. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Mon Nov 14 12:53:34 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Mon Nov 14 13:06:10 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Mon Nov 14 13:30:26 2005. |
| From: stranger on Mon Nov 14 15:54:58 2005. |
| From: Surya on Mon Nov 14 20:40:13 2005. |
| Sanjeevi wrote: |
|
BTW surya, intha viyathi-nu sonnatha pre-marital sex than. Ivargal ellam seruppu, thodapakatta eduthu athuku ethira poradalamae. I really feel bad, investigative journilism is falling into athala pathalam. Also the viyathis mentioned by you are very dangerous. |
| From: Surya on Mon Nov 14 20:51:30 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
| I think, we all have to admit that all of us had premarital relationships. If we deny that then Sugashini and Kushboo will say that we are all lying.
According to Sugashini and Kushboo, the only thing which is importatant is "not getting aids" or "pregnant" and it does not matter how many people you get involved with. You can do anything else you wish. After all this is a civilized world! According to Kushboo and Sugashini u can involve in any kind of relationship, * Premarital relationship, * extramarital affairs, * multiple sex partners before and after marriage if you wish. * may be husband or wife swap as well in a civiized manner. As long as you can protect yourself from getting pregnant or getting infected with any virus, Sugashini will condsider you as a civilized Tamil. Otherwise, she will ask you to show your "horn"! |
Suhasani or Kushboo never said that all of Tamil Nadu is involved in Premarital Sex!! This is a common misunderstanding due to the media!
| From: Surya on Mon Nov 14 21:14:03 2005. |
| From: joe on Mon Nov 14 23:18:03 2005. |
| From: Nerd on Mon Nov 14 23:21:19 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Nov 14 23:23:37 2005. |
| From: joe on Mon Nov 14 23:27:01 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Nov 14 23:39:28 2005. |
| From: joe on Mon Nov 14 23:48:08 2005. |
| From: Nerd on Mon Nov 14 23:51:52 2005. |
| From: svaisn on Mon Nov 14 23:53:08 2005. |
| From: joe on Mon Nov 14 23:53:32 2005. |
| From: Nerd on Mon Nov 14 23:55:36 2005. |
now everyone knows who that 5-lettered word is | From: joe on Tue Nov 15 0:00:23 2005. |
| From: svaisn on Tue Nov 15 0:04:08 2005. |
| joe wrote: |
| Kasi,
I don't consider you are a person to argue with .Reply to me only if I ask you or talk about you .I won't reply to you anymore.Don't dream that I listed out for you. |
| From: Nerd on Tue Nov 15 0:08:05 2005. |
| From: joe on Tue Nov 15 0:08:39 2005. |
| svaisn wrote: | ||
enna sir.. chinna pulla thanama erukku |
| From: Surya on Tue Nov 15 0:09:41 2005. |
| joe wrote: |
| If someone write in colourful bold letters and added with some emoticons ,it became valid points..ha ha..This guy surya is just a DMK hater..plain and simple. |
If u have anything to say about my posts earlier today, then please, quote it, and post VALID points, instead of giving nicknames to hubbers like "DMK hater"
| Joe wrote: |
| Kasi,
I don't consider you are a person to argue with .Reply to me only if I ask you or talk about you .I won't reply to you anymore.Don't dream that I listed out for you. |
If u feel that u cannot aruge with Kasi, since u fail to read his posts, respond to me, it's my post that u had a prob with the begin with! What did u find in my post that was so "Invalid" ?? They are all facts, my arguement is based on facts, as opposed to urs which is "U are a DMk hater"
Then u'd just be wasting time, energy, and drive space.
[/quote]| From: j.chenkalvarayan on Tue Nov 15 0:13:05 2005. |
| From: joe on Tue Nov 15 0:13:48 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Tue Nov 15 0:17:03 2005. |
| j.chenkalvarayan wrote: |
| kushbu suhashini are all loud mouth. they just say something to hog the limelight. we shouldn't take their comments seriously. suhashini she thinks she represents tamil ladies which is sadly nowhere near the truth. she thinks her views are radical and hopes something rvolutionary will happen . but again its a freak show. i would sit and listen if a person of high caliber like arundhati roy, medha patkar or kiran bedi says something . but suhashini |
...| From: Nerd on Tue Nov 15 0:22:04 2005. |
| From: Surya on Tue Nov 15 0:28:03 2005. |
| Quote: |
| 1.If Kushboo beleives what she said is valid ,why she cried and asked appology in Jeya TV ,then why she is 'Bulti' now? |
| Quote: |
| a) "Enkitta keettiruntha Kizhichiruppen"
Yaara kizhippanglam ?ethai Kizhippangalam? |
| Quote: |
| b) "TamizhakaLukku enna Kompa muLachirukku"
suhasinniku mattum kompa muzhachirukku? |
| Quote: |
| "Tamizh Nattu makkal saarpa kusboo kitta naan mannipu kedkiren" |
| From: joe on Tue Nov 15 0:34:22 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Tue Nov 15 0:37:08 2005. |
| From: just_hubber on Tue Nov 15 0:37:40 2005. |
| From: Surya on Tue Nov 15 0:42:38 2005. |
| From: joe on Tue Nov 15 0:44:33 2005. |
| From: Surya on Tue Nov 15 0:47:36 2005. |
| Quote: |
| Now Suhasini is running from media , not dared to comment anything , the reasons are she is scared of more cases files may filed against her about her "loose talk" |
| From: joe on Tue Nov 15 0:51:38 2005. |
| From: Surya on Tue Nov 15 0:52:10 2005. |
| Quote: |
| He is a politician..defenitely he will have to focus on votes ,just like marketless actress use this issue to build her popularity |
| From: Surya on Tue Nov 15 0:53:38 2005. |
| joe wrote: |
| Yeah..For surya ,Kushboo and suhasini are high class ..and Thirumavalavan is a pig and low class for obvious reasons..very good.! |
| From: joe on Tue Nov 15 0:54:16 2005. |
| Surya wrote: | ||
She's a retired actess who is now a housewife! Her husband is one of the most famous, sucessful directors in Tamil Filmdom! Her relatives are big boys in the field like Kamala Haasan! |
| From: Surya on Tue Nov 15 0:56:21 2005. |
What is ur level of comprehension??
| From: joe on Tue Nov 15 1:01:26 2005. |
| From: Surya on Tue Nov 15 1:04:21 2005. |
U blindly opposed my posts a couple pages ago, but I still don't see u saying anything about it, other than "U hate DMK" or "Kasi ur a moron." Who's the zealous blind man here?
| From: Surya on Tue Nov 15 1:08:25 2005. |
I gotta go! | From: Shakthiprabha. on Tue Nov 15 1:08:42 2005. |
| just_hubber wrote: |
|
These are the summary of media But those who supports suhasini&Kushbu 's comments can they impose for their own family members first and they are elible to support suhasni & Kushbu. |
| From: joe on Tue Nov 15 1:13:03 2005. |
| From: just_hubber on Tue Nov 15 1:17:48 2005. |
| From: mr_karthik on Tue Nov 15 3:35:51 2005. |
| Surya wrote: |
| Is this democracy? For an opinion expressed, the reply comes in the shape of broomsticks and footwear. Effigies are being burnt. - Cinesouth.
Today Sun TV's Biased News, stated that VJ's effigies were burnt today because of some dialouge in Sivakasi about Lawyers.
Take a look Folks! Kushboo: Her effigies were burnt because she expressed her views on Premarital Sex. Suhasani: Her Effigies were burnt because she said that she supported them, and stated a fact. SJ Suryah: His Effigies were burnt because of some dialouge in Ah..Aaah. Kamala Haasan: His effigies were burnt for naming his movie "Mumbhai Express." Writer Jeyakanthan: His Effigies were burnt for saying that these anti-sanskrit extreamists are over the top, and Chandramukhi is a good name because it goes with the storyline. Vijay: His Effigies were burnt today because of some dialouge in Sivakasi about Lawyers. Huh.....It seems that burning effigies for moronic reasons has now become part of Tamil Culture lately!!
So, if anyone says that burning effigies for stupid silly reasons is wrong, then their effigies will be burnt, and they will be asked to go to their Home Town!! |
You have collected all news about the burning of "Effigies" in Tamil Nadu (eventhough you are said to be in California). But how you purposely HIDE the fact that, recently the Effigies of Karunanidhi also burnt, (for his Tholkaapiyam) for just put the blame for all these incidents on PMK, DMK and Thiruma...??.
| From: mr_karthik on Tue Nov 15 3:48:22 2005. |
| just_hubber wrote: |
| Kushbu is fully eligible to talk like that .because
when she was a heroine she gave a interview in stardust magazine like this " she said that she lived with actor Prabhu for sometime . and she like him so much, she remembered this as her memorable days" She said she had a abortion due to prabhu. Due to circumstances(because sivaji warned) she said she terminated her relationship with Prabhu, I read this in StarDust magazine when she was number one "nadigai" She is really brave like jayalalitha ! |
| From: mr_karthik on Tue Nov 15 4:19:12 2005. |
| nilavupriyan wrote: |
| naatula avanavan sorillama kashtapatukittu irukaan....andha prachanayellam vittutu kushboo edho sonnalam.....ivunugalum poraatam nadatha vantanuga......do they think we are fools..
idhu varaikum andha parties urupadiya eadhavadhu pannadha news vandhirukka..... |
| From: mr_karthik on Tue Nov 15 4:55:59 2005. |
| Surya wrote: | ||
Joe,
I was glad to see this. PMK morons were embarassing Tamils in front of the nation! Reg Suhasani, Aroi, etc, She might, but what she said is still true. This is clearly harrasment. Who the hell are these idiots to say that people can't express their opinions in a Democracy??? I agree that Suhasani's apology in the name of tamlis wasn't a good decision, because most of the idiots who are in the streets supporting these extreamists aren't sorry. Other than that, I don't see anything wrong. |
| From: mr_karthik on Tue Nov 15 5:04:25 2005. |
| From: Cinefan on Tue Nov 15 7:13:45 2005. |
| From: Sanjeevi on Tue Nov 15 7:58:34 2005. |
| mr_karthik wrote: |
|
If what Kushboo said (Pre-marital sex os no harm and it exist in Tamil Nadu), is 100 % correct, then what Thanger Bachaan told (actresses are prostitutes) also 200% correct. Can any Kushboo or any Suhasini (or their supporters) refuse this....?????????. |
| mr_karthik wrote: |
|
Who is Suhasini, to seek apology from Kushboo on beahlf of me and my family?. |
| mr_karthik wrote: |
|
Your first point, Tamil Nadu makkaL means only PMK morons..is it?. Nobody others Tamil Nadu. I am also Tamilan and my family also |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Tue Nov 15 8:24:03 2005. |
| From: arvind on Tue Nov 15 8:28:41 2005. |
| Cinefan wrote: |
| mr_karthik,
Are you by any chance representing the PMK&'Thollai' Thirumavalavan here? |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Tue Nov 15 8:28:46 2005. |
| Sanjeevi wrote: |
|
Do you fee the difference between the following two sentences? 1) Indians are idiots (wrong) 2) India has idiots also (true) |
| From: mr_karthik on Tue Nov 15 8:44:22 2005. |
| arvind wrote: | ||
|
| From: mr_karthik on Tue Nov 15 9:01:31 2005. |
| Shakthiprabha wrote: |
| I think suhasini AND SHE bringing this issue up TO PRIME DISCUSSION AGAIN is foolishness AND UNCALLED FOR on their part.
Suhasini can have her own opinion BUT, SHE NEED NOT TAKE THE TROUBLE OF APOLOGIZING ON behalf of so many tamilians. Being a tamil citizen, I cant talk my opinion and say I say this on behalf of 10000000 CITIZENS! SHE should have been lil more diligent. Emotions should be at rest when talkin on such issues. Sad she got caught! |
| From: mr_karthik on Tue Nov 15 9:19:27 2005. |
| From: mr_karthik on Tue Nov 15 9:57:44 2005. |
| From: vasanthkv on Tue Nov 15 11:22:29 2005. |
| mr_karthik wrote: |
| 'Mannippu kEttAr Suhasini"
The former actress Suhasini sent her 'Letter of Apology' to Nadigar Sangam. She never expected the reaction for her speech will be this much. Link: http://thatstamil.indiainfo.com/news/2005/11/15/suhasini.html Her husband Director Mani Rathnam did not support her speech and further actions. He already met heart attack two times. So he doesnt want to INVITE unnecessary problems through his wife. I want to know, where Suhasini supporters will go now. |
| From: interz on Tue Nov 15 11:55:07 2005. |
| From: ssanjinika on Tue Nov 15 12:04:53 2005. |
| interz wrote: |
| .-.off topic question ...arent mani rathnam and suhasini divorced??? |
| From: ssanjinika on Tue Nov 15 12:15:19 2005. |
| From: stranger on Tue Nov 15 12:23:41 2005. |
| From: j.chenkalvarayan on Tue Nov 15 13:19:24 2005. |
)the same constitution which bestows the fundamental rights also imposes certain obligations on every citizen. these are the fundamental duties.
| From: Kollywoodfan on Tue Nov 15 16:06:16 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Tue Nov 15 17:10:29 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Tue Nov 15 17:14:22 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Tue Nov 15 17:37:05 2005. |
| From: Surya on Tue Nov 15 19:07:47 2005. |
| cinefan wrote: |
| mr_karthik,
Are you by any chance representing the PMK&'Thollai' Thirumavalavan here? |
| mr_karthik wrote: | ||
You have collected all news about the burning of "Effigies" in Tamil Nadu (eventhough you are said to be in California). But how you purposely HIDE the fact that, recently the Effigies of Karunanidhi also burnt, (for his Tholkaapiyam) for just put the blame for all these incidents on PMK, DMK and Thiruma...??.
(an additional news for you, now Thiruma is going to join in alliance with your Jaya's ADMK). |
Since when yar? See ur unnesserily draging the DMK into this!! Why?
| From: m_23_bayarea on Tue Nov 15 19:20:45 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
| I would say,
JJ was smarter in this issue! It is hard to win standing by Kushboo because there are indeed a million tamils believe tha premarital sex is wrong. If I dont have sex, where will I get HIV from??? But when I have premarital sex, (obviously I am cheating someone here) and I cant think straight unless I am a professionl and I have a great chance to get AIDS How does Kushboo or Suhashini help me from AIDS?????
I think the former is the BEST. You protect yourself from the getting the AIDS and u dont cheat on anybody and u protect your culture as well. Unless I need to get transfused using Kushboo or Sugashini's blood, I would not worry. Prevention is the CURE for AIDS. So, keep your motuhs SHUT, you idiotic actresses! |
| From: Surya on Tue Nov 15 19:21:23 2005. |
| mr_karthik wrote: | ||||
Your first point, Tamil Nadu makkaL means only PMK morons..is it?. Nobody others Tamil Nadu. I am also Tamilan and my family also. Who is Suhasini, to seek apology from Kushboo on beahlf of me and my family? |
Again: Actually READ the posts.
| Quote: |
|
Your second point "Freedom of speech". Why not she gave the same freedom of speach for Thanger Bachaan?. When 3,487 actresses were keep quit, why she only jumped to sky, when TB came to Nadigar Sangam. Now I am telling Thanger Bachaan is done a mistake by coming to Nadigar Sangam and get apology. If what Kushboo said (Pre-marital sex os no harm and it exist in Tamil Nadu), is 100 % correct, then what Thanger Bachaan told (actresses are prostitutes) also 200% correct. Can any Kushboo or any Suhasini (or their supporters) refuse this....?????????. |
| Quote: |
|
Your third point, all 6 crores Tamil people shoul fall in the feet of Kushboo. But, as it is not possible, Suhasini fell "ON BEHALF OF ENTIRE TAMILANS". Is it?. |
Not that I'm surpriced though. | From: Surya on Tue Nov 15 21:15:10 2005. |
| Bay wrote: |
| This is my opinion. I don't care if I get sued or driven to court by some fanatics. |
| Quote: |
| But I think having sex is upto two individuals and no one else has the right to comment on it....India is not a dictator-ruled country, but a democracy. Each citizen is entitled to his/her rights. |
| Quote: |
| The issue is Kushboo has committed the sin of her life by speaking out and being honest in expressing her opinion. And Suhashini has committed an immortal sin by supporting her. Wow, we all should be ashamed to call ourselves Tamilians for having mauled a fellow citizen for just what, TALKING !!! To the extent that we've sent her to jail ??? Man, this is disgusting and atrocious.
Ok, I explained my stance on Pre-marital sex in the first paragragh, and so did a number of hubbers...What are the gonna do to us? JAIL us or sentence us ??? |
| Quote: |
|
God save Tamil Nadu !!!! |
| From: just_hubber on Tue Nov 15 22:03:56 2005. |
| interz wrote: |
| .-.off topic question ...arent mani rathnam and suhasini divorced??? |
| From: mr_karthik on Wed Nov 16 4:20:46 2005. |
| m_23_bayarea wrote: |
|
But I think having sex is upto two individuals and no one else has the right to comment on it. Of course, if it's an affair after marriage, then it's a totally different story. Of course, if you go to a brothal, it's a different story as well. But if two people are in love, and if neither of them is married, it is upto THEM to have sex or not. And no one else has the right to interfere, especially in the name of culture. India is not a dictator-ruled country, but a democracy. Each citizen is entitled to his/her rights. But that's not the issue here. The issue is Kushboo has committed the sin of her life by speaking out and being honest in expressing her opinion. And Suhashini has committed an immortal sin by supporting her. Wow, we all should be ashamed to call ourselves Tamilians for having mauled a fellow citizen for just what, TALKING !!! To the extent that we've sent her to jail ??? Man, this is disgusting and atrocious. Ok, I explained my stance on Pre-marital sex in the first paragragh, and so did a number of hubbers...What are the gonna do to us? JAIL us or sentence us ??? God save Tamil Nadu !!!! |
| From: mr_karthik on Wed Nov 16 4:57:04 2005. |
| Surya wrote: |
|
What??
I'm blaming DMK and CO for everything?? R u insisting that the ppl who burnt VJ's effigies are with the DMK?? Since when yar? See ur unnesserily draging the DMK into this!! Why?
My ADMK?? Haven't I already said that I don't like ADMK either??
Please actually READ the posts before blabbering on and on based on assumptions. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Wed Nov 16 15:40:11 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Wed Nov 16 15:48:28 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Wed Nov 16 15:52:08 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Wed Nov 16 16:05:02 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Wed Nov 16 16:10:18 2005. |
| From: Surya on Wed Nov 16 18:41:11 2005. |
| m_23_bayarea wrote: |
| Kushboo gets bail.
Now are they gonna burn the effigies of the judge who granted bail ???? |
| From: Surya on Wed Nov 16 18:45:10 2005. |
| mr_karthik wrote: | ||
Surya sir, Instead I read your posts again, it is better you read your posts again in earlier pages (especially the bold lettered one, in wbich you dragged DMK in this matter) which is entirely different from this post. |
Which is the truth, it has nothing to do with the DMK, it's all about PMK not going to Sathyaraj. After taht u and Joe have repetivily dragged the DMK itno this by saying "KK's effiges were burnt too!!!!!!" and "U R a DMK Hater!!!" and so on and so forth!! | From: Surya on Wed Nov 16 18:47:17 2005. |
Unlike SOME ppl!
| From: stranger on Wed Nov 16 20:04:34 2005. |
| From: Surya on Wed Nov 16 23:41:43 2005. |
| From: Cinefan on Thu Nov 17 0:46:44 2005. |
| From: Nerd on Thu Nov 17 0:58:54 2005. |
| From: Cinefan on Thu Nov 17 1:02:58 2005. |
| From: Sanjeevi on Thu Nov 17 1:52:50 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Thu Nov 17 1:54:14 2005. |
| From: Alien on Thu Nov 17 2:39:21 2005. |
| Cinefan wrote: |
| At the Hindustan Times Leadership summit ,Sania Mirza spoke a couple of days back&made a statement that pre-martial sex is a reality in today's times&efforts should be made to promote safe sex.
Narain karthikeyan who also spoke referred to Khusboo's comments on the same,said it made sense&it was a certain section of the media which blew it out of proportion&converted it into a controversy. Now what,cases against Sania&Narain in various courts&a fatwa against Sania? |
| From: mr_karthik on Thu Nov 17 2:47:50 2005. |
| Surya wrote: | ||
Solla mudiyaathu machi! Ethunge senjaalum sieyum!! |
| From: mr_karthik on Thu Nov 17 3:02:57 2005. |
| Surya wrote: |
| ////Kushboo has once again proved that she likes to take the moral high ground.///
Unlike SOME ppl!
Later. |
| From: mr_karthik on Thu Nov 17 3:37:45 2005. |
| From: mr_karthik on Thu Nov 17 3:56:13 2005. |
| vasanth_luv wrote: | ||
Brilliant ! I sincerely felt that Kushboo's intentions was this(the above point), when giving that infamous interview ! Of course I have no clear way of knowing it, but thats what I was able to interpret to, when looking at her point with a general perception ! But, then morons have blown it out of proportion ! |
| From: mr_karthik on Thu Nov 17 5:52:32 2005. |
| From: arvind on Thu Nov 17 6:14:34 2005. |
| From: Sanguine Sridhar on Thu Nov 17 6:21:35 2005. |
| From: arvind on Thu Nov 17 6:36:56 2005. |
| From: mr_karthik on Thu Nov 17 7:10:54 2005. |
| Beckham wrote: |
| My views on Kushboos case
Thirumavalavan -------------------- This Gentleman is playing double game.He is against this marriage,sadangugal etc...etc., And why the hell he should protest Kushboos views on premarital sex.Its nothing but another ruthless politics.Thirumavalavan&co's main target was Kushboo after Thangarbachan's case.They were waiting for the right time..Bang on target! Kushboo ----------- I wont support Kushboo too.Shez in media whatever shez gonna tell will def affect the soceity.It shows her lack of maturity.She thinks herself as the boss of woman soceity or what? Who is she to open her mouth and talk about tamizh ladies and about their affairs.Thousands of things are happening behind kollywood..she has gutts to open those things in front of media(I m relating Thangarbachan's case)?... Suhasini ----------- Suhasini = Summa kedantha Sangga Oodhi keduthavar... Manasukulla ivvungalukkukellam puratchi pengal endru ninappu..Nenaikiradhu onnum thappu illa..eppo pesanum-gura basic knowledge kooda illana...waste! Media ------- Sun TV is playing master game on it.Jaya TV leading Sun tv only in in the game show "Jackpot" is doing good buisness...to make it down they are making Kushboo's scene more worst by telecasting abt this atleast once in a day.Normal literate ppl may wont have that much interest on this issue.But think abt village ppl,illiterates..they may think as if Kushboo is targetting them. Last but not least If they continue to protest Kushboo like this..Kushboo will gain more symphathy from crwd...who knows she may be crowned as next CM also |
| From: Lambretta on Thu Nov 17 8:52:12 2005. |
| Beckham wrote: |
| My views on Kushboos case
Thirumavalavan -------------------- This Gentleman is playing double game. He is against this marriage,sadangugal etc...etc., And why the hell he should protest Kushboos views on premarital sex.Its nothing but another ruthless politics.Thirumavalavan&co's main target was Kushboo after Thangarbachan's case.They were waiting for the right time..Bang on target! Kushboo ----------- I wont support Kushboo too.Shez in media whatever shez gonna tell will def affect the soceity.It shows her lack of maturity.She thinks herself as the boss of woman soceity or what? Who is she to open her mouth and talk about tamizh ladies and about their affairs.Thousands of things are happening behind kollywood..she has gutts to open those things in front of media(I m relating Thangarbachan's case)?... |
| From: Sanjeevi on Thu Nov 17 9:16:47 2005. |
| mr_karthik wrote: |
|
In Kushboo matter, Sun TV did not show anything artificial but showed what happenened, without hiding anything |
| From: mr_karthik on Thu Nov 17 9:36:38 2005. |
| Sanjeevi wrote: | ||
Greatest joke of the year. Sun TV is telecasting their VIEWS not NEWS |
| From: ssanjinika on Thu Nov 17 10:13:43 2005. |
| Beckham wrote: |
|
Media ------- Sun TV is playing master game on it.Jaya TV leading Sun tv only in in the game show "Jackpot" is doing good buisness...to make it down they are making Kushboo's scene more worst by telecasting abt this atleast once in a day.Normal literate ppl may wont have that much interest on this issue.But think abt village ppl,illiterates..they may think as if Kushboo is targetting them. |
| From: ssanjinika on Thu Nov 17 10:17:22 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Thu Nov 17 14:22:06 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Thu Nov 17 14:43:10 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Thu Nov 17 14:55:45 2005. |
| From: stranger on Thu Nov 17 15:06:30 2005. |
| m_23_bayarea wrote: |
|
"It is not necessary for me to advise people to have safe sex. Whether before or after marriage, one should practice safe sex. There is nothing to hinder people from having sex before marriage." Sania spoke her mind clearly and unhurriedly - a challenge to the slipper and egg flinging Siruthaigal and Paattaalis. Let's see how they react to Sania's bold statements. Let's see how brave we are! |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Thu Nov 17 16:14:38 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
|
It all depends on one's moral. Moral is set by the individual and not by sania or Kushboo or any oher slut. And God or "california desi" does not set the rule. * you can marry your cousin in India but you cant in US. * The rules set differently at different places. That is called culture. |
| From: stranger on Thu Nov 17 16:28:08 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Thu Nov 17 16:31:04 2005. |
| From: malligai on Thu Nov 17 16:52:06 2005. |
| stranger wrote: | ||
* So what is wrong in having sex with anybody or anywhere????? I dont care if Sania or Kushboo wants get laid with anybody "safely". They can be proud of their "vast experience" too! As long as they dont suspect every individuals' integrity or suggest everybody is a cheat and liar, I dont have a problem with it. It all depends on one's moral. Moral is set by the individual and not by sania or Kushboo or any oher slut. And God or "california desi" does not set the rule. * you can marry your cousin in India but you cant in US. * The rules set differently at different places. That is called culture. |
| From: vasanthkv on Thu Nov 17 17:03:16 2005. |
| From: Surya on Thu Nov 17 18:47:31 2005. |
| Quote: |
| It all depends on one's moral. Moral is set by the individual and not by sania or Kushboo or any oher slut. And God or "california desi" does not set the rule.
* you can marry your cousin in India but you cant in US. * The rules set differently at different places. That is called culture. |
since it is against their "Culture" eventhough it's politicians like them who practice it the most! | From: Surya on Thu Nov 17 18:48:54 2005. |
| m_23_bayarea wrote: |
| Can't prevent sex before marriage - Sania supports Khushboo
- 17.11.2005 Cinesouth.com Amidst throwing of rotten eggs and slippers, Khushboo has got bail, but with restrictions, not to express her comments or seek publicity before the case is over. For a depressed Khushboo there is a supporting voice from Delhi. It belongs to Sania Mirza. Khushboo is in trouble over the chastity issue and Sania over her brief skirt on court. Orthodox Muslims are more interested in her costume than in her game. And the girl has come up with a smasher yesterday. "Outside the court, nobody needs to bother about what clothes I wear, what I do, what I eat or drink. When I am on court, what people need to concern themselves with, is my game, and not whether my skirt is 6' or 6" long." When Mirza spat out fire, she was asked about her opinion on pre-marital sex. Sania gave a smashing reply to the question that got Khushboo into trouble. "It is not necessary for me to advise people to have safe sex. Whether before or after marriage, one should practice safe sex. There is nothing to hinder people from having sex before marriage." Sania spoke her mind clearly and unhurriedly - a challenge to the slipper and egg flinging Siruthaigal and Paattaalis. Let's see how they react to Sania's bold statements. Let's see how brave we are! ___________________________________ Siruthaigal and Paattaalis: Ippo enna panna poreenga ??? Poi muttikongada engayavathu !!! |
| From: kandiban on Thu Nov 17 18:52:48 2005. |
what she think very body like her .... | From: Surya on Thu Nov 17 18:52:48 2005. |
| Kasi wrote: |
| I guess they are now busy making effigys of them both and the jordan car narain drove to burn them. |
| Cinefan wrote: |
| kasi
very soon we will have mr_karthik,saradhasn jumping up&down criticising both of them here with stranger supporting them with one-liners. |
Good Stuff!!
A riot indeed!! | From: stranger on Thu Nov 17 19:25:07 2005. |
| Surya wrote: |
| If the Individual feels that it's okay to have premarital sex, then it is according to them! |
| From: Surya on Thu Nov 17 20:57:15 2005. |
Wake Up call!!
| From: Lambretta on Thu Nov 17 22:21:13 2005. |
| Surya wrote: |
| She wasn't challenging the tamil populations saying that "How many ppl are involved in PM sex?" It was a mere question. R you saying that ppl don't do that? Or that only actresses etc do so??? Wake Up call!! |
| Quote: |
| A Democracy Tamil Nadu is! Right! Hipocrates! |
| From: Surya on Thu Nov 17 22:30:02 2005. |
| Lambretta wrote: | ||||
Exactly! She was only being sarcastic in her question, as if to ask, y do yall act like no-one (in TN) has done such a thing...... But I agree w/ Beckham tat she nevrtheless had no need to raise the topic of such an issue, watever her intentions wud've been.......I mean she cud've talked abt issues like traumas of prost., dowry harassment, sexual harassment etc. which r far more serious, if she was aiming at women's rights.......
Um....u mean Hypocrites??
Btw, um.......cud sumone plse. answer my qsn. abt this Thangar Bachan.....?? |
And when Tamil women said "Naangal ellam Kannagi-yin Maru Uruvam blah blah blah, yada yada yada, bada bing bada boom, so on and so forth" that's when Suhasani said : "Tamils are no exception! What makes us any different? We are in danger of STD's also since there is PM sex in TN! Tamizhargalukku enna komba mulaithu irukirathu?
| From: rachel on Thu Nov 17 22:33:14 2005. |
| From: Surya on Thu Nov 17 22:38:56 2005. |
| rachel wrote: |
|
what the hell? |
| From: Justice on Thu Nov 17 22:39:22 2005. |
| From: rachel on Thu Nov 17 22:40:47 2005. |
| Surya wrote: | ||
What the Hell? |
| From: Surya on Thu Nov 17 22:41:47 2005. |
| From: rachel on Thu Nov 17 22:42:29 2005. |
| justice wrote: |
| those who think that kushboo has no right to say those things should NOT be posting here. if she has no freedom then, how do you have it?
those who think she was right in saying that should NOT bash those who oppose what kushboo said. I escape-u |
| From: Justice on Thu Nov 17 22:44:47 2005. |
| rachel wrote: |
|
good point...juice.... |
| From: Sandeep on Thu Nov 17 23:18:00 2005. |
| From: mr_karthik on Fri Nov 18 2:37:32 2005. |
| mr_karthik wrote: | ||||
No, they are appreciating the Judge Mr.Sreedharan for the following reasons: 1. He did not make this case "thaLLupadi", but accepted for prosecution. 2. He issued arrest warrent against Kushboo, which made her rush to Mettur. 3. Eventhough he granted bail, he put a big 'Dindigul' lock for her mouth and stopped further bla...blas... from her. Long live Justice. |
| From: Sanjeevi on Fri Nov 18 3:09:25 2005. |
| From: mr_karthik on Fri Nov 18 3:09:59 2005. |
| mr_karthik wrote: | ||||
Did you notice..?. Sania Mirza and Naren Karthik expressed their openion about pre-marital sex and stopped in that level. Sania did not ask "Howmany ladies in Andhra are virgin before marriage?. can anybody prove?" (in Kushpoo paani) (or) Sania did not tell, "Ennai karuththu kEttirundhAl, Tennis battAl adithiruppEn" (Suhasini's "kizhithiruppEn" formula) (or) "Telungu people enna kombu muLaithavargaLA?". She did not tell any of the comments like above, and she proved she is not a "araivEkkAdu" or "kaththukutti" like Kushboo and Suhasini, by not crossing the limit in the name of 'freedom of speech'. |
| From: netfriend4u2005 on Fri Nov 18 3:55:41 2005. |
| From: Lambretta on Fri Nov 18 11:39:28 2005. |
| Surya wrote: |
| Retta....hmmm...what do I call u now? Lamb....that doesn't sound good. |
| Quote: |
| WHat was ur ? on TB again? |
| From: Avenger on Fri Nov 18 12:17:46 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Fri Nov 18 15:09:24 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Fri Nov 18 15:41:22 2005. |
| From: Surya on Fri Nov 18 21:16:54 2005. |
| Karthik wrote: |
| Submitted again to Suryas, Arvindhs and sajeevis...again. |
I didn't even mention the judge again....| From: Surya on Fri Nov 18 21:25:32 2005. |
| From: Surya on Fri Nov 18 21:27:55 2005. |
They are clearly for misguiding the innocent public for their selfish reasons!!| From: Lambretta on Fri Nov 18 21:35:28 2005. |
| Surya wrote: |
| Screw it, I'll still call u lord. |
| Quote: |
| Thangar Bhachan said "Women who are willing to act, will do ANYTHING to get that chance. Women who come for acting are ready to sleep with anyone. They aren't good charectered women." |
| Quote: |
| (Now why did these PMK hypocrates go after Kushboo and not Radhika??? Note: Radika is a known strong DMK personality.) |
| From: Lambretta on Fri Nov 18 21:40:40 2005. |
| Surya wrote: |
| In Kumudham the Erumai had given an interview on this event which he has caused.
When asked: What do you think about Suhasani when she said "Kushboo-ve Mumbai-kku pooge sonnaange, ennai Paramakudi-kku poge solluvaangala?" The Erumai answered: Erumai: "Ivange avange sonthe oorukku poganum-na ethukkage Paramakudi-ku poganum?? Avange Iran-ukku thaane poganum! Ethukaage Tamiz Naatu-le irrukanum? (Claiming that she cannot stay in Tamil Nadu because she is a Bramin.) Wow! Looks like the Erumai is really trying to stir up other things here for publicity! I say that this moron should be arrested for disturbing public harmony!! |
can't believe how certain politicians take undue advantage of a situation like this!!
| From: m_23_bayarea on Sat Nov 19 14:07:13 2005. |
| From: interz on Sat Nov 19 14:17:33 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Sat Nov 19 14:53:12 2005. |
| From: Lambretta on Sun Nov 20 3:18:40 2005. |
| From: malsi on Sun Nov 20 3:52:17 2005. |
| From: mr_karthik on Sun Nov 20 3:57:29 2005. |
| m_23_bayarea wrote: |
| [tscii]Interz, Sorry machi !! This is what I originally intended to post ....
_________________________________ Khushboo and the quirky producer - 19.11.2005 Cinesouth.com A small flashback! It was the time when Rajinikanth spoke vehemently against Jayalalitha’s government. During election propaganda, Manorama spoke for Jayalalitha. She used words like ‘avan’ and ‘ivan’ and this created trouble all over Tamilnadu. Producers stopped giving acting offers to Manorama. She was excluded from the publicity given to films she had acted in and ads featuring her were not featured on television. The same situation is back in force. This time, it is because of Khushboo. After she became an opinion flaunting kannamma, there has been unexpected condemnation by the distributors. ‘Vetrivel Sakthivel’ and ‘June-R’ starring Khushboo have been completed and the film already sold in the areas. So, the actors and producers of these films have already made their money. It is the poor distributors and theatre owners who are in deep trouble now. If they spot even a single poster of Khushboo, the Paattaalis and Siruthais set out armed with brooms and petrol cans. |
| From: arvind on Sun Nov 20 4:27:20 2005. |
| Surya wrote: |
| CASTIESM REERS IT'S UGLY HEAD ONCE AGAIN IN TAMIL NADU!
In Kumudham the Erumai had given an interview on this event which he has caused. When asked: What do you think about Suhasani when she said "Kushboo-ve Mumbai-kku pooge sonnaange, ennai Paramakudi-kku poge solluvaangala?" The Erumai answered: Erumai: "Ivange avange sonthe oorukku poganum-na ethukkage Paramakudi-ku poganum?? Avange Iran-ukku thaane poganum! Ethukaage Tamiz Naatu-le irrukanum? (Claiming that she cannot stay in Tamil Nadu because she is a Bramin.) Wow! Looks like the Erumai is really trying to stir up other things here for publicity! I say that this moron should be arrested for disturbing public harmony!! |
| From: Lambretta on Sun Nov 20 9:03:10 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Sun Nov 20 11:20:36 2005. |
| From: Surya on Sun Nov 20 21:48:59 2005. |
| m_23_bayarea wrote: |
| Support for Kushboo IndiaGlitz [Saturday, November 19, 2005]
It may be recalled that her controversial remarks on pre-marital sex in an interview to a magazine has resulted in protests by PMK and DPI cadres,who have threatened the release of her forthcoming movies. PMK cadres had ransacked a theatre, which screened Baba and also threatened the release of Vijayakanth's Gajendra last year. |
| From: Surya on Sun Nov 20 21:53:08 2005. |
| arvind wrote: | ||
|
Now karuthu karthik will come with a rejoinder as how Tamils are pure innocent virgins while Aryans are evil rapists!
|
| Lord wrote: |
| Ok.......I saw the talk abt Kushboo on NDTV.......during the debates, the compere once asked Sarat Kumar (who was also among the 'against Kushboo' gumbal) tat most of the Tamil films today (which r viewed not only by the urban population but also the rural ones) portray sumthing tat hardly has nething to do w/ the "Tamil culture" tat is being vouched for here, so wat did he hav to say abt tat?
And SK goes on saying "we consider those as just modes of entertainment.......we see tat they don't hurt the sentiments of our ppl. or ne part of our culture"........Ha! Wat a big lie!! Whom does he think hez trying to fool w/ this statement??! Neone who sees the amount of masala today's filmmakers (in this case Tam.) r adding in their films wud deny the existance of ne attempt at preserving ne of the so-called culture tat these guys r hankering abt! Y do the filmmakers still make the heroines dress up in Sarees/Half-Sarees?? Thoppey idup-e kamikarthuku......avlo thaan! This jus underlines the hypocrisy tat these guys hav behind them! |
| Nilavu wrote: |
| by the way who u r all mentioning as "erumai"...thirumaavazhavan?
this guy is a black mark in tamilnadu politics..... |
| From: Surya on Sun Nov 20 21:54:30 2005. |
| Surya wrote: |
| CASTIESM REERS IT'S UGLY HEAD ONCE AGAIN IN TAMIL NADU!
In Kumudham the Erumai had given an interview on this event which he has caused. When asked: What do you think about Suhasani when she said "Kushboo-ve Mumbai-kku pooge sonnaange, ennai Paramakudi-kku poge solluvaangala?" The Erumai answered: Erumai: "Ivange avange sonthe oorukku poganum-na ethukkage Paramakudi-ku poganum?? Avange Iran-ukku thaane poganum! Ethukaage Tamiz Naatu-le irrukanum? (Claiming that she cannot stay in Tamil Nadu because she is a Bramin.) Wow! Looks like the Erumai is really trying to stir up other things here for publicity! I say that this moron should be arrested for disturbing public harmony!! |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Mon Nov 21 2:17:05 2005. |
| From: Justice on Mon Nov 21 2:19:39 2005. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Mon Nov 21 2:49:41 2005. |
... these ppl dont seem grow up at all!!!
| From: malsi on Mon Nov 21 6:27:14 2005. |
| From: alwarpet_andavan on Mon Nov 21 7:12:06 2005. |
| From: Raghu on Mon Nov 21 7:27:03 2005. |
| From: Justice on Mon Nov 21 8:42:05 2005. |
| Shakthiprabha wrote: |
| See justice EVEN U think MATURED ... these ppl dont seem grow up at all!!!
What are u doing in this thread btw....Its not for kids
(kidding....please dont mistake) |
| From: Jilaba on Mon Nov 21 9:26:49 2005. |
| Shakthiprabha wrote: |
| Kushboo is not gonna host the show anymore?
what the Heck! All this for JUST TALKIN HER VIEWS! in DEMOCRATIC INDIA. Why was thangar bachchan alone spared, after just asking "sorry before media"? A rule for man and another for woman? |
| From: ssanjinika on Mon Nov 21 9:40:08 2005. |
| From: Jilaba on Mon Nov 21 9:40:17 2005. |
| malsi wrote: |
| by the way..who is this erumai?..i want to know .. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Mon Nov 21 9:41:21 2005. |
| Jilaba wrote: | ||
adhaane paarthen... aarambichiteengala, AMBALAI vs POMBALAI matterai...!! indha subject fulla padichi paatheenganna theriyum. idhula kushbuvai adhigam support panravanga aangal thaan . therinjukungamma.... |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Mon Nov 21 9:42:05 2005. |
| ssanjinika wrote: |
| Jilaba:
Its not ambalai pombalai vishyam..but I think SP brought that up because in our society it is common knowledge that the premarital sex issue was blown so out of proportion because Kushboo was talking about women.Had she said the same thing about men I dont think she would have been this targeted. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Mon Nov 21 9:43:50 2005. |
| justice wrote: | ||
then how come you are here?
|
OK. I am sorry.| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Nov 21 10:08:03 2005. |
| Shakthiprabha wrote: | ||||
JUSTICE! OK. I am sorry. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Mon Nov 21 10:16:26 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Nov 21 10:18:05 2005. |
| Shakthiprabha wrote: |
| ok nilavu ur verdict taken. pothuma? |
| From: Sanguine Sridhar on Mon Nov 21 10:22:21 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Nov 21 10:34:09 2005. |
| Beckham wrote: |
| Anybody saw NDTV Big fight...They talked about this issue..ppl like Thirumavalavan,Cho Ramasamy,Hindu Ram,Charuhaasan,Kanimozhi were there...It was very very interesting.Thirumaavalavan culdn reply not even a single question fired by Cho,Hindu Ram. |
| From: karthik_keyan_5 on Mon Nov 21 10:44:08 2005. |
| nilavupriyan wrote: | ||
is it running now? |
| From: nilavupriyan on Mon Nov 21 10:45:09 2005. |
| From: Avenger on Mon Nov 21 10:46:35 2005. |
| From: karthik_keyan_5 on Mon Nov 21 11:37:31 2005. |
| Avenger wrote: |
| Karthik is afraid of me!He wont say a word when im around in this thread! |
| From: Avenger on Mon Nov 21 11:41:39 2005. |
| karthik_keyan_5 wrote: | ||
i wont leave u mamu . until u accept that vj is **** |
| From: alwarpet_andavan on Mon Nov 21 11:43:35 2005. |
| Beckham wrote: |
| Anybody saw NDTV Big fight...They talked about this issue..ppl like Thirumavalavan,Cho Ramasamy,Hindu Ram,Charuhaasan,Kanimozhi were there...It was very very interesting.Thirumaavalavan culdn reply not even a single question fired by Cho,Hindu Ram. |
[j/k]
| From: karthik_keyan_5 on Mon Nov 21 11:51:38 2005. |
| alwarpet_andavan wrote: | ||
Enna pechu pesareenga neenga???????? [j/k]
Thol Thirumavalavan didn't have a clue as to what was going on! Like an automated EMail reply, irrespective of the question, he kept saying the same line in flawless Tamil Culture English, "Kushboo has the right to speak but she doesn't have the right to insult anyone". And who was that woman [supposedly a doctor and member of the BJP] who looked and spoke more like a flower-seller, than like a doc???? Charu Haasan took the cake yesterday but unfortunately [and not surprisingly, cos Srinivasan 'Stuttering' Jain always manages to goof up],he got the least air time yesterday. Succinct yet correct. |
| From: Sanguine Sridhar on Mon Nov 21 11:57:43 2005. |
| alwarpet_andavan wrote: | ||
Enna pechu pesareenga neenga???????? [j/k]
Thol Thirumavalavan didn't have a clue as to what was going on! Like an automated EMail reply, irrespective of the question, he kept saying the same line in flawless Tamil Culture English, "Kushboo has the right to speak but she doesn't have the right to insult anyone". And who was that woman [supposedly a doctor and member of the BJP] who looked and spoke more like a flower-seller, than like a doc???? Charu Haasan took the cake yesterday but unfortunately [and not surprisingly, cos Srinivasan 'Stuttering' Jain always manages to goof up],he got the least air time yesterday. Succinct yet correct. |
| From: karthik_keyan_5 on Mon Nov 21 12:01:34 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Mon Nov 21 14:33:38 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Mon Nov 21 14:48:14 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Mon Nov 21 14:50:11 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Mon Nov 21 14:58:16 2005. |
| From: Surya on Mon Nov 21 21:05:47 2005. |
| From: Jilaba on Tue Nov 22 1:26:43 2005. |
| karthik_keyan_5 wrote: |
| dr.thamilisai sundar rajan |
| From: Lambretta on Tue Nov 22 3:34:34 2005. |
| Beckham wrote: | ||
I forget her name but she is the daughter of Kumari Anandhan... |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Tue Nov 22 14:07:26 2005. |
| From: Surya on Tue Nov 22 15:44:50 2005. |
| From: Avenger on Tue Nov 22 15:46:45 2005. |
| Surya wrote: |
| What is the CPI-M btw? |
| From: Surya on Tue Nov 22 15:51:03 2005. |
| From: Sanguine Sridhar on Tue Nov 22 15:54:26 2005. |
| Surya wrote: |
| Damn Commies! |
but cool down Surya..this is public forum | From: Surya on Tue Nov 22 15:57:08 2005. |
| From: Sanjeevi on Wed Nov 23 2:20:01 2005. |
. I found a dog on thirumavalava's face while his emotion speech . He did not tell anything as a valid point.
| From: Avenger on Wed Nov 23 3:23:50 2005. |
| Surya wrote: |
| Damn Commies! |
| From: Surya on Wed Nov 23 3:45:18 2005. |
| From: Surya on Wed Nov 23 3:48:43 2005. |
| Sanjeevi wrote: |
| I saw yesterday's argument on Kushboo in SUN TV.
9 persons were participated. Thiruma valavan, Sarath Kumar, Kumari Anandan's Daughter, Pazha Karuppiah, Cheeman, Nakkeeran Gopal, Arunmozhi, a women of lady association and a female adv. Among these persons, only the last two ladies supported kushboo. The other 7 persons blames kushboo. But i think, the 2 ladies won the argument. Mainly, the adv. lady told her views neatly. Once that lady directly attacked thirumavalavan by words. Initially SUN News telecasted the words told by kushboo. I shocked due to there were no word "TAMIL". Mr.karthik enga irukkenga neenga kushbu sonnatha sonnthu unga karpanaiya
The great comedy was Nakkeeran Gopal's speech. His magazine looks like a semi yellow-magazine. He told about karpu and tamil culture and ladies "ozhukkam" . I found a dog on thirumavalava's face while his emotion speech . He did not tell anything as a valid point.
Pazha karuppiah was yet anoher person who told about tamil culture. He added that, "tt is normal to participate pre marital sex for Tamil ladies for the past 300o years, but the couple got marriage after the sex". 3000 varusama pre-marital sex nadakutham, aana avargal ellorum kalyanam pannikiduvangalam. oru jodi kuda kalyanam pannama irunthathu illaiyam. |
I can't believe I missed it.
| From: Lambretta on Wed Nov 23 4:15:13 2005. |
| Surya wrote: |
| Avenger,
That's even worse!! They are hypocrats sucking off of the name of the Original Communists. Both ways, they don't come out good. |
| Surya wrote: |
| It was on Sun TV?? When? I can't believe I missed it. |
| From: alwarpet_andavan on Wed Nov 23 4:18:47 2005. |
| From: Avenger on Wed Nov 23 4:19:41 2005. |
| Surya wrote: |
| Avenger,
That's even worse!! They are hypocrats sucking off of the name of the Original Communists. Both ways, they don't come out good. |
| From: Sanjeevi on Wed Nov 23 4:23:24 2005. |
| From: Sanjeevi on Wed Nov 23 4:26:59 2005. |
| alwarpet_andavan wrote: |
| CPI and CPI(M) have supported Kushboo/Suhasini [the only political parties to do so] by denouncing the agitations against them while Karunanidhi has ruled out his interference in the issue.
Also, Amir Khan came on NDTV not only categorically supporting Kushboo and Sania, but also urged everyone to stand by what they believed in |
| From: mr_karthik on Wed Nov 23 5:23:04 2005. |
| Sanjeevi wrote: |
|
Initially SUN News telecasted the words told by kushboo. I shocked due to there were no word "TAMIL". Mr.karthik enga irukkenga neenga kushbu sonnatha sonnthu unga karpanaiya
|
| From: Jilaba on Wed Nov 23 10:15:14 2005. |
| From: Cod on Wed Nov 23 10:28:07 2005. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Wed Nov 23 10:30:30 2005. |
| Cod wrote: |
| Kushpu news is now being aired on BBC in Europe and presented as if Tamils are barbarians!
Thanks to Thirumavalavan & Co, the whole of Europe now knows and laughs at how backward Tamils are! Vennaigala. |
| From: pavalamani pragasam on Wed Nov 23 10:34:07 2005. |
| From: stranger on Wed Nov 23 10:36:38 2005. |
| From: Sanguine Sridhar on Wed Nov 23 10:37:29 2005. |
| pavalamani pragasam wrote: |
| If Tamils are barbarians, tell the western world we think the whites are beasts, a lower species than barbarians |
| From: stranger on Wed Nov 23 10:38:52 2005. |
| Cod wrote: |
| Kushpu news is now being aired on BBC in Europe and presented as if Tamils are barbarians!
Thanks to Thirumavalavan & Co, the whole of Europe now knows and laughs at how backward Tamils are! Vennaigala. |
| From: stranger on Wed Nov 23 11:39:55 2005. |
| From: stranger on Wed Nov 23 12:14:30 2005. |
| naNdu wrote: |
| Vennaigala. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Wed Nov 23 12:37:22 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Wed Nov 23 13:15:36 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
|
Q. Is sex before marriage a sin in Roman Catholicism? From Jessica Steinmetz, Your Guide to Christianity - Catholicism. FREE Newsletter. Sign Up Now! A. In Roman Catholicism, premarital sex is a sin. If you're having sex before you're married, you should stop. Sex was created for a husband and a wife, and having sex beforehand makes it a grave sin. Sex before marriage can cause numerous health and emotional problems. You might be in love, but being unmarried brings on uncertainty. Don't give that bond to just anyone. Give it to your spouse. According to Catholicism, it is that important to God that we should wait until marriage. http://catholicism.about.com/cs/sex/f/premsexfaq.htm ------------------------------------------------- Is Kushboo or BBC saying all the Catholics are Barbarians too ???? |
| From: stranger on Wed Nov 23 13:31:28 2005. |
| From: stranger on Wed Nov 23 13:34:23 2005. |
| m_23_bayarea wrote: |
|
Stranger, I can answer that question since I'm a Catholic Christian myself.....According to our religion, "YOU CANNOT HAVE SEX BEFORE MARRIAGE EVEN IF YOU"RE IN LOVE. YOU HAVE TO ENTER THE SACRAMENT OF MATRIMONY, TAKE OATH IN FRONT OF GOD, AND ONLY AFTER MARRIAGE, CAN YOU INVOLVE IN A PHYSICAL RELATIONSHIP". This applies to any culture in the world....Hope it answers your question... |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Wed Nov 23 13:36:24 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
|
Bay! All I am saying is Kushboo was stupid in phrasing the statement. So was Sugashini. |
| From: stranger on Wed Nov 23 13:38:46 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Wed Nov 23 13:40:35 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
| Bay!
Did you know what happened after katrina in Louisiana, USA?????????? Several people have been robbed and LOOTED !!!! Barbarians are everywhere! |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Wed Nov 23 13:41:32 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
| Shakthi:
what happened to Kushboo and sugashini??? Have they been physically atttacked??? BTW, the British supported US to invade Iraq going against UN- nations suggestion. Is this a civilized ACT???????????????? What BBC has to say about it. I am sure several women got raped and molested during the taking over. Please answer this Shakthi. I am really puzzled here. How one defines a Barbarian????? |
| From: stranger on Wed Nov 23 13:41:54 2005. |
| From: stranger on Wed Nov 23 13:44:02 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Wed Nov 23 13:46:21 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
| So why it is always Tamils' fault, bay????? |
| From: Lambretta on Wed Nov 23 13:52:10 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
| Do you think people those who slept with only one person all their life, do not have any mental torture becasue of Kushboo-Suhashini's outrageous statements?????? |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Wed Nov 23 13:53:43 2005. |
| From: ssanjinika on Wed Nov 23 14:19:03 2005. |
| From: stranger on Wed Nov 23 14:44:48 2005. |
| From: Sanguine Sridhar on Wed Nov 23 15:25:11 2005. |
| Beckham wrote: |
| My views on Kushboos case
Thirumavalavan -------------------- This Gentleman is playing double game.He is against this marriage,sadangugal etc...etc., And why the hell he should protest Kushboos views on premarital sex.Its nothing but another ruthless politics.Thirumavalavan&co's main target was Kushboo after Thangarbachan's case.They were waiting for the right time..Bang on target! Kushboo ----------- I wont support Kushboo too.Shez in media whatever shez gonna tell will def affect the soceity.It shows her lack of maturity.She thinks herself as the boss of woman soceity or what? Who is she to open her mouth and talk about tamizh ladies and about their affairs.Thousands of things are happening behind kollywood..she has gutts to open those things in front of media(I m relating Thangarbachan's case)?... Suhasini ----------- Suhasini = Summa kedantha Sangga Oodhi keduthavar... Manasukulla ivvungalukkukellam puratchi pengal endru ninappu..Nenaikiradhu onnum thappu illa..eppo pesanum-gura basic knowledge kooda illana...waste! Media ------- Sun TV is playing master game on it.Jaya TV leading Sun tv only in in the game show "Jackpot" is doing good buisness...to make it down they are making Kushboo's scene more worst by telecasting abt this atleast once in a day.Normal literate ppl may wont have that much interest on this issue.But think abt village ppl,illiterates..they may think as if Kushboo is targetting them. Last but not least If they continue to protest Kushboo like this..Kushboo will gain more symphathy from crwd...who knows she may be crowned as next CM also |
| From: Lambretta on Wed Nov 23 23:05:18 2005. |
| stranger wrote: |
| British must have got embarrassed when Princess Diana, a mother, was sleeping with a French boy-friend. |
| From: Justice on Wed Nov 23 23:05:54 2005. |
| From: karthik_keyan_5 on Wed Nov 23 23:13:43 2005. |
| Lambretta wrote: | ||
Actually he was Egyptian, Dodi Al-Fayed. |
| From: Lambretta on Thu Nov 24 0:36:02 2005. |
| karthik_keyan_5 wrote: |
| ur signature talks truth like mine. |
| From: Jilaba on Thu Nov 24 3:46:27 2005. |
| Shakthiprabha wrote: |
| Stranger, why should they take it personally?
IF somewoman refers to something which she thinks is her opinion, why should a normal person be affected by it? So much of importance given to some xyz's words? In everyday life, we hear 1001 garbage? If we take all those personally and get affected by it, can one lead a peaceful life? |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Thu Nov 24 4:14:43 2005. |
| Jilaba wrote: | ||
If somebody doing something against Kushboo & suhasini, in what way you affected by that?. why you r spending yr time for somany postings for that?. so much of importance given for xyz's actions?. In everyday life, we hear 1001 court cases and protests against 'somebody'? If we take all those personally and get affected by it, can one lead a peaceful life? Why kushbu & suhasini supporters are thinking, they are only intelligents in the world? |
| Jilaba wrote: |
| why you r spending yr time for somany postings for that?. |
. Bye n goodluck.| From: Jilaba on Thu Nov 24 8:41:18 2005. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Thu Nov 24 9:48:00 2005. |
| Jilaba wrote: |
| Sakthiprabha,
Now all of your answers are much coincides for all of your earlier questions. (you pl. read YOUR questions and YOUR answers again). So, it is not a reply for me, but you replied for your previous questions...ok?. .. |
| Jilaba wrote: |
|
Shortly telling, you are throwing stones by sitting inside a glass room (or) spitting by facing upside. take care.. |
| From: Sanguine Sridhar on Thu Nov 24 9:53:46 2005. |
| From: Lambretta on Thu Nov 24 10:03:43 2005. |
| Beckham wrote: |
| If Vijay gives a hit then..Jilba will be very happy and his career will improve, Vijay and Ajith fans will fight like street dogs |
| From: Surya on Fri Nov 25 20:33:56 2005. |
And there are actually idiots here who support these castiest rabid animals? I feel incredibly sorry for their stupidity!
| From: interz on Sat Nov 26 10:45:34 2005. |
| From: Lambretta on Sat Nov 26 12:44:15 2005. |
| interz wrote: |
| Unexpected support from the BIG B
http://www.indiaglitz.com/channels/tamil/article/18516.html |
| From: Scale on Sat Nov 26 12:47:26 2005. |
| Lambretta wrote: | ||
For a moment, I was astonished until I saw whom u refer to as "BIG B"........! |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Sat Nov 26 12:50:25 2005. |
| From: Lambretta on Sat Nov 26 12:52:52 2005. |
| Shakthiprabha wrote: |
| For some of us, BIG B means only ........... BIG B. |
| From: Lambretta on Sat Nov 26 13:42:08 2005. |
| From: interz on Sat Nov 26 14:36:54 2005. |
| Quote: |
| Lambretta wrote:
interz wrote: Unexpected support from the BIG B http://www.indiaglitz.com/channels/tamil/article/18516.html For a moment, I was astonished until I saw whom u refer to as "BIG B"........! |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Sat Nov 26 14:38:34 2005. |
| From: Surya on Sat Nov 26 15:49:13 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Sat Nov 26 15:50:30 2005. |
| Surya wrote: |
| Finally!! A man has the Balls to come out with the truth!!
Big B according to us is..... Bachan, Amithabh Bachan! |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Sat Nov 26 16:01:41 2005. |
| From: Jilaba on Sun Nov 27 3:19:22 2005. |
| interz wrote: |
| Unexpected support from the BIG B
http://www.indiaglitz.com/channels/tamil/article/18516.html |
| From: interz on Sun Nov 27 9:00:15 2005. |
| From: Lambretta on Sun Nov 27 9:03:37 2005. |
| interz wrote: |
| i dont know about amitabbachan, he is from the generation i dont care a **** about. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Mon Nov 28 2:21:07 2005. |
| Lambretta wrote: | ||
Maybe.......but even most ppl. of this gen. like/respect him whether they give a **** abt his gen. or not.....
*dig'sn. ended...... |
| From: Alien on Mon Nov 28 2:34:58 2005. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Mon Nov 28 3:01:48 2005. |
| vasanth_luv wrote: |
| SP akka went crazy |
I did not. | From: Sanjeevi on Mon Nov 28 3:20:57 2005. |
| From: Sanguine Sridhar on Mon Nov 28 3:29:15 2005. |
| From: rachel on Mon Nov 28 6:10:04 2005. |
| Beckham wrote: |
| Seruppu, Thudaippakaddai, Vilakkumar, Azhukuna Muttai .... this shows that tamizh pplkku (ppl who call them tamizhans here ..like thiruma &co) aamam Kombu mulaichurukku |
| From: ssanjinika on Mon Nov 28 9:40:56 2005. |
| interz wrote: | ||
WHo is BIG B according to you??? |
| From: ssanjinika on Mon Nov 28 9:43:40 2005. |
| interz wrote: |
|
i dont know about amitabbachan, he is from the generation i dont care a **** about. |
| From: Lambretta on Mon Nov 28 12:26:46 2005. |
| Shakthiprabha wrote: |
| Well if ppl dont give a **** to stars like these, then, sad to say any artists of present gen wont be worthy of any **** in another 10 years. |
| Quote: |
| As rightly lambretta said, most ppl in India, who belong to previous gen, this gen and younger gen give a **** bout him even better than they give a **** bout present generation artitsts.
Like how young kids of these days gives a **** bout rajni, kamal and other OLD SOULS. |
)
)| From: Shakthiprabha. on Mon Nov 28 13:13:50 2005. |
| Lambretta wrote: |
| Digrsn. restarted..........
|
| Lambretta wrote: |
| *digresn. ended again (for the time being! ) |
| From: Alien on Mon Nov 28 18:57:07 2005. |
| ssanjinika wrote: | ||
Sorry for the late reaction folks..but I just logged in today after a loooooonnnnnnnggggggggg weekend only today belive me when I say I was SHOCKED to read interz's post! |
| From: Sandeep on Mon Nov 28 21:27:49 2005. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Tue Nov 29 2:01:37 2005. |
| From: Alien on Tue Nov 29 2:44:56 2005. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Tue Nov 29 2:52:43 2005. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Tue Nov 29 16:31:15 2005. |
| From: Surya on Tue Nov 29 20:24:33 2005. |
| Beckham wrote: |
| Seruppu, Thudaippakaddai, Vilakkumar, Azhukuna Muttai .... this shows that tamizh pplkku (ppl who call them tamizhans here ..like thiruma &co) Kombu mulaichurukku |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Wed Feb 1 2:00:25 2006. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Wed Feb 1 9:32:04 2006. |
| From: great on Wed Feb 1 9:34:39 2006. |
| From: alwarpet_andavan on Wed Feb 1 9:45:02 2006. |
| From: ssanjinika on Wed Feb 1 9:45:17 2006. |
| From: great on Wed Feb 1 9:58:10 2006. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Wed Feb 1 10:02:34 2006. |
| From: Chappani on Wed Feb 1 10:34:26 2006. |
| From: ssanjinika on Wed Feb 1 10:40:12 2006. |
.| From: Lambretta on Wed Feb 1 10:54:37 2006. |
| Chappani wrote: |
| SP what is your comments on Kushboo being targetted in so many directions. Its not true that all ladies from the Cine world are targetted. Revathi, Radhika and others in Cine field who are getting into other walks of life are not getting targetted why Kushboo alone????? |
| From: Lambretta on Wed Feb 1 10:57:08 2006. |
| ssanjinika wrote: |
| IMO shes making a big deal about the magazine issue only coz of what happened few months back.Had that not happened and the magazine came out with the morphed image,she cudnt have cared less.Evano Yetho sonna sollittu poran-nnu vituerrupanga . |
| From: ssanjinika on Wed Feb 1 10:58:18 2006. |
| From: Lambretta on Wed Feb 1 11:17:53 2006. |
| ssanjinika wrote: |
| Lamby this was in an english magazine.
The way I read it was,the fact that kushboo was targeted so much due to the statements made by her amused them so much that they decided to do a cover on her.This is a tabloid hence the morphed image.They were basically making fun of her. |
| From: ssanjinika on Wed Feb 1 11:24:39 2006. |
| Lambretta wrote: |
| Y?? I thot they wud've been more 'supportive' of wat she said unlike our ppl......ie, they'd hav felt tat there was nothing to feel disturbed abt wat she said, u know..... |
?
and she filing a criminal case just shows how affected she was by the other matter.| From: Shakthiprabha. on Wed Feb 1 11:38:22 2006. |
| From: NTR on Wed Feb 1 11:53:15 2006. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Wed Feb 1 12:29:42 2006. |
| From: settaboy on Thu Feb 2 3:54:33 2006. |
| From: kuthu on Thu Feb 2 3:57:05 2006. |
| settaboy wrote: |
| Kushbu pesinadhu rombo rombo thappu.
Enakku kovam kovama varudhu. |
| From: nilavupriyan on Thu Feb 2 3:59:06 2006. |
come on super namepa| From: m_23_bayarea on Tue Feb 14 13:00:35 2006. |
| From: great on Tue Feb 14 13:02:29 2006. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Tue Feb 14 13:05:20 2006. |
| great wrote: |
| Bay , onga kadamai unarchiya patha pull arikuthu |
| From: Thirumaran on Tue Feb 14 13:07:26 2006. |
| m_23_bayarea wrote: |
| Khushboo becomes elder sister
|
| From: m_23_bayarea on Tue Feb 14 13:08:54 2006. |
| Thirumaran wrote: |
| Is there any controversy in this?
|
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Wed Feb 15 11:51:43 2006. |
| From: ssanjinika on Wed Feb 15 11:58:34 2006. |
.
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Wed Feb 15 12:32:33 2006. |
| From: Thirumaran on Wed Feb 15 12:34:41 2006. |
| Shakthiprabha wrote: |
| kaalam seitha kolamadiii
ennavo ponga. netru iruntha iLamai-kalantha-azhagu indru iruppathillai
athaan life. |
| From: ssanjinika on Wed Feb 15 12:38:11 2006. |
.
.Avalavuthan .| From: terminator on Wed Feb 15 12:39:01 2006. |
| ssanjinika wrote: |
| she looks fat and old. Ennime evanga akka/amma than |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Wed Feb 15 12:42:11 2006. |
| From: ssanjinika on Wed Feb 15 12:43:51 2006. |
:
| From: m_23_bayarea on Wed Feb 15 17:39:39 2006. |
| From: James Pain on Wed Feb 15 22:52:09 2006. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Thu Feb 16 6:19:58 2006. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Thu Feb 16 16:02:45 2006. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Thu Feb 16 16:35:48 2006. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Thu Feb 16 23:21:53 2006. |
| m_23_bayarea wrote: |
| Khushboo to sue Maxim for 3 crores in damages
- 16.02.2006 Now, Khushboo could hit the jackpot if she gets compensated for damages. For this injustice, Khushboo seeks a personal compensation of 3 crores! This is much more than what she has earned through her films. But this concerns defamation, so the appropriate amount to seek damages for naturally should be in crores! Oh, scribes, please publish some glamour pics of us also. We can also then sue the publication and earn some great money! |
| From: alwarpet_andavan on Fri Feb 17 6:50:47 2006. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Fri Feb 17 7:15:44 2006. |
| From: selvakumar on Fri Feb 17 7:16:18 2006. |
| A_A wrote: |
| We can have a nationwide all party debate in parliament as to which state is more Taliban-like, Maharashtra or TN. My bet is TN would beat any other state hands down. |
| A_A wrote: |
| * - The so-called lewd pictures were no more "lewd" than what we see every week in Kungumam, AV or Kumudham. Why don't these guys go file asuit against godesses and their sculptors???? |
| From: alwarpet_andavan on Fri Feb 17 7:23:51 2006. |
| Shakthiprabha wrote: |
|
how can money be a good compensation for ethical defamation? |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Fri Feb 17 7:30:34 2006. |
)
| From: alwarpet_andavan on Fri Feb 17 7:34:38 2006. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Fri Feb 17 7:38:43 2006. |
| From: alwarpet_andavan on Fri Feb 17 7:43:33 2006. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Fri Feb 17 7:53:15 2006. |
| From: Lambretta on Fri Feb 17 10:20:12 2006. |
| alwarpet_andavan wrote: |
| Why don't these guys go file asuit against godesses and their sculptors???? |
The only ones I heard of r the paintings done by MF Husain......| From: Lambretta on Fri Feb 17 10:21:11 2006. |
| Shakthiprabha wrote: |
| Money is no-big-deal FOR BIG GUYS to pay
Money is a gain for the other party. Magazine circulation increases Fame (negative popularity) for the personality Tommorrow the magazine would do it to another woman and pay her compensation. SIMPLE! Its A WIN-WIN situation for everybody, in EVERY commercial point of view |
| From: great on Fri Feb 17 10:32:07 2006. |
| Shakthiprabha wrote: |
| Money is no-big-deal FOR BIG GUYS to pay
Money is a gain for the other party. Magazine circulation increases Fame (negative popularity) for the personality Tommorrow the magazine would do it to another woman and pay her compensation. SIMPLE! Its A WIN-WIN situation for everybody, in EVERY commercial point of view |
, think of the agony they undergo...money cant do everything| From: Lambretta on Fri Feb 17 10:41:42 2006. |
| great wrote: |
| How come its a win win situation , think of the agony they undergo...money cant do everything |
| From: kannannn on Fri Feb 17 10:42:47 2006. |
| Lambretta wrote: | ||
"Lewd" pics. of godesses?? The only ones I heard of r the paintings done by MF Husain...... |
| From: great on Fri Feb 17 10:45:49 2006. |
| Lambretta wrote: | ||
But if they truly experience tat agony, y the demand for a specific amount of money?? How cud they feel like thinking abt tat in such a situation?? |
just to boost up the sales of magzines| From: Shakthiprabha. on Fri Feb 17 10:52:01 2006. |
| From: Lambretta on Fri Feb 17 13:23:58 2006. |
| kannannn wrote: |
| No Lambretta, You're mistaken. Well, lewdity lies in the eye of the beholder. What makes you think the sculptures of semi-nude godesses look more divine than the paintings of Hussain? |
| From: Lambretta on Fri Feb 17 13:25:20 2006. |
| Shakthiprabha wrote: |
| Therez world of diff between sculptured sexuality and SKIN AND FLESH sexuality. PLEASE!!!
lambretta, U GOT MY POINT PRECISELY. |
yea, exactly my point 2!| From: m_23_bayarea on Fri Feb 17 13:28:58 2006. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Fri Feb 17 13:42:08 2006. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Fri Feb 17 13:46:14 2006. |
| From: r_o_j_a on Sat Feb 18 13:25:41 2006. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Sat Feb 18 13:26:42 2006. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Sat Feb 18 13:38:07 2006. |
| r_o_j_a wrote: |
| this issue is personal....
but she is too old to be a role model for teenagers.... if actresses like trisha states their opinion on this issue then it is totally different |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Sat Feb 18 13:41:51 2006. |
| m_23_bayarea wrote: |
| 'Karuthu’ Another complaint against Khushboo
- 18.02.2006 Cinesouth.com It is not new for Khushboo to open her mouth in unrelated matters and get into problems. Not stopping with stirring up Tamilnadu with her comments on ‘chastity’, now she has earned a medal by her statements against the courts. Dakshinamurthy is a lawyer from Madurai, a self styled moral police who is extremely perturbed even at the slight displacement of the saree. He has filed a case against actors Shilpa Shetty and Reema Sen and a newspaper that published their glamorous pictures. The court has also sent summons to the concerned people. This matter has nothing to do in the least with Khushboo . But after her transformation to ‘Karuthu’ Khushboo, she has made it a point to get involved. In an interview given to a TV channel on 15th of this month, she has taken the courts and the judges to task. This will amount to the contempt of the court. Dhakshinamurthy has sent a telegram asking the Chennai High Court Judge and the Madurai Judicial Magistrate to action against Khusbhoo for contempt of the court. If ‘Karuthu’ Khushboo is found as contempt of the court, then she will have more problems. No doubt about it. |
| From: Lambretta on Sun Feb 19 1:30:46 2006. |
| Quote: |
| Dakshinamurthy is a lawyer from Madurai, a self styled moral police who is extremely perturbed even at the slight displacement of the saree. He has filed a case against actors Shilpa Shetty and Reema Sen and a newspaper that published their glamorous pictures. The court has also sent summons to the concerned people. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Sun Feb 19 12:59:33 2006. |
| From: stranger on Mon Feb 20 15:21:27 2006. |
| From: pavalamani pragasam on Mon Feb 20 23:12:13 2006. |
| From: selvakumar on Tue Feb 21 3:19:07 2006. |
| stranger wrote: |
| 54. பெண்ணின் பெருந்தக்க யாவுள கற்பென்னும்
திண்மைஉண் டாகப் பெறின். What greater fortune is for men than a constant chaste woman? ---------------------------------------- What would be Kushbu and Sugashini's opinion on this kuRaL??? |
| From: lancelot on Tue Feb 21 3:25:45 2006. |
| From: villan007 on Tue Feb 21 3:28:29 2006. |
| From: pavalamani pragasam on Tue Feb 21 3:48:38 2006. |
| From: selvakumar on Tue Feb 21 4:10:12 2006. |
| pavalamani pragasam wrote: |
| ÁÉ¢¾ý ¿¡¸Ã¢¸õ «¨¼óÐ ÁÚÁÄ÷ ¸ñ¼ ¿øÄ ¿¡Ç¢§Ä À¡Ã¾¢ ¸ü¨À þÕÀ¡Ä¡ÕìÌõ ¦À¡ÐÅ¢ø ¨ÅòÐ §À¡üÈ ÜÅ¢ «¨Æò¾¡ý. Á¢¸×õ ¿øÄÐ. ¿¢¨ÉÅ¢ø ¦¸¡ûÇ ¾ÅÈìܼ¡¾Ð.
¸ü¨À ¬Ïõ ¦ÀñÏõ ¸¨¼À¢ÊìÌõ §À¡Ð/¾ÅÈÅ¢Îõ §À¡Ð ²üÀÎõ ¿¢¸ú׸û, ÀÄý¸û Á¢¸×õ Å¢ò¾¢Â¡ºÁ¡ö þÕìÌõ. ´§Ã Å¢¨É¨Â þÕÅ÷ ¦ºöž¢Öõ ÀÄ¡ÀÄý¸û ¦Åù§ÅÚ! Ü÷óÐ º¢ó¾¢ò¾¡ø ÒâÔõ, ¦Àñ½¢ý ¸üÀ¢üÌ «¾¢¸ Ó츢ÂòÐÅõ ²¦ÉýÚ! |
| From: Lambretta on Tue Feb 21 5:32:32 2006. |
| From: selvakumar on Tue Feb 21 5:41:18 2006. |
| Lambretta wrote: |
| Aiyyooo...selva, PP ma'm!! Ennaku ithu onnume padika varale/puriyle!!
Plse plse plseeeee!!! post in English only! |
| From: Lambretta on Tue Feb 21 5:49:48 2006. |
Besides, its not like ALL men hav been lacking in it.....emphasising on chastity in both sexes, as u r, is of course exactly opposite from discouraging it in even the sex tat is more widely known to follow it! As Martin Luther King said "the old eye for an eye philosophy only ends up leaving everyone blind!" | From: selvakumar on Tue Feb 21 6:04:48 2006. |
| Lambretta wrote: |
| Tks 4 translating Dada!
Neways, I don't disagree w/ PP ma'm altho I do sympathise w/ ur point tat purity of character is necessary for BOTH the sexes! However, my point also is tat bcos men hav been lacking in this virtue wud it be justified (as many ppl. seem to suggest nowadys) for women also to go over to the wrong side based on the 'eye for an eye philosophy', or w/ the intention of 'vengeance'?? I think not. Besides, its not like ALL men hav been lacking in it.....emphasising on chastity in both sexes, as u r, is of course exactly opposite from discouraging it in even the sex tat is more widely known to follow it! As Martin Luther King said "the old eye for an eye philosophy only ends up leaving everyone blind!" |
| From: Lambretta on Tue Feb 21 6:08:22 2006. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Tue Feb 21 11:45:51 2006. |
| From: pavalamani pragasam on Tue Feb 21 11:54:51 2006. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Tue Feb 21 12:11:50 2006. |
| From: kannannn on Tue Feb 21 12:31:04 2006. |
| Lambretta wrote: | ||
I didn't say they were more divine or nething like tat! I was jus wondering abt AA's reference to 'lewd sculptures' of Godesses in magazines, since I rem. seeing usually pics./portraits of Godesses (my mum used to read tamil mags.), the same tat we find in portraits in puja rooms & those def. don't seem lewd/provocative......hence my qsn.! |
| From: pavalamani pragasam on Tue Feb 21 12:42:05 2006. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Tue Feb 21 12:47:47 2006. |
| From: kannannn on Tue Feb 21 13:02:31 2006. |
| pavalamani pragasam wrote: |
| SP, I did & do say it is more important for women to be chaste which does not mean men need not be chaste. I quoted Bharathi who declared it a common asset to both sexes and praised his declaration. I am fed up with pseudo women's equality blah blah. Women ARE SUPERIOR. |
| From: pavalamani pragasam on Tue Feb 21 13:14:55 2006. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Tue Feb 21 13:24:06 2006. |
(Even after saying 'u win' and deciding not to argue with u, sadly I am not able to hold my tongue) | From: kannannn on Tue Feb 21 13:28:38 2006. |
| From: stranger on Tue Feb 21 14:33:05 2006. |
| pavalamani pragasam wrote: |
| ¾¢ÕÅûÙŨÃò¾¡ý male chauvnist ±ýÚ ±ô§À¡§¾¡ brand ¦ºöÐÅ¢ð¼¡÷¸§Ç? ¦Àñ½Ê¨Áò¾Éò¨¾ ¬¾Ã¢ôÀ¾¢ø Ó¾ø ¬Ç¡§Á???!!! |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Tue Feb 21 14:34:18 2006. |
| stranger wrote: | ||
Really?!
That's news to me PP! |
| From: stranger on Tue Feb 21 14:51:19 2006. |
| pavalamani pragasam wrote: |
| It is simply because women are the axle of the cart called LIFE. We cant expect to run a contraption on defective suppoting part. |
| From: Lambretta on Tue Feb 21 14:59:14 2006. |
| From: Kollywoodfan on Tue Feb 21 14:59:27 2006. |
| From: Lambretta on Tue Feb 21 15:11:29 2006. |
| stranger wrote: |
| * BTW The attitude of "he is a womanizer, why should not I become a slut"??? never makes anybody a "pudhumai peN" It only shows that 'some' like to 'use' that as an 'excuse' for their filthy thoughts! |
| From: stranger on Tue Feb 21 15:42:59 2006. |
| Lambretta wrote: |
|
While I agree tat chastity is like tightened bolt on either axle, so nec. for both men & women, I certainly don't appreciate the 'eye for an eye' or 'wats good for the goose is good for gander' theory tat 'some' try to engraft upon society in the guise of justice/equality! |
| From: kannannn on Tue Feb 21 16:50:50 2006. |
| Quote: |
| We seldom hear ppl. (inc. women) saying tat our culture had been on the decline say in the 1950s (or even 20 yrs ago!) even tho most of the men in our society hav been doing things against it! Wasn't smoking/drinking/behaivng loosely common among our men even 50+ yrs ago?? |
| From: stranger on Tue Feb 21 17:26:19 2006. |
| From: kannannn on Tue Feb 21 17:55:04 2006. |
| From: stranger on Tue Feb 21 17:58:58 2006. |
| From: kannannn on Tue Feb 21 18:26:54 2006. |
| From: Lambretta on Wed Feb 22 2:24:44 2006. |
)
| kannannn wrote: |
| The thrust of my argument is, not only should we place both sexes on the same pedestal, but we should emphasize enough to men that they also have the same responsibilities - something that we unfortunately don't do now. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Wed Feb 22 4:16:49 2006. |
| From: kannannn on Wed Feb 22 12:23:20 2006. |
| From: Tirupathi on Wed Feb 22 12:26:23 2006. |
| From: Tirupathi on Wed Feb 22 12:26:53 2006. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Wed Feb 22 12:43:53 2006. |
| From: stranger on Wed Feb 22 12:46:42 2006. |
| Shakthiprabha wrote: |
| Staying in morals or not, is up to the concerned person and its his or her private decision. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Wed Feb 22 12:54:37 2006. |
illaiya?
| From: stranger on Wed Feb 22 13:18:12 2006. |
| Quote: |
| Second.......... is fact stranger illaiya? |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Wed Feb 22 13:33:34 2006. |
.| From: m_23_bayarea on Fri Mar 3 14:42:24 2006. |
| From: Lambretta on Fri Mar 3 23:37:26 2006. |
| m_23_bayarea wrote: |
| Now in his Pacchai Kuthiral, he has penned a song extolling her boldness and open mind. |
| From: Thirumaran on Fri Mar 3 23:43:48 2006. |
| From: Shakthiprabha. on Sat Mar 4 2:59:16 2006. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Tue Mar 28 12:26:48 2006. |
| From: m_23_bayarea on Tue Mar 28 12:58:14 2006. |
| RSS Feed
| Email me when a reply is posted