Topic started by vohsendhan (@ 202.88.143.68) on Sun Jul 7 08:16:03 .
All times in EST +10:30 for IST.
Abishtu: Athimber! Is the LTTE really involved in the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi?
Athimber: Please do talk only in whispers, Abishtu! The available evidence proves the contrary.The persons suspected to have a role in it are M/s Subramanyam Swamy, Chandrasamy and Narasimha Rao. But, it is in our interest to build up a story fixing the LTTE and propagate it accordingly.
Abis: What do you say? There had been Commissions and investigations and so many stories in the newspapers. Yet, we could not identify the real culprits. How could it be so?
Athi: No, the fact is that we do not want to identify and expose the real culprits. The article written by Dr.Norman Baker, a US-based writer and published in the Illustrated Weekly of India, August 22 –28, 1992 would tell you very clearly that the persons in power wanted to frame somebody for the assassination and the existence of the LTTE came in very handy for them.
Abis: Why should there be a show of investigation at all then?
Athi: You must tell the public that you have done something to nab the killers. Fix somebody and propagate th story about it. That is all.
Abis: Was it really not established that the LTTE was behind the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi.
Athi: No, it was not. But, the secret manner in which the trial was permitted to be conducted helped us to cover up a lot. Because we did not want to expose the real conspirators, we did not permit the persons now held guilty when they expressed their desire to talk to the Press after the verdict.
Abis: Will their request be granted at a later stage, at least?
Athi: No, it will not be and should not be. Otherwise, the public would come to know the real story behind the episode and the government may not be able to sustain the cock and bull story it has so far dished out carefully in this case. It was only for that purpose we held the trial in camera.
Abis: I understand that even the trial on the assassination of Kennedy was held in camera.
Athi: But there was no intention for any one there to cover-up. People were permitted to discuss their views in the newspapers. Because Lyndon Johnson, the Vice-President had succeeded Kennedy, a stage-show was enacted for a very long time alleging how Lyndon Johnson had plotted against and killed Kennedy. And, Lyndon Johnson was the President at the time when the show was going on for weeks. In India, we created such a frency against the LTTE that the common people felt afraid of even hearing anything except the propagand a fo of the Aryan Press. But such a privilege was given by us only to our Godse who killed Gandhi.
Abis: What privilege is it?
Athi: The opportunity of making one’s stand public. Godse was supplied with pen and paper at Government’s cost to make his statement explaining how and why he wanted to kill Gandhi. His statement titled ‘May it please your honour’ has been published in the form of a book and the RSS parivar had managed to get a foreword on the book written by the same judge who punished him. A play in Marathi by name “Mee Nathuram Godse Bolsthoy” is being staged everywhere justifying the action of Godse. Because, Godse was a Brahmin. But we should not allow the alleged Rajiv killers even to talk to the press. We would, then, stand exposed.
Abis: How can there be two different kinds of treatments? In fact, Rajiv Gandhi was not such a great personality as Mahatma Gandhi was.
Athi: True. Rajiv Gandhi had stolen public money in the guise of acquiring arms for the defence of the nation. But, still Mahatma Gandhi cannot be equated with him. After all, Rajiv Gandhi was a Brahmin and was recognized as such by the Brahmins Association in January 1996, while the Mahatma was not a Brahmin. You know, there had been very severe punishment to the killers of the Brahmins right from the days of Manu. That is why we permitted the admirers of Godse to keep his ashes as a memento. And they perform rituals with it till date and keep it in safe custody until the day the Akhand Bharath as desired by Godse is born. At the same time we did not allow even the chappals or clothes of Satwant Singh who killed Indira Gandhi to be handed over to his widow after he was hanged. We always maintain the very clear distinction between the Brahmin and non-Brahmin criminals. You would know more about the special privileges given by us to the Brahmin offenders in society if you go through the ISRO espionage case. We would never compromise on our superior status. That is not negotiable at all.
Abis: So, Athimber! We treat the assassins of Indira Gandhi and the assassins of Rajiv Gandhi on par then?
Athi: No. We treat the alleged assassins of Rajiv Gandhi worse. First our Aryan newspapers orchestrated such a campaign that many lawyers did not come forward to defend the accused in the Rajiv case. But, that was not the case with the accused in the Indira Gandhi case. They were defended by the prominent lawyer Ram Jethmalani and others. The newspapers did not spread venom against the accused in the Indira case. On the other hand, when the accused Satwant Singh was hanged on not-so-clearly-proven evidence, the Indian Express came out with a cartoon by the famous cartoonist Ravishankar that the God of Justice had been hanged. But, that is not the case with the accused in the Rajiv case. There were so many contradictions in the prosecution side-imputing motive to the LTTE, which can be easily disproved by citing even the news-items in the Hindu, Indian Express and Frontline. But no action was taken in that direction. The prosecution had not been sincere enough to know the truth. The government had frightened the people that anyone who talked in favour of the Lankan Tamils, let alone the LTTE, would be booked. It should have allowed a public debate to unearth the truth. But nothing of that kind had taken place. Because, we punished the LTTE and the Lankan Tamils first and then only went through the formality of taking legal action against the alleged culprits. We wanted to implicate the LTTE as it was really protecting the interests of the Lankan Tamils.
Abis: What is wrong if the LTTE protects the interests of the Lankan Tamils?
Athi: You see, Abishtu! We have diagnosed that the interests of the Brahmins lie in suppressing the facts pertaining to (1) Tamil and (2) the Tamils. The very alphabets for creating Sanskrit were borrowed by us from Tamil only. But we are not honest enough to acknowledge this fact. So anyone who suppresses Tamil and the Tamils anywhere in the world must receive our support. This is our considered decision.
Abis: Oh, that is why we are hand in glove in this genocide with the Sinhalese who also belong to the Aryan race, just like us.
Athi: No, Abishtu! The Sinhalese just claim that they belong to the Aryan race. But they really are not. They migrated from the present Bihar and Orissa areas. They were the common people of that area who migrated at the call of the banished mischievous prince Vijaya. They can at best call themselves Kshatriyas and Shudras only. Later they converted themselves to Buddhism at the instance of Ashoka who sent his son to Sri Lanka for propagating the religion. They are not Aryans at all.
Abis: Why should we support them, then?
Athi: They are doing our work there my dear boy. That is why. Are we not setting the BCs against the SCs and vice versa here in India? We carry our mission off-shore also now. We have, in Sri Lanka, set one sect of Dravidians to fight against another.. We had better now sit and watched enjoying the fun.
Abis: If anybody notices our machinations….
Athi: We must then shout from the rooftops that those people are spreading hatred in the society. But the fact is that we alone are responsible for having sown the seeds of dissension, the way Chanakya has shown to us in his Arthasasthra.
Tell your friend about this topic