ź
Topic suggested by Babu on Tue Feb 23 14:10:42 .
All times in EST +10:30 for IST.
ź
----------
׀ ̯ր. בѴ
Í ր. ݹǥ
̑ Ƒ̿ ր. ґ ت.
ð ÀƑ ô ̜
ϙ. ל ލ
¯ À㙎. ̑ Ѵت
, րҿ ,
Ϲ ל ލ ? Ѵ ð
ր...
Ͽ괰 - ̑
. ̑ ґ
ׯϹ. , 雍,
״ Ѵ, Ҏ,
Ƒ ѹ ... ! בր ѹ ,
̫ґ ב. , Ħ ѹ .
ˢґ Ϲ. ? ... Í.
æƑ Í ... ð ׀ 깰
̀. Ƒ ? ̴ Ƒ ?
ր.
", Ƒ ?"
"Ƒ ? 쿽 Ƒ ? ׀ Ϲ.
Ѵ. ϰ ב. ґ ϙ. ̑ב ϙ
?"
". Ƒ ϙ. "
ϰ. ֍ ϰ ב , Ƴ.
, ׀ ت ҍր. ͙
Ĩ ? À ׀ љ,
Ѵ. ב . Ѵ ̝
͢ Ϲ ... Ϲ ...
" . ."
"Ƒ. ٨."
ƀ . ґ ל ٝƳ. 촱
Ϲ ϙ .
.
"ґ, . Ƒ .."
" ϙ , ՛. 晐 Ϲ"
"Ƒ ? ? ź 晐 ?"
" ź 晐 ?"
" Ƒ ?"
"."
", ՛"
" . Ү."
" Ż ϰ ә. æ "
" ? ٪ ՛. ?"
" ?"
" Ƒ ?"
"ґ ?"
" ౙ"
, ౙ . Ƒ
׀ƴ .
", ՛, Ϲ ?"
""
" ?"
" . 㑥 "
""
Ƴ.
"㙐 뛍 ?"
ݹ , źϴ Ƒ 엍Ϲ.
Ѵ ʹ. Ƒ Ĩ Ϳ. Ϲ ѹ.
" " .
" Ү."
"՛"
ґ, ﹳ .
" ?"
"̑"
"ݹ ע ?"
"ր, ϙ 降."
Ϲ. 㛐 㢜. ґ בѴ
ב ̹ .
" ґ ٛ ϙ"
"Ƒ ? Ƒ ?"
¯ Ϳ.
" ґ ͢ ϙ"
ґ .
" ґ ?"
" ϙ"
ⵑ ̫ Ƒ בƴ ʹϙ . ʹ
. Í .... Ħ "" .
"Ƒ ?"
" ̑ ׯ Ż. æ æ. Ҫ ?"
""
" ള
ô ґ ! Ƒ ... æ"
" æ ?"
"晐 ׯ ?"
" "
̯ ͍ îî. Ƒ , ҳ
ݍ Ϲ.
"雐 ̴ ѳ㙍
Ѿ ґ ... ϙ ?"
ѿљր. , 㛀
ô.
"" .
... " Ƒ 뛍 Ѵ ?"
". ϙ "
ʹ. " . љ鳙 晐 Ƒ Ƒ׳ Ƒ
æ"
"Ƒ ? ? Ӣ "
ր.
"٪ ב Ѵ"
". "
" 뛍 ?"
" ̑... Ѱ Ѵ"
"ϰ ב "
""
" ϛ. "
э ׀ ב . ϙ شƑ. ʹ ̑ՙ
Ħ ױր ? ׯ ̑ ڍ ր ?
Ϲت Ѵ Ż. ב ׀ . ̑
Ϲ.
" љґ Ѵ ?"
" "
. Ƴ ב . Í
Ż. Ѵ Ϲ.
, ̑ : "Ѵ ̑ Ͽ "
: ", 쿺"
ð .
Responses:
- From: Ramki (@ pm062-19.spindler.wmich.edu)
on: Tue Feb 23 19:39:52
Meendum Nandini? :)
- From: babu (@ 198.153.135.42)
on: Tue Feb 23 20:02:10
appavumE Nandhini :)
BTW no comments about the story ?
- From: Ramki (@ pm062-19.spindler.wmich.edu)
on: Tue Feb 23 21:44:29
Babu the story is good. I like your tamil and
the kavidhais you write in between. Paisathile irukkire mundhiri paruppu madhiri
(naan tamizh padikkadhadhu
ennakkippa varuthama irukku:))
Intha madhiri sabalangal aerpaduvadhu sagajam.
Is there a part II?
- From: babu (@ 198.153.135.42)
on: Wed Feb 24 10:06:16
Thanks Ramki, there is no part II. The 'story' ends there. :-)
- From: chandra (@ viking.delta-air.com)
on: Thu Feb 25 15:34:53
Ramki:
"Meendum Nandini? :)"
Chandra:
yeah...she either divorced pArththi who anyway
turned out to be infected with gayitis or she was
reborn with the same name.
Babu, I have not read the story yet...will read it shortly.
chandra
- From: Mukund (@ sd-ppp-338.abac.net)
on: Sat Mar 27 14:38:32
Hi Babu,
Here are my thoughts on this story.
In the first paragraph it is very confusing as to whether she has been married to rakul OR if she was a carrying a child just prior to the marriage during Penn paarkum time. And it is not clear as to whose child it is when you end up reading about Paarthiban in the last line of the paragraph.
You could have said something like
Ƒ, ݹ ϙ, ϥ , ̑ӥ Ѣ Ʊր
which would have clarified things and set the story line in its course.
Of course, clinching it with "Muthal poi" in tha last line was very good and does create a lasting impact.
Somehow, IMO, I don't find the
Ƴ
very nice description.
But once again you managed to elevate the status of the story because of the last line.
- From: babu (@ 198.153.135.42)
on: Mon Mar 29 09:15:38
Mukund: I accept that the first paragraph may be confusing, but as you read the story, the story line is quite clear.
I don't understand why "Uriyadhu" is not a very nice description. Can you elaborate ?
Thanks for the time and comments.
- From: Mukund (@ bart.americas.nokia.com)
on: Mon Mar 29 17:07:21
babu,
Yes, The confusion does get cleared to some extent on the next line itself when she says she had to go to the Rahul's "athai payan's" marriage since Rahul was busy !! Maybe that initial bit confusion will keep the reader curious too.
As for ooriyadhu, theriyavillai !! I don't know why I dont like the description.
Can you tell me what was the feeling you wanted to convey, if you don't mind ?
if you want my personal email is rangm@hotmail.com
Want to post a response?
Back to the Forum