TAJMAHAL. ....KALLARAIYA??..KAVIYAMA?
Topic started by JEYANTHI MEERA (@ 202.185.32.191) on Wed Aug 13 23:21:22 .
All times in EST +10:30 for IST.
ANBIN SATCI ENRARGAL
KADHALIN CINNAM ENRARGAL
AASAIYIN ADAIYALEM ENRARGAL
AANAL ATHUUM ORU SAMATHITHANE?
TAJMAHALAI ELUPPUM BOTHU ATHENOODE SAMATHIYANE SEVAGARGAL SOLLEDUM ATHU KAYIYAMENDRU..
MUMTAJ SOLLEDUM ENATHU KATHAL MALIGAI ENDRU
PINNER NAAMUM ATHAI KAVIYAMENBOM.....?
Responses:
- Old responses
- From: rajini (@ ppp-219-65-128-123.bng.vsnl.net.in)
on: Mon Sep 8 04:35:51 EDT 2003
Hi dear jeyanthi meera
Tajmahal satharanamaga nengal athai paarthal athu kalaraithan maruka mudiathu anal kathalithavargal elorum mananthukolugira vaipu kedaipathu illai so kalaraithan avargal vazhum idamaga irukindrathu, kalaraithan avargaluku nimathi tharugindra edamaga irukindrathu, kathalargalukku nimathi tharum idathai yen kovil endru sollakudatha? Nimathi kidaikum idam thane kovil, ithum oru vagail kovilthane?
Inthakalathila yaar kathalikaga inthamathiri ellam pandra , oru kathali irukumothey kathalio da frienduku root vidranunga ,
- From: JEYANTHI MEERA (@ 202.185.32.203)
on: Wed Sep 10 02:01:30 EDT 2003
SARIYA SONINGGE RAJINI SIR KATHEL ELLAME SOTHAPPEL ANAL KATHALIKKU KOVIL KATTUVATHU KODUMAITHANE
- From: JEYANTHI MEEERA (@ 202.185.32.203)
on: Wed Sep 10 02:03:19 EDT 2003
LATEDA PURINTHALUM KADAISIYIL PURIYUTHULLE
- From: JEYANTHI MEERA (@ 202.185.32.203)
on: Wed Sep 10 02:05:01 EDT 2003
NO SORRY I HATE THE WORD
- From: Abirami (@ )
on: Tue Aug 24 09:09:29
tajmahal oru kaviyamthan. kathalippavargelukkuthan teriyum kathalin punitham. kathalargel irenthalum kathal ireppetillei. kathalargelukku kallerei kaddi, avergeluthu kathelei kaviyam enbom. tajmahal, kannal paarthal athu kallerei , manathal parthal athu kaviyam.
- From: vazipOkkan (@ cache9-4.ruh.isu.net.sa)
on: Wed Aug 25 03:51:01 EDT 2004
Shajahan-in nesaththirku taj mahal mattum satchiyalla. 14 kuzandhaigalai petreduththa piragum mumtaz mel avan konda nesam kuraiyavillai ena solgirargal.
innonrum keLvipatten. mumtaz's death was so shocking to shajahan that his beard turned grey overnight - endrum solgirargal. science accepts it as a possibility.
- From: malligai (@ 63-227-112-115.dnvr.qwest.net)
on: Fri Aug 27 00:58:11 EDT 2004
//tajmahal, kannal paarthal athu kallerei , manathal parthal athu kaviyam.//
--nicely said Abirami...
- From: gopi (@ 203.195.244.5)
on: Fri Aug 27 03:15:43 EDT 2004
TAJ MAHAL IS A TEMPLE
READ THIS
1. The term Taj Mahal itself never occurs in any Mogul court paper or chronicle even in Aurangzeb's time.
2. The attempt to explain it away as Taj-i-Mahal i.e. a crown among residences is, therefore, ridiculous.
3. Moreover, if the Taj is believed to be a burial place how can the term' Mahal' i.e. 'mansion', apply to it?
4. The other popular Islamic explanation is that the term'Taj Mahal' derives from 'Mumtaz Mahal'--the lady who is supposed to be buried in it. This explanation is itself full of absurdities as we shall presently see. It may be noted at the outset that the term 'Taj' which ends in a 'j',could not have been derived from Mumtaz ending in a'z'.
5. Moreover, the lady's name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Arjum and Banu Begum alias Mum taz-ul-Zamani , as mentioned in Shahjahan's official court chronicle, the Bad-shahnama.
- From: G (@ 203.195.244.5)
on: Fri Aug 27 04:04:25 EDT 2004
6. Since the term Taj Mahal does not at all occur in Mogul records it is absurd to search for any Mogul explanation for it. Both its components namely 'Taj' and 'Mahal' are of Sanskritic origin. Mahal in Hindu parlance signifies a mansion i.e. a grand edifice. Taj is the popular corruption of the word 'Tej' meaning splendour. In no Muslim country from Afghanistan to Abyssinia, is any edifice described as Mahal.
- From: G (@ 203.195.244.5)
on: Fri Aug 27 04:05:39 EDT 2004
7. The Taj Mahal dome bears a lotus cap. Original Islamic domes have a bald top as is exemplified by the Pakistan Embassy domes in Chanakyapuri, New Delhi and the domes in Pakistan's newly built capital Islamabad.
8. The Taj Mahal entrance faces south. Had the Taj been an Islamic building it should have faced the west.
9.Had the Taj been built specially to bury Mumtaz, in it should not have been cluttered with other graves. But the Taj premises contain several other graves at least in its eastern and southern pavilions.
10.Vincent Smith records in his book titled "Akbar the Great Mogul" that "Babur's turbulent life came to an end in his garden palace in Agra" in 1630. That palace was none
other than the Taj Mahal.
- From: G (@ 203.195.244.5)
on: Fri Aug 27 04:05:56 EDT 2004
11. Babur's daughter Gulbadan Begum in her chronicle titled Humayun Nama refers to the Taj Mahal as the Mystic House
12. Apparently the Taj Mahal as a temple palace seems tohave had a chequered history. The Taj was perhapsdesecrated and looted by every Muslim invader from Mohammad Ghazni onwards but passing into Hindu hands off and on the sanctity of the Taj Mahal as a Shiva temple continued to be revived after every Muslim onslaught. Shahjahan was the last Muslim to desecrate the Taj Mahal alias Tejo Mahalaya.
GOPS
- From: VN (@ 203.129.236.225)
on: Fri Aug 27 07:23:46 EDT 2004
Tajmahal , oru kallarai
Kaviyamakka patta kallarai
- From: malligai (@ 63-227-112-115.dnvr.qwest.net)
on: Fri Aug 27 12:29:11 EDT 2004
Gops, the info u gave is veryy confusing..
:)
- From: malligai (@ 63-227-112-115.dnvr.qwest.net)
on: Fri Aug 27 12:33:39 EDT 2004
Tajmahal kallaraiya irundha enna, kaaviyama irundha enna??...its a symbol of a great and rare love, which i s very hard to find these days...
- From: Kathir (@ cache1-2.ruh.isu.net.sa)
on: Fri Aug 27 15:22:57 EDT 2004
Agreed. Adhu symbol of love-ngiradhai siramattu matri, adhu verum kallaraidhan-nnu niroopippathil enna benefit?
Gopi has reproduced what was circulating in net for quite some time. There was something like this on nokia phones in the form of a memorandum nokia management wrote to its staff. These are all carefully crafted lies.
- From: gopi (@ 203.195.244.5)
on: Mon Aug 30 02:14:39 EDT 2004
HI
2 kathir and malligai
Do you think that wat we learnt is history ?
Only when British came they started recording of events and which was sent to England as work orders b4 that there was no recording of events
the chinese travelers recorded their time of travel to india and about the emperor.it is bits of information and no recorded or documented history is there....it is out of own biography and other we cam to knoe about the Moghul ruling .
Do u think they would write som thing bad about themselves the projected goodness was all we hav
even at the time of hitler no german publisher said he was a fanatic/lunatic... it is all the same...
so think different and why not this could be
thanks
gops
- From: Manju (@ arktur.bbs2.fh-wilhelmshaven.de)
on: Mon Aug 30 05:40:21 EDT 2004
adap paavingala vitta Shahjahan's kathalaiyee santheghep paduvinga poola irukku..!
Taj Mahal Shahjahan'ku Kovil,
kathalarkalukku Kaviyam.
velinatavanukku athisaayam
ithayam illathavanummu kallarai.
- From: malligai (@ 63-227-112-115.dnvr.qwest.net)
on: Tue Aug 31 11:45:47 EDT 2004
Gopi,
i dont have a clue of what u r trying to prove here...
Well said Manju..
- From: esh (@ mlk-cache1.jaring.my)
on: Tue Aug 31 20:27:00 EDT 2004
tajmahal pathine unmaiye terinjikenumna enthe website ke poyi parungge. http://www.stephen-knapp.com/was_the_taj_mahal_a_vedic_temple.htm
- From: gopi (@ 203.195.244.5)
on: Thu Sep 2 01:28:57 EDT 2004
HI!
Malligai....
I'm not trying to prove ne thing wat we study in india is the history recorded by British and the
Moghul rulers. all the biography and court cronicles Do u think NE fo the MLA's in the rule of Jaya will write the truth of wats going on.....
NEVER when he praises he is rewarded.is that not true.
NO history of karikalan and rajendra chola is elobrated in our text book.
we have been reading about the people who invaded and ruled us instead of native knigs who ruled us
When Alexander was confronted by the king Porus but we never learnt about porus......
INDIA THE COUNTRY PLUNDERED AND LOOTED AND RULED
WILL RULE THE WORLD..
Tell your friend about this topic
Want to post a response?
Back to the Forum